Los Angeles County Asian Providers

[QUOTE=JayKay213;5373499]I don't know if I got bait and switch. The girl looked nothing like dahee. She looked much older. Skinny no meat, make up looked like she was crying. It didn't look like dahees pics. I was pretty disappointed first 20 min of session she was in the restroom. Not experiencing the greatness others have rated. On top of that her english was zero and couldnt understand anything[/QUOTE]Sounds like B&S but Sugarcake isn't advertising any girls other than Dahee at the moment. Not sure who you saw. Did you happen to ask her name? Personally, I always ask a girl's name when I'm meeting for the first time as a simple icebreaker and to confirm I'm seeing who I requested. Sure, she can just lie but reviews and back channeling can help unearth disingenuous kgirls and agencies for the community at large. Fake or overly exaggerated photos are common so it's best to verify.

[QUOTE=Eponymously;5372506]I wanted to repeat with Livy but she's off for a few days apparently. Scarlett was the consolation prize. Think she's booked through a few places and possibly under different names. Pics aren't her (of course), but she's very attractive. Nice face, tall (5'6" probably) and athletically built. Not a big ass but tight. Natural breasts, I think, and they're definitely a handful. Nice tone overall and has a core with some visible definition. Service was quite good with an above-average BBBJ, great GFE / DFK throughout. She let me set the pace for the most part, not one of those who have a strict script (for those who like that). Great sense of humor as well. Fans of Lexi / Victoria will enjoy her service as I did.[/QUOTE]Good review. Scarlett is an old-time fav of mine. She is always a good time. She has a shapely, curvy body and is sassy with a wicked sense of humor. I like her too.

[QUOTE=JayKay213;5373499]I don't know if I got bait and switch. The girl looked nothing like dahee. She looked much older. Skinny no meat, make up looked like she was crying. It didn't look like dahees pics. I was pretty disappointed first 20 min of session she was in the restroom. Not experiencing the greatness others have rated. On top of that her english was zero and couldnt understand anything[/QUOTE]There must be a bookers-only chat room where bookers get together, compare notes on guys and mine must say something like, " Won't complain or write negtice reviews no matter how bad you bait & switch him, will just pay 20 bucks and walk". I should start a new approach to all this.

I booked "Dahee" 2 x, and both times I got someone who looked nothing like photos, had saggy tits and was very unattractive to me. I remember lamenting, damn I just want to meet that girl in the pics someday.

So yeah. Highly possible you got b & s 'd.

"Click on this link allegedly showing Rebecca - [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/rebecca-escort-los-angeles-69252[/URL] . This is what she looked like 7 0 r 8 years ago. Does the Rebecca of today look anything like this today? Aren't ridiculously out of date photos a form of bait and switch? Aren't the donations priced for hot young beauties. Who turn out to be pleasantly plump MILFs? Should we ask for current selfies? Should you just walk out when the picture is Marilyn Monroe but the person in front of you turns out to be Momma Cass?

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5373874]Sounds like B&S but Sugarcake isn't advertising any girls other than Dahee at the moment. Not sure who you saw. Did you happen to ask her name? Personally, I always ask a girl's name when I'm meeting for the first time as a simple icebreaker and to confirm I'm seeing who I requested. Sure, she can just lie but reviews and back channeling can help unearth disingenuous kgirls and agencies for the community at large. Fake or overly exaggerated photos are common so it's best to verify.[/QUOTE]I guess I shouldve trusted my instincts when I felt something was off. Dahee wasnt listed that day and booker told me an hr later and was late. Pretty disapointing. Once I lose trust for a booker due to lies or b&s. I no longer use that booker. Back to my original bookers who don't lie. For the lucky ones who got the dahee in the picture I envy you. Sucks I drove all the way from la to oc for that bs.

[QUOTE=Humyiy;5374046]There must be a bookers-only chat room where bookers get together, compare notes on guys and mine must say something like, " Won't complain or write negtice reviews no matter how bad you bait & switch him, will just pay 20 bucks and walk". I should start a new approach to all this.

I booked "Dahee" 2 x, and both times I got someone who looked nothing like photos, had saggy tits and was very unattractive to me. I remember lamenting, damn I just want to meet that girl in the pics someday.

So yeah. Highly possible you got b & s 'd.[/QUOTE]Most likely a bait and switch. I actually went to try new agency lakangels who listed a beauty. Door opened and looked nothin like her. Peeps on forum said reverse engine search, which didn't show any clues whether was real or not maybe cause blur or photoshop. Anyhow I left. Since I drove la to oc. I thought I'd catch dahee but I got bait and switch a 2nd time. Damn scammers.

[QUOTE=JayKay213;5373499]I don't know if I got bait and switch. The girl looked nothing like dahee. She looked much older. Skinny no meat, make up looked like she was crying. It didn't look like dahees pics. I was pretty disappointed first 20 min of session she was in the restroom. Not experiencing the greatness others have rated. On top of that her English was zero and couldn't understand anything[/QUOTE]That's the real way to tell if it was Dahee or not. Only 2 or 3 girls in SoCal can match her BJ skills. It would be tough to b & s you into another girl with her skills.

Off of this recommendation, I went to see Scarlett today as well. She is very attractive, proportions are as stated. Athletics build is a big turn on for me. Breasts are not natural but small enhancements. Service was quite good and auditory feedback was good. Only thing I was concerned about was her butt. It looked like someone enjoyed the other hole a bit and was a bit swollen. But, didn't bother me too much.

Her personality is great and likes to joke around as previous stated. Definitely solid service and looks are solid as well.

[QUOTE=Eponymously;5372506]I wanted to repeat with Livy but she's off for a few days apparently. Scarlett was the consolation prize. Think she's booked through a few places and possibly under different names. Pics aren't her (of course), but she's very attractive. Nice face, tall (5'6" probably) and athletically built. Not a big ass but tight. Natural breasts, I think, and they're definitely a handful. Nice tone overall and has a core with some visible definition. Service was quite good with an above-average BBBJ, great GFE / DFK throughout. She let me set the pace for the most part, not one of those who have a strict script (for those who like that). Great sense of humor as well. Fans of Lexi / Victoria will enjoy her service as I did.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JayKay213;5375965]Most likely a bait and switch. I actually went to try new agency lakangels who listed a beauty. Door opened and looked nothin like her. Peeps on forum said reverse engine search, which didn't show any clues whether was real or not maybe cause blur or photoshop. Anyhow I left. Since I drove la to oc. I thought I'd catch dahee but I got bait and switch a 2nd time. Damn scammers.[/QUOTE]Was it same girl you saw 1st time?

"Is that Scarlett with Candygirl?

[QUOTE=OneADay;5376028]That's the real way to tell if it was Dahee or not. Only 2 or 3 girls in SoCal can match her BJ skills. It would be tough to b & s you into another girl with her skills.[/QUOTE]No deep throat, I think I now see the girl who they told me was dahee. Think it was this girl in link below. When I opened door. Priva at mkc. I imagined dahee was more meaty and not skinny bones.

Maybe these bookers are actually one booker using multiple websites to confuse mongers. Maybe its all one organization. Any how ill no longer use sugarcake.

[URL]https://mykupcake.com/Priva[/URL]

[QUOTE=HotManGuy;5376164]Off of this recommendation, I went to see Scarlett today as well. She is very attractive, proportions are as stated. Athletics build is a big turn on for me. Breasts are not natural but small enhancements. Service was quite good and auditory feedback was good. Only thing I was concerned about was her butt. It looked like someone enjoyed the other hole a bit and was a bit swollen. But, didn't bother me too much.

Her personality is great and likes to joke around as previous stated. Definitely solid service and looks are solid as well.[/QUOTE]I recall what you mean, her b-hole seemed like it maybe had some excess skin on the outside? Could be swollen or just one of those weird things across the panoply of human anatomy. Greek isn't on the menu at least, afaik.

[QUOTE=BuildingGuy;5377546]"Is that Scarlett with Candygirl?[/QUOTE]Yes, candygirl is who I used. I've seen her pics at a few other bookers as well, don't remember if the name was the same.

Hey friends,

I've decided to take my budget cushion from my "No Pay May" and fly to Brazil where I will be banging this body type (see attached) for about $50. The dollar is five times as strong as the real right now. Brazil has a lot of asians as well if you know where to look. So, learn your Portuguese! I'm mostly posting this to say, sorry for no new reviews, but I still log on to answer questions in my inbox regarding past reviews. The last was an inquiry about Rose / Cece / Lucky who was a favorite of mine (even though she was just okay for other reviewers). No, I didn't verify if it was the same girl, but yes it was the same set of pictures. As of today, those pictures were still listed at [URL]https://2pop.shop/[/URL].

Enjoy your June, everybody. Ate logo!

[QUOTE=Eponymously;5378056]I recall what you mean, her b-hole seemed like it maybe had some excess skin on the outside? Could be swollen or just one of those weird things across the panoply of human anatomy. Greek isn't on the menu at least, afaik.[/QUOTE]Ya! Okay. I'm not crazy. That was the one thing that would keep me from seeing her again. But I'm most likely going to see her again.

[QUOTE=Humyiy;5374046]There must be a bookers-only chat room where bookers get together, compare notes on guys and mine must say something like, " Won't complain or write negtice reviews no matter how bad you bait & switch him, will just pay 20 bucks and walk". I should start a new approach to all this.

I booked "Dahee" 2 x, and both times I got someone who looked nothing like photos, had saggy tits and was very unattractive to me. I remember lamenting, damn I just want to meet that girl in the pics someday.

So yeah. Highly possible you got b & s 'd.[/QUOTE]I've seen Dahee who some guys rave about. Service was pretty good but she wasn't hot. Pics might've been hers but didn't look as hot in person. I didn't get B&S because everything matched service wise with what has been said here. Top BJs for sure but not hot enough for me to repeat.