Rants, Raves and Opinions AKA "The Octagon"

[QUOTE=TheGenteelMan;2852234]Everyone is certainly entitled to an opinion. However, my guess is that the stronger the opinion the more scrutiny that opinion may receive. In this particular case, I beg to differ. I am certain there are a few that would top the list of "[i]most sexy on BP[/i]" before this one. ...

[blue]Look Late night Specials The most sexy Girl on backpage Incalll - 29[/blue]

[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/looklate-night-specialsthe-most-sexygirl-on-backpage-incalll/28556854[/URL]

Feedback and /or critique welcome.[/QUOTE]She does post in Wichita Kansas at times "area code 316" I don't recall any reviews on her?

[QUOTE=TheGenteelMan;2852234]Everyone is certainly entitled to an opinion. However, my guess is that the stronger the opinion the more scrutiny that opinion may receive. In this particular case, I beg to differ. I am certain there are a few that would top the list of "[i]most sexy on BP[/i]" before this one. ...

[blue]Look Late night Specials The most sexy Girl on backpage Incalll - 29[/blue]

[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/looklate-night-specialsthe-most-sexygirl-on-backpage-incalll/28556854[/URL]

Feedback and /or critique welcome.[/QUOTE]I'm assuming she was trying to implant an impression and going for lots of clicks on the ad. Not my taste but nothing wrong with her having confidence.

[QUOTE=ProVid;2852343]I'm probably the only guy who did read that, but just to be clear are you saying that if a provider shows her pussy in her ads, or shows her pussy spread in her ads, she must be up for doing things bare? Or however you want to hint about?

Because that seems to be the gist of what you're saying, despite the "if not, then that's okay" dancing around things you're doing. I just assume all the girls who see you or get your nod of approval are doing BB. I assume all provider are going BB unless when I see them they insist on covers in an automatic way.

But maybe I'm confused. You keep talking about PSY. I'm not a fan of K-Pop in general, but Gangnam Style was indeed catchy.[/QUOTE]I am not telling you what to think I am telling you what I THINK Lets be clear about that. I have done bare and as it said in the post JUST BECAUSE I LIKE IT DOES NOT MEAN I GET FROM THE LADIES I SEE. I assume you read that also. JUST TO BE CLEAR. Whether you like it or not is your choice and I respect whatever that may be but you are not me Again I said in the post we all have our likes and there is someone out there for all the different likes each of us have. Enjoy your way of doing things and what you like and allow me the same privilege Have a good spring.

[QUOTE=FirstHalf;2852311]This has something to do with BBFS and personal choices. Not sure though.[/QUOTE]And you have deduced correctly what you read and have stated so far but read the CAPS also They say a lot also. Have a good Spring also and a great week.

[QUOTE=BigMack;2853021]I am not telling you what to think I am telling you what I THINK Lets be clear about that. I have done bare and as it said in the post JUST BECAUSE I LIKE IT DOES NOT MEAN I GET FROM THE LADIES I SEE. I assume you read that also. JUST TO BE CLEAR. Whether you like it or not is your choice and I respect whatever that may be but you are not me Again I said in the post we all have our likes and there is someone out there for all the different likes each of us have. Enjoy your way of doing things and what you like and allow me the same privilege Have a good spring.[/QUOTE]Just fucking around here. But seriously I don't think showing the pussy in ads should inspire claims of false advertising if she doesn't offer BBFS.

That just means we won't get to see as little beaver shots as we are getting now because of the stigma and shit.

[QUOTE=BigMack;2853030]And you have deduced correctly what you read and have stated so far but read the CAPS also They say a lot also. Have a good Spring also and a great week.[/QUOTE]That a woman who shows her pussy in an ad or shows her self fingering her self in an ad, is suggesting that she is offering BBFS? And if the woman in the bare pussy pics, insist on you wearing a condom, She is guilty of false advertisement? That's not what I think when I see those kinds of pictures. If most guys are coming to that conclusion, I suggest to the ladies, that they should wear latex gloves in any pictures that they are fingering themselves in. Or at least condom on the penetrating fingers. And no more full beaver shots in your ads, please consider cover your pussy with a clear dental damn. That should remove the confusion.

[QUOTE=ProVid;2853135]Just fucking around here. But seriously I don't think showing the pussy in ads should inspire claims of false advertising if she doesn't offer BBFS.

That just means we won't get to see as little beaver shots as we are getting now because of the stigma and shit.[/QUOTE]I respect your feelings Pro and no offense taken I am very open about my feelings and appreciate a good psy pic as much as the next guy but appreciate the psy even more We all have our needs and are looking for what gives us the most for our donation and that we both like to indulge in. Any reputable lady on USASG who is not into drugs alcohol and is reliable is free to contact me for playtime with absolute assurances that what happens between us stays that way Just my way of doing things Have a good one Pro.

[QUOTE=BuyingSmiles;2853271]That a woman who shows her pussy in an ad or shows her self fingering her self in an ad, is suggesting that she is offering BBFS? And if the woman in the bare pussy pics, insist on you wearing a condom, She is guilty of false advertisement? That's not what I think when I see those kinds of pictures. If most guys are coming to that conclusion, I suggest to the ladies, that they should wear latex gloves in any pictures that they are fingering themselves in. Or at least condom on the penetrating fingers. And no more full beaver shots in your ads, please consider cover your pussy with a clear dental damn. That should remove the confusion.[/QUOTE]We all have our impressions of what pictures suggest to us Love pussy picks and the psy ealso. To avoid confusion I usually ask though before taking the safari to the lady in question and under my screwtiny The mind is a terrible thing to waste and when one assumes without asking then you know what assuming might suggest. Have a good day and enjoy the heat inside and outside:)

[QUOTE=TheGenteelMan;2852234]Everyone is certainly entitled to an opinion. However, my guess is that the stronger the opinion the more scrutiny that opinion may receive. In this particular case, I beg to differ. I am certain there are a few that would top the list of "[i]most sexy on BP[/i]" before this one. ...

[blue]Look Late night Specials The most sexy Girl on backpage Incalll - 29[/blue]

[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/looklate-night-specialsthe-most-sexygirl-on-backpage-incalll/28556854[/URL]

Feedback and /or critique welcome.[/QUOTE]Feel like I've seen her at some point. At the very least I've seen the ad. I'd definitely not tell her no, and probably the sexiest ad in recent memory on BP, IMHO. To each their own though.

[QUOTE=BuyingSmiles;2853271]That a woman who shows her pussy in an ad or shows her self fingering her self in an ad, is suggesting that she is offering BBFS? And if the woman in the bare pussy pics, insist on you wearing a condom, She is guilty of false advertisement? That's not what I think when I see those kinds of pictures. If most guys are coming to that conclusion, I suggest to the ladies, that they should wear latex gloves in any pictures that they are fingering themselves in. Or at least condom on the penetrating fingers. And no more full beaver shots in your ads, please consider cover your pussy with a clear dental damn. That should remove the confusion.[/QUOTE]I am so with BuyingSmiles on this. For anyone to draw a conclusion BB is on offer just because she posts pics with a bare PSY and even inserted fingers, and then call it false advertising if she doesn't offer that up is just absurd. Why would anyone even draw that conclusion to begin with?

Just my 02.

CFG.

[QUOTE=BuyingSmiles;2853271]That a woman who shows her pussy in an ad or shows her self fingering her self in an ad, is suggesting that she is offering BBFS? And if the woman in the bare pussy pics, insist on you wearing a condom, She is guilty of false advertisement? That's not what I think when I see those kinds of pictures. If most guys are coming to that conclusion, I suggest to the ladies, that they should wear latex gloves in any pictures that they are fingering themselves in. Or at least condom on the penetrating fingers. And no more full beaver shots in your ads, please consider cover your pussy with a clear dental damn. That should remove the confusion.[/QUOTE]I'm with Buying Smiles. If a bare pussy means bareback, Does a face pic mean that COF is on the menu? If her mouth is open, is that a CIM invitation? How about an ass picture? I guess Greek is available. And of course, if she's fully clothed, I guess you only can go to first base.

Don't know if I'm aloud to post this, but I'm going to try. This afternoon I was setting up a dream with a client from Detriot, MI. He used a text app, which I realize is pretty common. I got two references from him, one returned my text and told me that the number was not recognized; however, the other agency (based out of Detriot, I googled the number) returned my text stating that he was OK. Long story short, In my dream, he told me that he left his wallet in his car. I told him I would walk to the car with him. Of course, no wallet to be found. States he must have left it at a gas station. He then sped off. Out of curiousity, I called the number he had which is 586-580-48* He blocked my number, but he is still using it as I called from a different number. Please beware. The number is still active which leads me to believe he plans on doing this again. He claims he is a consultant to a major automotive name and travels here frequently from Detriot. He says he is staying on Florence.

Who have been reviewed as offering the "forbidden" fruit to their clients who showed up with no covers expecting the woman to hve them or just offering it to the men. Their locations are for you to RTF and find but if I can find them you should be able to. Not saying this happens with all of their clients but again it has been included in the reviews. Some have partaken some have refused Mans choice to refuse ladies choice to offer. As I have said many times I do not kiss and tell nor again caps here DO I ALWAYS GET IT when a woman asks me what I want in playtime. Ladies choice Always has been always will be. RTF all five display the sacred COOCHIE and all give it up or have been reported to have offered it. There are men who want it and seek it and there are ladies who for whatever reason, they like cock they need dollars to pay bills buy clothes for themselves or kids WHATEVER reason / s it is out there The challenge is to find the ones who aren't into drugs have good reputations as providers and are considered quality ladies on the boards by the men. Just my opinion and apparently the opinions of some others who have been offered it. As I have said before there is someone and something out there for everyone Just a matter of finding it. The Louisville board has a list that has been created of ladies who allegedly have offered it and many of them with fine reputations. They even have a thread down there for it. It is out there if you seek it discretely and ask whether openly ask or Back channel. Just my opinion and my last one on this topic Have a good Spring and turn up the heat. No judgements on my part just stating what has been reported on a sex site dedicated to fiinding pussy and good loving for the men who need it and seek it to supplement their dry spells at home

I don't care is somebody has 1 post or 1,000,000 posts. Can we start mixing in some damn paragraphs?

One looooong ass non paragraphed group of words with 10,000 different points in it, makes it terribly difficult to read.

I'm in heavy construction, so I'm not a white collar, sit-at-desk, suit and tie, grammar nazi. But damn.

[QUOTE=BigMack;2854951] No judgements on my part just stating what has been reported on a sex site dedicated to fiinding pussy and good loving for the men who need it and seek it to supplement their dry spells at home[/QUOTE]I really don't think there's too much concern here about you judging anyone. No one here disputes that BBFS happens, and some are more "eaten-up" about it than others. But making a rant that chicks who show their pussy in an advertisement is a datapoint for determining BBFS offerings is pretty misguided.

If you play the stock market with those types of indicators you wouldn't have enough money for pussy.

And for the love of sweet little jesus, please learn to use some fucking paragraphs.

[URL]https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Paragraph[/URL]