KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5217187]Excuse my nerdiness, but check at the date at the bottom of this very page: "2000-2015. " But we know the convos on this page aren't 6 years old. That's because the footer area of web pages are generally inserted from a template rather than updated directly. It has no correlation to whether or not the content on a given page is current.

The lack of rates on the page doesn't surprise me. Maybe it's some (weak) attempt at avoiding criminal charges in the event of a bust.[/QUOTE]But directly above that it says:

"Powered by vBulletin® Version 4. 1. 4.

Copyright © 2021 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved".

Copyright 2021 seems pretty current to me. Actually the KAngels Seattle site also says "Copyright at 2019", and it seems like rate information is no longer available.

[QUOTE=BBPornoGeek;5217225]The rates changes from Bay Area vs Seattle. It's almost half of what is charged here.[/QUOTE]Dam! That would mean for a full hour including BBBJ, DATY, DATO, BBFS, and Rimming, it would be about $225, compared to $450 up here.

For what it's worth, I was chatting with Micky between 1st and 2nd pop and she told me she was working in San Jose before (presumably through some agency) were it's 240/ hour and no up charge for BBFS!! So she said she's much happier working here at 450. We are definitely getting played here. If you wanted to see 2-3 girls then it's cheaper to book flight down to San Jose and get a hotel for the weekend then it is to pay Seattle rates.

Don't really have much to add in terms of a review for micky. She's super skinny but you can see her bones so it's not like athletic skinny. Service was decent but definitely wouldn't repeat.

I think the only kangels experience I had that I felt was 100% worth the price was rose. She was young (probably late 20's), super petite / fit build and great service. Sadly she's long gone.

[QUOTE=JoeSmith11;5218109]For what it's worth, I was chatting with Micky between 1st and 2nd pop and she told me she was working in San Jose before (presumably through some agency) were it's 240/ hour and no up charge for BBFS!! So she said she's much happier working here at 450. We are definitely getting played here. If you wanted to see 2-3 girls then it's cheaper to book flight down to San Jose and get a hotel for the weekend then it is to pay Seattle rates.

Don't really have much to add in terms of a review for micky. She's super skinny but you can see her bones so it's not like athletic skinny. Service was decent but definitely wouldn't repeat.

I think the only kangels experience I had that I felt was 100% worth the price was rose. She was young (probably late 20's), super petite / fit build and great service. Sadly she's long gone.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the intel. $240 would be good, as long as it includes BBBJ, DATY, DATO, and BBFS. And if she also provides Rimming, that would even be better!

But yeah, we are definitely being played here.

[QUOTE=JoeSmith11;5218109]For what it's worth, I was chatting with Micky between 1st and 2nd pop and she told me she was working in San Jose before (presumably through some agency) were it's 240/ hour and no up charge for BBFS!! So she said she's much happier working here at 450. We are definitely getting played here. If you wanted to see 2-3 girls then it's cheaper to book flight down to San Jose and get a hotel for the weekend then it is to pay Seattle rates.

Don't really have much to add in terms of a review for micky. She's super skinny but you can see her bones so it's not like athletic skinny. Service was decent but definitely wouldn't repeat.

I think the only kangels experience I had that I felt was 100% worth the price was rose. She was young (probably late 20's), super petite / fit build and great service. Sadly she's long gone.[/QUOTE]Mickey sure does like to chat LOL. I like her personality, she reminds me of a previous kgirl that was here 7 years ago.

For Sam Jose do we just contact the bookers recently mentioned in this thread?

[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5217576]But directly above that it says:

"Powered by vBulletin Version 4. 1. 4.

Copyright 2021 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved".

Copyright 2021 seems pretty current to me. Actually the KAngels Seattle site also says "Copyright at 2019", and it seems like rate information is no longer available.[/QUOTE]There are two types of text resources: dynamic and static.

An example of a static text resource would be a "hard-coded" date, where a human typed the numbers "2 0 1 9" when editing the footer. Static resources only change when a human manually changes them (in this case, opening the footer file and manually changing the year).

And example of a dynamic text resource would be an automatically updating date field like the one vBulletin uses. Because vBulletin runs on PHP and uses the PHP "date" command to check the full date of the internal clock on the server then print only the year when needed (see [URL]https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.date.php[/URL]). If you load the page at 11:59 PM on Dec 31,2020 (in the server's home timezone) the year will display as "2020. " If you refresh the page 60 seconds later, the year will show as "2021."

So THIS website actually has TWO footers: a dynamic footer with the year generated by PHP's date command and then below that an additional static footer where the admin typed the actual keys to input "2019."

And to keep this thread on-topic, I hear a new GSL girl is on her way on the 24th.

[QUOTE=Bonnaryi;5218356]Mickey sure does like to chat LOL. I like her personality, she reminds me of a previous kgirl that was here 7 years ago.

For Sam Jose do we just contact the bookers recently mentioned in this thread?[/QUOTE]If you have a relationship with the local K-bookers, they can sometimes help you book in the Bay Area or LA by vouching for you. And some of them book in both places.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to [u]discourage members from posting information[/u]. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue]

Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL]

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]If they offer BBFS, even for an upcharge, please let us know. Hopefully, they don't do Bait and Switch +1, like KAngels.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hmm, interesting. 1/2 hour rate is definitely ridiculous. Hourly rate same as KAngels. Wonder if BBFS is offered, and if so, any up charge?

If photos are accurate, women are gorgeous.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Interesting that this new btownks website and the kangels website use the same favicon (seen on the browser tab).

[QUOTE=DukeOfExeter;5224889]Interesting that this new btownks website and the kangels website use the same favicon (seen on the browser tab).[/QUOTE]That's the favicon for WordPress which is a popular blogging and website building platform. Anyone that doesn't change the default favicon has that one.

[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5224795]Hmm, interesting. 1/2 hour rate is definitely ridiculous. Hourly rate same as KAngels. Wonder if BBFS is offered, and if so, any up charge?

If photos are accurate, women are gorgeous.[/QUOTE]The agencies price HH like that because they don't want you to do HH visits.

And a quick Google image search reveals, as expected, those photos are re-used on unrelated websites (i.e. They are not real).

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hesitant to try a new agency without any vouches. Be careful out there.

(as much as I hate tna, one good thing is seeing a provider's reviews mean you know its not a string.). Whoever takes one for the team, be careful, don't request any service over text, etc.

[QUOTE=JoeSmith11;5225571]Hesitant to try a new agency without any vouches. Be careful out there.

(as much as I hate tna, one good thing is seeing a provider's reviews mean you know its not a string.). Whoever takes one for the team, be careful, don't request any service over text, etc.[/QUOTE]Here's one review I found but I don't know how valid this is.

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/coco-4254658474-357196[/URL]

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5225553]The agencies price HH like that because they don't want you to do HH visits.

And a quick Google image search reveals, as expected, those photos are re-used on unrelated websites (i.e. They are not real).[/QUOTE]So, HH rates are just a rip off? Actually, in doing the math, it costs only $80 more to double the session time.

And as for the pictures of the women, my "hope" statement was just that: a hope that the pictures were real and unique. Thanks for your work, AussieFury.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Obviously don't trust the reviews on the site, most likely fake. A whois search just shows "california' and that the domain was just created on the 9th. Yet already one of review talks about visiting multiple times. Possible? Sure. Likely? I'm skeptical. Could be a pig in k-girl clothing.

I see that GSL has a new girl Hera. Anyone seen her? I feel like I've seen those same pics used somewhere. Might've been Kbeautypops or another one of those similar sites. Any intel is appreciated!

[QUOTE=JoeSmith11;5225571]Hesitant to try a new agency without any vouches. Be careful out there.

(as much as I hate tna, one good thing is seeing a provider's reviews mean you know its not a string.). Whoever takes one for the team, be careful, don't request any service over text, etc.[/QUOTE]I can verify they real and the girl (Coco) was very attractive, girl in the pics? Could very well be. I don't want to get into great detail but it is YMMV. She can communicate decently, and worth the trip, at least for me. Would see coco again for sure.

[QUOTE=ByumYum;5226612]I can verify they real and the girl (Coco) was very attractive, girl in the pics? Could very well be. I don't want to get into great detail but it is YMMV. She can communicate decently, and worth the trip, at least for me. Would see coco again for sure.[/QUOTE]Nice looking Korean gal. Her measurements are stated as 34 c-30-34, but in the pictures, waist looks much smaller. Can you clarify that?

[QUOTE=WellThisIsFun;5225162]That's the favicon for WordPress which is a popular blogging and website building platform. Anyone that doesn't change the default favicon has that one.[/QUOTE]Ah, thanks! That possibility occurred to me, but I did not recognize the logo.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Kangels clone. The girls were at Kangles a year or 2 ago.

[QUOTE=BBPornoGeek;5226884]Kangels clone. The girls were at Kangles a year or 2 ago.[/QUOTE]Yeah, keep thinking those photos are wishful thinking.

[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5226748]Nice looking Korean gal. Her measurements are stated as 34 c-30-34, but in the pictures, waist looks much smaller. Can you clarify that?[/QUOTE]I would say its very close. Chest probably large B or small C, but real not MM. Ass is really nice, enjoy seeing it very much. Honestly looks wise, you will not be disappointed.

[QUOTE=ByumYum;5226612]I can verify they real and the girl (Coco) was very attractive, girl in the pics? Could very well be. I don't want to get into great detail but it is YMMV. She can communicate decently, and worth the trip, at least for me. Would see coco again for sure.[/QUOTE]You've been on this site for nearly a decade and this is the first time you chime in regarding any topic? Holy hell man. Spill the beans, how special do I need to be to get in on these new agencies early?

[QUOTE=ByumYum;5227835]I would say its very close. Chest probably large B or small C, but real not MM. Ass is really nice, enjoy seeing it very much. Honestly looks wise, you will not be disappointed.[/QUOTE]Sent you a PM a couple of days ago, but no reply. Would appreciate one (just sent it again).

Reminders: KAngels.

Ivy = Diana. Both now on their site.

Melody DD = Suzy DD. Both just popped back onto their site.

[QUOTE=ItssHHuk;5228372]You've been on this site for nearly a decade and this is the first time you chime in regarding any topic? Holy hell man. Spill the beans, how special do I need to be to get in on these new agencies early?[/QUOTE]I apologize I like to be private, but wanted to help and contribute what I can. They ask the basic, where I found them email, race, age and wanted I'd or references.

[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5227738]Yeah, keep thinking those photos are wishful thinking.[/QUOTE]In 99 out of 100 cases at Kangels and most agencies, the photos are NOT the actual girl. In the 1 out of 100 that are real, they are still heavily photoshopped and usually outdated.

Everyone reading this should stop making ANY decisions based on Korean provider photos. Of all the things to drive your decision, the photo should be last on the list.

That said, there are agencies that use real (still Photoshopped) photos. Kangels is not one of them and this new agency isn't either.

MelodyDD is the current Kangels exception. She looks slightly older in pics but that's her.

[QUOTE=ByumYum;5229002]I apologize I like to be private, but wanted to help and contribute what I can. They ask the basic, where I found them email, race, age and wanted I'd or references.[/QUOTE]Hi, Byum Yum. We've got a brand new agency combined with your single-digit post count USAG handle making a positive post about it. I hope you can understand why some here are naturally skeptical.

How did you hear about this new agency? What made you double your post count to tell us about them? Anything else you can share with us to increase our confidence that you're not affiliated with them?

Also, did you write this review on TER?

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/coco-review-by-ykyss-2271959

The writing sounds similar to your posts here. The tone of that review seems like it could easily be associated with this new agency because it tries to instill confidence that the new agency is legit... even though that Ykyss has only one review ever.

We’ve all learned to be extremey skeptical with Asian agencies — and brand new ones in particular.

Thanks and safe hobbying.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5229418]Hi, Byum Yum. We've got a brand new agency combined with your single-digit post count USAG handle making a positive post about it. I hope you can understand why some here are naturally skeptical.

How did you hear about this new agency? What made you double your post count to tell us about them? Anything else you can share with us to increase our confidence that you're not affiliated with them?

Also, did you write this review on TER?

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/coco-review-by-ykyss-2271959

The writing sounds similar to your posts here. The tone of that review seems like it could easily be associated with this new agency because it tries to instill confidence that the new agency is legit... even though that Ykyss has only one review ever.

Weve all learned to be extremey skeptical with Asian agencies and brand new ones in particular.

Thanks and safe hobbying.[/QUOTE]No hurt feelings her brother. This reply might be long since you have a lot of reasoning and concerns, which are warranted, so let's start with the trust / reliability issue.

Although I have not posted until now and my post keeps on doubling, tripling is because I am responding to questions. I do have an account with the other popular board here and have vouches on there. If you like to know my handle there PM me.

I heard about them here. The reason I toftt, was after my initial text to them and learning where they were hosting I wasn't too concerned about a sting. They are located in the same complex as the kangles, just different building. Secondly the way they text, it could very well be the same agency. The one difference in the text is NO service or upgrade was mentioned ot referenced, which to me is good.

Lastly, no I am not with TER.

Again I understand the hesitation, but hope it helps.

Be safe.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5229418]Hi, Byum Yum. We've got a brand new agency combined with your single-digit post count USAG handle making a positive post about it. I hope you can understand why some here are naturally skeptical.

How did you hear about this new agency? What made you double your post count to tell us about them? Anything else you can share with us to increase our confidence that you're not affiliated with them?

Also, did you write this review on TER?

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/coco-review-by-ykyss-2271959

The writing sounds similar to your posts here. The tone of that review seems like it could easily be associated with this new agency because it tries to instill confidence that the new agency is legit... even though that Ykyss has only one review ever.

Weve all learned to be extremey skeptical with Asian agencies and brand new ones in particular.

Thanks and safe hobbying.[/QUOTE]To amplify on what AussieFury is saying ByumYum, it would be really helpful if you could provide many more details on your visit. Since this new place seems to be a KAngel "clone", really need some details about the services you received. It sure would be helpful.

[QUOTE=ByumYum;5229647]No hurt feelings her brother. This reply might be long since you have a lot of reasoning and concerns, which are warranted, so let's start with the trust / reliability issue.

Although I have not posted until now and my post keeps on doubling, tripling is because I am responding to questions. I do have an account with the other popular board here and have vouches on there. If you like to know my handle there PM me.

I heard about them here. The reason I toftt, was after my initial text to them and learning where they were hosting I wasn't too concerned about a sting. They are located in the same complex as the kangles, just different building. Secondly the way they text, it could very well be the same agency. The one difference in the text is NO service or upgrade was mentioned ot referenced, which to me is good.

Lastly, no I am not with TER.

Again I understand the hesitation, but hope it helps.

Be safe.[/QUOTE]Granted YMMV, but does this new agency also offer BBFS, even if for an upcharge?

Yes, I should definitely see her again as soon as I get the vaccine. She used to do a happy start, face up, followed by the warm oil massage, teasing, and then a very sensual happy end with prostate. If she added BBBJ, she'd be perfect! At the time, for 120, it was a fantastic deal. Hoping she hasn't raised rates too much?

Now if only Sweet Thai June would return. Best bang for the buck out of all the AAMPs.

[QUOTE=Lego19;5198276]Met Sweet Mickey and get cute dog. I found her on TNA, checked out some of her reviews and decided to go visit her. Easy setup and met her at her incall. She is easily in her late 40's and has some extra weight but I was not here for looks or body. The massage bed is heated, warm and comfy, and the oil she uses is also hot and at the perfect temperature. She gives a good massage with a lot of teasing from the beginning of the massage all the way to the great finish. She paid good attention to my inner thighs which was therapeutic and sensual, which I don't see often with other providers. Towards the end of the massage she propped my hips up and gave a great HJ while she also focused on my rear sanctuary. This was amazing and just what I needed for the day. After the finish flipped and reduced a massage followed by a quick shower and back on the road.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MitchCor;5230591]Yes, I should definitely see her again as soon as I get the vaccine. She used to do a happy start, face up, followed by the warm oil massage, teasing, and then a very sensual happy end with prostate. If she added BBBJ, she'd be perfect! At the time, for 120, it was a fantastic deal. Hoping she hasn't raised rates too much?

Now if only Sweet Thai June would return. Best bang for the buck out of all the AAMPs.[/QUOTE]It's 140 now, still a really good deal IMO.

Anyone else besides ByumYum visit Btownks yet? [URL]http://www.btownks.com[/URL].

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5233821]Anyone else besides ByumYum visit Btownks yet? [URL]http://www.btownks.com[/URL].[/QUOTE]ByumYum still has not provided details of his visit there.

Apologies (I know I appear to be a noob. Been lurking for a few years now. I think post count reset when the site switched from com to nl, but could be wrong).

Little birdy told me the Kangels was where to go for what I wanted, when I asked in the massage thread.

Reading through this thread makes me thinks that it's more of a bait-and-switch to the photos on their site. (doesn't really bother me, as long as the photos are close enough).

I assume btown is as well.

Curious to know if there is a particular girl to ask about.

Feel free to PM me.

And thanks.

[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5234110]ByumYum still has not provided details of his visit there.[/QUOTE]I sent you a PM. Not sure if you received it.