-
Until women also have to pay, even a nominal amount, quality will continue to decrease. There are no barriers to entry for a woman, whereas the barrier to entry for men is rather high.
[QUOTE=BeegDick;7438315]Hey everyone,
I'm a senior member who is getting completely burnt out on the low-quality, high-effort profiles you find everywhere else STG, TRYST, etc. The signal-to-noise ratio is just terrible. I keep hearing about the big price increase on [URL]Seeking.com[/URL], with Platinum going up to $150+ a month.
For those who are currently active: Is the high price acting as an effective filter right now? Are you actually seeing a significant difference in the quality of women and the seriousness of their intent compared to a year ago?
Specifically, what has been your actual success rate (meaning, quality meet-ups leading to an arrangement / connection) in the last few months? I'm trying to figure out if the higher cost is worth the investment to skip the endless swiping and low-effort profiles.
Thanks for any honest feedback![/QUOTE]
-
Not Millie but Milly
[QUOTE=Bizkit69;7438327]Read my review of Millie two posts down.[/QUOTE]Check out the profile which is the one in this post.
-
[QUOTE=Bizkit69;7437366]Curious if anyone else has any experiences with Kay? Thanks![/QUOTE]Do not bother. We texted, agreed on amount and set a time and place. Then nothing. She even texted the morning of meeting to confirm, then that afternoon, total ghost. Time waster.
-
[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;7438421]Until women also have to pay, even a nominal amount, quality will continue to decrease. There are no barriers to entry for a woman, whereas the barrier to entry for men is rather high.[/QUOTE]Very true, exactly the reason I dropped out. They have no skin in the game and if they violate any of their rules they just create a new profile.
