Are you sure about that?
[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4377604]None of Tom's are BBFS.[/QUOTE]
Printable View
Are you sure about that?
[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4377604]None of Tom's are BBFS.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4377583]M.
Paige (new). WLA. https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/paige-escort-los-angeles-549240
.[/QUOTE]Those are some big ass looking tits for a B cup.
But Paige looks passable as far as recent M girls go. Her face doesn't look fucked up at least.
Probably refer to Megan with M.
[QUOTE=VanAlden;4377251]Is this Lucky you are discussing? Them: 21XXX7. Phone ending in 7XX8? That's not M's number that I have.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4377403]That sucks, isn't that typically if you are a provider's regular and she kind likes you, you always get BB?
I get BB from time to time with none BB girl just because they prefer certain type of people to go BB with.
A good example that Lyn is picky about seeing who, I'm sure a girl could be picky about letting you BB, so always look clean and groomed nice usually help.[/QUOTE]None BB girls are not none BB. LOL.
[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4377604]None of Tom's are BBFS.[/QUOTE]Guess you have not been with Vixen yet then.
[QUOTE=Jack926;4377644]I would say that is STRETCH, don't you think so? LOL.
Look is HIGHLY SUBJECTIVE and I do not find Lucia attractive at all. As a matter of fact when I saw her, I could not wait to get out. When I saw the ad for twin sisters and I saw it was Lucia and her sister, I was relieved as I knew I would not participate.[/QUOTE]I wasn't talking about looks which I agree is highly subjective. Now I haven't seen Chanel for whom I also haven't seen reviews that are off the charts but attitude and service for Sasha and Lucia can't be beat. Especially with Sasha who blends PSE with GFE and a sweetness and desire to please that can't be beat. And Lucia with an aggressive all out fuck fest that leaves you weak kneed the way she wants to give you more and more.
[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4377604]None of Tom's are BBFS.[/QUOTE]That's not true. Vixen is BBFS.
[QUOTE=Crism080;4377862]Guess you have not been with Vixen yet then.[/QUOTE]In my post I was responding to his question about Esther and Rachel.
In regards to "none" of any particular booker's girls being BBFS, it's realy just a game of probability. I've had BBFS with girls from every booker I know, it's just much more likely with some. Here's a rough order of likelihood from my personal experience (most likely first). These days, I play around more in the bottom half of the list. I find those girls generally more attractive and feel like they're more selective with BBFS (sharing the pussy with fewer bare dicks). Of course, it doesn't keep me from popping up to the top half of the list if I hit a "dry spell". LOL.
M.
Palace.
Kupcake.
EuKgirl / Tom / Sweetgem.
KTE.
Top / Kakaogirls / 1004 KGirl.
CV Asian / AsianVibe.
SAG / DreamKGirl.
Mango.
SixShop.
NewTopAsian.
Fruitstore.
Jewelry.
AsianGoodGirls.
J / KDolls.
[QUOTE=VanAlden;4377251]Is this Lucky you are discussing? Them: 21XXX7. Phone ending in 7XX8? That's not M's number that I have.[/QUOTE]Is THIS the Lucky you are discussing?
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/lucky-escort-los-angeles-152977[/URL]
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4376106]Oclookin16 said: She's $$$ but she's worth it. Super hot and that body is to die for! And her stories are awesome. Funniest when she walked in shower with heels. I started laughing and she said baby I'm professional.
Didn't have to even ask for BBFS. She just grabbed and stuck it in. BBFS is not my thing and scary but it was already in so wth.
Panchito33 said: Had her 2 weeks ago and even though its been a few months since I had seen her, no problems going in raw. Good times.
AsianBaller1 said: best bbfscip from M.
HapaBoy86 said: No more BBFS.
StarfishPrime said: No and she keeps yadi yada..[/QUOTE]Is it this one? [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/lucky-escoreles-217557.[/URL] or [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/lucky-es-angeles-152977[/URL].
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4377998]I wasn't talking about looks which I agree is highly subjective. Now I haven't seen Chanel for whom I also haven't seen reviews that are off the charts but attitude and service for Sasha and Lucia can't be beat. Especially with Sasha who blends PSE with GFE and a sweetness and desire to please that can't be beat. And Lucia with an aggressive all out fuck fest that leaves you weak kneed the way she wants to give you more and more.[/QUOTE]I'm surprised you haven't seen Chanel yet. But given your previous reviews I wouldn't blame you for it. Chanel isn't as sexually charged as Lucia (can't speak for Sasha. Haven't seen her yet) but she makes up for it, for me at least, in GFE. She's sweet, a lot softer in style and personality. It definitely seemed like she opened up more after the deed. I decided to finally pull the trigger after Cona told me that I should go see her. Last time Cona recommended anyone to me it was Ava, and that turned out to be fucking awesome.
[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4377604]None of Tom's are BBFS.[/QUOTE]Vixen, as said before, and I've BB'd Luna, first couple times with her she wasn't BB, though. She's very YMMV.
Anyone see Yui from ktown?
Generally I book with the bottom of that list and gotten more BBFS action from there, the first one on that list forget it LOL doesn't even respond.
[QUOTE=Dwaeji;4378139]In regards to "none" of any particular booker's girls being BBFS, it's realy just a game of probability. I've had BBFS with girls from every booker I know, it's just much more likely with some. Here's a rough order of likelihood from my personal experience (most likely first). These days, I play around more in the bottom half of the list. I find those girls generally more attractive and feel like they're more selective with BBFS (sharing the pussy with fewer bare dicks). Of course, it doesn't keep me from popping up to the top half of the list if I hit a "dry spell". LOL.
M.
Palace.
Kupcake.
EuKgirl / Tom / Sweetgem.
KTE.
Top / Kakaogirls / 1004 KGirl.
CV Asian / AsianVibe.
SAG / DreamKGirl.
Mango.
SixShop.
NewTopAsian.
Fruitstore.
Jewelry.
AsianGoodGirls.
J / KDolls.[/QUOTE]