General Reports

I was in CT last night around 7-8pm. Had some spare time on my hands so I did a stroll of the old stroll - first time ever. Not a SW to be seen. There's also a new take out place on a brighty lit Tyler - sad.

[QUOTE=Phat Bastard]Things seemed to spiral down in the 90's. Think back, you were stuck in the merry-go-round in the 90's just like I was when we were stuck on Oak and Tyler for 40 minutes and drove by 30 or so SW and then hit upper Tyler after the lights and got stuck in traffic for another 40 minutes while we made the loops and saw another 30 SW's. I miss seeing the girls dressed like strippers.

How long has that been gone my friend?
Too long certainly.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Cruiser D]I was in CT last night around 7-8pm. Had some spare time on my hands so I did a stroll of the old stroll - first time ever. Not a SW to be seen. There's also a new take out place on a brighty lit Tyler - sad.[/QUOTE]

Damn that is sad....even if the take out place was good;)

Every time I drive through there it bums me out and going through Bay Village pisses me off - if there can be 5 trannies working and not getting arrested, why not real SW's?

I have a friend, she is 5'-5" 130 blonde 25yrs old, she is a WSW, usually on Harrison between traveler st and mullins way in the pm after 7pm and into the wee hours. Blue jeans heels, red striped sweater. Was hanging with her last night till she fell asleep. She will be out later tonite if your looking for a cardate. From my experience she gives the best BJ I've ever encountered, very aggressive, no gag, no rush as far as I remember. And this was a cbj, I can imagine if it were BBBJ. I'll be hooking up with her tonite, so guys check her out. Shes independent, no pimp or dudes shadowing her, I hate when I see a girl who has that going on I refuse to stop makes me uncomfortable, maybe its just me. PM me if you like and I can give you my cell if you want to reach her. I will be hanging out watching the game with some brews in my truck near Harison Ave.

FYI Gents
[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/technology/internet/07craigslist.html?hp[/url]

[QUOTE=Teejay]FYI Gents

[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/technology/internet/07craigslist.html?hp[/url][/QUOTE]Sure, let's focus on victimless crimes.

Bunch of fools.

Has anyone seen any of the local Stippers, North of Boston that work OUT/IN/CAR around. I have asked a few ladies and they say they have but aren't very open about it.

[QUOTE=Teejay]FYI Gents
[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/technology/internet/07craigslist.html?hp[/url][/QUOTE]

The New York Times, being a prime example of the death of investigative journalism, reported on this as badly as they report on politics and neglected to provide this relevant information:


"Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Washington D.C., the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam"

That's where it will take effect. Massachusetts is not among them.

[QUOTE=Phat Bastard]The New York Times, being a prime example of the death of investigative journalism, reported on this as badly as they report on politics and neglected to provide this relevant information:


"Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Washington D.C., the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam"

That's where it will take effect. Massachusetts is not among them.[/QUOTE]
Those are just the Attorneys General that were involved in the negotiations. The change in policy will be in all craigslist areas, not just those listed.

[QUOTE=Savior Faire]Those are just the Attorneys General that were involved in the negotiations. The change in policy will be in all craigslist areas, not just those listed.[/QUOTE]


Good point. Could you throw up the link to the article that said it will affect all areas? The ones I've read so far don't say that.

It does make much more sense to make the change nationally but on the other hand, why affect California, Florida, New York, Texas, Michigan, Alaska, Missouri, Alabama, Mass and Minnesota if they didn't complain.

Even still, they're asking for credit card payment in addition to phone numbers which they've already been asking for. They take throwaway phones for phone verification and if they take gift cards for payment then what we'll see is a major reduction in multiple posts which is good but unfortunately also a reduction in providers too stupid to use the gift cards.

[QUOTE=Phat Bastard]Good point. Could you throw up the link to the article that said it will affect all areas? The ones I've read so far don't say that.

It does make much more sense to make the change nationally but on the other hand, why affect California, Florida, New York, Texas, Michigan, Alaska, Missouri, Alabama, Mass and Minnesota if they didn't complain.

Even still, they're asking for credit card payment in addition to phone numbers which they've already been asking for. They take throwaway phones for phone verification and if they take gift cards for payment then what we'll see is a major reduction in multiple posts which is good but unfortunately also a reduction in providers too stupid to use the gift cards.[/QUOTE]

Well one good thing. If they have to pay to post that means they might not post the same ad every 10 minutes and we won't havt to go through 200 ads to find someone.

[QUOTE=Phat Bastard]Good point. Could you throw up the link to the article that said it will affect all areas? The ones I've read so far don't say that.

It does make much more sense to make the change nationally but on the other hand, why affect California, Florida, New York, Texas, Michigan, Alaska, Missouri, Alabama, Mass and Minnesota if they didn't complain.

Even still, they're asking for credit card payment in addition to phone numbers which they've already been asking for. They take throwaway phones for phone verification and if they take gift cards for payment then what we'll see is a major reduction in multiple posts which is good but unfortunately also a reduction in providers too stupid to use the gift cards.[/QUOTE]
The article I read was from the LA Times. It quoted the AG's Office there saying 'There was no reason for California to get involved. The changes to take effect will include California whether we got involved or not'.

[QUOTE=Rito1]Well one good thing. If they have to pay to post that means they might not post the same ad every 10 minutes and we won't havt to go through 200 ads to find someone.[/QUOTE]

Yeah exactly, no more wading through ad after ad of the same old shit we've been passing up everyday for the last few weeks just to find one that looks good enough to take a chance on. I'm still not worried, if CL really wanted to eliminate prostitution on it's site, they'd get rid of the section entirely not just make it harder to post. Though they may go that far eventually.


SV: Thanks for enough info to find a link.

[QUOTE=Phat Bastard]The New York Times, being a prime example of the death of investigative journalism, reported on this as badly as they report on politics and neglected to provide this relevant information:

"Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Washington D.C., the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam"

That's where it will take effect. Massachusetts is not among them.[/QUOTE]I wonder why Rhode Island would participate in this since prostitution is legal in the state.

[quote=pjtoms]i wonder why rhode island would participate in this since prostitution is legal in the state.[/quote]

i'd guess because the intended purpose is to save **** girls from prostitution and to save women who are caught up in trafficking and are sex slaves. those are good reasons and shit like that gives the whole sport a bad name. ri will probably be the only area that uses the new tools strictly for what they're meant for.

[QUOTE=Mmmguide]Has anyone seen any of the local Stippers, North of Boston that work OUT/IN/CAR around. I have asked a few ladies and they say they have but aren't very open about it.[/QUOTE]Mmmguide, would you mind clarifying this a bit further? You talked to whom about what? Seen where? Doing what? Thank you.