Massage Parlor Reports

for those of you who remember 2 pop, she was replaced by someone. ANyone have any feedback on her replacement? Looking for a good massage!

She was replaced by Linda (I think that is her name). She gives a very good massage, a good HR and allows roaming. Only downside is she is not pretty and maybe late forties. I have been three times all pretty good experiences. Good luck.

[QUOTE=Mini Man]She was replaced by Linda (I think that is her name). She gives a very good massage, a good HR and allows roaming. Only downside is she is not pretty and maybe late forties. I have been three times all pretty good experiences. Good luck.[/QUOTE]Nice to see more positive feedback on Linda. I think a lot of Susan's regulars will never be satisfied by her replacement, because really there is no replacing Susan's value. I'm curious. How much does Linda charge and does she offer the 2 pops like her predecessor?

She charges .30 for the half and .60 for the hour. She will probably accommodate two pops if you tell her.

[QUOTE=Mini Man]She charges .30 for the half and .60 for the hour. She will probably accommodate two pops if you tell her.[/QUOTE]Is she on CL, or do I have to search the threads for a location?

[QUOTE=Stan Daround]Is she on CL, or do I have to search the threads for a location?[/QUOTE]Shes in chinatown. Don't have the number but you can easily find more info on this board or one of the other ones

Anybody been to Ecco? The salon in the China trade center? I went and got a great massage with a TON of teasing but no finish. Anybody know of anything different there?

Anybody been to Ecco? The salon in the china trade center? I went and got a great massage with a TON of teasing but no finish. Anybody know of anything different there?

[QUOTE=New1235]Anybody been to Ecco? The salon in the china trade center? I went and got a great massage with a TON of teasing but no finish. Anybody know of anything different there?[/QUOTE]

I've been to Ecco a while back. I saw an ad for it on CL and thought it might be good to try it out, but no luck. I only got a decent massage without any finish. I remember seeing a paper posted up on the door leading to the massage room and also inside the room saying to keep your underwear on. They will not give the massage if you're nude. It gave me a bad vibe and I was correct about it. I think i posted about it too. Anyways, not sure if anything changed, but I doubt it.

Good luck mongering

Cloude

No change

Try Knapp

Saw Linda for the first time today. Although I liked her, I prefer Alice on Knapp St. I just click better with her, and I find her massage technique to be better. Obviously YMMV.

Hey all,

Long time lurker, first time poster.

Thanks for the recommendations on Lily's. I don't think you can go wrong there.

Called 30 minutes before arriving. Got in the door, $.6 house fee and led to a room. The place was clean and well kept. Introduced to Mimi. Lat twenties/early 30s Korean, very attractive, petite and in great shape. Actually, more than just very attractive, 9/10 for me. Decent english, we had some nice conversations.

Good TS, got all the nooks and crannies and proceeded to a fairly good medium/hard massage. Certainly not pro, but pretty good as far as AMPs usually go. On to the flip and great slow finale. $.6 tip and I'll be back soon to see Mimi again.

Went to L&G Massage Center in Plymouth. It advertises that it is "Chinese" and offers "whole body accupressure," so I thought is was worth a shot. Korean massage lady did not object to my getting naked, but no extras were offered and I got the feeling that they would not be allowed if asked. Look elsewhere.

[QUOTE=Petaling]Hey all,

Long time lurker, first time poster.

Thanks for the recommendations on Lily's. I don't think you can go wrong there.

Called 30 minutes before arriving. Got in the door, $.6 house fee and led to a room. The place was clean and well kept. Introduced to Mimi. Lat twenties/early 30s Korean, very attractive, petite and in great shape. Actually, more than just very attractive, 9/10 for me. Decent english, we had some nice conversations.

Good TS, got all the nooks and crannies and proceeded to a fairly good medium/hard massage. Certainly not pro, but pretty good as far as AMPs usually go. On to the flip and great slow finale. $.6 tip and I'll be back soon to see Mimi again.[/QUOTE]You tipped $160 for a HJ?

Toodw

[QUOTE=Toodw]You tipped $160 for a HJ?

Toodw[/QUOTE]

At a place like Lily's, the house fee is typically sixty. I assume he tipped sixty for a total of one hundred twenty.

(Those abbreviations for dollar amounts are, in my opinion, silly and confusing. They add no value, but instead, clutter the board with questions and clarifications about the actual amounts.)

[QUOTE=Triesharder]Those abbreviations for dollar amounts are, in my opinion, silly and confusing. They add no value, but instead, clutter the board with questions and clarifications about the actual amounts.[/QUOTE]Amen, brother! For goodness sake, can we f'ing drop these already??

Does someone actually think we're fooling LE with some kind of secret code? This practice has unraveled into a seriously bad "who's on first" routine. It is used inconsistently and is confusing as hell. It is like Roman Numerals and the Metric System explained as Esperanto.

I strongly suggest we go with straight numbers henceforth. I paid Tess $80 for 2 x BBBJTCIM last week. That was eighty dollars, not one hundred and eighty dollars. The week before I paid a SW $30 for a BBBJ.

From this point forward, when I post, "$" alone will have no meaning other than perhaps "money" and $0 will mean "zero dollars" while "$50" will mean fifty dollars" and if I want to convey "one hundred fifty dollars" I will use "$150"

I urge others to join me (and hopefully Triesharder) in this cause of commonsense and sanity.