Escort Classified Ads - Member Discussions

[QUOTE=Stimulus;1492312]I've got to second the motion that the board name of the informant should be revealed. It is in the best interest of the ladies that they know not to do business with this guy and it's best the mongers know so we don't give information to him which could be used to harm someone.[/QUOTE]I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, but I seem to remember reading somewhere that revealing the name of someone like the informant could be considered obstructing justice if they are still being used.

Like I said, I'm not a lawyer and I may just be remembering an old Law & Order episode. .

As always, check with your legal counsel and YMMV.

C

Had a short dream about your Boo again late last night and again early this morning. I just can't get enough of her amazing oral skills.

Sorry to hear about the people who ran into trouble with LE.

I am not an attorney either. I have, however, been a hobbyist for quite some time, and I have been following the trends since the pre-Internet era.

A few generalizations:

- Just as LE does not stop every speeder, LE is also uninterested in making every provider / hobbyist bust. They prioritize for certain issues.

- The biggest red flags, of course, are any sort of human trafficking or minor involvement. We have *none* of that on the local scene; and I think that all of us would be supportive if LE *did* bust something like that. What goes on locally is consenting adults engaging in consensual behavior. Theoretically, at least, it should be fairly easy to do this without it becoming a police issue.

- So. The next big red flag for LE is anything that is too open, too flagrantly "in your face" for Joe or Jane Public. This is why streetwalkers are always such a target. From the public perspective, SWs are a nuisance. AMPs that locate themselves in suburban strip malls are a close second.

- Another big red flag is raised when a lone woman with a local address on her driver's license rents a hotel room, and has multiple male visitors throughout the day. Often it is the hotel staff themselves who are informing police. No hotel manager wants his facility to become a haven for escort activity, and they are usually very vigilant about looking for the telltale signs.

- However, this seems to be the dominant business model that Cincy-area providers use, even though it is the most dangerous. Whenever you call one, they always say,"incall in a hotel." And I always say,"If you want my business, you're going to have to come to my house."

- When I was in Columbus in the 1990s, providers would *only* provide outcall to a private residence that was registered in a phone directory. If the local providers in Cincinnati would follow this practice, they would eliminate 90% of the arrest issues. While not impossible, it is far more costly and logistically difficult for LE to stage a "sting" in a suburban environment. Think about it: They have to rent a house or a condo on an ongoing basis. Again. I know there are ways around it; but it is *far* more difficult, compared with the ease of conducting a sting in a hotel room.

- It is also far less likely that outcall to a private residence would generate complaints to LE in the first place. When a provider sets up camp in a hotel room, everyone knows what is going on. When a provider comes to my front door, my neighbor assumes that she is my friend or GF dropping by for a visit, as long as her clothing and demeanor are discreet. Therefore, no calls to LE about "suspicious activity."

- Therefore, I almost never use incall services. Too much risk for everyone involved.

- Bottom line: Until the business model shifts to outcall to private residences, both providers and hobbyists will continue to show up on these police reports.

I just want to say if you haven't meet your boo then you just don't know what you are missing. This girl has some great oral skills. I wish I could take her with me when I deploy. She has such a big heart and it shows with everything she does. She aims to please in every way I could ever imagine. Thank you Boo I don't think my leave would've been the same without you. Don't Forget.

[QUOTE=Todd Cincy; 1492497]Sorry to hear about the people who ran into trouble with LE.

I am not an attorney either. I have, however, been a hobbyist for quite some time, and I have been following the trends since the pre-Internet era.

A few generalizations:

- Just as LE does not stop every speeder, LE is also uninterested in making every provider / hobbyist bust. They prioritize for certain issues.

- The biggest red flags, of course, are any sort of human trafficking or minor involvement. We have *none* of that on the local scene; and I think that all of us would be supportive if LE *did* bust something like that. What goes on locally is consenting adults engaging in consensual behavior. Theoretically, at least, it should be fairly easy to do this without it becoming a police issue.

- So. The next big red flag for LE is anything that is too open, too flagrantly "in your face" for Joe or Jane Public. This is why streetwalkers are always such a target. From the public perspective, SWs are a nuisance. AMPs that locate themselves in suburban strip malls are a close second.

- Another big red flag is raised when a lone woman with a local address on her driver's license rents a hotel room, and has multiple male visitors throughout the day. Often it is the hotel staff themselves who are informing police. No hotel manager wants his facility to become a haven for escort activity, and they are usually very vigilant about looking for the telltale signs.

- However, this seems to be the dominant business model that Cincy-area providers use, even though it is the most dangerous. Whenever you call one, they always say,"incall in a hotel." And I always say,"If you want my business, you're going to have to come to my house."

- When I was in Columbus in the 1990s, providers would *only* provide outcall to a private residence that was registered in a phone directory. If the local providers in Cincinnati would follow this practice, they would eliminate 90% of the arrest issues. While not impossible, it is far more costly and logistically difficult for LE to stage a "sting" in a suburban environment. Think about it: They have to rent a house or a condo on an ongoing basis. Again. I know there are ways around it; but it is *far* more difficult, compared with the ease of conducting a sting in a hotel room.

- It is also far less likely that outcall to a private residence would generate complaints to LE in the first place. When a provider sets up camp in a hotel room, everyone knows what is going on. When a provider comes to my front door, my neighbor assumes that she is my friend or GF dropping by for a visit, as long as her clothing and demeanor are discreet. Therefore, no calls to LE about "suspicious activity."

- Therefore, I almost never use incall services. Too much risk for everyone involved.

- Bottom line: Until the business model shifts to outcall to private residences, both providers and hobbyists will continue to show up on these police reports.[/QUOTE]This couldn't have been said any better. I totally agree and thanks for writing it.

I have had the pleasure of meeting your boo and in my experience I believe she is one of the best providers around. I have traveled the world with the miltary and play the field alot and she definately ranks at the top for skill and she really enjoys what she does. Most providers are here just for the money and yes I'm sure boo is here for that as well but her rates and quality of skills says otherwise. She should charge far more than she does. I have been with providers that charge double and even triple what she does and didn't get a 1/8 of the pleasure as I did with boo. Since I was short on time with this visit I am looking forward to meeting again to enjoy more time with her, she is a keeper please treat her right.

Choose wisely? From whom should I choose if I am not going to associate with a known law-breaker? Hmmm?

As has been pointed out in the past, every one of us who engages in "the Hobby" is a [B][I]known [/I][/B]law-breaker. It doesn't matter if you have been caught or not. You are knowingly breaking the law. Every time.

Although I get the gist of what you are trying to say, the logic of your argument is faulty on several points. Here are just a couple:

1) Are you suggesting the person be banned from "the Hobby" or just this Site? I'm assuming that you mean this Site, since I don't know how you could possibly "ban" them from the Hobby.

2) How are you going to "ban" someone from this Site if they are arrested? Jackson certainly can't continually check every person who is a member of this Site for arrest records. I doubt it would be legal even if he were so inclined. So, how are you going to even know that someone was arrested unless they admit it or someone happens across the information?

3) As has been pointed out, when the Providers and Clients here are banned from this Site after they are arrested, this place is going to become a cyber ghost town. Then who is going to provide Services or Information?

What you are suggesting is irrational. I think Crissee has pretty much nailed it (no puns intended). Be an adult and act responsibly. If you are not prepared to "associate with a known [I][fill in the blank][/I]," then you need to get out of the Hobby. Simple.

We should all be as careful as we possibly can, but that is no guarantee that you won't get implicated, questioned, or arrested. In fact, the longer you do this and the more times that you participate, I would hazard an educated guess that the more likely it is that you [B][I]will [/I][/B]get implicated, questioned, or arrested. The [B][I]only[/I][/B] way to avoid it is to [U]not do it[/U].

'Nuff said.

As a personal aside, I would like to thank Crissee for informing us of what happened and giving us details. I think that is commendable of her. And in my opinion, she is among the most articulate and reasoned of the members of the USASG Cincinnati Forum. Something that I fear is sorely lacking at times.

Be safe, be well.
JRW1

[QUOTE=Brass1964;1492266][I]portions of this post were deleted for clarity[/I]

Would you associate with a known pedophile, a known drug-dealer, a known thief, a known wife-beater?

My advice; Choose wisely.

I have said my piece.

Brass[/QUOTE]

Some very good points and some food for thought. Thank you, Todd Cincy.

A couple of thoughts, though.

Not everyone is in a position to have a Provider come to them at their home (wife, girlfriend, family, neighbors, etc.). Having one Provider come by might be passed off as a girlfriend or something, but having multiple different Providers come by [B][I]could [/I][/B]arouse suspicion.

Having a Provider come to your home can be dangerous, since they can return at will for several types of unpleasant purposes. This has been a problem that has been reported several times on this Forum (refer to the Rip Off Reports and other threads).

If you don't have them come to your home, renting a hotel room yourself results in additional cost for the hotel room and sometimes the Provider (outcall rates tend to be higher for some reason). Plus, your information usually has to be left at most somewhat nice hotels. I prefer to leave as little information as a trail as possible in this Hobby.

Not every Provider wants "a lot of" guys coming to their home (husband, boyfriend, family, neighbors, etc.). A lot of different men coming to a Provider's home [B][I]might/would[/I][/B] tend to attract the attention of the neighbors and at least raise some potentially uncomfortable questions.

Most Providers can't afford to have a "separate" house to work out of if they don't want to work out of their homes. So... hotels end up being the choice.

I think you are accurate on almost everything that you said. Nevertheless, there are still problems to overcome before what you suggest could become a reality.

JRW1



[QUOTE=Todd Cincy;1492497]Sorry to hear about the people who ran into trouble with LE.

I am not an attorney either. I have, however, been a hobbyist for quite some time, and I have been following the trends since the pre-Internet era.

A few generalizations:

- Just as LE does not stop every speeder, LE is also uninterested in making every provider / hobbyist bust. They prioritize for certain issues.

- The biggest red flags, of course, are any sort of human trafficking or minor involvement. We have *none* of that on the local scene; and I think that all of us would be supportive if LE *did* bust something like that. What goes on locally is consenting adults engaging in consensual behavior. Theoretically, at least, it should be fairly easy to do this without it becoming a police issue.

- So. The next big red flag for LE is anything that is too open, too flagrantly "in your face" for Joe or Jane Public. This is why streetwalkers are always such a target. From the public perspective, SWs are a nuisance. AMPs that locate themselves in suburban strip malls are a close second.

- Another big red flag is raised when a lone woman with a local address on her driver's license rents a hotel room, and has multiple male visitors throughout the day. Often it is the hotel staff themselves who are informing police. No hotel manager wants his facility to become a haven for escort activity, and they are usually very vigilant about looking for the telltale signs.

- However, this seems to be the dominant business model that Cincy-area providers use, even though it is the most dangerous. Whenever you call one, they always say,"incall in a hotel." And I always say,"If you want my business, you're going to have to come to my house."

- When I was in Columbus in the 1990s, providers would *only* provide outcall to a private residence that was registered in a phone directory. If the local providers in Cincinnati would follow this practice, they would eliminate 90% of the arrest issues. While not impossible, it is far more costly and logistically difficult for LE to stage a "sting" in a suburban environment. Think about it: They have to rent a house or a condo on an ongoing basis. Again. I know there are ways around it; but it is *far* more difficult, compared with the ease of conducting a sting in a hotel room.

- It is also far less likely that outcall to a private residence would generate complaints to LE in the first place. When a provider sets up camp in a hotel room, everyone knows what is going on. When a provider comes to my front door, my neighbor assumes that she is my friend or GF dropping by for a visit, as long as her clothing and demeanor are discreet. Therefore, no calls to LE about "suspicious activity."

- Therefore, I almost never use incall services. Too much risk for everyone involved.

- Bottom line: Until the business model shifts to outcall to private residences, both providers and hobbyists will continue to show up on these police reports.[/QUOTE]

Now I normally don't wright too many reviews on my hobby. But for the first time in many months, this experience was mind blowing. The environmentwas great, clean, fresh, great location, very comforting hotel room. She was absolutely gorgeous, her smile lit up the room, her body was so perfect I couldn't take my eyes off of her for a second. Her lovely personality makes you feel so relaxed and comfortable makes the experience so much better. I could go on for hours on

Positive Comments on The Lovely Aubre. But I highly recommended you gentlemen to see for yourself. Hopefully you fel the same and wright her a review also. You can find her contact information on cincinnati backpage ' The Lovely Aubre! '

I would never bring a provider to my house regardless. I'll take my chances at a hotel and if necessary, rent it myself. If I were a provider - besides being broke because I am somewhat ugly - I wouldn't have clients coming to my home. I will take a motel / hotel any day over a private residence. That's not to say I won't go to a provider's home, but they will NEVER come to mine. I had one psycho encounter that really reaffirmed my personal position on this.

-BigBird69.

[QUOTE=Jry Wild1; 1492660]Some very good points and some food for thought. Thank you, Todd Cincy.

A couple of thoughts, though.

Not everyone is in a position to have a Provider come to them at their home (wife, girlfriend, family, neighbors, etc.). Having one Provider come by might be passed off as a girlfriend or something, but having multiple different Providers come by [B][I]could [/I][/B]arouse suspicion.

Having a Provider come to your home can be dangerous, since they can return at will for several types of unpleasant purposes. This has been a problem that has been reported several times on this Forum (refer to the Rip Off Reports and other threads).

JRW1[/QUOTE]

I've been having providers to my home / apartment since 1992. Not one single issue. I have even had a few cases when I had to ask the woman to leave, due to bait and switch situations. Once again-never a problem.

(I did, though, have a problem with a psycho ex-girlfriend who kept returning to my home. So perhaps the moral of the story is that one should allow providers to one's home, but not girlfriends.)

On the other hand, I have encountered numerous dicey situations in hotel rooms, including one time when I missed a police raid by only an hour. (I found out about it later on the boards.) That settled it for me: no more hotel rooms. I also avoid AMPs-even though I love Asian women. Once again: I don't want to be caught with my pants down in a strip mall AMP when LE comes through the front door.

Hotel rooms provide a false sense of confidence: You are much more vulnerable there than you think you are.

I do, however, agree with you that providers should not have clients to their personal homes.

The safest arrangement for everyone involved is outcall to the client's verified residence.

P.S.: I had a conversation about this with an agency owner once, who had the above policy I advocate. He told me that *every* single LE-related problem he had occurred in a hotel room. But he had no problems at clients' private residences, which is why he mandated residential outcall for first appointments, at least.

[QUOTE=BigBird69; 1492685]I would never bring a provider to my house regardless. I'll take my chances at a hotel and if necessary, rent it myself. If I were a provider. Besides being broke because I am somewhat ugly. I wouldn't have clients coming to my home. I will take a motel / hotel any day over a private residence. That's not to say I won't go to a provider's home, but they will NEVER come to mine. I had one psycho encounter that really reaffirmed my personal position on this.

-BigBird69.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Todd Cincy;1492708]I've been having providers to my home / apartment since 1992. Not one single issue. (Edit Delete) On the other hand, I have encountered numerous dicey situations in hotel rooms, (Edit Delete) Hotel rooms provide a false sense of confidence: You are much more vulnerable there than you think you are. (Edit Delete) The safest arrangement for everyone involved is outcall to the client's verified residence. (Edit Delete)[/QUOTE] I don't think we can say which is safer, incall (and where) or outcall (and where). Different situations present different risks. Nothing in the hobby is without risk.

When we have girls in our home we don't have the option of walking out. We are certainly not protecting our personal identity. I know that Todd has considered this. In return we are probably safer from a law enforcement sting because we are making it inefficient for law enforcement to spend the extra time necessary for the opportunity to bust just one hobbyist unless they are trying to get a high profile hobbyist. Undercover female law enforcement is also less likely to come inside our residence alone. Her backup cannot protect her once she is inside. In exchange for our enhanced safety from law enforcement every girl we see will have our personal information. That may not be enhanced safety when all the risks are considered. We have to balance the risks based upon our own situation.

I agree with Todd that hotels are risky.

The bottom line is we are like the chickens we see by the county road where one chicken in the group has been run over. Maybe that chicken didn't look, maybe it had to do with crossing the road one time too many. We are those chickens.

I like this topic.

So sweet thanks babe. Hope to see you again babe I had a great time too!

[QUOTE=Jry Wild1; 1492635]Choose wisely? From whom should I choose if I am not going to associate with a known law-breaker? Hmmm?

As has been pointed out in the past, every one of us who engages in "the Hobby" is a [B][I]known [/I][/B]law-breaker. It doesn't matter if you have been caught or not. You are knowingly breaking the law. Every time.

Although I get the gist of what you are trying to say, the logic of your argument is faulty on several points. Here are just a couple:

1) Are you suggesting the person be banned from "the Hobby" or just this Site? I'm assuming that you mean this Site, since I don't know how you could possibly "ban" them from the Hobby.

2) How are you going to "ban" someone from this Site if they are arrested? Jackson certainly can't continually check every person who is a member of this Site for arrest records. I doubt it would be legal even if he were so inclined. So, how are you going to even know that someone was arrested unless they admit it or someone happens across the information?

3) As has been pointed out, when the Providers and Clients here are banned from this Site after they are arrested, this place is going to become a cyber ghost town. Then who is going to provide Services or Information?

What you are suggesting is irrational. I think Crissee has pretty much nailed it (no puns intended). Be an adult and act responsibly. If you are not prepared to "associate with a known [I][fill in the blank][/I]," then you need to get out of the Hobby. Simple.

We should all be as careful as we possibly can, but that is no guarantee that you won't get implicated, questioned, or arrested. In fact, the longer you do this and the more times that you participate, I would hazard an educated guess that the more likely it is that you [B][I]will [/I][/B]get implicated, questioned, or arrested. The [B][I]only[/I][/B] Way to avoid it is to [U]not do it[/U].

'Nuff said.

As a personal aside, I would like to thank Crissee for informing us of what happened and giving us details. I think that is commendable of her. And in my opinion, she is among the most articulate and reasoned of the members of the USASG Cincinnati Forum. Something that I fear is sorely lacking at times.

Be safe, be well.

JRW1[/QUOTE]Before I concede any or all of your points of contention, which I will most humbly do, let's hear from a gentlemen that has been arrested.

If you could please provide me the links to any forum posts that will provide the members of this site the other side of the story.

Feel free to post those links in a response to this post, or, if you are more comfortable, please send me a PM. Either way, upon reading those articles, I will apologize directly to Crissee in an open forum.

Brass

Not sure how I missed her for as long as I did, but fortunately I found her this week. Recently noticed a review here which led me to contact this truly nice young lady. We hit it off and had a great time together. The only thing that surpasses her skills as a provider is her genuine personality; she is a keeper. Low key and as nice as they come. Thanks sweetheart for a great visit. Highly recommend if BBW is on your menu.

Thank you for your kind words. I really enjoyed our time together.

Before someone points it out, I know this topic belongs in "General Reports" or somewhere else. But like Golfcart, I like this topic. It has been a good, relevant to the Hobby discussion; filled with thoughtful comments and opinions. And as a side benefit, it has been drama-free.

I agree that there will be no final "this is the way it should be done" type answer, but it has provided much to contemplate. Perhaps we will all (Providers and Hobbyists) benefit from the consideration of where we partake of the hobby. Anything that leads to safer encounters is going to be a good thing.

Obviously, having a Provider come to the Client's home has worked well for some (e.g. Todd Cincy). It has worked out horribly for others (e.g. Selective69). I have known Providers who work out of their own home and that seems to work out well for them (especially if they are a low-volume Provider). I have rented hotel rooms myself for outcall (don't personally like that, as I noted in my previous post). I have seen Providers in hotels for incall (obviously). They all [I]work[/I], but there are varying degrees of risk, reward, safety, and privacy for each.

I think Crissee's and Sinful Dreams' idea of moving very frequently to different parts of the city and different hotels sounds like a "best practice" for hotel incall. I agree that more upscale hotels are [I]probably [/I]better than the no-tels, which tend to be targets for LE. This solution is still not perfect, of course. For instance, you never know if the Provider is near where you are or if you'll have to drive 45 minutes to see her until you find out where she is that day.

The best choice might be for the Hobbyist or Provider to have a totally separate residential location to use for the Hobby. That might be the best mix of protection from LE and privacy. However, this solution involves having the money to purchase/rent this alternate residential location. And before someone thinks of it, don't consider "going in together" with other Hobbyists or Providers to purchase/rent this residential location. Just think, a number of Providers or Hobbyists all going to the same place to engage in these activities is going to get noticed and become a beacon target for LE.

Contributing to the discussion,
JRW1



[QUOTE=Sinful Dreams;1492815]I like outcalls, however it seems more are after the Incalls because of their "situation" whatever it may be. I make sure I don't go to the same hotel twice, and I go to different areas of the tri-state. I don't do the right up to the door hotels, because to me that is asking to be caught. And I don't do the notels either, because that shows a lot about who you are as a provider, and not caring about the client. I like nice hotels, and where there is an elevator and really the front desk doesn't even pay attention, versus a smaller hotel they do.

I will not ever do an incall out of my personal home, so I agree with everyone on that. The saying goes, do not shit where you eat. And basically the same goes for incalls in a providers personal home. I thought about getting another apartment just for that, but haven't made up my mind just yet.

Everyone including clients just needs to be safe, and practice common sense, and there will be a lot less to worry about. I do my reference checks, and am very cautious and smart.

Be Safe, Be Careful.

Ally[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Golfcart;1492783]I don't think we can say which is safer, incall (and where) or outcall (and where). Different situations present different risks. Nothing in the hobby is without risk.

When we have girls in our home we don't have the option of walking out. We are certainly not protecting our personal identity. I know that Todd has considered this. In return we are probably safer from a law enforcement sting because we are making it inefficient for law enforcement to spend the extra time necessary for the opportunity to bust just one hobbyist unless they are trying to get a high profile hobbyist. Undercover female law enforcement is also less likely to come inside our residence alone. Her backup cannot protect her once she is inside. In exchange for our enhanced safety from law enforcement every girl we see will have our personal information. That may not be enhanced safety when all the risks are considered. We have to balance the risks based upon our own situation.

I agree with Todd that hotels are risky.

The bottom line is we are like the chickens we see by the county road where one chicken in the group has been run over. Maybe that chicken didn't look, maybe it had to do with crossing the road one time too many. We are those chickens.

I like this topic.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ImTheMan99; 1492668]Now I normally don't wright too many reviews on my hobby. But for the first time in many months, this experience was mind blowing. The environmentwas great, clean, fresh, great location, very comforting hotel room. She was absolutely gorgeous, her smile lit up the room, her body was so perfect I couldn't take my eyes off of her for a second. Her lovely personality makes you feel so relaxed and comfortable makes the experience so much better. I could go on for hours on

Positive Comments on The Lovely Aubre. But I highly recommended you gentlemen to see for yourself. Hopefully you fel the same and wright her a review also. You can find her contact information on cincinnati backpage ' The Lovely Aubre! '[/QUOTE]Seen the ad but no one of credit has reported on her think she also put ad here on USA.

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-lovely-aubreincalls-only-tri-county-area-off-of-kemper-rd-20/10504147[/url]

Anyone I trust seen her?

MilitaryMan513, want to Play, Loves Ass thank you for your kind words. I don't know how I missed seeing your reviews earlier. I really enjoyed our times together and can't wait for our next visit. Want to Play I will never forget. See each of you soon, Hugs and kisses.

I saw her and it was o good time.

Lite GFE.

I would repeat.

[QUOTE=Caligulaxxx; 1493261]Seen the ad but no one of credit has reported on her think she also put ad here on USA.

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-lovely-aubreincalls-only-tri-county-area-off-of-kemper-rd-20/10504147[/url]

Anyone I trust seen her?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Brass1964; 1492839]Before I concede any or all of your points of contention, which I will most humbly do, let's hear from a gentlemen that has been arrested.

If you could please provide me the links to any forum posts that will provide the members of this site the other side of the story.

Feel free to post those links in a response to this post, or, if you are more comfortable, please send me a PM. Either way, upon reading those articles, I will apologize directly to Crissee in an open forum.

Brass[/QUOTE]That is fucking hysterical. From the guy who proposes that anybody who gets arrested gets banned from this board!

Good luck with that.

-BigBird69

I am interested. Has anyone seen her or have any intel?

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/avail-able-right-now-22/10522073[/url]

Good things do happen on Friday 13th! Great GFE time with a nice bodied spinner. Decent location, Friendly service, good skills, as Aronld said, I'll be back!

This women is all about customer service. Her skills are excellent. I came away very satisfied and would call it a great GFE experience.

She is my all, all, all-time fave. Period. Can't say enough other than if you haven't seen her you should.

First the TL / DR version of the review for those of you in a hurry: A+. Pictures and menu are as listed (looks better than the pictures, IMHO). Pricey compared to some on this board, but you will know where those extra roses went when you go there, and my buddy will be going back there, I assure you. Smart, clean, professional, beautiful; no real downside. Highly recommended.

Details:

Floored.

If you made my friend describe the experience in one word, that would be it. Ally would typically reside out of my buddy's typical comfort zone in terms of rates ($$) , but he's had a pretty good month, so he decided to make an exception, and that was probably one of the better decisions he's ever made in terms of the hobby.

The incall was a nice hotel (*very* nice by typical hobby standards) , and when she answered the door, it was clearly the girl in the pictures, but they didn't really do her justice. He says this woman is pretty overwhelmingly good looking, and an excellent conversationalist to boot. After a few minutes of the typical "get comfortable, get to know you" typically associated with a first meeting, it was right down to business, and business was good. Everything was on the menu (even one or two things I wouldn't have guessed.) and it was all delicious. Service was always with a smile, never rushed at any point, and very good to boot."Accommodating" would be an understatement.

The bottom line is this: Ally may have turned my friend in a quality-over-quantity kind of hobbyist, and he's always been the diametric opposite of that. If spending a little more and hobbying a little less because of it is what gets you in to see Ally once or twice, he can advise giving it whirl. He's spent at that level in the past but was never really satisfied with the results (or at least, the results were not significantly different than what he got for spending less). This one was different, so this is what he'll try going forward.

Questions / comments / concerns all welcome via PM

Saw this lady posting a new ad on backpage did a google search on her phone and pics but nothing came up. Wanted to know if anyone called her or seen her or has intel?

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/great-time-with-a-great-lady-30/10535826[/url]

Had a wonderful time with your Boo. She is a wonderful woman with amazing skills. She is definately a keeper. Treat her right.

I had another visit with Boo and all I can say is "wow" she really knows how to please a man. This girl really knows how to give one heck of a good BBBJ and offers an open menu. I wished I could keep her all to myself. She is a must see.

[QUOTE=Sway2012; 1493567]I am interested. Has anyone seen her or have any intel?

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/avail-able-right-now-22/10522073[/url][/QUOTE]I took the plunge on this one and answered my own question. Excellent service, one of the best I have had actually. Highly recommend to anyone seeking a chocolate dream.

I agree Byron, she is a gorgeous, sweet GFE & great value. As MacArthur said "I shall return." She is looking for regulars, easy to set up 513-703-6937.

[QUOTE=ByronDee;1493611]Good things do happen on Friday 13th! Great GFE time with a nice bodied spinner. Decent location, Friendly service, good skills, as Aronld said, I'll be back![/QUOTE]

Has anyone seen Genevieve that has been posting on here?

Anybody seen her? I'm cautious because her posts / ads also seem to link back to another girl, Alexandria. That seems fishy to me for some reason. The phone number and previous posts seem to switch back and forth.

[url]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?6324-Escort-Classified-Ads-Posted-by-Escorts-No-Reviews-or-Commentary&p=1495396&viewfull=1#post1495396[/url]

I had the pleasure of meeting with your boo earlier today. Her reviews on here are dead on. She is a sweet and beautiful woman. Nice oral skills and enjoys what she does. Nice menu and I had the pleasure of trying greek for the first time. Easy to schedule. I will repeat soon.

[QUOTE=Browsing35; 1495851]Anybody seen her? I'm cautious because her posts / ads also seem to link back to another girl, Alexandria. That seems fishy to me for some reason. The phone number and previous posts seem to switch back and forth.

[url]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?6324-Escort-Classified-Ads-Posted-by-Escorts-No-Reviews-or-Commentary&p=1495396&viewfull=1#post1495396[/url][/QUOTE]Yep! I have seen her. She is good to go. Look for details under my posts.

[QUOTE=DatDude1799;1495685]Has anyone seen Genevieve that has been posting on here?[/QUOTE]Yes I believe several have, including myself. She was pretty wonderful, young, sexy, sweet, and extremely beautiful. All this at a very reasonable cost. Definitely worth it (and more). As always, Walt.

[QUOTE=Browsing35; 1495851]Anybody seen her? I'm cautious because her posts / ads also seem to link back to another girl, Alexandria. That seems fishy to me for some reason. The phone number and previous posts seem to switch back and forth.

[url]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?6324-Escort-Classified-Ads-Posted-by-Escorts-No-Reviews-or-Commentary&p=1495396&viewfull=1#post1495396[/url][/QUOTE]I want to publicly apologize for that

I was helping both girls out and screwed up the phone numbers they are legit and great providers I was posting adds for them since they didn't have internet access and switch the numbers I am sorry for any confusion or headaches I may have caused you or any one else.

[QUOTE=Browsing35; 1495851]Anybody seen her? I'm cautious because her posts / ads also seem to link back to another girl, Alexandria. That seems fishy to me for some reason. The phone number and previous posts seem to switch back and forth.

[url]http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/showthread.php?6324-Escort-Classified-Ads-Posted-by-Escorts-No-Reviews-or-Commentary&p=1495396&viewfull=1#post1495396[/url][/QUOTE]Texted "Sexy Ass Kristen" yesterday, but connected with an Alexandra. Check out my review in the Review section.

I had a recent dream that I met this young lady. She was very accommodating to all my wishes and I wonder why it took me so long to meet her. No time was wasted after a quick introduction. She knew instinctively what I wanted / needed and made our time together worth the drive to see her.

Definitely on my short list of repeat dreams.