[QUOTE=Teratogen666;4998539]Hm. I'm surprised that "no" list doesn't include genital penetration[/QUOTE]That's hilarious.
It really is a long list, but sometimes I will kind of pursue something because of a certain look. But I'm generally wary of these girls so I make a few requests before I even see them. When I see them, I go over everything again before any type of exchange is made.
That said, I will discuss things with girls who start little higher than a lot of other locals would even take the time to talk to. This one starts at 500 but will go significantly lower. I also don't bare bone these girls or really care for dfk. As long as the 2 main holes are open I'm good. If the third is available that's even better.
I think bare and dfk are on a lot of girls' "no" list and a lot of the locals are into that. Cool if that's your thing, just not for me. Another user broke it down (can't recall which thread) and said that it's fine and dandy for the guys who want BBBJ, bfs, etc. , to dabble in the many providers here who will cater to that. But the ones who do this and for 150 and below are typically older, have signs of drug use, and have soft or stretched bodies.
Then there are the young girls with pretty faces, tight bodies, and no tracks or stretch marks, but they generally come at a premium and tend to provide what most guys on here call "lesser" service. I happen to be fine with them most of the time since the stuff on their "no" list isn't typically what I'm looking for anyways. When I dabble I mostly want someone fitting the latter description and for them to be less than 25 yo. I will pay the "premium" but still have my own hard limits as do we all. I've even dabbled with some girls who have been cited as GPS girls on these threads.
By no means am I the guy who pays 1 k+ for cuddles. Then again that guy turned out to not be doing that either since he posted false reports with fake pictures and was likely just getting his jollies as a fiction writer.
