Sugarbabies?

"Met" both of these birds on SA:

Daisycat69: Wants $500 per date.

Xenberry: Wants $800 (EIGHT HUNDRED! Per date.

These chicks are either off their meds or there's a LOT of simping in Cincy going on. LOL.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6270003]Asks $500 will do $300 ppm. She went ghost. Same person with three accounts below.

Barbiebabe8989.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/38478f13-040e-4fa4-9520-2efd1d137aba[/URL]

CuteTemptress.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/026834c5-f72b-4457-b4de-c7796f24c5fa[/URL]

Barbienicole89.
[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/be3d34a928b0730b[/URL][/QUOTE]Looks like a drunken 5 year old drew on her with a Sharpie.

[QUOTE=RockaBillyRiot;6270005]"Met" both of these birds on SA:

Daisycat69: Wants $500 per date.

Xenberry: Wants $800 (EIGHT HUNDRED! Per date.

These chicks are either off their meds or there's a LOT of simping in Cincy going on. LOL.[/QUOTE]A few of the top SBs here can get $500 ppm. I don't think either of those girls fall into that category.

Sometimes whale SDs will take an interest in a mid chick that they like and give them way too much money. That happens, but I don't think it's that common.

[QUOTE=Cincyfunguy;6268847]Has anyone actually met with this one? She's on like her 5th profile by now, aka babykay, Ashlynn777, SweetCutie, spoiledbrat. Comes on very direct. Seems legit in text convos but something just doesn't feel right.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c9b1095e-62c6-4c35-9c34-b11155bd2c18[/URL][/QUOTE]I've been asking the same question.

[QUOTE=RockaBillyRiot;6270005]"Met" both of these birds on SA:

Daisycat69: Wants $500 per date.

Xenberry: Wants $800 (EIGHT HUNDRED! Per date.

These chicks are either off their meds or there's a LOT of simping in Cincy going on. LOL.[/QUOTE]As for simps: There have always been guys willing to pay exorbitant rates. But they are limited in number.

Our problem right now is not one of demand, but of supply.

When I started on Seeking in 2011, I was meeting recent UC grads who were working hourly jobs at Starbucks and Panera to make ends meet. Unsurprisingly, I was getting some very high-quality women at reasonable prices.

I was typically offering college girls $300 ppm and doing very well. I was sometimes able to go as low as $200.

Needless to say, some rejected those offers, but I was always able to go on to the next one. I *never* had to go much above $350.

This is a different environment. We now face a situation not where college grads are working at Starbucks, but where corporate employers are foregoing college degree requirements to get workers. One of my friend's daughters is a recent UC grad hauling down $90 K at P&G. She's not an idiot, but she's no valedictorian, either. About average. We aren't likely to see her on Seeking.

IMHO, the girl market is going to suck until the job market dips, or at least normalizesaside from the old women, the druggies, and the skanks.

I've hobbied off and on since the 1990's, and I've observed a clear trend: the hobby gets better in inverse proportion to the job market.

When unemployment is very low, the selection, quality, and pricing of girls in the hobby is worse. When the job market weakens, more women are willing to consider opportunities in male entertainment: not only as SBs, but also as escorts. In 2011, there were lots of good escorts, too.

The escort market is often a good indicator of how Seeking is going to go. Right now, most of the escorts available to us are pre-pandemic women, most of whom are older, and some of whom have been around since the early 2010's. There is no new crop of 21-32 year old escorts. As a result, the few girls who are young and conventionally attractive (refer to recent discussions about Tia Taylor and Tiffany Teigan) can practically double their rates.

Similarly, I've also noticed that the younger generation of college students and recent college grads is largely "missing" from Seeking. (You may have noticed that a disproportionate number of the women on Seeking nowadays are older.) The economic reality is that relatively few 23-year-olds are going to want to hook up with guys their dads' age for cash, when they can make $90 K at P&G. And if they *are* on Seeking, their expectations are *very* high.

I'm not saying you should stop looking. Just don't *expect much* when the unemployment rate is 3. 7%, as is currently the case. In 2011, a great year on Seeking and in the escort market, the unemployment rate was 8. 5%. Therein lies the difference.

I'm not interested in older women or skanks, and I don't want to pay $500 just to get a mid-level SB or escort. Nor do I want to spend 30 hours per week on Seeking, sorting through fake profiles. This is why I'm biding my time for now.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;6270684]This is a different environment. We now face a situation not where college grads are working at Starbucks, but where corporate employers are foregoing college degree requirements to get workers. One of my friend's daughters is a recent UC grad hauling down $90 K at P&G. She's not an idiot, but she's no valedictorian, either. About average. We aren't likely to see her on Seeking.[/QUOTE]This is true, but the girls pulling down $90 k still have money problems all the same. Ordering stuff off Amazon and DoorDash everyday. Constantly upgrading new gadgets and accessories. Financing a car they can't afford. While it's unlikely they'll actively advertise themselves as an SB, if an opportunity falls into their lap they might just pursue it. You've got to approach them, build up a rapport and offer "your help" once you sense an opening. It's possible to see PPMs as low as 200 bucks. Which can be the difference between making their minimum credit card payment, bank getting overdrafted or what little emergency pops up.

I am seeing lots a new profiles. Sadly, many of them appear to be scammer of one sort or another.

DesirableDuchess: more crypto-royalty? They are recycling names now? This Duchess lives in Atlanta, owns a clothing store and is originally from Russia. I speak Russian and she responded almost immediately with some copy-paste Cyrillic.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e31f0cb4-52bc-4fc5-85c8-0d572afff4fa[/URL]


Vaan90: Crypto-scammer. Had me fooled initially.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/19057b43-61f8-45f5-955a-a66f976e57a9[/URL]


InnocentMama: Online pic seller, taking me straight to snap. Ghosted quickly.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d5fd796d-d681-4892-a21f-7d369328d19c[/URL]


DesirableDuchess: Classic crypto-scammer.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0c009515-d287-4efb-bdee-0976e06d59d1[/URL]


CuteSocialite: Classic crypto-scammer, a lazy one, will not last long. [URL]https://www.instagram.com/nargiza_kassenova/?hl=en[/URL].

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/503a8c07-a0c4-4b64-8f50-72e60a355d17[/URL]


BAM

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;6270684]As for simps: There have always been guys willing to pay exorbitant rates. But they are limited in number.

Our problem right now is not one of demand, but of supply.

When I started on Seeking in 2011, I was meeting recent UC grads who were working hourly jobs at Starbucks and Panera to make ends meet. Unsurprisingly, I was getting some very high-quality women at reasonable prices.

I was typically offering college girls $300 ppm and doing very well. I was sometimes able to go as low as $200.

Needless to say, some rejected those offers, but I was always able to go on to the next one. I *never* had to go much above $350.

This is a different environment. We now face a situation not where college grads are working at Starbucks, but where corporate employers are foregoing college degree requirements to get workers. One of my friend's daughters is a recent UC grad hauling down $90 K at P&G. She's not an idiot, but she's no valedictorian, either. About average. We aren't likely to see her on Seeking.

IMHO, the girl market is going to suck until the job market dips, or at least normalizesaside from the old women, the druggies, and the skanks.

I've hobbied off and on since the 1990's, and I've observed a clear trend: the hobby gets better in inverse proportion to the job market.

When unemployment is very low, the selection, quality, and pricing of girls in the hobby is worse. When the job market weakens, more women are willing to consider opportunities in male entertainment: not only as SBs, but also as escorts. In 2011, there were lots of good escorts, too.

The escort market is often a good indicator of how Seeking is going to go. Right now, most of the escorts available to us are pre-pandemic women, most of whom are older, and some of whom have been around since the early 2010's. There is no new crop of 21-32 year old escorts. As a result, the few girls who are young and conventionally attractive (refer to recent discussions about Tia Taylor and Tiffany Teigan) can practically double their rates.

Similarly, I've also noticed that the younger generation of college students and recent college grads is largely "missing" from Seeking. (You may have noticed that a disproportionate number of the women on Seeking nowadays are older.) The economic reality is that relatively few 23-year-olds are going to want to hook up with guys their dads' age for cash, when they can make $90 K at P&G. And if they *are* on Seeking, their expectations are *very* high.

I'm not saying you should stop looking. Just don't *expect much* when the unemployment rate is 3. 7%, as is currently the case. In 2011, a great year on Seeking and in the escort market, the unemployment rate was 8. 5%. Therein lies the difference.

I'm not interested in older women or skanks, and I don't want to pay $500 just to get a mid-level SB or escort. Nor do I want to spend 30 hours per week on Seeking, sorting through fake profiles. This is why I'm biding my time for now.[/QUOTE]I agree with this 100%. This is the best explanation for the state of the hobby I have ever heard.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/585becfa-0ba0-4da4-96c6-4a57d43adde1[/URL]

Strikes me as a dancer or a UTR looking for regulars.

Been talking to this one. Anyone met her?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6b9f19d2-9472-4a3e-9d40-32d22b2e3681[/URL]

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;6271657][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/585becfa-0ba0-4da4-96c6-4a57d43adde1[/URL]

Strikes me as a dancer or a UTR looking for regulars.[/QUOTE]Someone just posted on the Stripclub thread that she use to work at a club called Playpen.

[URL]https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/74bf5225fdded77b[/URL]

Has anyone met Cutie? Any info would be greatly appreciated. Feel free to PM me.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5a8f2aa7-d99b-4cc8-87fb-9eddbb734c1b[/URL]

Any information this one would be appreciated. Thanks.

[QUOTE=Anvil;6272767][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5a8f2aa7-d99b-4cc8-87fb-9eddbb734c1b[/URL]

Any information this one would be appreciated. Thanks.[/QUOTE]She's a stripper. Has a couple of pics of her in a changing room at a strip club. Generally to be avoided unless you like women who view men as ATMs.

[QUOTE=Ginzo666;6272780]She's a stripper. Has a couple of pics of her in a changing room at a strip club. Generally to be avoided unless you like women who view men as ATMs.[/QUOTE]Thanks- she does claim to be a UC student but I thought those photos had familiarity.