Printable View
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;3204990]Even if it's 30 minutes of the most mind-blowing, toe-curling, PSE style sex you've ever experienced in your life with two 21 year old 10/10 Playboy models?
Not saying that's what you'll get with those two, just saying, wouldn't that be worth it?[/QUOTE]It would be, but those girls would NEVER BE ON BP. That's his point, I'm fairly certain.
[QUOTE=RICheeseHead;3205048]It would be, but those girls would NEVER BE ON BP. That's his point, I'm fairly certain.[/QUOTE]Probably not. But hey, you never know! Think I'll let someone else TOFTT on that one though, lol.
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;3205099]Probably not. But hey, you never know! Think I'll let someone else TOFTT on that one though, lol.[/QUOTE]After reading here and being in the hobby for some time this is what I have to offer on the subject. It is my opinion that 95% of the girls on BP are over price. I have read all your reviews on these girls very few get a good grade. Even most of the good reviews come with a negative. So these two are way out of line and I can bet they did not get one real reply. Most if not all of the best girls I have seen have been in the lower price range. A girl with a realistic view knows that the best way to make it in the business is by good reasonable service that creates repete business. It is less hassle and way less risk.
Beware.
[URL]http://www.providencejournal.com/news/20161228/police-say-westerly-man-was-assaulted-while-responding-to-online-escort-ad[/URL]
[QUOTE=TomHallForU;3204560]Anyone recognize this girl?[/QUOTE]It's a puppy dog with Goldie locks hair.
can't stand these girls that do the immature puppy dog ears & nose & flowers etc on their photos
[QUOTE=Krappenschitz;3205233]Beware.
[URL]http://www.providencejournal.com/news/20161228/police-say-westerly-man-was-assaulted-while-responding-to-online-escort-ad[/URL][/QUOTE]Always good to be careful, that's the most important reason for sites like this one to exist (imo). I doubt the police are going to be much help in that matter.
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;3205422]Always good to be careful, that's the most important reason for sites like this one to exist (imo). I doubt the police are going to be much help in that matter.[/QUOTE]Thats a tough neighborhood, drug dealers, pimps. You name its there.
Number ending in 1855. Ad on P. Not looking for anything but asking if you seen her is her location safe? Is she a thief If no one has seen her L report back after Saturday. Thanks.
[QUOTE=Raven1950;3205902]Number ending in 1855. Ad on P. Not looking for anything but asking if you seen her is her location safe? Is she a thief If no one has seen her L report back after Saturday. Thanks.[/QUOTE]Reviewed her a while back (3257). She had gone by a lot of names with Belle in them. I want to say she was Belle Sinclaire or something then. Okay neighborhood. She's not a scammer. She had awful teeth and was in a rush. Definitely wouldn't repeat.
[QUOTE=Raven1950;3205902]Number ending in 1855. Ad on P. Not looking for anything but asking if you seen her is her location safe? Is she a thief If no one has seen her L report back after Saturday. Thanks.[/QUOTE]That is indeed Belle Sinclair. She's been around quite a while. I saw her several years ago, incall then was very safe. She is NOT a thief nor a scammer--she does what she promises. You can usually work with her on price, she starts out a bit on the high end for a backpage lady. The ad pics are fairly accurrate as per my memory, but of course they are glam pics. Tits were a little deflated but I think that overall, she was pretty damn cute, very small frame like a spinner. There was fair but not stellar kissing, more light LFK than DFK, not a lot of tongue in my experience. Decect BBBJ but no CIM. She was good to go, though, with a lot of juice and moaning after DATY and a really fun lay. No CIM with the blowjob though. At least that was my experience.
[QUOTE=Lips1963;3206310]That is indeed Belle Sinclair. She's been around quite a while. I saw her several years ago, incall then was very safe. She is NOT a thief nor a scammer--she does what she promises. You can usually work with her on price, she starts out a bit on the high end for a backpage lady. The ad pics are fairly accurrate as per my memory, but of course they are glam pics. Tits were a little deflated but I think that overall, she was pretty damn cute, very small frame like a spinner. There was fair but not stellar kissing, more light LFK than DFK, not a lot of tongue in my experience. Decect BBBJ but no CIM. She was good to go, though, with a lot of juice and moaning after DATY and a really fun lay. No CIM with the blowjob though. At least that was my experience.[/QUOTE]I will add that she is cool & eccentric, her body was not toned by any means but she is tight & I went quite a bit over time with no issues.
[QUOTE=LuvEmHott;3206391]I will add that she is cool & eccentric, her body was not toned by any means but she is tight & I went quite a bit over time with no issues.[/QUOTE]I agree that she is not a scammer. But will also add that when I saw her a few years back it was VERY smokey and it was like kissing an ashtray (not fun at all). There was also a dog outside the bedroom that cause her to be completely pre-occupied. The body was average at best. Just my two cents. I wouldn't repeat, but have heard from others that had a nicer experience.
[URL]http://rhodeisland.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/are-you-sitting-all-alone-bored-in-your-hotel-room-in-need-of-quality-companionship/6471589[/URL]
For those of you unfamiliar, she is pretty much the worst provider ever. No redeeming qualities, just a total rip off. And she was 28 about 10 years ago!
[QUOTE=Paul8170;3204021]Had an unexpected disappointing session given some positive reviews here and the oThER site. Main pro is that she is sociable and friendly. Main con, among others, is that she is less than forthcoming about services offered. After the show was well on the road she disclosed that she could not perform FS because it was her time of the month. WTF I said why didn't you tell me earlier. She responded that she had to be careful on the phone. Ok I understand that but you should have told me before asking for the donation and before we had reached the time of the main event. So a 30 minute session featuring a BBBJ no CIM was 1. 2. There were other shortcomings. Suffice to saw I got screwed in a way I had not intended. BTW she stood me up the first time I scheduled to see her.[/QUOTE]Sorry about your visit Paul8170. The best advice I have ever gotten, is from a member of this forum. He has never stared me wrong in this game that we play. Never pay upfront. I have stuck to this rule and it has done me well. I have walked a few times, but when I tell her I will only pay when we are done, I have found the provider to be more willing and honest with their service. These girls want to get paid. I hope this helps. I have heard good things about Rockell. Stay safe, CJ.
[QUOTE=CanJockey;3206821]Sorry about your visit Paul8170. The best advice I have ever gotten, is from a member of this forum. He has never stared me wrong in this game that we play. Never pay upfront. I have stuck to this rule and it has done me well. I have walked a few times, but when I tell her I will only pay when we are done, I have found the provider to be more willing and honest with their service. These girls want to get paid. I hope this helps. I have heard good things about Rockell. Stay safe, CJ.[/QUOTE]I call it the C. C. Rule and it works. I always use it with a new provider and I do just like he said show them money but do not hand it to them until after the session. I have been doing that since June / July and have not run into any issues with any provider. Try it. (you will see how easy it is).