Printable View
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5334317]Now they describe Nana as "a little chubby." Smh.
Also interesting to note, they now put the following in their ads:
"Please remember this before you visit us. I am not that far from my flowers. Do not hurt them. No Drug. No Toy. No Crime. No Video Recording."
So yea, don't even ask about vids and leave that dirty ass bag of dildos in your car.[/QUOTE]Yeah, they had a recent incident that ended in violence where someone tried to record without consent.
Had a GFE and somewhat of a PSE with her. I think I had an off day because I didn't last as long with her than I did with the last four. We all have our days. Not her fault. Nice rack, great personality, tight and I mean tight kitty. I could have sworn she was doing her Kegels when I was inside her. It was part of the reason why I finished faster than I usually do. Felt too good. I see how many guys here don't like her look / body. She just so happens to be right in my wheelhouse and so yes, I would repeat eventually once I work my way down my "to do" list. My one and only complaint, which is not a deal breaker by any mean, is that she didn't have a completely bald kitty. It had a toupee right at the mons pubis and a bit around the anterior 1/3 portion of the labia majora.
[QUOTE=ChefBoyardee;5335021]Despite the red flags and my own reservations, I TOFTT with Lilly because WLA is much more convenient for me. Obviously none of the pictures are real, we already knew that. Frankly, none of them are even representative. I have no idea if Lilly is also Barbie as I have never seen Barbie. Do you guys remember Lia? Lilly looks better than her but it was pretty close. Nice experienced lady with a good attitude, typical menu but not a standout performer (as Lia was). I really hope M finds some new, more attractive talent very soon. I hate driving to MW but no one in WLA excites me right now.[/QUOTE]Lilly was with also known as Nikki with Booker M.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/nikki-escort-los-angeles-564328[/URL]
[QUOTE=Kamsamida;5335126]Yes. This Chanel from CaKdolls:[/QUOTE]She was so so hot.
And yet even when we were lucky enough to have her around and available I can remember reviews and comments saying she was chubby or too thick or whatever.
Man, some guys want to bang a toothpick with two basketballs taped to its top half.
[QUOTE=LonerRanger;5335541]Lilly was with also known as Nikki with Booker M.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/nikki-escort-los-angeles-564328[/URL][/QUOTE]Is it the same girl or did they just use the same pics. I was told Lilly is new.
[QUOTE=Humyiy;5335694]She was so so hot.
And yet even when we were lucky enough to have her around and available I can remember reviews and comments saying she was chubby or too thick or whatever.
Man, some guys want to bang a toothpick with two basketballs taped to its top half.[/QUOTE]One of the best CFS. If she would have done bb, she would be very busy. Do we know if she will ever come back?
[QUOTE=GardenBae;5335344]Had a GFE and somewhat of a PSE with her. I think I had an off day because I didn't last as long with her than I did with the last four. We all have our days. Not her fault. Nice rack, great personality, tight and I mean tight kitty. I could have sworn she was doing her Kegels when I was inside her. It was part of the reason why I finished faster than I usually do. Felt too good. I see how many guys here don't like her look / body. She just so happens to be right in my wheelhouse and so yes, I would repeat eventually once I work my way down my "to do" list. My one and only complaint, which is not a deal breaker by any mean, is that she didn't have a completely bald kitty. It had a toupee right at the mons pubis and a bit around the anterior 1/3 portion of the labia majora.[/QUOTE]I hear she is fat and service is bad. I guess not in your case? I did want to try until I had a few mongers say pass. Hmmm.
[QUOTE=Humyiy;5335694]She was so so hot.
And yet even when we were lucky enough to have her around and available I can remember reviews and comments saying she was chubby or too thick or whatever.
Man, some guys want to bang a toothpick with two basketballs taped to its top half.[/QUOTE]Before Chanel got her butt implants -she had that perfect fit body with a full round ass. Then she went Khardashian? To appease the "big ass" crowd, I guess. Silly girl, shortly after that she was gone.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5335871]Is it the same girl or did they just use the same pics. I was told Lilly is new.[/QUOTE]That guy just found one of the 3-4 girls that used one of the pics in the past. I saw Nikki and all of the rest. Lilly is new. Trust my review or not, I know who I saw.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5336118]Before Chanel got her butt implants -she had that perfect fit body with a full round ass. Then she went Khardashian?[/QUOTE]Butt implants are a had no for me. I have only encountered one girl with them (Sonya from SAG). I enjoyed Sonya, but those implants were just weird, off putting, and gross. That's really the main reason I haven't repeated with her. I don't really see the appeal. I would rather have an all natural ass of any kind. It sounds especially disappointing in regard to Chanel because people say she had a great ass in the first place.
With all the back and forth and difficulty scheduling Pink, went ahead and saw SA Sarah.
I still can't really get over how we can raw-dog and creampie young Korean girls. Especially reading the "Massage Parlor Reports" here about some paying money to creampie 62-year-old obese Mary at Chen's.
I didn't want to shower so just tossed her on the bed to stick it in. She was dry and needed lube. Left her pussy soaked and oozing jizzum. She seemed startled by the amount.
Showered quick afterwards and she was trying to get it all out of her snatch. What, -"a Korea hooker's too good to have my baby?
With how much I've spent to creampie Koreans, I hope I've impregnated at least one.
Anyway, out in less than 30 mins. Might repeat for convenience, and because she's not Mary at Chen's or Jane from Facebook.
Anyone has intel on Grace from Candygirl, pictures says real selfie but bit TGTBT.
[QUOTE=LonerRanger;5335541]Lilly was with also known as Nikki with Booker M.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/nikki-escort-los-angeles-564328[/URL][/QUOTE]Oh that's who it is. Yeah, I remember when she first came to M back in 2019? She was pretty booked in the first week or few days. She worked at M for a little bit then moved to Acektown for an upcharge. I had to look her up and I wrote a micro review of her at the time and that was when she offered the same service but at 360. As someone esle pointed out earlier, service was nothing special and nothing compelled me to return. Despite me giving her a good review on the first time around, I did not enjoy the second one. I'm not even sure why or what was going in my head at the time. This was before the 2020 bbfs virus era.
Does anyone know my kup cake phone number?
[QUOTE=Kamsamida;5333837]Kgirl with Latina-type booty? You may want to try Ruby who now goes by Romi here.
[URL]https://mykupcake.com/home/Romi[/URL]
Have seen her many times just for doggy style with that booty. She works out to maintain that booty.[/QUOTE]
Any duos talent? Ever since Pepsi palace dried up I can't see to find any place that's offer twice the fun. I've been off the game for a two months because of work. Trying to get back in.
Long time Mid-west lurker, wrapping up a two year work stint up on the central coast. Never felt I had much to contribute here as I've always faired well on getting vetted, but you can also beat a dead horse to dust. You guys have more top-shelf pussy per square mile than any city in existence and you're all clawing to fill up the same hole. On that note, had a back to back Cami and Hana as I rearview mirror this smog shop for hopefully the last time. Not bad way to roll out.
Anyway, just wanted to offer a tip of the cap for the insight, good laughs and handful of blissful memories. Not going to miss the shit traffic, people or the sloppy 6th's, but I'll def miss the fresh talent.
Stay safe and happy hobbling gents. Peace.
[QUOTE=ChefBoyardee;5335021]Despite the red flags and my own reservations, I TOFTT with Lilly because WLA is much more convenient for me. Obviously none of the pictures are real, we already knew that. Frankly, none of them are even representative. I have no idea if Lilly is also Barbie as I have never seen Barbie. Do you guys remember Lia? Lilly looks better than her but it was pretty close. Nice experienced lady with a good attitude, typical menu but not a standout performer (as Lia was). I really hope M finds some new, more attractive talent very soon. I hate driving to MW but no one in WLA excites me right now.[/QUOTE]That's too bad. Lia made up for her lack of looks with her AAA service. I'm still waiting for her to come back.
M. Lilly, Ruby.
Sunny. Choi, Niya, Nuri.
Newtopasian. Min, LA Sera.
Pink Angels. Sarah.
Sexy Angels. Sophia.
SFK.
PKL. Saki, Pink.
Sesang. Hana.
Angelsinwla. Hana.
KGLA. Saki, Pink.
[QUOTE=WaterBottle323;5336295]Anyone has intel on Grace from Candygirl, pictures says real selfie but bit TGTBT.[/QUOTE]Pics on Candy Girl are not her. I've seen her already. She looks more like this which IMO is still good [URL]https://eukgirl.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=1982[/URL].
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5336118]Before Chanel got her butt implants -she had that perfect fit body with a full round ass. Then she went Khardashian? To appease the "big ass" crowd, I guess. Silly girl, shortly after that she was gone.[/QUOTE]That apparently paid off for her because she got a sugar daddy and is now off the grid. Good for her but sad for us mongers.
[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;5336012]I hear she is fat and service is bad. I guess not in your case? I did want to try until I had a few mongers say pass. Hmmm.[/QUOTE]It seems many guys here have a very narrow spectrum of what they consider beautiful. I happen to have a very wide spectrum where she falls under. She is not fat in my opinion. She is thicc not fat. In other words no folds. Her pics on the site are accurate except for the face (maybe) and her boobs are bigger than advertised. Yes, her service is a bit mechanical but I'm sure if you took control, she would oblige. Her English isn't too bad. I was able to communicate somewhat. Still, I found her desirable but as a noob to mongering, I'd say take my opinion with a grain of salt. There is probably better ladies out there (looks and service) that I just haven't had the pleasure. Maybe once I'm in the game long enough, my opinion of her may change.
[QUOTE=SomeGuyCool;5336460]Any duos talent? Ever since Pepsi palace dried up I can't see to find any place that's offer twice the fun. I've been off the game for a two months because of work. Trying to get back in.[/QUOTE]Casino has done duos with Mistress X. However Casino doesn't work very often. Just keep an eye out when she's working and request the duo.
[QUOTE=Comport;5336343]Does anyone know my kup cake phone number?[/QUOTE]It's on their website. But we've seen that movie before. Smh.
Look up TER I'd: 358298.
Posting pictures to see if anyone recognizes her. The last love I saw was about a year ago at SA which isn't the same as this one.
[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/?lightbox=dataItem-ko0mcbjj[/URL]
[QUOTE=TempletonRat;5336146]With all the back and forth and difficulty scheduling Pink, went ahead and saw SA Sarah.
I still can't really get over how we can raw-dog and creampie young Korean girls. Especially reading the "Massage Parlor Reports" here about some paying money to creampie 62-year-old obese Mary at Chen's.
I didn't want to shower so just tossed her on the bed to stick it in. She was dry and needed lube. Left her pussy soaked and oozing jizzum. She seemed startled by the amount.
Showered quick afterwards and she was trying to get it all out of her snatch. What, -"a Korea hooker's too good to have my baby?
With how much I've spent to creampie Koreans, I hope I've impregnated at least one.
Anyway, out in less than 30 mins. Might repeat for convenience, and because she's not Mary at Chen's or Jane from Facebook.[/QUOTE]Her holes should still be well lubed from the previous guys jizz.
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;5336668]Pics on Candy Girl are not her. I've seen her already. She looks more like this which IMO is still good [URL]https://eukgirl.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=1982[/URL].[/QUOTE]I have noticed that Grace and Gracee both have very similar measurements, are they same person? If not which one are you referring?
[QUOTE=Kamsamida;5336671]That apparently paid off for her because she got a sugar daddy and is now off the grid. Good for her but sad for us mongers.[/QUOTE]Where did you get that bit of info?
She's got an IG and her SD / BF shows up in her stories, for months and months now. So yeah, idk how it can get anymore concrete than that.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5336934]Where did you get that bit of info?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HeavySetD;5336960]She's got an IG and her SD / BF shows up in her stories, for months and months now. So yeah, idk how it can get anymore concrete than that.[/QUOTE]Can you PM me her IG?
I've never seen phatass chanel, but I've always been curious what she really looks like without the photoshop in her ads.
Sorry if this has been discussed, but I couldn't find anything via search. Lately I've been wanting to do more FIV and the girls have said no every time (so I respectfully stop / don't). With some girls willing to do BBFS, is there a standard upsell for FIV? I don't think FIV is worth +100, but something under +50 and I might find it worth paying for.
Are they worried about just general bacterial infections from hands? Or possibly similar concerns as BBFS? I don't think I come across as dirty. I'm relatively clean cut and I always shower right before going just to be sure too. Thanks guys!
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5336720]It's on their website. But we've seen that movie before. Smh.
Look up TER I'd: 358298.[/QUOTE]Not to be argumentative, but I've been scanning their website for about half an hour and I don't see ANY contact details anywhere on it. No phone numbers or texts or even booking links. Nada.
Seriously? If the girls don't want your fingers jammed up their twats then that should be the end of it. Why are you trying to complicate the menu by adding another upcharge so you can get your rocks off? If the girls don't like it or want your fingers in them move on. There's no point in trying to justify it by saying you show up clean or your clean cut or are they worried about bacterial infection or try to get support in the idea of another upcharge.
[QUOTE=Scudd44;5337002]Sorry if this has been discussed, but I couldn't find anything via search. Lately I've been wanting to do more FIV and the girls have said no every time (so I respectfully stop / don't). With some girls willing to do BBFS, is there a standard upsell for FIV? I don't think FIV is worth +100, but something under +50 and I might find it worth paying for.
Are they worried about just general bacterial infections from hands? Or possibly similar concerns as BBFS? I don't think I come across as dirty. I'm relatively clean cut and I always shower right before going just to be sure too. Thanks guys![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TheSpius19;5337041]Not to be argumentative, but I've been scanning their website for about half an hour and I don't see ANY contact details anywhere on it. No phone numbers or texts or even booking links. Nada.[/QUOTE]You're not the first, and unfortunately not the last to say that. So yea, your answer awaits on TER, or sliding into their DMs on HX.
Folks, anyone can tell me approximation of Royas age?
I know she is a legend in socal, and she's been around. She's at GFEI here in the bay now, and some of my buddies are interested but they are mindful of age.
From what I could put together is that she's a vet and is in her mid 40's at least and probably close to 50.
Is this correct or awfully off?
Any estimates appreciated, but truth welcomed most.
[QUOTE=Scudd44;5337002]Sorry if this has been discussed, but I couldn't find anything via search. Lately I've been wanting to do more FIV and the girls have said no every time (so I respectfully stop / don't). With some girls willing to do BBFS, is there a standard upsell for FIV? I don't think FIV is worth +100, but something under +50 and I might find it worth paying for.
Are they worried about just general bacterial infections from hands? Or possibly similar concerns as BBFS? I don't think I come across as dirty. I'm relatively clean cut and I always shower right before going just to be sure too. Thanks guys![/QUOTE]Girls don't FIV because it can be uncomfortable if you don't know what you're doing. If you haven't trimmed your nails, you can scrape them with it. Instead of them testing out to see who's good at fingering and who's not, they'd rather just not allow it at all. Some girls don't mind though. Hana allows FIV, at least from my experience.
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;5337046]Seriously? If the girls don't want your fingers jammed up their twats then that should be the end of it. Why are you trying to complicate the menu by adding another upcharge so you can get your rocks off? If the girls don't like it or want your fingers in them move on. There's no point in trying to justify it by saying you show up clean or your clean cut or are they worried about bacterial infection or try to get support in the idea of another upcharge.[/QUOTE]This.
Pink or MKC Scarlett might be your best bet for FIV action. Obviously Hana is generally down for whatever. Like any session, shoot your shot. If you lay a brick, on to the next one.
[QUOTE=AlexisDavis;5337187]Girls don't FIV because it can be uncomfortable if you don't know what you're doing. If you haven't trimmed your nails, you can scrape them with it. Instead of them testing out to see who's good at fingering and who's not, they'd rather just not allow it at all. Some girls don't mind though. Hana allows FIV, at least from my experience.[/QUOTE]Ah okay. I wasn't sure if I was missing something else, but that totally makes sense. Thanks.
[QUOTE=AlexisDavis;5337187]Girls don't FIV because it can be uncomfortable if you don't know what you're doing. If you haven't trimmed your nails, you can scrape them with it. Instead of them testing out to see who's good at fingering and who's not, they'd rather just not allow it at all. Some girls don't mind though. Hana allows FIV, at least from my experience.[/QUOTE]This is true. Not just K-girls but FIV is very rare across the whole provider spectrum, in my experience. Guys are too rough, don't know how to do it (or do some tryhard shit they saw in porn incorrectly), or don't groom their hands like Alexis said. I've only tried it on repeat visits and you have to work up to it after some foreplay.
[QUOTE=GardenBae;5336672]It seems many guys here have a very narrow spectrum of what they consider beautiful. I happen to have a very wide spectrum where she falls under. She is not fat in my opinion. She is tick not fat.[/QUOTE]Haven't seen her but I believe you completely. Mongers can be extremely weird about weight and body shape. Part of it is insular frat-bro pressure, part is just K-girl fans in particular tend to really value certain body types more. Just take everything you read with a grain of salt.
Saw Pink last night, I think her real age more like 31-34 years old. BBFS, daty, BBBJ is on the menu, except She not into dfk, only kisses on the lips.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;5333863]She still upcharging? I'd rather go see hana or other 300 or under girl. She wanted upcharge on msog and bb when I saw her last year, fuck that.[/QUOTE]For the majority of people seeing her? Yes. For her regulars and favorites from her previous tours? Probably not. When you first get there, if she's checking the envelope then chances are you are going to be upcharged if you want BB or anal.