Escort Reports

[QUOTE=GolphPro;6478559]I am sorry. What is PB?.

Can she deep throat? Facefuck?[/QUOTE]PB = ProneBone.

[QUOTE=LoveBJ;6473909]Saw one last night, BB pretty much offered at various levels.

Quote ]
Anyone know where the Chinese groups are advertising now? The ones that are usually in the Bellevue / Renton area apartments?
Saw one last night, BB pretty much offered at various levels. [/QUOTE]219-202-9896.

I did not ask for bare FS. As a rule I always wrap it up before going in, because I absolutely have zero wiggle room for any STD. No idea whether bare services are on the table.

[QUOTE=DrtyHarry;6479606]Excellent review. Thanks for sharing. Did you ask for uncovered FS as I think it is YMMV but she is known to be open to that.[/QUOTE]

A year ago my regular shared with me that she will be leaving the country in the fall for a couple years, and so I am on the hunt for a new regular. I have been auditioning many of the locals to find a suitable replacement. Not too long ago I tried out Sasha Porizkova. While I cannot find any faults with her service, I did not feel the chemistry I am seeking and for that reason I will not repeat. However I believe others would find her satisfying.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?110179-Sasha_Porizkova[/URL]

Face - 2 of 5 stars: Ok, let's face it (I swear that was not intentional), she's no beauty. I think her face is the mash up between Macaulay Culkin and Wayne Gretzky, with a very subtle underbite. However her mug is very feminine. Maybe some dudes will like this. I do not.

Body - 4 of 5 stars: I estimate she's late 30 and possible early 40's. She definitely takes care of herself. Body is very well toned, flat stomach with a belly button stud, slim hips and thigs, smooth & clear skin. Best of all are her very soft C cups which where a joy to have in my hands and mouth. However I found her nipples on the small side though they did swell up adequately when suckling them. Vag upper area was very tightly groomed but the outer pussy lips were shaved bare. Pussy smelled and tasted clean & fresh, with pink inner lips that were slender and a nice tight knob for a clit.

Attitude - 4 of 5: she was very warm and welcoming and wanted to chat to get to know me, as well as to tell me about herself. I took this as her way of getting comfortable and trying to develop chemistry, which I appreciate. She asked me directly what I wanted in our session and was very encouraging and charming in our discussion. She put in a lot of effort to move her body and shift her weight for my comfort when needed. She is intelligent and appeared to be interested in our pillow talk.

Service - 3 of 5: LFK and CBJ was enthusiastic as was the extensive foreplay and greek, though she made it clear ahead of time no FIV. Overall she put in the effort to make me feel like I was pleasuring her and that she was enjoying our time together, and thus far I would find no fault in her service. One problem, however, is she informed me that her breasts are sensitive and that I needed to be very gentle when nursing. This is a problem for me because I like to spend a lot of my time latched on and suckling away, and hence this is the biggest reason for my rating. The other big reason is I like FIV because I like to play with a pussy in between shots, with my fingers running in between the lips and over the clit and sliding in & out, and as mentioned FIV is on her no list.

All in all Sasha is a very good provider who puts in the effort to deliver a great experience. All at a great per hour rate. However despite her great body I could not get over her face, her no FIV, and that she does not enjoy suckling. If you're okay with all that then I would not hesitate to recommend.

[QUOTE=LoveBJ;6479813]219-202-9896.[/QUOTE]Is that the booker number or direct contact? Actually prefer Renton better. TIA. Can contact my DM.

Cheers.

I mentioned in a different review that ever since my regular shared that she's leaving this fall that I've been auditioning providers for a replacement. A while ago I saw Angelbabyxo. I would recommend her but since she's not exactly what I want I will not be repeating.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?569641-angelbabyxo[/URL]

Face - 2 of 5: Her face is a feminine Kid Rock. Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to be mean or hurtful, but I cannot think of any other way to describe.

Body: 3 of 5: She is young, in her mid to upper 20's, and obviously works out. She says she does pilates, and it shows with her very solid core and very tone arms, shoulders, and back. If you like your baby got back. Well, she got that, which honestly throws me for a loop because the rest of her is to fit and tone, though tbh her ass is firm and not jiggly or flabby. Maybe it is all muscle? Her pussy was shaved bald, with taught outer lips and slender inner lips that parted easily during foreplay and felt slippery from natural wetness. Her natural D cups look fabulous, but unfortunately for me are very firm with small nipples. I love tits that are soft with nipples sized big enough for satisfying suckling, and unfortunately Angel isn't built that way, which is the biggest reason for my rating.

Attitude: 4 of 5. Very personable, likes to talk, upbeat, positive, cheery. As is common in first meetings we chatted to get to know each other and also share our likes & dislikes. She is relatively intelligent, rational, and talks about having standards to live by. She made an effort to make it feel like she enjoyed my company and moved her body and vocalized like I was pleasuring her to a great degree.

Service - 3. 5 of 5: LFK, FIV, CBJ, CFS, Mish, K9, MSOG. She has a very clean and private incall in an upscale apartment. As mentioned, she put in good effort to make it seem like she was passionately enjoying my company with her vocalizations and body movement. She allowed my hands to roam all over her wherever I wanted. I did get to spend time latched onto her right breast, but as mentioned above I found it unsatisfying given the firmness and small nipples. I did spend time during foreplay to tease her nipple with my fingers trying to get it to swell, as well as when suckling, but the nipple just didn't get very big. I didn't try the left breast due to the nipple stud, which honestly I do not enjoy in my mouth. The lack of nipple enjoyment plays a big factor in my rating, as well as what I consider a relatively steep $500/ hour rate.

All in all Angelbabyxo delivers, and does it well. If you are ok with her rate and are ok with firm breasts and small nubs for nipples, then I would suggest that you may enjoy a session with her.

[QUOTE=MauiGlory;6480264]I mentioned in a different review that ever since my regular shared that she's leaving this fall that I've been auditioning providers for a replacement. A while ago I saw Angelbabyxo. I would recommend her but since she's not exactly what I want I will not be repeating.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?569641-angelbabyxo[/URL]

Face - 2 of 5: Her face is a feminine Kid Rock. Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to be mean or hurtful, but I cannot think of any other way to describe.

Body: 3 of 5: She is young, in her mid to upper 20's, and obviously works out. She says she does pilates, and it shows with her very solid core and very tone arms, shoulders, and back. If you like your baby got back. Well, she got that, which honestly throws me for a loop because the rest of her is to fit and tone, though tbh her ass is firm and not jiggly or flabby. Maybe it is all muscle? Her pussy was shaved bald, with taught outer lips and slender inner lips that parted easily during foreplay and felt slippery from natural wetness. Her natural D cups look fabulous, but unfortunately for me are very firm with small nipples. I love tits that are soft with nipples sized big enough for satisfying suckling, and unfortunately Angel isn't built that way, which is the biggest reason for my rating.

Attitude: 4 of 5. Very personable, likes to talk, upbeat, positive, cheery. As is common in first meetings we chatted to get to know each other and also share our likes & dislikes. She is relatively intelligent, rational, and talks about having standards to live by. She made an effort to make it feel like she enjoyed my company and moved her body and vocalized like I was pleasuring her to a great degree.

Service - 3. 5 of 5: LFK, FIV, CBJ, CFS, Mish, K9, MSOG. She has a very clean and private incall in an upscale apartment. As mentioned, she put in good effort to make it seem like she was passionately enjoying my company with her vocalizations and body movement. She allowed my hands to roam all over her wherever I wanted. I did get to spend time latched onto her right breast, but as mentioned above I found it unsatisfying given the firmness and small nipples. I did spend time during foreplay to tease her nipple with my fingers trying to get it to swell, as well as when suckling, but the nipple just didn't get very big. I didn't try the left breast due to the nipple stud, which honestly I do not enjoy in my mouth. The lack of nipple enjoyment plays a big factor in my rating, as well as what I consider a relatively steep $500/ hour rate.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the review. Been on the fence and can't trust tna reviews. Do you know if she's exactly like her pics or has she gained weight?

Anybody have any experience with Sarah?

[URL]https://us-seattle.bedpage.com/bodyrubs/outcall-only-no-incall/23005141.html[/URL]

Visiting next week and was thinking she might be an option.

[QUOTE=MauiGlory;6479478]I saw Gemini last spring. She was very nice. She's not ugly, but does look like a female version of Glen Campbell.[/QUOTE]Now I can't get "Rhinestone Cowboy" out of my head. LOL.

Thanks for your assessment of her!

Gained weight compared to what? I think you are asking in comparison to her photos in her ads.

I didn't get the sense that she's stuffing herself full of processed carbs and alcohol. In fact I would put her in the very fit hardbody category in that her core is really solid as are her arms & shoulders. The only thing that didn't fit the category is her ass, which was wide and "bubble" but even then it was very firm and not flabby & squishy like a junk food queen.

Note that the biggest thing that you should consider is that she's young, and so she has a young person's idea of how a dude likes his member serviced, which if you're experienced you know that the experienced older ladies have a completely different and IMO a more refined idea of how a man likes to be pleasured.

[QUOTE=MrLarryDong;6480312]Thanks for the review. Been on the fence and can't trust tna reviews. Do you know if she's exactly like her pics or has she gained weight?[/QUOTE]

Would it help if I would say that maybe her face reminds me of Ricky Schroder?

[QUOTE=KitWalker1967;6480585]Now I can't get "Rhinestone Cowboy" out of my head. LOL.

Thanks for your assessment of her![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MauiGlory;6481045]Would it help if I would say that maybe her face reminds me of Ricky Schroder?[/QUOTE]That definitely worked the song out of my head and replaced it with nausea. Thanks! LOL!

I gave Chloe James a test drive last fall. I really liked her service, but she is so disproportionately and egregiously overpriced that I will not repeat.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?334223-Chloe_James[/URL]

Face - 2 of 5: Classic Sicilian facial features with a sturdy jaw and full lips. She's not ugly, but I would never say she's an example of pretty. She looks much better with makeup than without.

Body - 4 of 5: She's relatively tall at approx 5'9" and has a sturdy build. She told me she does cross fit and I definitely can tell through her muscle definition, strong shoulders, arms, lats, core. Her butt is a little bit large but firm not flabby. C cups are nice & soft with nipples for satisfying suckling. Pussy is shaved but with a 5 o'clock shadow which I believe she does intentionally for nuru gliding. Outer pussy lips are nice and fat and inner lips are slender and pink and clit is a little nub. It smelled and tasted clean and got very wet & slippery with my tongue and fingers inside. Skin is smooth and clear and a bit tanned when I saw her. Overall she has one of the nicest bodies among the providers I've experienced.

Attitude - 4 of 5: She put in a great deal of effort with the friendly & warm intro, nice chit chat, and seemingly cared whether I was comfortable or not, etc. She put a lot into her nuru with all the sliding & squirming, as well as allowed me free roaming when we were in the bath.

Service - 1 of 5: while she loves to deliver nuru, I really don't care for it since it's messy and worst of all a passive experience. After giving it a go after about 10 minutes I politely suggested that we should move to FS which included CFS, CBJ, DATY, mish, FIV, DATO, and K9. A bath was also included which I really enjoyed because it was different, and because I spent the time roaming, lots of time massaging and groping her tits and ass and pussy lips while "spooning" in the tub (I don't know what to call it. What is the bob sled or motorcycle driver + passenger position?) Aside from the nuru everything was excellent. I really got into the groping and FIV in the bathtub which I normally don't get into. I think it was because we were sitting so closely to each other.

So if I enjoyed it so much then why the 1 star? Because of the price for the 3 hour bath + FS VIP session is off the charts overpriced. I tried it because I wanted to see what a super premium high luxury and unique experience would be like. I tried it, and, well, she's just another provider, albeit with a nice body. I'd also add that she has this dog, I think it's a Mastiff, that was super annoying. I mean the thing was huge, like 250 lbs, and it came up to me when I entered the apartment and sniffed me and shoved it's head into me wanting me to pet him. Now I love dogs, but I hate super needy and whiney dogs with minimal training, and the bigger the dog the more training it needs for me to like it. This one sucked.

All in all, she has a great body with really nice tits and a clean and shiny pussy. However I don't think her face is all that attractive, and her dog is super annoying, and worst of all, her prices are just out of whack with reality. I predict that she will have to dramatically slash prices or will be broke and out of providing by end of this year out of having no customers.

[QUOTE=MauiGlory;6481224]I gave Chloe James a test drive last fall. I really liked her service, but she is so disproportionately and egregiously overpriced that I will not repeat.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?334223-Chloe_James[/URL]
[/QUOTE]Thanks for the intel. The extended session piqued my interest (when rates were quite a bit lower) but I never reached out because of her screening requirements. I would have expected her nuru skills to be exceptional but oh well.

Yeah, I felt the same way as you for the screening. I did it because I wanted to see what a high end** experience is like. If she's typical of high end then yeah I know that it's not worth it.

** by "high end" I mean high end for regular guys like me, not *HIGH END* like Jeff Bezos or Prince Andrew having on-board entertainment on the mega yacht high end.

[QUOTE=Donato21;6481256]Thanks for the intel. The extended session piqued my interest (when rates were quite a bit lower) but I never reached out because of her screening requirements. I would have expected her nuru skills to be exceptional but oh well.[/QUOTE]