Printable View
[QUOTE=ComTech42;5809854]ABC is owned by Disney. Safe to say it is a Mickey Mouse Network.[/QUOTE]I'm sure newsmax and OAN are much more your style, sphincter-boy.
[QUOTE]Will you also be attending the annual Gay Days at Disney World in Orlando?[/QUOTE]You being a homophobic little brown water twat, or looking for a date?
[QUOTE=CrestWood87;5810156]No not really something I am proud of but I don't try to hide my flaws with false bravado. I know the things I am good at. Spelling is not one of them. It doesn't add or detract from who I am. No one is perfect.[/QUOTE]Sure. So what, exactly, are you good at? Nothing apparent from your posts.
UK government data covering weeks 5-8. Of the 3,527 people who died from China Virus, 394 were unclotshotted, 3133 were clotshotted. Case rates per 100,000 were 3 times greater among the clotshotted than unclotshotted in age groups 30-80. Negative efficacy from a DNA altering clotshot using experimental substances that weren't even tested in lab rats to attack a man made virus from 400 years in the future. What could go wrong?
[URL]https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1058464/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-9.pdf[/URL]
[QUOTE=AaronHamlet;5810885]UK government data covering weeks 5-8. Of the 3,527 people who died from China Virus, 394 were unclotshotted, 3133 were clotshotted. Case rates per 100,000 were 3 times greater among the clotshotted than unclotshotted in age groups 30-80. Negative efficacy from a DNA altering clotshot created to attack a man made virus from 400 years in the future using experimental substances that weren't even tested in lab rats. What could go wrong?
[URL]https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1058464/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-9.pdf[/URL][/QUOTE][B]Executive Summary:[/B]
[I]Four coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines have now been approved for use in the UK. Rigorous clinical trials have been undertaken to understand the immune response, safety profile and efficacy of these vaccines as part of the regulatory process. Ongoing monitoring of the vaccines as they are rolled out in the population is important to continually ensure that clinical and public health guidance on the vaccination programme is built upon the best available evidence.
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), formerly Public Health England (PHE), works closely with the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA), NHS England, and other government, devolved administration and academic partners to monitor the COVID-19 vaccination programme. Details of the vaccine surveillance strategy are set on the page COVID-19: vaccine surveillance strategy (1). As with all vaccines, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is continuously being monitored by the MHRA. [b]They conclude that overall, the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines outweigh any potential risks (2).[/b]
[/I]
[B]Vaccine effectiveness[/B]
[I]Several studies of vaccine effectiveness have been conducted in the UK against different COVID-19 variants. Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease with the Omicron variant is substantially lower than against the Delta variant, with rapid waning.[b] However, protection against hospitalisation remains high, particularly after 3 doses.[/I][/b]
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5810894][B]Executive Summary:[/B][/QUOTE]A govt who spent billions of taxpayer dollars, locked down nations and mandated an experimental clotshot to be used on its citizens, say in an exec summary their shit don't stink and they did great things. Wow. What a surprise. But as you look at the actual data you see, 'UK government data covering weeks 5-8. Of the 3,527 people who died from China Virus, 394 were unclotshotted, 3133 were clotshotted. Case rates per 100,000 were 3 times greater among the clotshotted than unclotshotted in age groups 30-80.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5810894]protection against hospitalisation remains high, particularly after 3 doses.[/QUOTE]Protection against hospitalization may or may not remain high after 3 doses, but protection against death sucks ass. The latest data covering weeks 5-8 in UK shows deaths from China virus were approximately 800% higher in the clotshotted than non clotshotted.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5810894] Executive Summary:[/QUOTE]Did you catch this part from UK gov report, Roger? Case rates per 100,000 were 3 times greater among the clotshotted than unclotshotted in age groups 30-80. What does that mean? Could it mean the clotshot does change your DNA? Maybe enters your organs, changes the DNA within so the China Virus is not attacked but is self replicated? If that's true, even the early clotshot doomsayers were too optimistic. Our immune systems may have a short, 12 months memory, but DNA is forever.
[QUOTE=AaronHamlet;5810940]Protection against hospitalization may or may not remain high after 3 doses, but protection against death sucks ass. The latest data covering weeks 5-8 in UK shows deaths from China virus were approximately 800% higher in the clotshotted than non clotshotted.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=AaronHamlet;5810965]Did you catch this part from UK gov report, Roger? Case rates per 100,000 were 3 times greater among the clotshotted than unclotshotted in age groups 30-80. What does that mean? Could it mean the clotshot does change your DNA? Maybe enters your organs, changes the DNA within so the China Virus is not attacked but is self replicated? If that's true, even the early clotshot doomsayers were too optimistic. Our immune systems may have a short, 12 months, memory, but DNA is forever.[/QUOTE]And maybe if a frog had wings, it wouldn't bump its ass on landing. See, since you insist on creating pet names for the virus and vaccine and take everything out of context to fit it into your fevered little mind, your interpretations are meaningless to me. You're just a loony fuck. Have a nice day being stupid.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5810994]And maybe if a frog had wings, it wouldn't bump its ass on landing. See, since you insist on creating pet names for the virus and vaccine and take everything out of context to fit it into your fevered little mind, your interpretations are meaningless to me. You're just a loony fuck. Have a nice day being stupid.[/QUOTE]You attack the messenger not the facts. Do you always rail against facts and data or only when they don't fit your perceptions? Remembering your perceptions must be narrowed because you exist in fear. That end result forces you to overcompensate. Not only for that fear but also for your smallness of stature. Both which are obviously related. How does that make you feel?
[QUOTE=AaronHamlet;5811026]You attack the messenger not the facts.[/QUOTE]He has a point. That being that the messenger is free and loose with the "facts."
Case in point, your continuing use of the term "clot-shot. " Exactly how many people have received the vaccine to date? How many have developed blood clots? How many of those were determined to be caused by the vaccine?
Please do the math and get back to us. You will need many, many decimal places to display your answer. Then tell us all again about the "facts."
[QUOTE=AaronHamlet;5811026]You attack the messenger not the facts. Do you always rail against facts and data or only when they don't fit your perceptions? Remembering your perceptions must be narrowed because you exist in fear. That end result forces you to overcompensate. Not only for that fear but also for your smallness of stature. Both which are obviously related. How does that make you feel?[/QUOTE]You may as well be speaking of yourself. You try to make yourself some authority on epidemiology by cherry-picking stuff out of reports and posting as if it's real. But, of course, you have zero credibility, so there's no reason to pay any serious attention to your shit. For sure, it's fun to laugh at and make fun of, though.
[QUOTE=Bullett64;5811108]He has a point. That being that the messenger is free and loose with the "facts."
Case in point, your continuing use of the term "clot-shot. " Exactly how many people have received the vaccine to date? How many have developed blood clots? How many of those were determined to be caused by the vaccine?
Please do the math and get back to us. You will need many, many decimal places to display your answer. Then tell us all again about the "facts."[/QUOTE]He wouldn't know a fact if it fucked his sister in the ass while he watched. Things are only facts if HE says they are.
Do you remember back in English class the difference between past tense and future tense? I stated, no one has yet to be convicted of any kind of insurrection charge. You are not accusing me of using future tense. Try again.
[QUOTE=SgtSoros;5805696]Sarge, you state there was no freaking insurrection and there will not be a single conviction for such. Are you sure? This is the first of many, Oath Keeper is 1st to plead guilty to seditious conspiracy for Jan. 6 attack. The seditious conspiracy charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years.
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/oath-keeper-pleads-guilty-seditious-conspiracy-jan-attack/story?id=83212947&cid=social_twitter_abcn[/URL][/QUOTE]
Here is the Cambridge Dictionary defining insurrection, now you may find other dictionaries that will support your opinion. But I am tired of changing the meaning of words to suit someone's opinion. The old and established definition is:
"an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence:
These folks had zero plans for what would happen with the government once their riot was over.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5805707]You are just a fucking idiot. That's all. I've attached your dumbshit badge. You must be exhausted from being stupid for so fucking long.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5810894]snip
[/QUOTE]So Aaron mindset is basically like.
"I like the part where the report is right, unless it doesn't say what I want, then they're lying. ".
[QUOTE=Aaron Hamlet;5810885]Negative efficacy from a DNA altering clotshot using experimental substances that weren't even tested in lab rats to attack a man made virus from 400 years in the future. What could go wrong?
[/QUOTE]
Uh.... we got time travel going on in this conspiracy too? LOL
[QUOTE=SgtLurker;5812085]Here is the Cambridge Dictionary defining insurrection, now you may find other dictionaries that will support your opinion. But I am tired of changing the meaning of words to suit someone's opinion. The old and established definition is:
"an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence:
These folks had zero plans for what would happen with the government once their riot was over.[/QUOTE]What planet are you living on?? They wanted to change the outcome of the election!! I don't know how that doesn't meet the definition of an insurrection. It failed, but it was still an insurrection.