Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=TickingTock;3938872]I've seen kiss a few times, but Nana is still my unicorn. Almost a year now and still can't in touch. However I'm curious how she looks? Can anyone compare her to Kiss, and give me an idea? I feel like for most of you mongers, you've seen both.[/QUOTE]Imo Nana is the more attractive of the two (although neither were anything special visually). Nana's well documented and legendary wild woman sexual energy aggressiveness and willingness to make a man happy happy makes Kiss look kind of run of the mill. Eat your Wheaties before an encounter with Nana. Like I said, just my opinion. Others may not concur.

[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;3934925]Rebecca, is relocating to a different location when she returns.[/QUOTE]She relocating alright. Moving out of LA is more like it. Confirmed with booker J she not coming back this month. Out for very long vacation. Not sure when coming back. That usually means provider working at a different city. Damn! LA kgirls choices getting fewer and quality going down indeed.

As someone who travels between east and west coast. Own homes in philly and la, I can tell you there girls travel east alot. Infact megan in west la was known as hanna in philly. We have had fun outside the AMP, and I was look forward to seeing her when I'm in town.

[QUOTE=SlaterHind;3726370]Anyone know who is Emma's booker? A cross reference of phone number on TER doesn't help, so I'm assuming it's not M.[/QUOTE]Well. Her Booker on the east coast in philly is a legendary AMP woman name lily who is retired.

The booker who used to book for Kiss and usually has numbers at the end of their websites had a new girl named Haze today. Overall, it was a good time but NOT BBFS. There is a possible chance to get it next time but I am undecided on going back. She is more of my type, slender and a little tall. Young and not tanned. Great DFKer unlike some other girls. Sex is pretty standard with some P2 P thrown in. Pictures on the website are pretty low quality and blurred but they are her (kind of). She's been here for a few days and started to pick at me on where to advertise and how it's slow since she's been here. She could of always offer BBFS. About that, during P2 P she did pull away when I get near her hole. Someone esle here can go see her so we can get a second opinion if she's BBFS friendly or unfriendly.

[URL]http://www.haze6683.com/[/URL]

Hello, I am trying to see Cari who I've heard is with booker Julie. Any intel on working phone number? I guess the one on the monkey site isn't working. PM if needed thanks!! Will return favor if possible!

[QUOTE=RickZey;3939826]She relocating alright. Moving out of LA is more like it. Confirmed with booker J she not coming back this month. Out for very long vacation. Not sure when coming back. That usually means provider working at a different city. Damn! LA kgirls choices getting fewer and quality going down indeed.[/QUOTE]Some girls are coming back to LA. Now I think three BB girls from the Bay already here. Another two Bay girls I don't remember if they were BB or not. I have seen Haze pictures somewhere before and don't remember much either. I don't think there are lack of choices here. Quality is in the eyes of the beholder.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;3938730]As I described mine. Not a rebuttal. Just my experience.

Yes with Cynthia. First time and I haven's seen her for quite a while.

She was another one who had some negativity early on but for me she was great.[/QUOTE]What negativity? No, I don't really want to know. Had a good time with Cynthia when I first met her back when she first started.

[QUOTE=LaMancha;3936365]I am positive I saw Tammy. The pictures of her are spot on. The whole encounter was just weird. I have never experienced anything like it in the KB world. To be honest I would have to classify it as the worst encounter I have ever had from M. And I can also easily say it was one of my worst encounters ever. Now just to be clear, I usually have a great rapport with ladies and things generally go well. I might complain that a lady is not very good technically (not to her LOL) but I always get along with the ladies well.

I have been going to M's place for almost 5 years. I would say that I have been a good client and I have seen some great ladies there. However I have certainly learned to never ask for a recommendation from her because she will send you to an unpopular girl. I made that mistake twice. But generally she has some quality ladies.

However, I am finding that the current new crop is not anywhere close to what was there a couple of years ago. I am going to be that lone dissenter and say "no", on M's new ladies, as they are bad to my perspective. But then again I am comparing them to the likes of Cona, Rain, Grace, etc.

These are the last four ladies I have seen at M's.

Elsa, kind of not clean, did not have the usual KB routine down (nothing wrong with that) but she was just not a good encounter but we got along well. Session was rather short as well at probably 45 minutes in the room. Did not look even close to her pics.

JennyO. This was an accidental meeting because I was scheduled to see someone else but when I arrived JennyO was the only replacement offered. Although I have seen her before at the Palace and I actually did not want to see her again but I decided to take the replacement. I had a good time. No complaints. We get along well but I imagine JennyO gets along with everybody! Pics are accurate.

Ruby, I found to be much older and the water show was not to my liking. She was a nice person and we got along well. She certainly tried hard and was accommodating but water was going everywhere. She was easily past 40 and I think that the water show is her only talent. Also this session was short. Pics sort of accurate.

Tammy, Horrible. The minute I walked into the apartment she just glared at me and pointed her finger to my shoes (as to say, take them off) I don't think she ever smiled except those obvious overt fake smiles.

Now just to be in the spirit of this blog only JennyO was BBFS. All others demanded covers. I don't push their boundaries so if that is what they say that is where I go. Again, I think from reading some of these comments people are pushing people to do things they don't want to do and they don't know how to stop it.

I have also had some good encounters outside of M during this time, so again, I am thinking that M's new crop is not that good and the grail of the BBFS is being done without their enthusiasm.

However we all know everything here is YMMV.[/QUOTE]Elsa was better than average for me tho. I have been with M a long time and also saw Cona, Grace, Rain. M girls don't disappoint me even now but I don't get all this attention on recent girls like the holy grail. It seem like Tammy was pissed off by somebody who pushed for BB after she refused.

[QUOTE=VeryVictor;3940287]What negativity? No, I don't really want to know. Had a good time with Cynthia when I first met her back when she first started.[/QUOTE]I only know from her early reviews. She was fine with me.

[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;3915403]Yes, emma is on long vacay currently.[/QUOTE]Emma is currently in philly. Infact I live in the same building as their incall. LOL. Told her I was going to see her again when I'm back in philly. Going to surprise her tomorrow.

[QUOTE=Ted213;3939345]Is their number XXX-8455?[/QUOTE]I don't think this number spams you. Yocco eventually changed to work for this agency so I am just using her as as example for TheAbc. I don't actually know how they know you guys. One thing for sure you guys already saw at least one of their girls or was approved by their booker. I prolly know five bookers there and stop keeping track of who else there. They use too many numbers and confused the heck out of me. I still like their girls tho.

[QUOTE=BootyWatcher69;3940216]Hello, I am trying to see Cari who I've heard is with booker Julie. Any intel on working phone number? I guess the one on the monkey site isn't working. PM if needed thanks!! Will return favor if possible![/QUOTE]Cari and Rebecca same booker. So just use Rebecca number on monkey site. It's still active even though Rebecca not working.

[QUOTE=VeryVictor;3940287]What negativity? No, I don't really want to know. Had a good time with Cynthia when I first met her back when she first started.[/QUOTE]I had seen Cynthia in the past before all the chaos with CV started and session was really an average. I did not get into it with her nor did I found her ATTRACTIVE.

[QUOTE=Ted213;3939345]Is their number XXX-8455?[/QUOTE]No, one I'm getting texts from ends with 1197. But same thing with rainbows and emojis begging you to come every day. Advertise their girls on some wixsite that has the girls you listed.

[QUOTE=NeedAheRealBad;3938927]Strictly covered and I think they are packed. When I went there was no parking and I had to wait for another monger to leave and take his spot. Rushed in and out because I think the girls just have a constant stream of customers. Girls were attractive enough, but definitely not the ones in the pics. Standard kgirl service and nothing special about them.[/QUOTE]You must have seen the popular ones. I know about the constant stream of customers. The girls don't rush me but booker may call to wrap it up when there is another customer. Like I said before, a booker may use a girl real pictures but another booker may not and this is the mess we get. I have seen you guys discussed about them before. There were some special girls there for me too or I wouldn't be harping like this.

[QUOTE=Jack926;3940338]I had seen Cynthia in the past before all the chaos with CV started and session was really an average. I did not get into it with her nor did I found her ATTRACTIVE.[/QUOTE]Cynthias been hooking for years. I think she's burned out.

M's new girl in WLA.

Another pic of M's new girl.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;3940593]Another pic of M's new girl.[/QUOTE]Nice picture, hot girl. Have anyone seen here is the girl you saw anywhere close to this picture? My sad experience is all the K Girl ads are fake pictures and bait-and-switch.

[QUOTE=InTight;3940839]Nice picture, hot girl. Have anyone seen here is the girl you saw anywhere close to this picture? My sad experience is all the K Girl ads are fake pictures and bait-and-switch.[/QUOTE]Highly recommended.

[QUOTE=NeedAheRealBad;3940341]No, one I'm getting texts from ends with 1197. But same thing with rainbows and emojis begging you to come every day. Advertise their girls on some wixsite that has the girls you listed.[/QUOTE]Other one is xxx-9145.

"New" Version "Available Now".

Dude will not take me off his list after repeated requests.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;3940544]M's new girl in WLA.[/QUOTE]Is she BBFS?

[QUOTE=Bulak;3941165]Is she BBFS?[/QUOTE]Don't know yet but so I've heard.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;3940879]Highly recommended.[/QUOTE]Can you be more specific? BBFS offered? Services offered? GFE vs PSE? Atheletic or average? Boobs and ass any good?

[QUOTE=RickZey;3941480]Can you be more specific? BBFS offered? Services offered? GFE vs PSE? Atheletic or average? Boobs and ass any good?[/QUOTE]I haven't seen her. Just going by what I've heard. I'll have to see for myself for any further recommendation.

[QUOTE=RickZey;3941480]Can you be more specific? BBFS offered? Services offered? GFE vs PSE? Atheletic or average? Boobs and ass any good?[/QUOTE]I got denied BBFS, but she's nice girl, more playful GFE type. Is it me or do the pics always show a younger, hotter, thinner girl at best. Or a bait and switched at worst? Kandi is cute older version, pics are better, kinda average doughy body, soft flat ass, small soft tits you can feel the implants behind them, some belly rolls in missionary but flat stomach standing up, likes to kiss, good deep throat, rim, cim. Didn't rush me out. But their clock is fast so technically.

On Tammy repeat I got BBFS, had to beg for it, she's not that nice, maybe a bad day. Allison is young thin and hot, begging and repeating 3rd time got me nowhere. Anyone got info on M's new girls Sue and Ginger? I'm tired of wasting funds on these maybes and YMMV.

Going to see mistress x for the 2nd time. She promised me multiple pops on my next visit, wish me luck, will report back, 1st time was bbfscip. Great thick body, looked so good in the mirror while I was slamming her. Even though she is quite a bit older than I am, I can't wait to see her.

[QUOTE=KGirlAddict;3941770]I got denied BBFS, but she's nice girl, more playful GFE type. Is it me or do the pics always show a younger, hotter, thinner girl at best. Or a bait and switched at worst? Kandi is cute older version, pics are better, kinda average doughy body, soft flat ass, small soft tits you can feel the implants behind them, some belly rolls in missionary but flat stomach standing up, likes to kiss, good deep throat, rim, cim. Didn't rush me out. But their clock is fast so technically.

On Tammy repeat I got BBFS, had to beg for it, she's not that nice, maybe a bad day. Allison is young thin and hot, begging and repeating 3rd time got me nowhere. Anyone got info on M's new girls Sue and Ginger? I'm tired of wasting funds on these maybes and YMMV.[/QUOTE]I had the same exact experience and service with Kandy-She is by no means an "Eye Candy" but she can pass is a mature 33-38 years old very cute nice housewife that you would not mind banging everyday. Allison is hot but she is a NO GO on BBFS.

[QUOTE=Jack926;3941804]I had the same exact experience and service with Kandy-She is by no means an "Eye Candy" but she can pass is a mature 33-38 years old very cute nice housewife that you would not mind banging everyday. Allison is hot but she is a NO GO on BBFS.[/QUOTE]Kandy is older and is a nice person. But there are better out there. As far as this blog goes No of BBFS.

Hey guys,

I used to book a lot in WLA but #'s kept on changing, however it was always the same booker. Since CV went down can't find a # to reach them. Any ideas how to find? Thanks.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;3940593]Another pic of M's new girl.[/QUOTE]I am sorry to ask this. What is M's site?

I am so confuse now these days.

Somebody here said before. Always use the 10-10 rule. Add 10 year and 10 lbs to the pic.

[QUOTE=KGirlAddict;3941770]I got denied BBFS, but she's nice girl, more playful GFE type. Is it me or do the pics always show a younger, hotter, thinner girl at best. Or a bait and switched at worst? Kandi is cute older version, pics are better, kinda average doughy body, soft flat ass, small soft tits you can feel the implants behind them, some belly rolls in missionary but flat stomach standing up, likes to kiss, good deep throat, rim, cim. Didn't rush me out. But their clock is fast so technically.

On Tammy repeat I got BBFS, had to beg for it, she's not that nice, maybe a bad day. Allison is young thin and hot, begging and repeating 3rd time got me nowhere. Anyone got info on M's new girls Sue and Ginger? I'm tired of wasting funds on these maybes and YMMV.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BootyWatcher69;3941793]Going to see mistress x for the 2nd time. She promised me multiple pops on my next visit, wish me luck, will report back, 1st time was bbfscip. Great thick body, looked so good in the mirror while I was slamming her. Even though she is quite a bit older than I am, I can't wait to see her.[/QUOTE]You'll get your multi pop bbfc CIP. She is one of the girls that guarantee bbfcip on 1st visit. She aged like Jenny o. Other two that are younger are Kiss and Nana. Oh another one MILF is Yoona.

[QUOTE=RickZey;3942598]You'll get your multi pop bbfc CIP. She is one of the girls that guarantee bbfcip on 1st visit. She aged like Jenny o. Other two that are younger are Kiss and Nana. Oh another one MILF is Yoona.[/QUOTE]Any emoting or even feigned interest? My last session with Jenny O was devoid of any coyness, feigned interest or the like. Robotic BBFS in cowgirl, then doggy and mish to completion; but as I said there was not the slightest hint of interest or emoting. I think that some of these gals are just plain burned out.

He probably means emotions.

What are some common reasons why you wouldn't get verified by a booker even though you have valid references?

[QUOTE=Veni1;3942670]Any emoting or even feigned interest? My last session with Jenny O was devoid of any coyness, feigned interest or the like. Robotic BBFS in cowgirl, then doggy and mish to completion; but as I said there was not the slightest hint of interest or emoting. I think that some of these gals are just plain burned out.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ppbluesea21;3942400]I am sorry to ask this. What is M's site?

I am so confuse now these days.[/QUOTE]M, only has a site on hx. But lately she hasn't been updating it.

I just text her for availability and she sends me the pics of the gals.

Has anyone seen the new girls at this org? Coco, April, Lisa, or Sejin.

Apparently April is offering BBFS extra $.

I'm really hoping for a great GFE session with April or Lisa though. Any feedback?

[QUOTE=TickingTock;3938872]I've seen kiss a few times, but Nana is still my unicorn. Almost a year now and still can't in touch. However I'm curious how she looks? Can anyone compare her to Kiss, and give me an idea? I feel like for most of you mongers, you've seen both.[/QUOTE]I personally think that Nana is more attractive. And as far as service goes Nana is way better, Kiss doesn't come close. Just my opinion.

Nana is a bit different with the amount of energy she brings to the session. Don't be surprised if she sweats on you!

Seems like we got alot of mixed opinions on her girls. Has anyone esle confirm the service and quality of what she currently has? Last girl I saw was Jenny O and I usually have a good time with her but I think it's getting old for me to continue to see her. Something about my last visit with her wasn't as enjoyable as when she was still with the Palace last year. Only newish girl I saw was Mia and she was BBFS with me.