Iceland comes to grips with reality
Although I think this headline is a bit over the top, it's clear more and more countries are admitting the vaccines were a failure in conferring immunity, and are throwing in the towel on the mandates and restrictions.
[URL]https://onemileatatime.com/news/iceland-lifts-coronavirus-restrictions/[/URL]
Meanwhile, I continue to think we're only just seeing the tip of the iceberg wrt to the vaccines and their side effects. Similar to the data from North American insurers, German insurers are starting to note worrisome figures in their statistics:
[URL]https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/plus237106177/Coronavirus-Mehr-Impf-Nebenwirkungen-als-bisher-bekannt.html[/URL]
Nice try once again Waskily wabbit
A conviction is a conviction. It means, in the eyes of the law, they are guilty. End of discussion. If, later one the conviction is overturned, then and only then is the equation changed. The majority are pleading guilty to minor offences, mostly trespassing type laws which they are guilty of. As stated, one or two are guilty of assaulting an officer and I have no pity for them. So please, do not try to put words in my mouth. I made my original statement quite clear, so far, no one has been convicted of insurrection or sedition. Additionally, please tell me any other time in American history where citizens were being held in such conditions for over a year awaiting arraignment much less a trial? When have we, as a Constitutional Republic ever forced prisoners to read specifically slanted political material before allowing their case into court?
[QUOTE=TheRabbit;5795982]It's pretty common for hardliners such as yourself to set standards of evidence that are impossible to reach.
"Charges aren't convictions. ".
"Plea deals aren't convictions. ".
"Convictions won't count until they're fully appealed. ".
And then it still won't count to you because it was a biased judge / jury or a bad defense or a corrupt prosecutor or something else. Truthfully these guys getting convicted won't mean anything to you.
I know you'll dismiss this. So you can keep telling yourself whatever stories makes you happy, but that won't change reality, and that is a insurrection happen on Jan 6, get over it.
Also while you may have experience with court martials, you are not a jag, or at least you have not said anything to imply you are one. Operating on the assumption you are not a jag they shouldn't act as if they have legal understanding of cases, and if you are a jag you definitely shouldn't speculate about a case they are not familiar with.
Second, if those charged take a plea deal, why would the feds accept it if they were not getting info on someone they wanted more. Feds aren't in the habit of letting people walk unless they have bigger fish to fry.
Third, civil cases on average take 2-3 years in the US court system, and while criminal cases take less time, typically .5-1 years on average, the scale of those charged has steadily increased since the first related cases were brought. If you wish to educate yourself selves go to Capitol Breach Cases, under the DoJ's Attorney's Office, District of Colombia. That has the full list of federal cases associated with Jan 6, the charges, their individual status, and filing documents associated. I am not going to go through the 650+ cases listed and break down how many of those who pleaded guilty (200+) were charged with 'serious' crimes. I'm not going to go through the 350+ who've pleaded not guilty and went on to prove the feds had no case. Because honestly, I don't care enough to. I trust the legal system and the DoJ to do their jobs in this matter without interference on my part.[/QUOTE]