Massage Parlor Reports

I want to say tiger eye is a similar engine, I am aware of the technology, lots of adds use the same photo or a reversed image of the same person.

[QUOTE=Oldmonger]HD, TinEye is a free search engine that finds duplicate and modified versions of the image you submit. Instead of entering a search word or phrase, you specify a URL or upload an image. TinEye searches its index of more than a billion images and reports matches.

[url]http://www.tineye.com/[/url]

PWH, If you PM me a URL with a protected pic, I'll try a search for you. If I'm successful, I'll let you know how I did it.[/QUOTE]

Wondering if anyone has run into this recently. I called Spa be on Friday AM to request an appointment with G. Was told extremely rudely that they no longer take appointments and that I would just have to show up there and see if she was available. Not sure if I just caught someone in a bad mood or if they have truely changed their policies. It will be quite a bummer to drive all the way and not get some worth the trip.

Tinyeye is great in theory, but like all search engines it follows the Robots Exclusion Standard". That means a website can have a small text file named "robots. Txt" that tells all search engine spiders what parts/pages of the site can or can not be crawed to add to the search engine index. If a site like hidebehind blocks off most of their content, then tinyeye (and ultimately you) are out of luck because Tinyeye won't even get to the image to scan. If the image is hotlinked from Hidebehind, the spyder has to craw the path back to the server, which is both proxied for file name abstraction and, again, blocked by robots. Txt. (25% of the above is assumption, but an educated guess). On top of that, the web's rate of image expansion is exponential compared to one company's efforts to scan them all. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that tinyeye has only scanned around 10% maximum.

Additionally, tinyeye can't index Flash either because the search engine only recognizes Flash as one static executable (like one image that displays nothing) and will not bother with it. Google had the same problem for years with Flash and never really fixed it-they can index some text in Flash now, but nothing more.

The good news is that tinyeye has a semI-open API. If someone was so inclined, they might figure out a nefarious method for extracting image data from the plethora of "secure" images. This is the internet folks. Where there is a will, there definitely is a way.

[QUOTE=Pw Herman]I know this should be on another thread ( General) but thought I would start here.

Most of us know the advantages of using tineye, but I for one get frustrated when the girls pics are protected and I cannot search.

I do not claim to be any sort of computer guru so if this is a stupid question my feelings will not be hurt. " Hey pw you're so dumb, all you have to do is....." would be welcomed!!LOL

Is there a way to get a protected pic to a tineye search????[/QUOTE]

Hey Hand Deliver

Tried to reply to your Pm but gets kicked back saying you are "no longer accepting pms or........"

The key issue is whether TinEye is helpful with images in craigslist, backpage, the phoenix, and other sources of the information we seek. With _limited_ testing, I was unable to find matches for images on craigslist, but I found matches on backpage. One match for a photo on backpage was a photo on a stock photography site.

If I did not know the provider, I would assume her ad's photos are misleading.

Evil, you raised a number of technical points: I would welcome the opportunity to discuss these further via PM.

Oldmonger[QUOTE=Little Evil]Tinyeye is great in theory, but like all search engines it follows the Robots Exclusion Standard". That means a website can have a small text file named "robots. Txt" that tells all search engine spiders what parts/pages of the site can or can not be crawed to add to the search engine index. If a site like hidebehind blocks off most of their content, then tinyeye (and ultimately you) are out of luck because Tinyeye won't even get to the image to scan. If the image is hotlinked from Hidebehind, the spyder has to craw the path back to the server, which is both proxied for file name abstraction and, again, blocked by robots. Txt. (25% of the above is assumption, but an educated guess). On top of that, the web's rate of image expansion is exponential compared to one company's efforts to scan them all. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that tinyeye has only scanned around 10% maximum.

Additionally, tinyeye can't index Flash either because the search engine only recognizes Flash as one static executable (like one image that displays nothing) and will not bother with it. Google had the same problem for years with Flash and never really fixed it-they can index some text in Flash now, but nothing more.

The good news is that tinyeye has a semI-open API. If someone was so inclined, they might figure out a nefarious method for extracting image data from the plethora of "secure" images. This is the internet folks. Where there is a will, there definitely is a way.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=hairluver]Wondering if anyone has run into this recently. I called Spa be on Friday AM to request an appointment with G. Was told extremely rudely that they no longer take appointments and that I would just have to show up there and see if she was available. Not sure if I just caught someone in a bad mood or if they have truely changed their policies. It will be quite a bummer to drive all the way and not get some worth the trip.[/QUOTE]


I had an appointment by phone but am already in the system and had one pre paid visit coming to me so if I was a no show guess I would loose it.

Was in Kenmore the other day and I thought I would stop by before baseball season started and the area became a little to crowed with people. Was buzzed in and saw Amy. Was the first time I had seen her. Very good looking and in her late 30's early 40's. Gave one hell of a tease and then stripped down so I could give her a massage all over. Nice body with some of the longest nipples I have ever seen. She really was great all the way through. At the end she took me to the shower for a nice clean up. Would with out a doubt see her again. Standard house fee of. 70, and. 60 on top of that.

In real life I consider myself a competent and smart man. Until I read your post.
WTF!!!
Am I really supposed to understand any of that? Don't get me wrong, I really do appriciate the post , I just feel dumb right now (LOL)!

My only hope is that you have no clue on how to do my job.



[QUOTE=Little Evil]Tinyeye is great in theory, but like all search engines it follows the Robots Exclusion Standard". That means a website can have a small text file named "robots. Txt" that tells all search engine spiders what parts/pages of the site can or can not be crawed to add to the search engine index. If a site like hidebehind blocks off most of their content, then tinyeye (and ultimately you) are out of luck because Tinyeye won't even get to the image to scan. If the image is hotlinked from Hidebehind, the spyder has to craw the path back to the server, which is both proxied for file name abstraction and, again, blocked by robots. Txt. (25% of the above is assumption, but an educated guess). On top of that, the web's rate of image expansion is exponential compared to one company's efforts to scan them all. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that tinyeye has only scanned around 10% maximum.

Additionally, tinyeye can't index Flash either because the search engine only recognizes Flash as one static executable (like one image that displays nothing) and will not bother with it. Google had the same problem for years with Flash and never really fixed it-they can index some text in Flash now, but nothing more.

The good news is that tinyeye has a semI-open API. If someone was so inclined, they might figure out a nefarious method for extracting image data from the plethora of "secure" images. This is the internet folks. Where there is a will, there definitely is a way.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Pw Herman]In real life I consider myself a competent and smart man. Until I read your post.
WTF!!!
Am I really supposed to understand any of that? Don't get me wrong, I really do appriciate the post , I just feel dumb right now (LOL)!

My only hope is that you have no clue on how to do my job.[/QUOTE]

i think the short is that the program can only find the tip of the iceberg.

Thanks Dave
I pretty much got that on my own.
If you want to explain the whole robot and spider theory to me please feel free.



[QUOTE=HappyDave]i think the short is that the program can only find the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HappyDave]I had an appointment by phone but am already in the system and had one pre paid visit coming to me so if I was a no show guess I would loose it.[/QUOTE]

maybe you got a rude resptionist who has other problems PRIOR to your call. I see this at work a lot where some one snaps at me for no reason. I would try again. If that is the new policy then do what i do and look elesware. I don't get made any more..I just take my business eleseware and smile.

steve

[QUOTE=Steven1234]maybe you got a rude resptionist who has other problems PRIOR to your call. I see this at work a lot where some one snaps at me for no reason. I would try again. If that is the new policy then do what i do and look elesware. I don't get made any more..I just take my business eleseware and smile.

steve[/QUOTE]

Why you quoting me on this one and not hairlouver. I had no problem getting an appointment.

I do have to admit the lady who runs the show and answers the phone at b is extremely business like and absolutely no BS.

Now back to spiders and robots......

[QUOTE=HappyDave]Why you quoting me on this one and not hairlouver. I had no problem getting an appointment.

I do have to admit the lady who runs the show and answers the phone at b is extremely business like and absolutely no BS.

Now back to spiders and robots......[/QUOTE]


Sorry about the quote. Anyways, I would try to beek again with who you want at another time. many places I have been to will not take reservatiosn as they have so many no shows. i can see not taking a reservation from a new client etc but If you have been there many times on time there is no excuse. I recall a place (out of business) called Therapuetic Relaxation in Newton. I went there for 5 years and never was late, was clean hygene, polite and tipped appropriately for services yet they woul take my reservation and not honor it. The recptionist would say it was a mix up etc but this happened often and finally I stopped going there. I found out latter taht the reason was they had so many no shows that they woudl book two appointments and hope one customer actually showed up.

Steve

[QUOTE=Steven1234]Sorry about the quote. Anyways, I would try to beek again with who you want at another time. Many places I have been to will not take reservatiosn as they have so many no shows. I can see not taking a reservation from a new client etc but If you have been there many times on time there is no excuse. I recall a place (out of business) called Therapuetic Relaxation in Newton. I went there for 5 years and never was late, was clean hygene, polite and tipped appropriately for services yet they woul take my reservation and not honor it. The recptionist would say it was a mix up etc but this happened often and finally I stopped going there. I found out latter taht the reason was they had so many no shows that they would book two appointments and hope one customer actually showed up.

Steve[/QUOTE]TR in Newton had some great ladies. Remember Sue? She was Tracy at Broadway, best body!

Has anyone been to the one in Newton.

PM if preferred. think they charge .6 for special now, but .8 usual house fee.