Escort Reports

Saw the ad today, anyone tried yet?

[URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/773-592-2132-185465.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=Kevin44;4035675]Visiting for a month, can someone send me some recommendations. I'll post reviews and can share details with who I've seen or if you need info for girls in Florida I got you.[/QUOTE]Any specifics on what you are looking for?

I have been happy with these who fall into the catagory of "NG Girls".

Karolina. Many good reviews, petite and hot, pics are her. [URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/847-668-3374-175133.html[/URL].

Lara. Many good reviews, curvy and really gets into it, a bit more curves than her pictures show. [URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/872-203-5527-172960.html[/URL].

Karina. Many good reviews, full of energy, pics are her. [URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/872-305-1188-176199.html[/URL].

Natalia. My favorite but moody so YMMV, pics are her. [URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/773-501-3294-183656.html[/URL].

I have not seen her but initial reports are favorable.

Monika. Pictures may not her but may come close. [URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/773-225-5388-185212.html[/URL].

This agency seems to have nice talent with some accurate pictures but price gets upcharged. Check daily for the roster.

[URL]http://european.escortbook.com/[/URL]

Looks like a new NG arrival.

[URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/773-592-2132-185465.html[/URL]

I'm pretty sure this is the same Sara who was here earlier in January, see pictures below.

If the same one, I would NOT recommend. Of all the NG crew (which I hold in high regard), she was terrible. Rushed and not professional. Pictures are an excellent work of touch up art.

If I am wrong, and she is not the Sara from January, let me know!

[QUOTE=Awge17;4035734]Saw the ad today, anyone tried yet?

[URL]https://harlothub.com/united-states/illinois/chicago/female-escorts/773-592-2132-185465.html[/URL][/QUOTE]See my post #7220. If she is the same on as before, I don't recommend.

If someone checks it out, please let me know so I can remove my post if not correct.

I'm considering a giving Ms. Jenny Lynn a try, as I have a bit of a thing for curvy curvy girls and over read pretty good things about her service. Any tips feedback from anyone who's seen her recently?

[QUOTE=LatinPoker;4036114]I'm considering a giving Ms. Jenny Lynn a try, as I have a bit of a thing for curvy curvy girls and over read pretty good things about her service. Any tips feedback from anyone who's seen her recently?[/QUOTE]I guess the real question (for those of you that have perhaps indulged in both), who would you choose between Jenny Lynn and Rachel (in lake view, mentioned in the 'non-pro' forum)? Any insights would be appreciated gents!

[QUOTE=LatinPoker;4036134]I guess the real question (for those of you that have perhaps indulged in both), who would you choose between Jenny Lynn and Rachel (in lake view, mentioned in the 'non-pro' forum)? Any insights would be appreciated gents![/QUOTE]Been a while since I've seen Jenny, but she gives much better head. Both girls are about the same size and both are really cool. Rachael gives good head, but Jenny is on a different level. I think either is a good choice, although Rachel is gone until next week sometime.

[QUOTE=Bsuh69;4036157]Been a while since I've seen Jenny, but she gives much better head. Both girls are about the same size and both are really cool. Rachael gives good head, but Jenny is on a different level. I think either is a good choice, although Rachel is gone until next week sometime.[/QUOTE]Thanks A lot for the insight! I think I'm leaning towards Jenny, would you recommend hhr or full-hr? I'm also going to put Rachel on the calendar for when I'm in the city later next month.

[QUOTE=LatinPoker;4036166]Thanks A lot for the insight! I think I'm leaning towards Jenny, would you recommend hhr or full-hr? I'm also going to put Rachel on the calendar for when I'm in the city later next month.[/QUOTE]Hh vs hr is more of your preference, Jenny did give me an incredible bbj for almost an hour straight, unsure if she is multiple pops as I didn't go for it, but you can ask.

If you're into facials, Jenny's definitely your girl!

[QUOTE=Bsuh69;4036294]Hh vs hr is more of your preference, Jenny did give me an incredible bbj for almost an hour straight, unsure if she is multiple pops as I didn't go for it, but you can ask.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BillFourFree;4032122]Her pictures on EROS make her look super skinny, is she? Are her boobs real?[/QUOTE]I would not call her super skinny. She is slender with a very nice petite body. Her boobs are very nice natural small B cups.

[QUOTE=ChicagoScott;4036327]If you're into facials, Jenny's definitely your girl![/QUOTE]Definite plus! I haven't given a proper facial in way too long!

Thanks everyone for the awesome 411 !

The booker at 262 is a B*tch. Never replies to anything or anybody, and randomly texts that she doesn't know me even though I've verified myself numerous times. I remember when I originally used their service before it was 262 she was much friendlier, but over time she's become bitter as hell and does not care about customer retention at all.

530 booker is super nice. Saw Naomi and had a great time. With the 262 booker she always responds, and has a pleasant demeanor as well. It makes the process alot more enjoyable.

Completely done with 262 service, hope they go under. 530 is the only option in the N. Burbs for me going forward.

Anyone ever have any luck at hotel bars in the area of so pm me.

[QUOTE=LatinPoker;4036346]Definite plus! I haven't given a proper facial in way too long!

Thanks everyone for the awesome 411 ![/QUOTE]LP,

Jenny is a fantastic lay. Definitely an ATF.

She is cool and fun and kinky. Cannot recommend strongly enough.

And definitely a multi-shot girl with the hour. She works for it.

Jackie.