Is it possible you're mixing RS2K and RSG? roomservicegirls.com is the escort service that gives the best value in the Boston area. RS2k (Roomservice200) is a verification service that providers reference - you pay to be verified by them.
Printable View
Is it possible you're mixing RS2K and RSG? roomservicegirls.com is the escort service that gives the best value in the Boston area. RS2k (Roomservice200) is a verification service that providers reference - you pay to be verified by them.
[QUOTE=Troutman]I've used RS2K a number of times and never had to verify anything. Always chose the half, always had a very good time. Never the same girl twice.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Virgil Dan]Is it possible you're mixing RS2K and RSG? roomservicegirls.com is the escort service that gives the best value in the Boston area. RS2k (Roomservice200) is a verification service that providers reference - you pay to be verified by them.[/QUOTE]Yes he is confusing them yet insists he's RS2K several times, makes ya wonder dont it!
Gravel, are you a lawyer or an IT professional? I'm guessing neither. :)
[QUOTE=GravelPath]
In any case, be safe and watch how you post. Your best bet is to go to coffeeshops, bars, or other places that offer free wireless -- never from your home connection.[/QUOTE]
Do you have knowledge to share, or are you just here to knock on me?
I do know quite a bit about IP logging. I also know quite a bit about attorneys who have successfully subpoenaed IP logs.
Need a recent example?
[url]http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/08/07/yale_students_name_alleged_harasser_in_web_libel_suit/[/url]
***
Two female students at Yale Law School who say anonymous, defamatory comments were made about them on the Internet identified one of the defendants yesterday in their federal lawsuit.
The women filed new documents in US District Court naming Mathew C. Ryan of Austin, Texas. Through subpoenas to Internet service providers, the women have learned the identities of several other defendants but are trying to resolve their claims against those people before deciding whether to name them, according to court papers.
***
I'm not saying the situations are analogous. Only that IP logs can lead to identities.
One poster here said that the board's IP logs are hosted in Canada. I don't know if that's true or not -- haven't bothered a whois -- but it doesn't much matter. Believe it or not, there are a foreign jurisdictions whose judges tend to be *more* helpful than U.S. judges in these things. Not every place is so protective of individual liberties and privacy.
Hey, I'm not telling you what to do, though. Play at whatever level of safety makes you comfortable.
[QUOTE=Cruiser D]Gravel, are you a lawyer or an IT professional? I'm guessing neither. :)[/QUOTE]
1. how could they prove what you were posting was not made up? or that it was you?
2. juristiction. outside of **** (not allowed by jackson) and sex slaves (ditto), only local le can try to suppeona this board. good luck with that!
3. le loves this board. this is probably their primary, if not only, means of gathering info on local sw's, massage parlors, cl, etc.
stop debating about something that will never happen.
[QUOTE=WebDog]T If you were my employee and used my company name in the context of committing a crime, you better believe you would be fired! Nothing good can come out of providing that level of information][/QUOTE]And, what if you're un-employed. Or self-employed. There's no good reason for asking for that info.
My fear is that they want your employer for blackmail. "Pay up or we'll come hang out at your office building." For that purpose, they'd probably prefer your wife's name, but if you're that dumb Darwin would have taken you out by now.
[QUOTE=GravelPath]
One poster here said that the board's IP logs are hosted in Canada. I don't know if that's true or not -- haven't bothered a whois -- but it doesn't much matter. Believe it or not, there are a foreign jurisdictions whose judges tend to be *more* helpful than U.S. judges in these things. Not every place is so protective of individual liberties and privacy.
Hey, I'm not telling you what to do, though. Play at whatever level of safety makes you comfortable.[/QUOTE]
That would be me. Again, I'm not 100% sure about how it would be outside of the US. Only Jackson would be able to tell us with any semblance of detail.
Sure there are foreign jurisdictions whose judges are more helpful than U.S. judges, but unless I'm wrong, in Canada, prostitution is legal. At least communicating about it over the phone and outcall and incall escorts are legal.
This link might help: [url]http://www.sexwork.com/montreal/law.html[/url]
WTF?!
"How many arm chair lawyers can dance on the head of pin?" and other pointless questions. What the hell is the controversy here??
Yes, Canada has an extradition treaty with the U.S. which means it also reciprocates subpoena powers if you're trying to track down OSB with the phone records of 10 convicted jihadists -- *NOT* the weblog of U.S. based Internet BBS who is hosted in Canada and whose members participate anonymously with not authenticated registration process to discuss such activities as who gives the dirtier lapdance.
The issue is not Canadian judges, it is the fact that everything here is indexed by Google and likely will be stored until the end of mankind. So back to the ORIGINAL point before we went off the rails -- always stay under the radar and do not share any personal info, or otherwise assume that everything you share is public information.
[QUOTE=Paco Q]That would be me. Again, I'm not 100% sure about how it would be outside of the US. Only Jackson would be able to tell us with any semblance of detail.
Sure there are foreign jurisdictions whose judges are more helpful than U.S. judges, but unless I'm wrong, in Canada, prostitution is legal. At least communicating about it over the phone and outcall and incall escorts are legal.
This link might help: [url]http://www.sexwork.com/montreal/law.html[/url][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WebDog]WTF?!
"How many arm chair lawyers can dance on the head of pin?" and other pointless questions. What the hell is the controversy here??
Yes, Canada has an extradition treaty with the U.S. which means it also reciprocates subpoena powers if you're trying to track down OSB with the phone records of 10 convicted jihadists -- *NOT* the weblog of U.S. based Internet BBS who is hosted in Canada and whose members participate anonymously with not authenticated registration process to discuss such activities as who gives the dirtier lapdance.
The issue is not Canadian judges, it is the fact that everything here is indexed by Google and likely will be stored until the end of mankind. So back to the ORIGINAL point before we went off the rails -- always stay under the radar and do not share any personal info, or otherwise assume that everything you share is public information.[/QUOTE]
I didn't think there was any controversy. I for one, was just adding to a discussion that was more intelligent than most of the forums I frequent. Anybody who is making it into controversy just needs to relax.
As for Google, that's the main issue. So like you said, sharing personal info is a no-no; just assume everything is available to the public.
I think the discussion went OT in regards to whether or not the info here could be used in a court of law in the US. At least, so I think.
[QUOTE=Paco Q]I didn't think there was any controversy. I for one, was just adding to a discussion that was more intelligent than most of the forums I frequent. Anybody who is making it into controversy just needs to relax.
As for Google, that's the main issue. So like you said, sharing personal info is a no-no; just assume everything is available to the public.
I think the discussion went OT in regards to whether or not the info here could be used in a court of law in the US. At least, so I think.[/QUOTE]Fair enough, Paco. I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek -- I didn't mean to jump on your contribution.
LOL, but no.
[QUOTE=WebDog]WTF?!
"How many arm chair lawyers can dance on the head of pin?" and other pointless questions. What the hell is the controversy here??
Yes, Canada has an extradition treaty with the U.S. which means it also reciprocates subpoena powers if you're trying to track down OSB with the phone records of 10 convicted jihadists -- *NOT* the weblog of U.S. based Internet BBS who is hosted in Canada and whose members participate anonymously with not authenticated registration process to discuss such activities as who gives the dirtier lapdance.
The issue is not Canadian judges, it is the fact that everything here is indexed by Google and likely will be stored until the end of mankind. So back to the ORIGINAL point before we went off the rails -- always stay under the radar and do not share any personal info, or otherwise assume that everything you share is public information.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=GravelPath]LOL, but no.[/QUOTE]"No"? What are you referring to?
I would like to ask many here why we all settle for the sub-standard galls out on the many tracks today.We,or many here have seen what the streets were 3-4 years ago.Now we can also see what we once would not let our dog's play with, are prime choices many are scooping up.Standards,are we all going blind,crazy,or just desperate for the act itself ? Please tell me some or most have gotten so desperate we feed on the nasty,nasty,street shit we all would have passed on years back.
Yes I have gotten heavier,balder,and grayer over the past years.I am sure other have also,but my ability to choose a pearl from a lump of coal has not changed.I also know how the supply and demand factor hits this trade also.Most would feel ok about passing on a prospective visit to the doctor, or funeral director, I hope!This is not rocket science,who wants to get some old nasty that you would only see after dark?I for one will not put myself a in a jackpot on a death sentence for some nasty street troll.
We all remember what was normal for quality on the late night tracks.This is a new time and nothing like before,same streets,same old buildings,same blue/white cruisers, but nasty gals for the most part are commonplace today.
Please tell me if I am the only one that is looking at this picture.
B.B...
Bill, for the reasons you state, I can't remember the last time I picked up a streetwalker in Boston, but it has been a loooong time.
The quality is still there in other areas, like Florida and Southern California. But I have long passed the realization that I would not risk my life or livelihood for someone I would *never* pick up in a bar (for free).
[QUOTE=Bill Buxton]I would like to ask many here why we all settle for the sub-standard galls out on the many tracks today.We,or many here have seen what the streets were 3-4 years ago.Now we can also see what we once would not let our dog's play with, are prime choices many are scooping up.Standards,are we all going blind,crazy,or just desperate for the act itself ? Please tell me some or most have gotten so desperate we feed on the nasty,nasty,street shit we all would have passed on years back.
Yes I have gotten heavier,balder,and grayer over the past years.I am sure other have also,but my ability to choose a pearl from a lump of coal has not changed.I also know how the supply and demand factor hits this trade also.Most would feel ok about passing on a prospective visit to the doctor, or funeral director, I hope!This is not rocket science,who wants to get some old nasty that you would only see after dark?I for one will not put myself a in a jackpot on a death sentence for some nasty street troll.
We all remember what was normal for quality on the late night tracks.This is a new time and nothing like before,same streets,same old buildings,same blue/white cruisers, but nasty gals for the most part are commonplace today.
Please tell me if I am the only one that is looking at this picture.
B.B...[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WebDog]Bill, for the reasons you state, I can't remember the last time I picked up a streetwalker in Boston, but it has been a loooong time.
The quality is still there in other areas, like Florida and Southern California. But I have long passed the realization that I would not risk my life or livelihood for someone I would *never* pick up in a bar (for free).[/QUOTE]
Like I said,not worth the risk.The street quality I was talking about was around here.The quality in other parts yes is much the same as it always was.I am not saying you can or can not ever find a nice quality gal around here.Frankly it's just very hard to do on a regular basis.3-4 years ago it was very common to get top quality in looks,attitude,and service here,but not so much now.If you do have that luxury please pass on that private number to me.
B.B...