Sugarbabies?

[QUOTE=BamBam;5844860]Someone asked me how risky were cops on Seeking. I thought I would share my answer here.

The cops sometimes get on Seeking but they can really only go after the girls. They set up in a hotel room trolling for John's. Using the escort sites. If bored they might send offers to girls at absurd levels. If the girls agree, they say come on over and give the hotel room. This actually happened to a GPS woman who was on Seeking for a while. Anyone remember her name? It was like aniska siska or some such. (Too lazy to look it up.) If the girl shows she is busted. They might make the same approach to men but most men on seeking aren't after pros and are unlikely to agree to go straight to a hotel room. Avoid anything like that and you are good.

The seeking site, for men, usually involves 1-1 meetings first. If you always ask for an in-person MnG, in a public place, before private time, you are safe. This should be your standard procedure in any case just to avoid the muggers and blackmailers. Cops need to make arrests in wholesale numbers. They cannot afford the time to set up singles. I am even safer because the minute a girl talks ppm, or any sex for money talk, I slowly back away. I want true amateurs. In any case, aside from trolling for pedos, are there any other reports of the cops on Seeking?

BAM.[/QUOTE]Can you elaborate on the trolling for pedos? There was a profile in Dayton who was 17 posing as 18 curious if it was uncle.

Age is 16.

[URL]https://www.keatingfirmlaw.com/post/legal-age-of-consent[/URL]

[QUOTE=RickMann;5848518]Can you elaborate on the trolling for pedos? There was a profile in Dayton who was 17 posing as 18 curious if it was uncle.[/QUOTE]

They will sometimes post profiles that claim 18 but the pics look much younger. I know that some people have been nailed but I do not have any links. Just avoid anyone who looks really young; it shouldn't actually need to be said. More often, these profiles will be scammers trying to extort you. I have had a few people try that with me but I never engage in behavior that might make me vulnerable. My experience after doing this for a while is that the HS girls stick out. One note though, do not trust the 'ID Verified' check marks. All the HS kids have fake ID's showing them as over 21.

BAM.

[QUOTE=RickMann;5848518]Can you elaborate on the trolling for pedos? There was a profile in Dayton who was 17 posing as 18 curious if it was uncle.[/QUOTE]

I had several new profiles to add to the list and thought a second post was warranted.

FeminineBelle: likely romance scammer, fuzzy pic, Using Sandee Westgate pictures, [URL]https://www.romancescam.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56475&start=15;https://twitter.com/aliciarubialib;[/URL].

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0a394129-439e-465f-84b9-b349653fea25[/URL]


Megann025: How many of you guys remember a cute, ginger Megan from about six or seven years ago? She was a pro and a bit of a druggy. She was also a bit flaky. I almost saw her back then but got a tingle and cancelled. She is back now with a 5 year old. Her face is still cute but she looks quite a bit heavier. She used to be reasonable and I suspect still is but not really my thing. She was flattered I remembered her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d6277b6f-fffe-4a1f-85fd-710b2431fe00[/URL]


Kendall: accepted 200-300 ppm but no details, switched to text, living in Dayton, agreed to MnG in Middletown then dropped that she is 6 mos pregnant, no BD in the picture.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e15c1a4f-2852-433e-ae96-51fc921a0ece[/URL]


Amanda, 25, Dayton, since 6-21, was all set for MnG last June but she cancelled, Back now but unwilling to re-engage. No Marrieds. Her profile pics are old and she is a bit less attractive on her SM. PII available to contributing seniors.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/276b5527-ab2b-4ba7-a959-ef07a7d479ea[/URL]


CurlyBabyy, "Hiii!! I'm out of town on spring break until next weekend and was wondering if you're okay with starting online then meeting next weekend for fwb? "What could go wrong?? Ghosted me when I said; Sure! let's start with a video chat.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7e8c2ee0-c02f-423d-82b9-0e03beb07d14[/URL]


HystericalDuchess: CATFISH! Using pics of Ft. Lauderdale Realtor with no obvious connection to Cinti. I have PII for the realtor. Poor English. Asked me to go to What'sApp. Refusing to video chat. She blocked me.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1a539f7d-f499-48be-bc60-3da817b5bdf4[/URL]

BAM

[QUOTE=BamBam;5849029]I had several new profiles to add to the list and thought a second post was warranted. <snipped the intel>

BAM[/QUOTE]Dude, do you ever take a time out to have a martini and stare off into space? LOL.

[QUOTE=JackOhLantern;5847519]PrincessM.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/24be5550-f3c5-44a5-b4e5-4eb6768b6f25[/URL]

Wants to get to know each other for a couple of weeks, which entails her selling pics.

Magic8 Ball.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/06452658-5c3d-47c0-81ec-467748111775[/URL]

Wants an uber to me, and her rate is 550 - wayyyy too high.

FitnessFreak.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a5f1a5f1-3c42-4725-82de-04e978fbe414[/URL]

Was with her maybe a year ago a couple of times. I think someone reported that she's not much in terms of conversation / personality. I can confirm. But, she is super super fit and tight. I think we agreed on 400 if I'm not mistaken.[/QUOTE]Hey JackO, the link to Fitness Freak is to a message and not available. Do you have a profile link?

Voiceofenigma first said Cincinnati, now shows up near Vegas.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/86d083fe-c6bf-4f0c-b4f4-b13c62d51303[/URL]

[QUOTE=Cincyfunguy;5849181]Hey JackO, the link to Fitness Freak is to a message and not available. Do you have a profile link?[/QUOTE]Sorry about that!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/003a91de-c7c9-4255-b92c-cf66ba27803f[/URL]

I am more of a red wine drinker. Believe it or not, I usually watch Jeopardy at 7:30 and shut down all electronics afterwards. I spend a couple of hours or so reading and sipping some wine as I end my day. Yesterday, was a bit of an exception. I am currently reading a book titled "A Billion Wicked Thoughts." If you have any interest in human sexuality, and I assume most here do, you will find it fascinating. Lot's of counter-intuitive discoveries from mining the porn preferences revealed by search histories from around the world.

BAM.

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5849065]Dude, do you ever take a time out to have a martini and stare off into space? LOL.[/QUOTE]

This one is very pretentious. Every time we would agree on a ppm she would increase it.

[QUOTE=JackOhLantern;5847519]Magic8 Ball.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/06452658-5c3d-47c0-81ec-467748111775[/URL]

Wants an uber to me, and her rate is 550 - wayyyy too high.
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BamBam;5617608]She is a straight up pro. We chatted by text. She contacted me to say she had a room and wanted me to come over. She asked for 300 but accepted 200. I declined. She was also reviewed by Prat. He did a 3-way with her and her friend. As they were finished, she turned pissy and started demanding extra money, etc. According to him, it ended hostile. YMMV but I am not going near..[/QUOTE]I've had two good experiences with her recently. Service was spot on but she will pester the hell out of you for money days after. I simply say no!

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b387dcfa-6a61-4ba8-b151-2dd43a76697e[/URL]

Great service when she actually keeps the date. I have seen her about five times and she never shows up when scheduled and often times will not call to let you know she is running late or not coming. She will also pester you for advances. I have discontinued seeing her but might re-engage at a later date because when she does show up she performs well.

It is interesting that SA in the before covid times, banned this. Whether or not it was actually enforced or not that's a different story but I would like to see them ban it again, although it's probably one of those "genie in a bottle" situations.

To answer your question I think it's more about volume. If they can get 60 bucks from 10 people in a week that's enough right there.

I do not do online only arrangements. I do not pay for "meet and greets" Aside maybe from buying food or a beer or something. Not sure how things are in the midwest but the bowl in the Seattle area is a complete mess right now.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5842241]We all have different standards and red lines regarding age, looks, weight, price range, etc. I get that.

But is there anyone among us who is doing "online only" arrangements?

I can't even imagine how this would work.

Camshow sites have been around for 20 years. And back in the 1980's, there were the 1-900 lines. (As a high school kid in 1985, I once dialed a 1-900 line out of pure curiosity. I found it unsatisfying and boring. And I had a *lot* of fun trying to explain that one to my parents when it appeared on the family phone bill.).

I just can't imagine what any of these girls is providing that would enable them to make any real money with an "online arrangement". Am I missing something here?[/QUOTE]

Here are the recent additions to my watch list:

Yuwillloveme21: since 6-17, Last seen around 11-19, went by kaykay, was a UTR, was willing to go direct to FC for low $, profile pix are verrrry old, butterface in texted pics. Had some attitude. I am not interested in getting an update. I will not re-engage but thought you all might want the background.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/aa5b7a57-054e-439c-8fb5-ed9e1172874a[/URL]


Sweetdelight: not exactly sure why but this one set off my spidey sense. Fuzzy pics, Boone County?, a bit too overtly dtf, taking me straight to snap, using stolen pictures of porn star: Lela Star. LEO??

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/227ca7b0-a333-484c-ac61-0ff85a8bcd9e[/URL]


Ginia: on WYP, using GV number, bait-and-switch, hot pictures on the site, Thick pics by text. Close but not the same woman. No car, about an hour away in Sabina.

[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/okY13bKlJlGRRzPAneVE27Ma[/URL]


Angel wings: Crypto-scammer? "For the purpose of getting married." Odd and likely not real. Changed her pictures overnight, TGTBT, refuses to video chat.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2cefb197-3f49-4c8f-9b0e-611827d587ab[/URL]


SweetMusician: Classic Crypto-scammer. Stolen pic: [URL]https://www.misslola.com/products/shawna-camel[/URL].

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1a96c72d-eb43-4a9f-9fc8-d7f35c5962aa[/URL]


Waterbaby: "I'm looking for a bi weekly or weekly fwb arrangement but I'd ideally like to start online for a few days and explore my voyeurism kink more. How I did online with my last arrangement was I sent him pics, videos and FaceTimed him at night and danced for him for 140 then met up and started a weekly fwb arrangement and he helped me out every month with 800." I said I would love an arrangement like that. After we video chat for a few minutes. I also asked for her Paypal so I can send some money to show my seriousness. For some reason she ghosted me afterwards.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4c908ecb-32f6-4c8f-9e8a-652f4fe206fc[/URL]


Lipslikeangelinaaa: Not new. Frequent profiles, often reviewed. I have saved notes for anyone curious. Total GPS rinser: in the past, asking variously 800 MnG, 2000 FC, 5000 overnight. Another person got a 3500 allowance request. She is hot. Probably shows up to find a whale then disappears. There ARE whales on the site. They surface, grab a hot chick they can use for a month or so and then they dive again until they need someone fresh.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2e2b23b9-a51f-4bde-940a-11080045f426[/URL]


Queenme: Probably a real person but the picture is stolen: "You literally wrote me the same message 7 years ago. Likely true. She must have an eidetic memory. Careful what you say. Nice warning to me to start mixing up my messages. Here is where you find her profile pic.[URL]https://www.pinterest.com/chloetelesford/summer-vibes/[/URL].

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a336794d-d65d-444f-9f15-dce75f7f9bbf[/URL]


Misssexy101: ""Hey babe want to get together tonight?" "Did I scare you off?" UTR: I did not explore the value proposition.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/aea47ea2-cd45-4e80-bd1a-015ea9e7580f[/URL]


I welcome comments or feedback. I've decided that I am just going to immediately block the obvious scammers going forward. In the past, I would favorite them in order to keep track. I have also sometimes messaged them to explore their schemes and waste their time. I have recent experienced some retaliatory complaints on the site. I have been on the site for almost eight years without a complaint or problem before now. I suspect there are still idiots on this site sharing my posts with the targets. It's not worth the hassle. I usually have my profile hidden. If I never message them, they cannot see my profile and therefor cannot file a complaint. Any other suggestions?

BAM

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7c595d55-47c5-4ace-bf89-6de97bea9361[/URL]

Asking a grand. Serious gps.