Okay; but even Canada is still beyond Fed or States reach.
[QUOTE=RoadWarrior615;1425011]Hate to burst your bubbles but p-411 servers are in Canada and not Europe.[/QUOTE]Okay; if you're correct & I'm mistaken: obvously Canada is not in Europe. However Canada is still beyond the jurisdiction of Federal or any State (s) jurisdiction to enforce search-warrants or subpeonas! Which is the data_&_records_security issue I pointed out.
Sincerely: A K
"Canada is NOT necessarily beyond the jurisdiction of the Feds."?
[QUOTE=DanDNashMan;1426542][b]Canada is not necessarily beyond the jurisdiction of the Feds.[/b][/quote]Unless I missed the most astounding historical news since 2001 the USA has not either annexed or invaded_&_occupied Canada: it is still a [b]sovereign foreign[/b] Nation. Thus, while Canadian authorities & Canadian Courts might voluntarily cooperate occasionally with US authorities or US Courts, no US Federal or any US State Court has any [b]jurisdiction over[/b] Canadian citizens (except while they are physically present on US territory, naturally) to compel them, by subpeona or otherwise, to release confidential documents or info [b]in their possession in Canada. [/b]
[quote=DanDNashMan;1426542]However, Canada has some of the strictest internet privacy laws in the world. ISPs are not required to keep a log of who connected to a particular server. Some countries differ in this regard and the Feds have gotten records from ISPs from other countries (often required to bust child porn rings here in the USA).[/quote]Many nations have signed onto treaties or international-agreements to combat child-sexual-exploitation / child-porn & sex-slave-trafficking but, depending on the country, they might not be so easily convinced to release records of communications strictly between consening adults.
[quote=DanDNashMan;1426542]So yes as you point out. Dealing with a server in Canada you are pretty safe. Solicitation is a misdemeanor in Tennessee so I don't think too many resources would be spent in court trying to get subpoenas for info anyway.[/QUOTE]If you are simply corresponding with someone to say, in effect, that: "I'm not not either some psycho-stalker or a law-enforcement-officer, & I would like to make a date to meet you" & you NEVER refer to money or sex or sexual-activities in your communication then the charge of "Solicitation for Prostitution" (or similar) would be mighty difficult to prove in Court even to get a subpeona issued.
But all this paranoia about having your real identity on an ISP-server or in business-client-records in Canada (or in Europe) while at the same time rationalizing being willing to expose yourself to the all the risks of going to incall locations seems to me to be ludicrous! Being either detained_&_questioned by leo's if you're stopped approaching or leaving an incall location, [b]or being questioned by police while you're in the ER after you've been attacked & beaten unconcious or knifed or shot by robbers while going to or leaving an incall[/b], is hardly going to keep your identity secret from your employer or your family or your friends or your girlfriend or your wife! [b]Does anyone really want to risk all his security on some anonymous-username reviews of incall providers with fake names[/b] (on this, or other, free-bulletin-board sites)? Just so he can save a few dollars by not renting a secure motel-room & having a verified provider come OUTcall to him? How illogical & irrational is that?
Knowledge is advantage; sincerely: A K
Linsey is back. Oh, never mind.
It's funny, her ad says no texting, but this chick just texted me to tell me she is in town. I guess she keeps all of the numbers of the guys she sees and does a little direct advertising, which makes me glad I have a hobby phone. As I reported back in January, she's cute as hell but did not provide a welcoming or erotic time. So thanks for the text, baby, but I prefer the company of someone who at least pretends to enjoy herself. Of course, YMMV and she is a cute looking spinner, but not again here. Here's her BP ad that went up this morning.
[url]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/e-y-e-_-c-a-n-d-y-visiting-s-u-p-e-r-_cute-120-incall-special-19/4802470[/url]
That's a good rule of thumb, but
[QUOTE=Blackhawk 101;1428626]That's the kind of service you get with young providers! Give me a 30 yr old at her peak with curves![/QUOTE]That's always a risk with the younger ones, for sure, although I have also enjoyed some top quality young talent (a couple of well known Knoxville ladies come to mind). And while curves are great, I have a weakness for the thin spinner types, and they often tend to be on the younger side unless they're drugged out. Of course, a seasoned veteran who really knows how to use her assets is tough to beat too. Best time I ever had with a provider was a 30-something lady, long since vanished, who had a tiny build but obvious mileage, lots of experience and unlimited energy. Best of both worlds in my book, and a true PSE. Damn, I wish she would resurface.
This Girl is in the WRONG Business!
Are you kidding me? The girl is in the business of providing a fantasy and pleasure to men, women or couples. Part of any intimate encounter is physical touch. I am SICK of these providers that do not allow touch, What the F%k are they thinking? For a $100 per hour (which is quite a bit of money) there should be and must be touch all over. I can understand the use of condoms and no anal but common no sucking nipples, FIV please I can just use my hand while watching porn. Oh you did get a handjob. Sorry for your experience Hopper11 but we must teach these girls lessons and boycutt them or this bullshit will continue.
Just my $0. 03 cents.
[QUOTE=Hopper11; 1429133][url]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/lk-wh-h-wnd-ju-lw-n-x-_-l-i-n-20/5352076[/url]
I'm always interested when a new face shows up in town. Pics are very accurate, she is legit. Not a spinner, a nice curvy girl, with pierced nipples. Very clean, very friendly to talk to. She kept me waiting a few minutes in the hotel parking lot while she finished getting ready, but it was early in the day. CBJ was very nice, then CG and Doggie. She was responsive, but a little standoffish. She told me afterwards that she doesn't enjoy being touched very much. That was the major drawback-I like my hands to have free roaming, and I like a more intimate experience. So not a GFE. When I was having trouble getting to completion (perhaps due to what I just mentioned) she finished me by hand, which she did very skillfully.
So, three stars overall. Cute girl, very personable, a little aloof sexually. But, for $100, you could do much worse.[/QUOTE]
I think she might have moved
To Chattanooga. I read that somewhere not long ago, on another board I think. She was a firecracker when I saw her a couple of years ago, but some unconfirmed rumors floating around on here kept me from calling her again.
[QUOTE=Jerry1235;1429404]What ever happened to her, you might ask (or not). I heard it from a reliable source that she is retired. Time will tell, huh?[/QUOTE]
Morron alert in your neck of the woods
This guy JOKER246 asked me some info on a provider that I gave confidentualy in a pm. Well the dumbass goes and calls her and tells her everything he should do with her because I told him he could. (which was a lie) I told him that I had a great time and he asked in a pm if she kissed I said she did. BOOM thats it, so this SOB calls and tells her he wants to do this and that with her because I said he could. JOKER WTF WERE YOU THINKING? That she would open her arms and legs to you. She is massage only as her ad states, unless she's at a comfort level with a person nothing will happen. She now will not see you period!
Unless you guys want back stabbed don't give this fool the time of day.
TWO NUTTS
