Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5214964]Just wanted to update on this list since it changes so often. I will leave both active and dead ones so you can look at it for reference. As always, I probably missed some. I have updated with the ones recently posted.

Active.

[URL]https://2pop.shop/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.tomatoktown.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.dreamkgirl.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.pinkclubs.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://angelsinwla.wordpress.com[/URL]

[URL]https://lak.escortbook.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.thetopgirls.com/los-angeles-1[/URL]

[URL]https://ktownescort.com/home[/URL]

[URL]https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/[/URL]

[URL]https://newasianvibe.is/[/URL]

[URL]http://sexyfunkgirls2.escorts.biz/home[/URL]

[URL]http://sweetmoments.gfeincall.com/photos/[/URL] (not sure if this one is active, but website is working).

[URL]http://secretkgarden.escorts.biz/companions[/URL]

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://www.bookergray.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://mykupcake.com/home[/URL]

Https: is / model / sugar /.

[URL]https://sexyangels.site/sexy-angels[/URL]

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://eukgirl.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://ktownkgirlz.com/home[/URL]

M [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/aKndu2KCPapj[/URL].

Palace

[URL]https://fruitstore3.wixsite.com/mysite[/URL] (not sure if it still updates or not).

[URL]https://www.sixshop.com/star0082/home[/URL]

[URL]https://www.kakao-girls.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://ktowngfe.photo.blog/yeon-soo/[/URL]

Dead:

[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL]

[URL]http://newtopasia.hotprovider.com/escorts/[/URL]

[URL]https://kbunnygirls.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://acektownla.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://hiddenmango.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://cherrylove77.escorts.biz/secu...ceakacocolove/[/URL][/QUOTE]Sexyfunkgirls update their site. Their new domain is [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL].

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;5212394]They are consumed by most Korean people in copious amounts. Can't brush that smell away.[/QUOTE]I would rather smell a pound of kimchi with garlic for an hour than smell Bacterial vaginitis for 2 seconds.

[QUOTE=LegendKilla;5214433]She gave me that vibe as well. It seem like she probably wanted to settle down which would explain the on and off schedule. My alarm went off and time was up but she kept me over and wasn't trying to let me leave. Second notification of same time went off again and I finally reached for my phone and she may have played the dumb card like "what's that sound, I like the melody of it" but it was just a basic default Samsung alarm everyone has on their phone.[/QUOTE]Stella does feign innocence or play dumb. I saw her once in 2015 and recently a few weeks ago. She asked me why I didn't call her when I got here. I said we never exchanged numbers to which she replied "oh".

Saw piper tonight and have to say I was pretty pleased, I still think hana is prettier than her but pipers body is pretty hot although not quite as skinny as hana but still very nice, if you like dfk and lfk though holy shit piper gives you that and more, she is also very aggressive actually bit me multiple times which I didn't mind but I can tell she likes it rough, overall service is definitely as good as hana maybe even a tad bit better, but overall hana will still be my atf since I like her super spinner body and face more, piper was a nice break from hana for a night though and I do not regret seeing her. Damage was $$$ 1 hour BBFS cip.

No reviews and decided to TOFT. I went in already knowing the pictures are fake as hell but still went in with a positive mindset. I'll try to keep the review nice and short. Booker was responsive and less pressure to book than M. I noticed M wants you to book when you text. Overall, a pretty good time. The only major downside is looks. I equate her to the Palace where you got older milfs but they make up for it in service. Nothing special in the bathroom. At the start inside, expect a decent rim with great foreplay on the flip. BBBJ is on the softer side and she works not only the shaft, but the balls and the area between your cornhole and balls. Plenty of DFK, but has a weird kissing technique. She kinda chomps and locks lips more than tongue so you have to adjust this with her. Overall, expect a solid session if you can past her looks. I would say she's around 5'2-5'4, natural Bs, and around mid 40's at least. No tattoos or scars from what I seen. Body is to be expected for a lady in her 40s, doesn't look like she works out so average build. Really tries hard and has a nice attitude. If you go in with this expectation, I don't think you can go wrong. I might repeat, but I need better looks along with good service. Another plus is the upcharge isn't as bad as the other clones out there at $380. I for one, welcome more cheaper options out there with a modest upcharge. Also, she has duos with "Casey" who I later remembered as "Aimee" at M awhile ago. I never saw her then so I don't know if she is any good.

Pricing:

260 1 HR.

220 HHR.

300 1 HR BBFS.

[URL]https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/mimi/[/URL]

Thanks for replying both of you, the two girls were jane & ? From cakdolls. Sorry the second girl they offered me after I walked out isn't on the roster anymore so idk her name but neither her nor jane looked like their pics. Though you could say the pictures were representative of their stature. I would say I was screwed by false advertisement though I am guessing maybe the girls were who J normally offers under those names— or to newbies LOL.

I would say in general I do have high expectations but with the past two girls, belle & Victoria, they were at least attractive. Those other 2 were not. Either way. I have 2 refs now and am looking for DDG hourglass now.

[QUOTE=PumpNDump;5214327]Again as I have stated mr clifford needs to chime in on this and provide clarification to which girl
or girls was it that he booked and to the his personal rating of 3. I am not the only who is curious about this. None of us here know for a fact whether if its bait and switch. Was he really screwed over by false advertisement? Did the booker switch the girl (s) on him? Who the hell really knows if he doesn't chime in.

How am I siding with the bookers or agency? I've been asking for clarity to his claim and I hypothesized the poster as having high expectations. I don't see how that can be construed as siding with the booker or blaming a person for a review and in this case there was no review.

And yes a client has the right to walk when there's legitimate issues. But in his case the pig in the poke that was chosen was just not ddg model enough for him. Has there been other complaints of switcheroo or false advertisement by other's here for j's girls? The way that a girl appears is just subjective to everyone. A girl that I see may be a 7 or 7. 5 or 8 and he grades her a 5 or 6 and it can be vice versa. Now if he is fickle and keeps canceling because the girl isn't ddg model enough for him then yes I think it would be fair to say it's his fault if he gets blacklisted by that booker.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CliffordLy;5215344]Thanks for replying both of you, the two girls were jane & ? From cakdolls. Sorry the second girl they offered me after I walked out isn't on the roster anymore so idk her name but neither her nor jane looked like their pics. Though you could say the pictures were representative of their stature. I would say I was screwed by false advertisement though I am guessing maybe the girls were who J normally offers under those names or to newbies LOL.

I would say in general I do have high expectations but with the past two girls, belle & Victoria, they were at least attractive. Those other 2 were not. Either way. I have 2 refs now and am looking for DDG hourglass now.[/QUOTE]Your expectations are unrealistic. There are no DDG (hourglass or otherwise) kgirls in LA.

M. Chanel, Moni.

Sunny. Sandy, Niya, Lyn.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Fanny, Emma, Erica, Sophia, Helen, Jenny.

SFK. Viki, Jessie.

PKL. Ara.

Sesang. Hana.

Angelsinwla. Hana.

KGLA. Haper, Piper, Mimi.

[QUOTE=PumpNDump;5213792]I would like to also know who he claims is a "3". According to rocket's interpretation by means of English reading comprehension, it was bait and switch and now also false advertisement by the booker.[/QUOTE]In my opinion, bait and switch is different from false advertising.

In defense of J, she never baits and switches. Half her stable is represented well in the pictures and are consistent good providers. The other half are a revolving door of what we might call false advertisement. But J never does bait and switch. If you're wondering if a girl is one of the good ones, you only need to do a search here in this forum.

[QUOTE=CliffordLy;5215344]Thanks for replying both of you, the two girls were jane & ? From cakdolls. Sorry the second girl they offered me after I walked out isn't on the roster anymore so idk her name but neither her nor jane looked like their pics. Though you could say the pictures were representative of their stature. I would say I was screwed by false advertisement though I am guessing maybe the girls were who J normally offers under those names or to newbies LOL.

I would say in general I do have high expectations but with the past two girls, belle & Victoria, they were at least attractive. Those other 2 were not. Either way. I have 2 refs now and am looking for DDG hourglass now.[/QUOTE]Given that 90% of pictures are fake / altered / inaccurate, and most (experienced) hobbyists are aware of this (or should be), the notion that one is duped by "bait and switch" or "false advertising" is nonsense. That's why one toftt whenever they try someone new who hasn't been reviewed. If you think you got a "3" for someone who has been previously well-reviewed with an average of "8", then your expectations and view of looks are way outside the norm, not due to "false advertising", since it's already been established that the pictures are not real. Complaining about fake pictures isn't going to change anything anyway.

I never had any issues with "j's" girls in the past. The guy that jumped that gun and came to that conclusion is rocket as he interpreted the original poster's post as bait and switch and then transitioned into false advertisement. I speculated Clifford as having high expectations which he himself has validated. Appearance is subjective and honestly if one has been in this game for an extended time then one wouldn't rely on the pictures posted as the absolute truth nor is it false advertisement, its a gray area where you get likeness / fair representation.

[QUOTE=KingsFoil;5215780]In my opinion, bait and switch is different from false advertising.

In defense of J, she never baits and switches. Half her stable is represented well in the pictures and are consistent good providers. The other half are a revolving door of what we might call false advertisement. But J never does bait and switch. If you're wondering if a girl is one of the good ones, you only need to do a search here in this forum.[/QUOTE]

I don't think the OP ever got approved with J. He was talking about OC booker. He walked out on two girls Jane and Crystal in OC as a newbie but I think OC booker probably did not BL him yet. I didn't want to try Crystal and I saw Jane years ago. Her pics look familiar to me but look like old pics. I don't know if he rated on a 10 point scale but a 3 / 10 is unheard of for me. There are some good and attractive girls in OC but can't recommend until I understand his grading scale.

Can't expect accurate pics and profile of new girls these days. This is a TOFTT era.

[QUOTE=KingsFoil;5215780]In my opinion, bait and switch is different from false advertising.

In defense of J, she never baits and switches. Half her stable is represented well in the pictures and are consistent good providers. The other half are a revolving door of what we might call false advertisement. But J never does bait and switch. If you're wondering if a girl is one of the good ones, you only need to do a search here in this forum.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CliffordLy;5149691]Got BURNED. Bait & switched man. Asked for Caits nuru price & janes, (OC was the menu they gave me). Went and checked out, jane was not the same girl, a lot uglier than the photos unfortunately. Booker called me and insisted I see another girl, crystal (also not like her photos & not just P.S. Like he insisted). Such a shame. LA kgirl lineup looks nice too especially with Cami. Sigh. Anyone know good newbie agencies. Don't even know how to use HX tbh.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=KingsFoil;5215780]In my opinion, bait and switch is different from false advertising.

In defense of J, she never baits and switches. Half her stable is represented well in the pictures and are consistent good providers. The other half are a revolving door of what we might call false advertisement. But J never does bait and switch. If you're wondering if a girl is one of the good ones, you only need to do a search here in this forum.[/QUOTE]LOL, so now it's a semantics issue.

It's very simple. False advertising, bait and switch, whatever. If the girl from the pics looks completely nothing like the pic, the customer has a right to walk without being bullied. And it's not his fault.

There can be a million excuses of why the pics have to be completely fake, but if that's the case, meaning customer rolls dice blindly, then customer should have an option to say no thanks after seeing his blind date. Without being threatened of BL or BL.

Blaming the customer in such situation is preposterous. All you do is enable orgs and bookers to do it more often and without repercussions.

I thought orgs want repeat business? Then treat customers like customers and not like fools who can be tricked and then strong armed into paying for girls they don't want to fuck after seeing their real looks.

[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;5215641]Your expectations are unrealistic. There are no DDG (hourglass or otherwise) kgirls in LA.[/QUOTE]I got to say that Hana comes pretty close to that.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5216097]

I thought orgs want repeat business? Then treat customers like customers and not like fools who can be tricked and then strong armed into paying for girls they don't want to fuck after seeing their real looks.[/QUOTE]Brah, this is isn't a Ma & Pa shop bending over to make customers happy. No free refund for you.

It's way more profitable to use super model pics to get dudes in. No repeat? Eh, there's unlimited horny dudes out there. Less then 10% even bother looking at message boards so anything said here isn't going to make a difference.

Tbh, even when the girl isn't the one in the pics, it's still going to playtime with a hot chick.

New girl Emma at Sexy Angels. Pics are fake and she's known previously as Baby Irina. Young (22), cute girl with YMMV service I guess. I had a good time with her when she was in NorCal recently but others complained of less than stellar service and attitude.

[URL]https://sexyangels.site/emma[/URL]

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5216224]I got to say that Hana comes pretty close to that.[/QUOTE]That's like saying that the pictures are "representative" of how the girls look. In other words, meaningless. Also, an average looks rating of 8. 38 is not considered "pretty close" to ddg.

Are Hana's pics of angelsinwla real?

[QUOTE=Vibing13;5216399]Brah, this is isn't a Ma & Pa shop bending over to make customers happy. No free refund for you.

It's way more profitable to use super model pics to get dudes in. No repeat? Eh, there's unlimited horny dudes out there. Less then 10% even bother looking at message boards so anything said here isn't going to make a difference.

Tbh, even when the girl isn't the one in the pics, it's still going to playtime with a hot chick.[/QUOTE]Oh I get it, it's the customer who needs to bend over. How about no. You tell the PO you're walking because the girl looks nothing like pics, and if the PO threatens or BL lists you, you post on every forum you can. Like this one. About your experience. And no, it's not the customer's fault for being BLd if all you did was walk from someone who is looking nothing the pics.

Not too long ago someone here was talking about how orgs in the bay like their photoshop. But guess what, we can and do walk when the difference is big enough. Maybe it's the lack of air of exclusivity and lack of fear that the golden ticket inside secret society will be revoked, idk.

And BTW I'm not sure when a three became a "hot chick". Maybe you spelled "warm hole" wrong.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5216097]LOL, so now it's a semantics issue.

It's very simple. False advertising, bait and switch, whatever. If the girl from the pics looks completely nothing like the pic, the customer has a right to walk without being bullied. And it's not his fault.

There can be a million excuses of why the pics have to be completely fake, but if that's the case, meaning customer rolls dice blindly, then customer should have an option to say no thanks after seeing his blind date. Without being threatened of BL or BL.

Blaming the customer.[/QUOTE]Are you aware that prostitution is still illegal in California? Most K-girls are here on tourist or student visas. Posting their real pictures could result in visas being cancelled and get them deported and banned for 10 years. AI has become very powerful and is being used extensively by the DHS.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5216224]I got to say that Hana comes pretty close to that.[/QUOTE]Good cause I finally have the 2 references 😂.

Much spirited discussion I've started haha. I mean yeah I have pretty high standards but just cause if theyre not 8 or up for me I'd rather just stay home and save the money. There are some girls with real pics or with pics that are more representative that I appreciate.

Idk, I'll probably just go on the k rankings forum I guess. The Rankings now are kinda old tho. Nice warm hole comment rocket LOL. The type of warm hole that makes you feel crappy after nutting LOL.

& boner you're right but I'm pretty sure oc booker BLed me after walking bc J's # off cakdolls never replies.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5216065]I don't think the OP ever got approved with J. He was talking about OC booker. He walked out on two girls Jane and Crystal in OC as a newbie but I think OC booker probably did not BL him yet. I didn't want to try Crystal and I saw Jane years ago. Her pics look familiar to me but look like old pics. I don't know if he rated on a 10 point scale but a 3 / 10 is unheard of for me. There are some good and attractive girls in OC but can't recommend until I understand his grading scale.

Can't expect accurate pics and profile of new girls these days. This is a TOFTT era.[/QUOTE]The LA booker is a straight shooter and she is very honest about the looks of her girl. The OC booker is a really good guy and he won't BL you but he is always give you opinion as either: A) Coy and ambiguous about the girl look by saying "Oh, I never meet the girl (s), they send me a photos and I just post it" , B) Or Says: "Everyone likes her" sort of comments.

I had more MISS with him more often than HITS. On the other hand, the LA booker has been solid for years that I have dealt with her. She actually tells me point blank "Don't visit this one-not your type".

[QUOTE=AmericanDog;5216583]Are Hana's pics of angelsinwla real?[/QUOTE]Pretty close if not her.

Finally was able to book her after reading about her definitely wanted to try her out. Doing it PLEASER style.

Pocket KTE.

P. You already know what to expect from booker, no need to say much here.

L. 6/10. Her face is average, body obviously depends on what you like. I went in knowing she was going to be thin as hell so I wasnt disappointed. She is thin but wouldn't call it overly thin. Her main attraction was that tight P everyone was referencing. SHE IS TIGHT! And it makes sense why she takes so many days off she says she's always sore.

E. Good. Has the best conversational English out of the KTE girls I've seen which was good.

A. I think she has a good sense of humor and we got along great. Did not clock watch which was a plus.

S. Not bad not great. Shower took longer than I thought, I imagined she was trying to kill time not sure. I guess the only bad thing is she was making these screaming noises as if she was in pain. Definitely turned me off. Decent BBBJ skills but nothing worth noting.

E. 320, CFS x2.

I would repeat but BBFS but didn't do it this time just didn't want to pay the upcharge.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5215682]M. Chanel, Moni.

Sunny. Sandy, Niya, Lyn.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Fanny, Emma, Erica, Sophia, Helen, Jenny.

SFK. Viki, Jessie.

PKL. Ara.

Sesang. Hana.

Angelsinwla. Hana.

KGLA. Haper, Piper, Mimi.[/QUOTE]I got 3 question for you guys if you could help.

1st, Ara is Piper correct? Pictures look the same.

2nd, is Booker from PKL phone 1948 is the same person from KGLA phone 1015 ? Or she is using 2 different booker?

3rd, For all of you knows about Allie as one of your ATF, how do you feel about the comparison to Ara / Piper?

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5214964]Just wanted to update on this list since it changes so often. I will leave both active and dead ones so you can look at it for reference. As always, I probably missed some. I have updated with the ones recently posted.

Active.

[URL]https://2pop.shop/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.tomatoktown.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.dreamkgirl.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.pinkclubs.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://angelsinwla.wordpress.com[/URL]

[URL]https://lak.escortbook.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.thetopgirls.com/los-angeles-1[/URL]

[URL]https://ktownescort.com/home[/URL]

[URL]https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/[/URL]

[URL]https://newasianvibe.is/[/URL]

[URL]http://sexyfunkgirls2.escorts.biz/home[/URL]

[URL]http://sweetmoments.gfeincall.com/photos/[/URL] (not sure if this one is active, but website is working).

[URL]http://secretkgarden.escorts.biz/companions[/URL]

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://www.bookergray.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://mykupcake.com/home[/URL]

Https: is / model / sugar /.

[URL]https://sexyangels.site/sexy-angels[/URL]

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://eukgirl.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://ktownkgirlz.com/home[/URL]

M [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/aKndu2KCPapj[/URL].

Palace

[URL]https://fruitstore3.wixsite.com/mysite[/URL] (not sure if it still updates or not).

[URL]https://www.sixshop.com/star0082/home[/URL]

[URL]https://www.kakao-girls.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://ktowngfe.photo.blog/yeon-soo/[/URL]

Dead:

[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL]

[URL]http://newtopasia.hotprovider.com/escorts/[/URL]

[URL]https://kbunnygirls.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://acektownla.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://hiddenmango.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://cherrylove77.escorts.biz/secu...ceakacocolove/[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks for doing these, I wonder why so many other agencies no one really talk about, are they not BBFS?

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5215303]No reviews and decided to TOFT. I went in already knowing the pictures are fake as hell but still went in with a positive mindset. I'll try to keep the review nice and short. Booker was responsive and less pressure to book than M. I noticed M wants you to book when you text. Overall, a pretty good time. The only major downside is looks. I equate her to the Palace where you got older milfs but they make up for it in service. Nothing special in the bathroom. At the start inside, expect a decent rim with great foreplay on the flip. BBBJ is on the softer side and she works not only the shaft, but the balls and the area between your cornhole and balls. Plenty of DFK, but has a weird kissing technique. She kinda chomps and locks lips more than tongue so you have to adjust this with her. Overall, expect a solid session if you can past her looks. I would say she's around 5'2-5'4, natural Bs, and around mid 40's at least. No tattoos or scars from what I seen. Body is to be expected for a lady in her 40s, doesn't look like she works out so average build. Really tries hard and has a nice attitude. If you go in with this expectation, I don't think you can go wrong. I might repeat, but I need better looks along with good service. Another plus is the upcharge isn't as bad as the other clones out there at $380. I for one, welcome more cheaper options out there with a modest upcharge. Also, she has duos with "Casey" who I later remembered as "Aimee" at M awhile ago. I never saw her then so I don't know if she is any good.

Pricing:

260 1 HR.

220 HHR.

300 1 HR BBFS.

[URL]https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/mimi/[/URL][/QUOTE]TOFTT and did the duo with Mimi and Casey.

Agree with TheAbc above regarding Mimi's looks.

Of the two, Casey had the nicer rack and (IMHO) prettier face, but both were pretty much mid 40's MILFs.

Mimi was definitely more aggressive and passionate. There were times when Casey was just lying there on the side.

Both were around 5' 2" with Mimi at a B cup and around 110 lbs. I would say Casey was also about 5' 2" with a nice set of C / Ds and coming in around 115-120 lbs.

Easy BBFS duo price without upsell, but probably would not repeat just due to the visuals and connection.

-K.

Just wanted to update on this list since it changes so often. I will leave both active and dead ones so you can look at it for reference. As always, I probably missed some. I have updated with the ones recently posted.

[URL]https://2pop.shop/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.tomatoktown.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.dreamkgirl.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.pinkclubs.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://angelsinwla.wordpress.com[/URL]

[URL]https://lak.escortbook.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.thetopgirls.com/los-angeles-1[/URL]

[URL]https://ktownescort.com/home[/URL]

[URL]https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/[/URL]

[URL]https://newasianvibe.is/[/URL]

[URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://sweetmoments.gfeincall.com/photos/[/URL] (not sure if this one is active, but website is working).

[URL]http://secretkgarden.escorts.biz/companions[/URL]

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://www.bookergray.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://mykupcake.com/home[/URL]

[URL]https://sexyangels.site/sexy-angels[/URL]

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://eukgirl.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://ktownkgirlz.com/home[/URL]

M [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/aKndu2KCPapj.[/URL].

Palace (Humaniplex account, but I don't know what it is, someone needs to tell me).

[URL]https://fruitstore3.wixsite.com/mysite[/URL] (not sure if it still updates or not).

[URL]https://www.sixshop.com/star0082/home[/URL]

[URL]https://www.kakao-girls.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://ktowngfe.photo.blog/yeon-soo/[/URL]

Dead:

[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL]

[URL]http://newtopasia.hotprovider.com/escorts/[/URL]

[URL]https://kbunnygirls.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://acektownla.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://hiddenmango.com/[/URL]

[URL]http://cherrylove77.escorts.biz/secu...ceakacocolove/[/URL]

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=PlutoKiller;5216681]Are you aware that prostitution is still illegal in California? Most K-girls are here on tourist or student visas. Posting their real pictures could result in visas being cancelled and get them deported and banned for 10 years. AI has become very powerful and is being used extensively by the DHS.[/QUOTE]Nowhere did I say they need to post fully real pics.

Most pics at least have some resemblance. And good orgs in my area let you walk if you choose to. It's the shit ones who start threats and bluffs.

Again, not being able to walk away from a date when there's a huge discrepancy between what was advertised and reality, without getting BLd, is shit practice by the agency / booker.

"Shut up and eat what you're given (even if its fatter and uglier)" , is shit attitude to have towards customers. And if orgs don't give a shit about customers and don't want to give "free refunds" (actually, not even a refund since when you walk you never gave money in the first place), I'm sure they won't care if you write on an active public forum what transpired. Loudly, clearly write here and anywhere else about how the girl looked and what they did when you refused to go with their ruse. If they don't respect customers, why should customers respect them?

I had the opportunity to visit Moni of Booker M last night. She is a bubbly little fuck bunny whose body type may be described as slightly Rubenesque for a Korean.

She was not only open to the DFK and BBFSCIP, she was passionate about it! She had many nice comments about by handsome face, chest hair and big cha-ji.

I can say she's the opposite of a clock watcher since she went long. When I was putting my boxers back on to leave, she took me in her mouth and made a most compelling argument for a second pop. Unfortunately I'm getting on on years and taking Prozac to take the edge off, but her strident efforts were appreciated.

One thing different about her is she asked me to turn my cell phone off before the sesh. In the back of my mind I thought I was about to be robbed or stabbed mid-coitus, but she's a great girl and my fears were unfounded.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;5216864]I got 3 question for you guys if you could help.

1st, Ara is Piper correct? Pictures look the same.

2nd, is Booker from PKL phone 1948 is the same person from KGLA phone 1015 ? Or she is using 2 different booker?

3rd, For all of you knows about Allie as one of your ATF, how do you feel about the comparison to Ara / Piper?[/QUOTE]Let me try and answer your last question.

Comparing Allie, Piper, and Hana.

For me Allie is like meeting a girl in your early 20. She's fun in bed but she's more sensual but she's a freak but you need it get it out of her. Hana is that freak that's that you can toss around, carry and fuck, gives me vibe that you can fuck in a bar bathroom she's wild and crazy fun. Piper is in the middle of the two. She's the girl that's sensual and if you get to know her she will fuck your brains out. All 3 are all fun but it's all depends on how you vibe and what your looking for. I prefer Piper of the three. She's not over the top and a lot of fun.

Totally agree that she is a provider that has been an awesome visit each time I've gone to see her. I'm not one to do repeat visits, most of the time it's not as great as the first time in my experience. Viki is the rare exception for me. I've seen her 4 times in the last 2 months. Each time it's just as great as the first time I visited her, as stated she makes it seem very real. I haven't tried BBFS with her, or anyone honestly in this hobby, and it's a bit of joke that she has going with me. The last 2 visits she's made a cute joke about me not wanting to make babies with her and giggles and asks if I want to try today. I'm definitely tempted, especially after that last visit but haven't jumped into trying. As for her looks, I'm satisfied with them, she's petite and does have a slight stomach pouch when in certain positions but nothing off putting. I don't believe her to be 50 or near that because she doesn't have that neck skin situation that starts to happen to women around the 45 age mark, but I suppose she is a rare lady that it happens way later. She is older just not 50 if I were to guess. I'll be visiting her in the future but want to try out a few ladies, I. E. , Dahee, Hana, Piper (I believe someone said she looks like Asa Akira) and a few others.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5212745]There's been a lot of negative talk lately about quality of looks, service and prices with up charges for BBFS and MSOG. Add to that girls moving from agency to agency thinking they will find the pot of gold with a new agency. With all the negative talk we should be looking at the girls who give us what we want and haven't changed anything. One of those is Viki. She is nothing less than cute with a petite spinner body and service that is second to none. Viki's service is so sensual and passionate and most importantly she makes seem so real. I don't think she has to try to do that. She loves sex so much and is so customer oriented that the realness is there all the time and her kisses will tell you that she is really enjoying the time as much as you are. She will fuck and suck you till you are bone dry. Has great DT action and will suck you down to the last drop. Her kegel control is outrageous. Knows how to clamp down on your cock like most girls can't. If you like a girl who screams with passion while her pussy gushes wetness that will soak you to the bone then Viki is the one to see. With all the recent complaints Viki has remained steady in her price and service and if nothing else is a bargain not to be missed.

[URL]http://sexyfunkgirls2.escorts.biz/viki/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;5216536]That's like saying that the pictures are "representative" of how the girls look. In other words, meaningless. Also, an average looks rating of 8. 38 is not considered "pretty close" to ddg.[/QUOTE]One man's meat is another's poison. An average of 8.38 indicates that there are quite a few 9's and even a couple of 10's and I'm sure if there were fractions used some of those 9's would be closer to 10 than 9. In Hana's case not only are they representative but in person she looks better. Taking all that into account I think if you walked into a club with her all heads would turn to see that DDG girl on your arm.

[QUOTE=Pkim31;5215265]Stella does feign innocence or play dumb. I saw her once in 2015 and recently a few weeks ago. She asked me why I didn't call her when I got here. I said we never exchanged numbers to which she replied "oh".[/QUOTE]Does Stella offer BBFS? I though she's CFS?

Was trying to book Stella. I saw couple people mentioning her in this forum. Does she offer BBFS or is it YMMV?

M. Moni.

Sunny. , Niya, Lyn.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Taylor, Emma, Erica, Sophia, Helen.

SFK. Viki.

PKL. Saki (New WLA) Roommate of Hana. 5'6" 36 C BBFS MSOG 280 (Pics below).

Sesang. Hana.

Angelsinwla. Hana.

KGLA. Haper.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5217482]M. Moni.

Sunny. , Niya, Lyn.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Taylor, Emma, Erica, Sophia, Helen.

SFK. Viki.

PKL. Saki (New WLA) Roommate of Hana. 5'6" 36 C BBFS MSOG 280 (Pics below).

Sesang. Hana.

Angelsinwla. Hana.

KGLA. Haper.[/QUOTE]So that's where Annie with M went. Well, technically she didn't go anywhere, she's been Hana's roommate as Annie for a while now.

Any interaction between the ladies or is it just sex with two ladies one at a time?

[QUOTE=KeneBahl;5216875]TOFTT and did the duo with Mimi and Casey.

Agree with TheAbc above regarding Mimi's looks.

Of the two, Casey had the nicer rack and (IMHO) prettier face, but both were pretty much mid 40's MILFs.

Mimi was definitely more aggressive and passionate. There were times when Casey was just lying there on the side.

Both were around 5' 2" with Mimi at a B cup and around 110 lbs. I would say Casey was also about 5' 2" with a nice set of C / Ds and coming in around 115-120 lbs.

Easy BBFS duo price without upsell, but probably would not repeat just due to the visuals and connection.

-K.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5217606]So that's where Annie with M went. Well, technically she didn't go anywhere, she's been Hana's roommate as Annie for a while now.[/QUOTE]Actually she went where Hana went with her new agency. Somehow these agencies are overlapping. Hana is with angelsinla and Saki according to my information is with PKL. So go figure that one our.