Rants, Raves and Opinions AKA "The Octagon"

Been off line for a while trying to stay out of any drama. INFORMATION is critical to us all either in reviews posted back channel or however it is relayed. Drama is not necessary. Length of reviews are subject to personal taste and therefore up to the poster and if he has communicated with the lady for advice, that also. As my brother :PT says "ashes to ashes and dust to dust, if wasn't for pussy our balls would rust" So if we subscribe to the belief that reviews are critical then maybe clear concise and to the points would suffice but it is EVERYONES personal choice how they want to do it. Let's respect that also. It beats bashing the hell out of those we don't agree with. Been guilty of that on more than one occasion myself. Have a great week everyone and pop till you drop. BMack

I learned a long time ago in grad school that arguing any with doc boarders on irrationality but since we've moved this argument from ad hominem attacks to dueling quotes, let me one. James Burke, in a personal conversation once said to me:

[QUOTE]"Dweezil, hear me on this, the problem with PhDs is that they know more and more about less and less. I had a friend who received his degree for studying Dante's use of the comma. How valuable is that in the real world?"[/QUOTE]Rather than quote Nietzche via Criminal Minds, I prefer the wisdom of more timely, progressive intellectuals. Rather than comment on Nietzche's transition of the word irrationality from an adjective describing the character of an argument into an inarguable conceptual state of existence, let focus more on Argument 101.

The most challenging part of this training video is for us to determine from the case who's whom among us.

Hopefully this link works or this post is going to look dumber than shit (and even if it works, it may only improve to being dumb as shit).

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDjCqjzbvJY[/url]

On a more serious note, Jackson gave us the gift of an ignore button for a reason. There comes a point in every man's life where he has to have the balls to make that big boy decision of walking away from an argument without demanding the last word. That's what we have (had) wives for. LOL

[quote]At the end of the day a dick needs to be going into a pussy.[/quote]-Jax.

That's some deep shit there.

A2

[QUOTE=Admin2; 1762066]-Jax.

That's some deep shit there.

A2[/QUOTE]I can't decide whether to make a size joke from "deep" or an anal joke contrasting the "pussy" from Jax's quote and "shit" from yours. Maybe I shouldn't make any jokes. I don't want to break up the building tension in the Octagon.

I could tell a Mongerland story about the time Jackson had one of his famous stripper parties at the mansion. A2 told me a particular girl from Venezuela was off limits because Jax was already planing on taking her. His girlfriend (at the time) showed up at the party and that went out the window. The party was coming to and end and it was time for some dicks to go into some pussies. He looked at me and said "EricDraven! You can fuck Lunita or you can fuck Lunita and her friend Pamela but the stripper party is over and these girls came here to get fucked so make your choice!" I use exclamation points because whenever I hear his voice in my head it sounds like he's yelling. I took Lunita and it was a good choice. I didn't take both because there were other guys there ready to take whatever I didn't choose.

[QUOTE=EricDraven; 1762250]I can't decide whether to make a size joke from "deep" or an anal joke contrasting the "pussy" from Jax's quote and "shit" from yours. Maybe I shouldn't make any jokes. I don't want to break up the building tension in the Octagon.

I could tell a Mongerland story about the time Jackson had one of his famous stripper parties at the mansion. A2 told me a particular girl from Venezuela was off limits because Jax was already planing on taking her. His girlfriend (at the time) showed up at the party and that went out the window. The party was coming to and end and it was time for some dicks to go into some pussies. He looked at me and said "EricDraven! You can fuck Lunita or you can fuck Lunita and her friend Pamela but the stripper party is over and these girls came here to get fucked so make your choice!" I use exclamation points because whenever I hear his voice in my head it sounds like he's yelling. I took Lunita and it was a good choice. I didn't take both because there were other guys there ready to take whatever I didn't choose.[/QUOTE]He was yelling, it was 2AM and everybody was waiting for you to decide, Jax couldn't leave to fuck his, I couldn't go to bed, and other guy there was waiting for you to choose so he could take the other one. As a guest of the house you got to call dibs.

Although to be honest, he always yells. Queso and I joke that his voice has the property of a gas, it expands to fill whatever space it is in.

What a monumental shithead you are. LOL-there is something truly wrong with you dude.

[QUOTE=PhatDaty; 1761799]Perhaps you should book a date with one of the providers I review, and after the session ask them to be candid and tell you how you measured up.

There is no artistic license. They will tell you just what a tantric expert I happen to be.

Your entire approach here reminds me of the Hunter S. Thompson observation:

"For the rest of your life you will always be wondering what bawdy experience manly men will be experiencing sexually behind closed doors that is completely alien to you, and rather than admit your shortcomings and inadequacy, you will instead dismiss it as homo-erotica."[/QUOTE]

What I Have Learned.

Phatdaty is a Tantra Master.

Phatdaty is undisputedly the best at DATY.

If it were not for him we would not have so many providers in the area.

He has more money than most, if not all of us, to spend on the hobby.

Even though he has more money than us to spend on the hobby, he doesn't have too because he is such a great fuck the providers constantly give him discounts and extra time.

Phatdaty fashions himself as some sort of Jedi Master in the art of mongering and refers to his followers as Padawan

[QUOTE=Cincyeast52;1762326][b]Oh My God[/b] What a monumental shithead you are. LOL-there is something truly wrong with you dude.[/QUOTE]Did you just call God a shithead?

You said;

[QUOTE=TheGoodSh;1762351]PD says his reviews are a caricature. I assume he means that means they are exaggerated for effect.[/QUOTE]What he really said was.

[QUOTE=PhatDaty; 1761277]You clearly are a one dimensional thinker. Do you really believe the online persona some of us craft on the board have anything to do with who we actually are?

If so you are an idiot.

Phatdaty is simply a caricature.[/QUOTE]PD is often a pain in my ass (Dr Douchebag please don't put a gay sex spin on that, he is a figurative, not literal, pain in my ass) but he didn't say his reviews were caricatures of the events he [b]clearly[/b] said his [u]online persona[/u] was a caricature. Now you may [b]infer[/b] that because his persona is a caricature that his reviews may be less than accurate but you cannot say that [b]HE[/b] admits they are less than accurate. You knew this when you tried to pull this off and I loath the inherent dishonesty in deliberately fallacious arguments. Personally, IMHO, when I see one, I automatically assume that the person making the argument knows he is arguing in error but lacks the integrity to steal away silently.

The one thing a person trying to flame PD certainly would never lack is ammunition, he posts a lot of ego driven stuff all over this board. There is no need to make shit up about him.

Personally, and you can all note I'm speaking as myself (black ink) not the admin as I do from time to time on this board, I enjoy his reports. Further, as a long, long, long time member of all of Jax's boards with well over 2K posts in my own right, I detect a ring of truth in them. Does he embellish for theatrical effect, most likely, but I doubt there are many dishonest words in them.

[QUOTE=Admin2; 1762460]You said;

What he really said was.

PD is often a pain in my ass (Dr Douchebag please don't put a gay sex spin on that, he is a figurative, not literal, pain in my ass) but he didn't say his reviews were caricatures of the events he [b]clearly[/b] Said his [u]online persona[/u] Was a caricature. Now you may [b]infer[/b] That because his persona is a caricature that his reviews may be less than accurate but you cannot say that [b]HE[/b] Admits they are less than accurate. You knew this when you tried to pull this off and I loath the inherent dishonesty in deliberately fallacious arguments. Personally, IMHO, when I see one, I automatically assume that the person making the argument knows he is arguing in error but lacks the integrity to steal away silently.

The one thing a person trying to flame PD certainly would never lack is ammunition, he posts a lot of ego driven stuff all over this board. There is no need to make shit up about him.

Personally, and you can all note I'm speaking as myself (black ink) not the admin as I do from time to time on this board, I enjoy his reports. Further, as a long, long, long time member of all of Jax's boards with well over 2K posts in my own right, I detect a ring of truth in them. Does he embellish for theatrical effect, most likely, but I doubt there are many dishonest words in them.[/QUOTE]Phatdaty loves to put words in other posters' thoughts. Not once did I suggest that his online persona was a 100% accurate representation of who he really is. Yet you fell for it. My only criticism of Phatdaty is his braggadocio and intentional efforts to demean other users, including senior members of the board by resorting to name calling etc. My previous posts have recognized his right to brag all he wants, but if I understand the board correctly, if I keep it in the Octagon I can rant and / or rave about him. As a noob, I get I may violate rules or custom unintentionally until I get more experienced. Please tell me if I am violating rules or just being annoying like Phatdaty.

[quote]The one thing a person trying to flame PD certainly would never lack is ammunition, he posts a lot of ego driven stuff all over this board. There is no need to make shit up about him.

Personally, and you can all note I'm speaking as myself (black ink) not the admin as I do from time to time on this board, I enjoy his reports. Further, as a long, long, long time member of all of Jax's boards with well over 2K posts in my own right, I detect a ring of truth in them. Does he embellish for theatrical effect, most likely, but I doubt there are many dishonest words in them.[/QUOTE]Also, I definitely did not make anything up about him, I would not do that because integrity and truth are important to me. It may be possible that because of a delay in posting you are referring to another member. I assure you anything I referenced about Phat came directly from his posts.

Personally it seems Phat is capable of defending himself just like he is aptly capable of offending and threatening others. Again it causes me to scratch my head why so many rush to his defense. Does he need all of your help?

[QUOTE=Dr Kenneth W;1762481]Phatdaty loves to put words in other posters' thoughts. Not once did I suggest that his online persona was a 100% accurate representation of who he really is. Yet you fell for it. My only criticism of Phatdaty is his braggadocio and intentional efforts to demean other users, including senior members of the board by resorting to name calling etc. My previous posts have recognized his right to brag all he wants, but if I understand the board correctly, if I keep it in the Octagon I can rant and / or rave about him. As a noob, I get I may violate rules or custom unintentionally until I get more experienced. Please tell me if I am violating rules or just being annoying like Phatdaty.[/QUOTE]Three points.
[list]I didn't fall for shit from you. I wasn't quoting you in my post, I mentioned you because of your fascination with your perceived homosexual relationships between PD and the guys that like his posts. That is unless TheGoodSh is yet another of your alts. Which leads to point two.[/list][list]No way you're a noob, Dr Douchbag is an alt for a SR that doesn't want to post under his own name. And now I'm wondering if TheGoodSh isn't as well.[/list][list]Flame away brother it's why I made The Octagon. I've been very clear about this, don't fuck with me when I write in blue ink but anything I write with black is fair game. I have accidentally redacted posts by members here since I relaxed the rules on two occasions (because I didn't notice the thread) and on both occasions I apologized and invited them to repost.[/list]

[QUOTE=Dr Kenneth W; 1762489]Also, I definitely did not make anything up about him, I would not do that because integrity and truth are important to me. It may be possible that because of a delay in posting you are referring to another member. I assure you anything I referenced about Phat came directly from his posts.

Personally it seems Phat is capable of defending himself just like he is aptly capable of offending and threatening others. Again it causes me to scratch my head why so many rush to his defense. Does he need all of your help?[/QUOTE]I wasn't rushing to his defense, I was pointing out that the [b]other[/b] [sub]wink, wink[/sub] poster made a fallacious argument by misapplying PD's characterization of his online persona to imply that characterization included the veracity of his reports. I specifically said that PD is often a pain in my ass. My indignation arose not from the attack itself but the douchbaggery involved in the deliberate mischaracterization of PD's quote. Now you seem to be trying to do the same thing to me. I point out the douchbaggery of the [b]other[/b] [sub]wink, wink[/sub] poster and you claim it's a defense of the guy I called a pain in the ass? What's up with that twisted logic?

I'm really starting to wonder about this;

[QUOTE=Dr Kenneth W;1761323]but I know factually there are many on this board Seniors and Noobs alike who agree with me.[/QUOTE]Are all of these Seniors and Noobs that you know factually (as opposed to what I wonder) alike other alts of yours?

I'll spell this out so there can be no mistake, I'm still not defending PD, though I admit to liking his posts. I'm addressing your inaccurate assertions about what I posted and raising the question that I think there are several alts at work here because you claimed in two separate posts that I was responding to you you, when in fact I was responding to another poster.

Ok so I never stick up for anyone or jump into these school yard bullying efforts but I have had the pleasure of spending time with PD and he has always treated me much more than a provider he is gentle caring and yes as good as he says in everyone of post he is the only man whos ever made me squirt and that makes him a favorite in my book. Ya his reviews are a bit extravagant at times but he has the soul of a gifted writer and I so look forward to reading them all compared to this he said she said. It adds character and life to what used to be secretive and hush hush. I'm in no way playing the white maiden I just know if it was me he would help me. So please continue to entertain us pd we certainly need it compared to the daily drama and issues I'm sure we all are dealing with.