Sugarbabies?

Anyone meet this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6874cdea-ac09-480e-96e6-d67674de38b4[/URL]

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;6089703]Don't talk about fight club.

Most of the non-pro and UTR have no idea that some of us post to a board like this or for that matter know each other in real life.[/QUOTE]This also reinforces the fact that handoffs in the sugar bowl rarely work out well. Some women may be seeing a different SD every week but they still do not think of themselves as pros. As soon as they think they are being treated like an escort, they will cut off the offending guy (s). Of course, this can be a way of painlessly ending an arrangement that has run its course. Choose wisely.

BAM.

[QUOTE=Ccurtis;6089760]Anyone meet this one?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6874cdea-ac09-480e-96e6-d67674de38b4[/URL][/QUOTE]I have chatted with her. She tried to get money for a MnG. I declined and she is ghosting since. She also used PPM language on the site which made me nervous.

BAM.

Will pitch you on her OF account and maybe nothing more.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e55cd3b5-12c7-47a9-ac14-1f55efe08e9f[/URL]

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;6090728]Will pitch you on her OF account and maybe nothing more.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e55cd3b5-12c7-47a9-ac14-1f55efe08e9f[/URL][/QUOTE]You actually inquired thinking it is a legit ad?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0f62ec15-5e33-4d86-98c0-3b4a0fa23cb8[/URL]

Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

TSD1959.

[QUOTE=TSD1959;6091905][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0f62ec15-5e33-4d86-98c0-3b4a0fa23cb8[/URL]

Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

TSD1959.[/QUOTE]Wants 450 for PPM. Cannot host. I'm out.

[QUOTE=TSD1959;6091905][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0f62ec15-5e33-4d86-98c0-3b4a0fa23cb8[/URL]

Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

TSD1959.[/QUOTE]There are several recent posts on the forum about her.

[QUOTE=BamBam;6068217]That's odd behavior given that she volunteers to video chat on her profile. Did you ask for a video chat?

BAM.[/QUOTE]She sent me a full body selfie with most of face exposed except part blocked by camera. TSD1959.

"BlueEyeQueen02" on Seeking. Post lists Cincinnati as location and age at 20. She messaged me "hey" Saturday evening. So I messaged back the same. Went quickly to text. Says she lives in West Chester area with her family. Claims she is working regular job. Looking to earn money for her own apartment. She was "down" to get together at West Chester Hotel that night for 300 DTF. She sent a full body picture that matched her profile picture. Slender body. Did not pursue.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b9c56267-af72-4ab8-96de-7611ffa26c5e[/URL]

TSD1959.

[QUOTE=TSD1959;6093541]"BlueEyeQueen02" on Seeking. Post lists Cincinnati as location and age at 20. She messaged me "hey" Saturday evening. So I messaged back the same. Went quickly to text. Says she lives in West Chester area with her family. Claims she is working regular job. Looking to earn money for her own apartment. She was "down" to get together at West Chester Hotel that night for 300 DTF. She sent a full body picture that matched her profile picture. Slender body. Did not pursue.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b9c56267-af72-4ab8-96de-7611ffa26c5e[/URL]

TSD1959.[/QUOTE]She messaged me also this weekend but something seemed off. I asked her to send me a video of her and she did but I was still skeptical based on the quality. Then I asked her to send me a video saying a specific phrase and it was there that I confirmed that it was a voice over. I stopped communicating at that point.

[QUOTE=Goo3215;6093829]She messaged me also this weekend but something seemed off. I asked her to send me a video of her and she did but I was still skeptical based on the quality. Then I asked her to send me a video saying a specific phrase and it was there that I confirmed that it was a voice over. I stopped communicating at that point.[/QUOTE]I had "her" on text, but the pictures she sent me were good, but not unrealistically good. Since she can't host, I didn't like her enough to mess around with a hotel. Looks like I dodged one.

She's got reviews on the old backpage section.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/acf3c50a-b412-4414-954a-4b751a8390c9[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bc41b8c1-b411-48f8-bd64-5e77e760468b[/URL]

Seems to be a deposit scammer. Wants $150 CashApp, then $150 at the meet. Claims this covers the whole month. Also claims schedule is really flexible. I could ask for a video verification, but this is TGTBT.

[QUOTE=BamBam;6090529]This also reinforces the fact that handoffs in the sugar bowl rarely work out well. Some women may be seeing a different SD every week but they still do not think of themselves as pros. As soon as they think they are being treated like an escort, they will cut off the offending guy (s). Of course, this can be a way of painlessly ending an arrangement that has run its course. Choose wisely.

BAM.[/QUOTE]Seeking was much better for many reasons between 2011 to 2014 or so. But one of the good things about it was that Seeking had not yet attracted the attention of online forums like this.

In 2017 to 2018, with the passage of SESTA / FOSTA, Seeking was inundated with the scammers that used to operate on BP and CL. But it was also inundated with guys who were looking for $60 "streetscorts", and that turned off many of the women.

I'm not saying that it's bad to have this section of the forum. The environment has much changed since the old days, and this is a valuable place to bring attention to scammers. (Scammers were comparatively rare on Seeking in the old days.) Almost no college girl, however, wants to have her digits tossed back and forth in a forum like this.

It's good to publicly expose the Seeking scammers. By all means. Post the profiles. Name and shame.

More discretion should be used when talking about the Seeking girls who *do* put out. Most of them are aware of the pathways to being a public escort, and they have intentionally *not* chosen that route. They choose to be sugar babies at least partly because they *don't* want a permanent, public online record of their extracurricular activities.

One of my SBs from 2013 is now a middle manager at a major corporation in Cincinnati. I met her when she was a senior at Miami. That is the kind of quality we used to get on Seeking. And girls like that don't want to be publicly discussed like the druggies and worn-out grandmas that get talked about in the escort section of this forum. Talking about them openly, moreover, is a good way to drive them off Seeking.