Sugar Daddy & Other Related Websites

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;3845473]Look, if you are messaging w / a woman who is agreeing over the internet to sex w / someone she has never met, that is the definition of a pro. The only thing she's not doing is advertising on CL or BP. Oh, wait, those don't exist anymore, that's why she's on SA. Those women need to be reported, b / c if there is a lot of escorting off of SA, it will attract the attention of the judicial system, just like CL and BP did. You can kill the goose that laid the golden egg if we don't police this among SDs. Anytime I get anything like a hint a girl is a pro (even UTR), I report them to SA. There are zillions of ways you can violate their terms of service. Just look on the report form for examples. It doesn't even have to be on the site. They will accept screenshots of texts.

I joined SA originally b / c I wanted to avoid escorts. I get an experience by having an ongoing, exclusive relationship w / my SBs that you can't get anywhere else.

BTW, if you are getting someone to agree electronically to meet at a specific $ figure, that is her top dollar quote. I *never* negotiate sugar on the web, but of course I am maybe going for a different experience than you. There is a wealth of information on all these topics on the Richmond VA sugar thread (and its archive of classics). This one hasn't been that active until recently, I am very glad there is now some mutual SD support from guys who are fishing in the same ocean as I am, but you also shouldn't forget there is a wealth of experience out there that is pertinent.[/QUOTE]Well, true. I have only reported once on SA when a pro sent me message directly. The number of Pros on the site is increasing dramatically, we really police it among SDs.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;3845473]Look, if you are messaging w / a woman who is agreeing over the internet to sex w / someone she has never met, that is the definition of a pro. The only thing she's not doing is advertising on CL or BP. Oh, wait, those don't exist anymore, that's why she's on SA. Those women need to be reported, b / c if there is a lot of escorting off of SA, it will attract the attention of the judicial system, just like CL and BP did. You can kill the goose that laid the golden egg if we don't police this among SDs. Anytime I get anything like a hint a girl is a pro (even UTR), I report them to SA. There are zillions of ways you can violate their terms of service. Just look on the report form for examples. It doesn't even have to be on the site. They will accept screenshots of texts.

I joined SA originally b / c I wanted to avoid escorts. I get an experience by having an ongoing, exclusive relationship w / my SBs that you can't get anywhere else.

BTW, if you are getting someone to agree electronically to meet at a specific $ figure, that is her top dollar quote. I *never* negotiate sugar on the web, but of course I am maybe going for a different experience than you. There is a wealth of information on all these topics on the Richmond VA sugar thread (and its archive of classics). This one hasn't been that active until recently, I am very glad there is now some mutual SD support from guys who are fishing in the same ocean as I am, but you also shouldn't forget there is a wealth of experience out there that is pertinent.[/QUOTE]I have to disagree with you. A college girl that is down for whatever is not a pro maybe just high volume. And there is also a term "mutually beneficial arrangement" often used in the site. I have never nor will ever report a pro. I will just pass the info through this site.

If like paying girls to watch them eat before even knowing what they are not willing to do, good for you but that doesn't mean the girls that do agree before meeting are pros.

[QUOTE=Floro1243;3848699]I have to disagree with you. A college girl that is down for whatever is not a pro maybe just high volume. And there is also a term "mutually beneficial arrangement" often used in the site. I have never nor will ever report a pro. I will just pass the info through this site.

If like paying girls to watch them eat before even knowing what they are not willing to do, good for you but that doesn't mean the girls that do agree before meeting are pros.[/QUOTE]So, exactly what wealth of experience do you speak from? I am a 2+ year veteran of SA, and have had dozens of SBs from 19 to 40, several 1/3 my age. A high volume girl, even in college, is no sugar baby, she's an escort. Is your definition of pro different? I didn't have an exclusive w / every girl I got off SA, but I did with those I had ongoing arrangements w / - two of many months. I never pay a girl for the M&G or any dates. Allowance is only given after we go to the FC. I *prefer* to provide monthly or bimonthly allowance, and obviously, you don't do that unless you are very sure about someone.

If you like SA as a way to get a different kind of girl than you could find in the 'old' ways, you ought to start reporting the pros. I can promise, if there is infiltration of escorts onto the site, stimulated by the shutdown of BP and CL, the site will start to attract the wrong kind of attention. Take a look at the video the SA owner has posted, and all the comments on it. SA is certainly aware that it is at risk. There is a real Dean of sugaring who has zillions of posts on the Richmond VA thread, JZLizard. You should read what he has to say. He also thinks escorts are the biggest risk to SA, and he said that before BP was killed.

[QUOTE=RWarNmsn69;3835269]The Search Feature y'all are referring to should return to Seeking Arrangement soon. According to their Tech Support Staff, it was removed to improve the search functionality and squash some bugs".

RWARNMSN.

Safe mongering and sugaring![/QUOTE]Thanks for the info, and actually I just saw a message from you on the Richmond forum where you quoted DCOutlaw, nice trick and works great:

"The keyword search feature is gone but you can still perform a keyword search by enetering the following in the URL:

&q=keyword.

For example: if you want to search for keyword of "Dtf" use the following:

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/s...cation=0&q=dtf[/URL]

You can see other search filters I've used like within 100 miles of Arlington but the keyword search is at the end of the url. Just replace dtf with whatever you want to search for. ".

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;3848992]So, exactly what wealth of experience do you speak from? I am a 2+ year veteran of SA, and have had dozens of SBs from 19 to 40, several 1/3 my age. A high volume girl, even in college, is no sugar baby, she's an escort. Is your definition of pro different? I didn't have an exclusive w / every girl I got off SA, but I did with those I had ongoing arrangements w / - two of many months. I never pay a girl for the M&G or any dates. Allowance is only given after we go to the FC. I *prefer* to provide monthly or bimonthly allowance, and obviously, you don't do that unless you are very sure about someone.

If you like SA as a way to get a different kind of girl than you could find in the 'old' ways, you ought to start reporting the pros. I can promise, if there is infiltration of escorts onto the site, stimulated by the shutdown of BP and CL, the site will start to attract the wrong kind of attention. Take a look at the video the SA owner has posted, and all the comments on it. SA is certainly aware that it is at risk. There is a real Dean of sugaring who has zillions of posts on the Richmond VA thread, JZLizard. You should read what he has to say. He also thinks escorts are the biggest risk to SA, and he said that before BP was killed.[/QUOTE]Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, you have yours and I have mine. I am not here to give you my resume of where or how long have I been doing this nor to start argument due to different point of views. I will tell you that I been doing it for a couple years on different states but I will leave it at that. Have a nice day.

Was wondering what any of your experiences with AFF have been? I just joined for the first time and there seems to be a lot of scams and fake profiles on there. Am I wrong? If you guys have been sucessful on the site what kind of advise would you give? Is there a better site I should use? Thanks.

[QUOTE=GfEnthusiast;3850843]Was wondering what any of your experiences with AFF have been? I just joined for the first time and there seems to be a lot of scams and fake profiles on there. Am I wrong? If you guys have been sucessful on the site what kind of advise would you give? Is there a better site I should use? Thanks.[/QUOTE]I've used AFF for many years. Yes, there are many fake profiles and people who just like to fantasize and never meet. But if you look around you will find people to hook up with. It helps a lot of you can host. I can't so that limits me quite a bit. I have met some couples and single woman so I continue to use the site.

[QUOTE=JohnnyLovesIt;3854434]I've used AFF for many years. Yes, there are many fake profiles and people who just like to fantasize and never meet. But if you look around you will find people to hook up with. It helps a lot of you can host. I can't so that limits me quite a bit. I have met some couples and single woman so I continue to use the site.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the info. I haven't had much luck on the site so far but who kniws maybe I get lucky.

Went to SA site, and after entering the address, it pops up but the site address is "[URL]seeking.com[/URL]" not "seekingarrangement" The opening page appears to be the same. I didn't enter my user and PW since maybe the site was hacked?

[QUOTE=Waxxon;3859692]Went to SA site, and after entering the address, it pops up but the site address is "[URL]seeking.com[/URL]" not "seekingarrangement" The opening page appears to be the same. I didn't enter my user and PW since maybe the site was hacked?[/QUOTE]It works fine for me.

[QUOTE=Waxxon;3859692]Went to SA site, and after entering the address, it pops up but the site address is "[URL]seeking.com[/URL]" not "seekingarrangement" The opening page appears to be the same. I didn't enter my user and PW since maybe the site was hacked?[/QUOTE]Same thing here. My password saver app auto fills in my login and it did not this morning. It looks like SA but I'm worried it is not so I did not manually enter log-in. used to be: https://www.seekingarrangement.com/login
Now it's not. Anyone?

[QUOTE=NCRascal;3859839]Same thing here. My password saver app auto fills in my login and it did not this morning. It looks like SA but I'm worried it is not so I did not manually enter log-in. used to be: https://www.seekingarrangement.com/login
Now it's not. Anyone?[/QUOTE]Went ahead and logged in, seems to be ok, has all my messages, contacts etc. Not sure why we're getting diverted to a different address.

[QUOTE=Waxxon;3859904]Went ahead and logged in, seems to be ok, has all my messages, contacts etc. Not sure why we're getting diverted to a different address.[/QUOTE]Did the same and it looks ok. Just strange the address changed.

Hey guys,

I want to contribute to this thread since there hasn't been much reporting here lately. This girl is in the Santee area and dtf with everything fair games except anal for $$ She is on the chunky side so if you're into the spinner, she's not the one for you.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/16882fb0-fe5e-408d-9734-7e34c763cd4a[/URL]

[QUOTE=OcasianBoy;3861951]Hey guys,

I want to contribute to this thread since there hasn't been much reporting here lately. This girl is in the Santee area and dtf with everything fair games except anal for $$ She is on the chunky side so if you're into the spinner, she's not the one for you.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/16882fb0-fe5e-408d-9734-7e34c763cd4a[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks for sharing. She has a nice face and $200 seems to be the reasonable going rate, so a good find.