Ace has hit the nail on the head
[QUOTE=Ace87;3165850]Its not about looking at this website.
Its the fact that their child who is 7 could google their mom's name in a few years and this website pops up. Now some pre-teen is looking at a bunch of random guys rating their dead mom's oral skills.[/QUOTE]Kid grows up and wanting to learn about his or her mom googles her name, as the internet becomes even more pervasive and omnipresent even the most obscure facts about a persons life will be readily available. Kid starts reading about how great mom was at sucking cock and liked taking it hard in the ass! Surely not the thing most children hoping to learn about their mother are wanting too hear. Why do we really need to divulge these women true identities, what purpose does it serve? JD.
Posting Names on the Net?
[QUOTE=JaxDog;3166516]Kid grows up and wanting to learn about his or her mom googles her name, as the internet becomes even more pervasive and omnipresent even the most obscure facts about a persons life will be readily available. Kid starts reading about how great mom was at sucking cock and liked taking it hard in the ass! Surely not the thing most children hoping to learn about their mother are wanting too hear. Why do we really need to divulge these women true identities, what purpose does it serve? JD.[/QUOTE]If any person wants to be anonymous they don't post anything anywhere, especially on the internet, no matter what site. If anyone on this board thinks that by not identifying a provider they are keeping her identity a secret then they are really ignorant as any real person with any good tools can investigate anyone via public records, Google and / or pay per use sites so as to find information about anyone. I'm surprised that no one here realizes that? Most people find other people via Facebook these days so let's keep someone's identity secret seems more like wishful thinking, doesn't it?
Working Name vs Real Name
It's not an issue of just posting a name; it's an issue of posting a real, legal, identifiable, searchable name. This is the case in virtually any matter on this board. The problem arose when members started posting real names as opposed to posting working names. Passing along the knowledge that "Susie Rottencrotch" passed away is a service to the board. Passing along what Susie's real name was, and what her Facebook name is, is just wrong and potentially hurtful to her family.
For the girls that work under their real name; well, that's just stupid. And as you know, you can't fix stupid.
Working name versus really name
[QUOTE=BobbSledd;3167011]It's not an issue of just posting a name; it's an issue of posting a real, legal, identifiable, searchable name. This is the case in virtually any matter on this board. The problem arose when members started posting real names as opposed to posting working names. Passing along the knowledge that "Susie Rottencrotch" passed away is a service to the board. Passing along what Susie's real name was, and what her Facebook name is, is just wrong and potentially hurtful to her family.
For the girls that work under their real name; well, that's just stupid. And as you know, you can't fix stupid.[/QUOTE]I agree with you 100% that publishing her working name and / or picture should be of no consequence to anyone versus publishing a working girl's real name, unless she happens to be working under her real name, then it really doesn't matter, does it?
Looks like "DowntoBusiness" is white knighting for Tatiana Rose
Sir, the only person who needs an intervention is you! You need an ophthalmology intervention and a reading comprehension intervention. First of all, I NEVER dissed anyone that wants to pay her 500! I mentioned I would not pay 500; "I" actually refers to an individual not a group. She did recently post on BP but told someone she was removing her post from there. She was doing doubles with another girl, BTW. Now, if I make a statement on this site that "I" would not give her 500 and many guys on here complained about those high prices as well (not just me); then what's your problem Mr. White knight and want to take her home to meet mom! I also did not say she had to be the only author of the review, I said either her or some other moron. Now tell me, I write a review that "I" would not pay those high ass prices with the username I use on here than somehow, someone writes a review in the month of November which is about when I made the statement with same username and this doesn't seem peculiar to you? What the hell is wrong with your judgement asshole! I know it's my choice to spend whatever I want on a girl just like it was my choice to write what I did so what's your issue?! Why get your panties in a twist over free speech? Are you a communist or something? Listen, I would never tell a man how to spend his money. In fact, I don't give a flying fuuk how anyone spends their money so before you go starting some bullshit, at least read what I wrote very carefully and stop being a stupid ass! I can assure you I did not pay 500; never have and most likely, never will, but if you or anyone else chooses to do so, it's your money! White knight asshole! And BTW, even though I posted the review on here about December 2016, I believe when you write a review on the other site, you can enter in the actual date you seen a provider and not the date you're writing the review. I could have seen someone back in August and writing the review today and the review will reflect the August date, if I so specify. Nice trick to make it seem like I saw her before I wrote the review! LOL
Regarding white knight "downtobusiness" fella
I saw the post you were referring to and all I can say is I possibly, somehow, responded to that particular review about the other girl off Lane they were talking about unbeknownst to me but meant to respond to the post about Tatiana. I believe it was "SUIT" who was talking about her that I meant to respond to. That happens especially with this raggedy ass laptop I'm using and not paying attention of course. With my schedule, I sometimes am so busy, it's possible I wasn't even paying attention. But someone was talking about the money she (Tatiana) wanted. Anyway, her name came up. But the fact still remains as I mentioned already, "I" wouldn't pay such as that but that certainly doesn't mean I'm telling you not to. It's your prerogative whatever you do!
Storage Unit outcall spot!
Damn. I wish I thought of that!
What's that run you?
$55 a month?
[QUOTE=CommanderAeon;3176647]Does anyone else have a 24/7 storage unit and bring SWAns back for some action besides me? With air conditioned units and battery operated indoor LED lights it's been a great way to get some type of privacy that's above a car date but not have to shell out cash for a full blown room.[/QUOTE]
That is correct but here is what I think happened
[QUOTE=Janus420;3176530]So to clarify here, you're saying you in fact DID NOT write the November Review of Tatiana Rose on TER that gave her a 8/7?[/QUOTE]I surmise "Downtobusiness", who obviously is in love with Tatiana, became enraged when he read my review of her because a lot of this pecker wood's posts are about her. I think he went and created an account with my username I use here and wrote the review making it appear I saw her before my review on December 2nd. If you see a provider in August and you wrote review today, you can obviously enter a date to reflect the actual date or month you saw her. Go through his posts and you will clearly see this clown is head over hills for this woman! Unfuukin believable!
Janus, now that I think about it
[QUOTE=Janus420;3176530]So to clarify here, you're saying you in fact DID NOT write the November Review of Tatiana Rose on TER that gave her a 8/7?[/QUOTE]This shit is actually rather comical! Who in their right mind and notice I said, "in their right mind" would create an account on another review board with the same username as a member who wrote a negative statement about his wannabe girlfriend on this site. A girl who is ONLY interested in his money and not him and trying to make it look as if I contradicted myself. Notice he seemed to be the only one bothered by it and the only one who did his little in-depth investigation finding out I posted on the wrong post, yet it was indeed meant for Tatiana Rose. My review on this site was written the same day SUIT wrote a review on her and Barbie who advertised they were doing doubles on their BP ad. My review was obviously written in error on wrong review; I was probably in a rush and didn't pay attention. As I mentioned, look at his reviews and it becomes clear that he's the culprit or moron who likely wrote the review. It's like he's advertising for her or he's her PR person trying to maintain or drum up business for her. Someone told him on this site that they saw her for 250 a couple of times and got bored with her because she was awful in the sack and I noticed he didn't rail on this senior member about his comments! Anyway, his posts on this girl are unreal! Clearly, he is smitten!
Miggles mcgee full of bull on LA OC SW scene
While he correct that there was / is a lot of hot talent out there on BP and in the old days CL and even ********, the SW scene was just the same old cracked out or meth addled gals you see everywhere. Hell if you didn't pay attention, some of the he / she's were out there too. And I remember seeing rav reviews of BJs giving by some of these boys bt guys who didn't check or didn't care.
On the other hand, the AMP scene was incredible with really hot Asians at AMPs all over the place. Young and really really hot Koreans, Chinese, Japanese, Tais and occasionally a Mexican that could pass,. For a door fee or $60 or $80 and then all in for another $60-100 depending where. There used to be a place called Hou's that literally had 50 to 100 girls to choose from it was quite a mind blowing experience to try to choose. In some cases it made no sense to even bother with a BP unknown when you could get a nice massage an BJ for $100 or FS for $120-160.
Shaaring the F-pad at mini-store warehouse
[QUOTE=JustACbtGuy;3178460]Might be better for everyone to have their own Sin Shack and allow others to use them. Shared combination or whatever.[/QUOTE]Sharing a F-pad is a bad idea. Who is going to handle scheduling?
I always thought I could share my F-pad apartment, it sounded good since I don't have sex 24 hours a day.
I gave a key to my God-son, a quality guy in every way. After that I could never get in when I needed to. LOL.
I still allow him to use it, but he must call me first.
