Court Finds 'Happy Endings' To Be Legitimate Massage Procedure

[QUOTE=Dannymn;6766118]I live in the area and I been there few times there months back. I had a reasonable good massage first time so when I went there again, the masseuse was different that day and was distracted to something on her phone during the whole session so I never went back there again. But I had no idea if they have anything beyond genuine massage, I never got any hint or asked about it. Plus it is in an area which in pretty busy on a busy road, so I never thought they would be doing anything like that. But who knows.[/QUOTE]No blissful serenity for you, you say?

[QUOTE=Andir;6766133]No blissful serenity for you, you say?[/QUOTE]Yes, no such vibe I got so I did not ask nor did they ask. So it was just a massage.

[QUOTE=Dannymn;6766118]the masseuse was different that day and was distracted to something on her phone during the whole session [/QUOTE]That's the parlor's owner TT you were with during your second visit. She likes to be on the phone. A good-looking woman by the way.

"WASHINGTON, D. C. –.

The Supreme Court case of Ming's House of Pleasure v. The state of Maine has ruled in favor of Ming's in a shocking 7-3 vote. The Supreme Court of The United States has ruled that "happy endings" can be considered a legitimate massage procedure, and in no way should be considered prostitution.

"This case has been a court favorite for a while now," said Court reporter Luis DeJesus. "The Justices asked to hear testimony from all 15 of Ming's massage therapists. The early goings of the case did not look good for Ming, but the turning point of the case came when Ming offered the justices each a free massage. ".

"The day of the free massage was the only time I ever saw Ruth smile," said Ruth Ginsburg aide Sarah Nicole. "I knew the men would enjoy it, but who knew the old girl was a freak?

"The happy ending was a real pleasure," said Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. "I had my reservations, but once I experienced it, I had a change of heart. I can see how it's the perfect ending to a relaxing massage. To think this was considered prostitution is outrageous. Now that I've experienced it, I can't think of anything more natural than a good ol' fashioned to finish off a good deep tissue massage. ".

"Well, it's about time those old bastards finally got something right," said frequent Ming's patron Carmine Classi. "Now my wife can't give me hell when I go to Chinatown for a little release. Shit, now that it's legal and I don't have to worry about the cops busting in, I'll probably go 3 or 4 times a week instead of my usual 2. ".

[QUOTE=Andir;6796778]"WASHINGTON, D. C. .

The Supreme Court case of Ming's House of Pleasure v. The state of Maine has ruled in favor of Ming's in a shocking 7-3 vote. The Supreme Court of The United States has ruled that "happy endings" can be considered a legitimate massage procedure, and in no way should be considered prostitution.

"This case has been a court favorite for a while now," said Court reporter Luis DeJesus. "The Justices asked to hear testimony from all 15 of Ming's massage therapists. The early goings of the case did not look good for Ming, but the turning point of the case came when Ming offered the justices each a free massage. ".

"The day of the free massage was the only time I ever saw Ruth smile," said Ruth Ginsburg aide Sarah Nicole. "I knew the men would enjoy it, but who knew the old girl was a freak?

"The happy ending was a real pleasure," said Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. "I had my reservations, but once I experienced it, I had a change of heart.[/QUOTE]Supreme Court Finds 'Happy Endings' To Be Legitimate Massage Procedure.

POSTED ON January 29, 2015 BY ABE ABRAMS.

[URL]https://empirenews.net/supreme-court-finds-happy-endings-to-be-legitimate-massage-procedure/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Andir;6796778]"WASHINGTON, D. C. .

The Supreme Court case of Ming's House of Pleasure v. The state of Maine has ruled in favor of Ming's in a shocking 7-3 vote. The Supreme Court of The United States has ruled that "happy endings" can be considered a legitimate massage procedure, and in no way should be considered prostitution.

"This case has been a court favorite for a while now," said Court reporter Luis DeJesus. "The Justices asked to hear testimony from all 15 of Ming's massage therapists. The early goings of the case did not look good for Ming, but the turning point of the case came when Ming offered the justices each a free massage. ".

"The day of the free massage was the only time I ever saw Ruth smile," said Ruth Ginsburg aide Sarah Nicole. "I knew the men would enjoy it, but who knew the old girl was a freak?

"The happy ending was a real pleasure," said Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. "I had my reservations, but once I experienced it, I had a change of heart. I can see how it's the perfect ending to a relaxing massage. To think this was considered prostitution is outrageous. Now that I've experienced it, I can't think of anything more natural than a good ol' fashioned to finish off a good deep tissue massage. ".

"Well, it's about time those old bastards finally got something right," said frequent Ming's patron Carmine Classi. "Now my wife can't give me hell when I go to Chinatown for a little release. Shit, now that it's legal and I don't have to worry about the cops busting in, I'll probably go 3 or 4 times a week instead of my usual 2. ".[/QUOTE]To avoid confusion, this article is fake and was made as a joke.

[QUOTE=MaybeSometime;6801403]To avoid confusion, this article is fake and was made as a joke.[/QUOTE]I think it's real and the old girl Ruth enjoyed it!

They still talk about revealing the identities.

[URL]https://www.masslive.com/news/2024/09/woman-accused-of-running-cambridge-brothel-ring-to-plead-guilty-at-friday-hearing.html?outputType=amp[/URL]

Not going to happen in my humble opinion.