Printable View
With all the busts in the area I appriciate their being safe. If you do not like it don't take an attitude with them find someone else to play with. DC is dull of them and so are the sites.
[QUOTE=Steelinox]Tried to get "verified" with Nomi and sent a cropped pic of my drivers license. Emailed back saying they needed the whole thing. I replied "it is a legit license and why do they need all this." I am just looking for a little action, not applying for a job with the Secret Service.[/QUOTE]
This is my first review, but I thought I'd give everyone a heads up.
Bea is pretty great. I wanted a real massage but didn't want to go any further than touching. However, this being my first time, I went in nervous. I didn't have to be because Bea was great and I and came out smiling.
The pros: good massage overall - she's certified - and she's an excellent conversationalist with an excellent personality. She's not FS, but the ending was superb.
The cons: I went in for a full hour, but I could've gone with her 1/2 hour special (she was charging only $99). However, the extra spending did go a long way as things she usually charged extra for (topless) were given for free. I still tipped her well.
Her massage studio is out of her home in Alexandria and in a very nice neighborhood. Not seedy at all. She's a bit darker-skinned than her pictures lead on, but I don't mind Brazilian chocolate at all!
For some reason, this is becoming an awful trend with me. When I go out to see these girls, I keep coming home with the same amount that I took from the ATM machine (lol). Either it's a bait and switch, a scam, or the provider flakes out. So tonight, I decided to call “Kim” (photo 1). This is her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-in-town-naughty-lil-freak-bk-d00r-specials-19/3638298[/url]
She immediately asked me if I had called earlier. I told her I’ve never spoken to her before, but she apparently didn’t believe me. So we exchange info about rates and agree on a time to meet. I noticed during the convo she’s getting more and more testy with me. So when I ask her the location of the hotel she’s staying, she goes, “I’ll give that to you when I’m ready.” I’m like “Huh? What do you mean by that?” With much attitude, she repeats, “I said I’ll give it to you when I’m ready!” I said okay and hung up. I knew that was it with Kim, so I immediately called Chelsea (photo 2) this is her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/youll-remember-me-something-out-of-the-ordinary-22/3626821[/url]
Set up the appt for and hour later. Went through the normal motions and screening—cool. I asked if her pics were accurate; she said yes—cool. She even called before the time to make sure I was coming. So I thought this was legit. Got there early called up. Got to the elevator and “Vanna” walks out (the blond in photo 3). This is partly her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-blonde-and-hawaiian-playmates-2-girl-specials-double-the-fun-double-the-pleasure/3576191[/url]
I thought: That’s interesting. I wonder if the Hawaiian girl in photo 3 (Honeybunzz) is working here too? Sure enough I open the door, no Chelsea. Honeybunzz is standing there. F*cking bait and switch! So we calmly go back and forth, her trying to say the Chelsea pic was indeed her. She actually wasn’t bad looking, except for the cloudy eyes, but I have a zero tolerance for the B&S so I left without a fuss. Walking out of the hotel, Vanna is sitting on the stoop talking on the phone, I say to her, “We’re done,” as I walk past. She didn’t even flinch. She was still sitting there as I drove away.
I don’t understand why the providers employ this tactic of using both real and baited pictures. Once again I had redeposit my funds. But FWIW, the two girls in photo 3 are accurate to their pictures (they are both very tall).
[QUOTE=Low Jack]Had a crazy session with a service that advertises on both BP and CL. Anyways, Korean lady (Happy)with average body and looks but mind blowing techniques. a buck eighty was the damage. The only problem was the hotel is crappy and the shower stopped working mid way through my soaping. Have to say that Happy had some fast and furious techniques.
Senior Members pm for more details.
Face: Homely
Body: Average
Age: possibly mid to upper 30s pushing early 40s.
Technique: Fast and Furious[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah! +1 :D
MnV
[QUOTE=Justforme]With all the busts in the area I appriciate their being safe. If you do not like it don't take an attitude with them find someone else to play with. DC is dull of them and so are the sites.[/QUOTE]
But "verifying" clients through picture ID does not give protection against busts. Uncle LEO works for the same people who make drivers licenses, and he can get as many as he wants in any name he wants.
As far as preventing busts, checking ID is as pointless as asking "are you affiliated with any law enforcement agency?" or putting a disclaimer in an ad that calling a girl's number means you agree that you're not attempting to entrap her. Uncle LEO is allowed to lie and cheat.
I heard tell of a provider getting beaten up and a few getting ripped off by a verified client. Thing is, bad guys use the rep and another site names of good guys, get fake email addys that are similar and get a pass to walk in. Yes, law enforcement does what it wants but the "community" is about everyone looking out for each other. Whatever helps, I am for.
[QUOTE=Bunker Buster]But "verifying" clients through picture ID does not give protection against busts. Uncle LEO works for the same people who make drivers licenses, and he can get as many as he wants in any name he wants.
As far as preventing busts, checking ID is as pointless as asking "are you affiliated with any law enforcement agency?" or putting a disclaimer in an ad that calling a girl's number means you agree that you're not attempting to entrap her. Uncle LEO is allowed to lie and cheat.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Bunker Buster]But "verifying" clients through picture ID does not give protection against busts. Uncle LEO works for the same people who make drivers licenses, and he can get as many as he wants in any name he wants.
As far as preventing busts, checking ID is as pointless as asking "are you affiliated with any law enforcement agency?" or putting a disclaimer in an ad that calling a girl's number means you agree that you're not attempting to entrap her. Uncle LEO is allowed to lie and cheat.[/QUOTE]
Why do people assume when a provider is "being safe" it is from LE? They are MORE worried about crazy clients that might hurt them, force them, or not pay them. That is what the ID check is for. Dudes are far less likely to act up if the girl knows exactly who the person is.
ID checks are not for LE, they are for pyschos. Remember these providers assume a great personal risk.
[QUOTE=Brahmabull]ID checks are not for LE, they are for pyschos. [/QUOTE]
Of course, when LE will bust those guys, they will get computer with all those Names, ID's, Phones, Work, TER/USG ID. I do not like discuss idea that Your personal data will be sold for some criminal groups, and it could be used for identity theft, etc.
Stay Safe,
Aman
[QUOTE=Aman Tuleev]Of course, when LE will bust those guys, they will get computer with all those Names, ID's, Phones, Work, TER/USG ID. I do not like discuss idea that Your personal data will be sold for some criminal groups, and it could be used for identity theft, etc.
Stay Safe,
Aman[/QUOTE]
As I said, the girls in the hobby have the greatest risk and some of them want us to assume some of that risk too.
If you aren't down with screening or showing ID, I certainly won't fault you for that. It is not for everyone. But let's not hate on the providers that want to do it, if its not your thing skip them. It's a balance between you and the provider you each have to reach a level that you are comfortable with. Not everyone is going to feel the same way.
Take care.
BB
One could create a completely false *monger ID*.Then one wouldn'dt have to worry about ID theft.
[quote=Aman Tuleev]Of course, when LE will bust those guys, they will get computer with all those Names, ID's, Phones, Work, TER/USG ID. I do not like discuss idea that Your personal data will be sold for some criminal groups, and it could be used for identity theft, etc.
Stay Safe,
Aman[/quote]
[QUOTE=AKFourtySeven]One could create a completely false *monger ID*.Then one wouldn'dt have to worry about ID theft.[/QUOTE]
False monger ID takes care of ID theft but how do you get around their request for your employment information. Saying your retired doesn't seem to work. I also found that when you provide the name of a recent provider they may or may not accept the reference. You can also screw yourself up with the recent provider especially when recent provider does not like to be used as a reference. Because of the hassle I stopped replying to ads which ask for sceening info.
As most know Southern MD is mostly dead, however trips to DC or Richmond can be difficult and today, with the blood flowing, I decided to try a BP ad:
[quote]''''''''Sexy as I wanna Be only Real gents Can see Me''''''''''. - 27
posted: August 2, 2010, 05:55 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply: click here
Hello gentlemen It's your lovely lady special
I'm eager and ready to please and satisfy your every need and desire. Indulge in satisfaction with this sweet delight, I have a passion for satsifying, and love every minute of it.
So let me use my dreamy eyes seduce you, my gorgeous smile bring you closer, my sexy body introduce you to pure pleasure, and my open-minded spirits to give you the satisfaction you truely desire. I'm honest in my work. So if your looking for a true provider, that will enjoy unrushed time with you, then you've found me...
please ask for me my name is ''special''[/quote]She answered the phone and although slightly delayed made the appointment. She is in a very good hotel right in Waldorf. She has several 'coworkers'. When she gives you the room # and knock it is actually not the right room, someone in the hall is checking you.
For Service, she is all about the business. Nice but had to count the roses, then put them in the back. CBJ, kind of mechanical. I was still getting over the, "am I going to robbed or arrested" phase and a little slow on reacting. Not a lot of enthusium on her part and there was another girl in the room that startled me and they repeatedly tried to get me to upcharge for the 2 girl thing. I said one was all I could handle
All in all she is as her picture shows, she is nice but a little too businesC. Her appointments are safe however and lacking anything else in the area is not a waste of money.
Be safe
[QUOTE=Steelinox]Tried to get "verified" with Nomi and sent a cropped pic of my drivers license. Emailed back saying they needed the whole thing. I replied "it is a legit license and why do they need all this." I am just looking for a little action, not applying for a job with the Secret Service.[/QUOTE]Well, for better or worse I made the plunge and provided my drivers license to Nomi and company, sure hope it is worth it. I was not completely at ease doing this with possible LE seizure, etc. Do I really have something to worry about or am I just being paranoid?
Kim used to go by the name Rene. She had another name also but I can't remember it. I remember the bad attitude and the time that was wasted. [QUOTE=Utwogood]For some reason, this is becoming an awful trend with me. When I go out to see these girls, I keep coming home with the same amount that I took from the ATM machine (lol). Either it's a bait and switch, a scam, or the provider flakes out. So tonight, I decided to call “Kim” (photo 1). This is her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-in-town-naughty-lil-freak-bk-d00r-specials-19/3638298[/url]
She immediately asked me if I had called earlier. I told her I’ve never spoken to her before, but she apparently didn’t believe me. So we exchange info about rates and agree on a time to meet. I noticed during the convo she’s getting more and more testy with me. So when I ask her the location of the hotel she’s staying, she goes, “I’ll give that to you when I’m ready.” I’m like “Huh? What do you mean by that?” With much attitude, she repeats, “I said I’ll give it to you when I’m ready!” I said okay and hung up. I knew that was it with Kim, so I immediately called Chelsea (photo 2) this is her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/youll-remember-me-something-out-of-the-ordinary-22/3626821[/url]
Set up the appt for and hour later. Went through the normal motions and screening—cool. I asked if her pics were accurate; she said yes—cool. She even called before the time to make sure I was coming. So I thought this was legit. Got there early called up. Got to the elevator and “Vanna” walks out (the blond in photo 3). This is partly her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-blonde-and-hawaiian-playmates-2-girl-specials-double-the-fun-double-the-pleasure/3576191[/url]
I thought: That’s interesting. I wonder if the Hawaiian girl in photo 3 (Honeybunzz) is working here too? Sure enough I open the door, no Chelsea. Honeybunzz is standing there. F*cking bait and switch! So we calmly go back and forth, her trying to say the Chelsea pic was indeed her. She actually wasn’t bad looking, except for the cloudy eyes, but I have a zero tolerance for the B&S so I left without a fuss. Walking out of the hotel, Vanna is sitting on the stoop talking on the phone, I say to her, “We’re done,” as I walk past. She didn’t even flinch. She was still sitting there as I drove away.
I don’t understand why the providers employ this tactic of using both real and baited pictures. Once again I had redeposit my funds. But FWIW, the two girls in photo 3 are accurate to their pictures (they are both very tall).[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Utwogood]For some reason, this is becoming an awful trend with me. When I go out to see these girls, I keep coming home with the same amount that I took from the ATM machine (lol). Either it's a bait and switch, a scam, or the provider flakes out. So tonight, I decided to call “Kim” (photo 1). This is her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-in-town-naughty-lil-freak-bk-d00r-specials-19/3638298[/url]
She immediately asked me if I had called earlier. I told her I’ve never spoken to her before, but she apparently didn’t believe me. So we exchange info about rates and agree on a time to meet. I noticed during the convo she’s getting more and more testy with me. So when I ask her the location of the hotel she’s staying, she goes, “I’ll give that to you when I’m ready.” I’m like “Huh? What do you mean by that?” With much attitude, she repeats, “I said I’ll give it to you when I’m ready!” I said okay and hung up. I knew that was it with Kim, so I immediately called Chelsea (photo 2) this is her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/youll-remember-me-something-out-of-the-ordinary-22/3626821[/url]
Set up the appt for and hour later. Went through the normal motions and screening—cool. I asked if her pics were accurate; she said yes—cool. She even called before the time to make sure I was coming. So I thought this was legit. Got there early called up. Got to the elevator and “Vanna” walks out (the blond in photo 3). This is partly her ad:
[url]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sexy-blonde-and-hawaiian-playmates-2-girl-specials-double-the-fun-double-the-pleasure/3576191[/url]
I thought: That’s interesting. I wonder if the Hawaiian girl in photo 3 (Honeybunzz) is working here too? Sure enough I open the door, no Chelsea. Honeybunzz is standing there. F*cking bait and switch! So we calmly go back and forth, her trying to say the Chelsea pic was indeed her. She actually wasn’t bad looking, except for the cloudy eyes, but I have a zero tolerance for the B&S so I left without a fuss. Walking out of the hotel, Vanna is sitting on the stoop talking on the phone, I say to her, “We’re done,” as I walk past. She didn’t even flinch. She was still sitting there as I drove away.
I don’t understand why the providers employ this tactic of using both real and baited pictures. Once again I had redeposit my funds. But FWIW, the two girls in photo 3 are accurate to their pictures (they are both very tall).[/QUOTE]
I applaud your actions. Most Mongers including myself would have went for the bait & switch just because the little head is very influential. I have fell victim to it more times than I would like to mention. I made a conscious effort a few months ago to "Walk away" Maybe over time they will get the message.
I agree. Dallas is a hassle since lots of good providers want references. Same in Seattle. But you can usually talk your way around it or as Sashimi said - skip it. Which is why the FCCC apts, or AMP's are particularly easy in terms this issue. Has anyone used P411 - that also makes me nervous if there is some bust and trial some day. It's bad enough giving my cell phone number out...
[QUOTE=Sashimi]False monger ID takes care of ID theft but how do you get around their request for your employment information. Saying your retired doesn't seem to work. I also found that when you provide the name of a recent provider they may or may not accept the reference. You can also screw yourself up with the recent provider especially when recent provider does not like to be used as a reference. Because of the hassle I stopped replying to ads which ask for sceening info.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Dff 4580] Bea is pretty great. I wanted a real massage but didn't want to go any further than touching. However, this being my first time, I went in nervous. I didn't have to be because Bea was great and I and came out smiling.
The pros: good massage overall - she's certified - and she's an excellent conversationalist with an excellent personality. She's not FS, but the ending was superb.
The cons: I went in for a full hour, but I could've gone with her 1/2 hour special (she was charging only $99). However, the extra spending did go a long way as things she usually charged extra for (topless) were given for free. I still tipped her well.[/QUOTE]
I think she's settled into business now. About a year ago she was kind of confrontational when I tried to set up an appointment so I backed off. Glad to hear she's got things worked out. Yak
[QUOTE=MrSunnyHills] It's bad enough giving my cell phone number out...[/QUOTE]
Go to Wal-Mart, Or K-Mart and get a trac-phone. Never give any ID to anyone, there are plenty of good providers that do not reqiure it.
Employment info?
No way would I give that.
All I ever give is provider references. Treat the ladies well and younget a good reputation. No need to know more about me.
[QUOTE=AKFourtySeven]Employment info?
No way would I give that.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Joseleche]Go to Wal-Mart, Or K-Mart and get a trac-phone. Never give any ID to anyone, there are plenty of good providers that do not reqiure it.[/QUOTE]
The cheap phones last a year or two, and I'd suggest getting a new phone number and throwing away the old phone when it starts to crap out (delete all info, remove battery, and trash in a large public receptacle). Phones are as low as $15, and the airtime is cheap as well. Pay cash for the phones and minute cards.
Hobbyist phone numbers found in numerous girls' phones over time can accumulate in various databases, and as data mining and info sharing become more commonplace and easy, you're better off not being caught in possession of a phone that frequently appears in the phones of providers who've been nabbed. Why make yourself an attractive target for prosecutorial extortion?
[QUOTE=Bunker Buster]The cheap phones last a year or two, and I'd suggest getting a new phone number and throwing away the old phone when it starts to crap out (delete all info, remove battery, and trash in a large public receptacle). Phones are as low as $15, and the airtime is cheap as well. Pay cash for the phones and minute cards.
Hobbyist phone numbers found in numerous girls' phones over time can accumulate in various databases, and as data mining and info sharing become more commonplace and easy, you're better off not being caught in possession of a phone that frequently appears in the phones of providers who've been nabbed. Why make yourself an attractive target for prosecutorial extortion?[/QUOTE]
This is no longer needed. You can get a google voice number for free, and use it to make calls from most smart phones with internet. No need to carry around 2 phones.
You can even text with it.
[QUOTE=Brahmabull]This is no longer needed. You can get a google voice number for free, and use it to make calls from most smart phones with internet. No need to carry around 2 phones.
You can even text with it.[/QUOTE]
Since the google voice call is transferred to your existing phone, isn't there still an electronic record connecting the numbers? The beauty of the throwaway phone is there's no connection or electronic trail back to you.
[QUOTE=Bunker Buster]Since the google voice call is transferred to your existing phone, isn't there still an electronic record connecting the numbers? The beauty of the throwaway phone is there's no connection or electronic trail back to you.[/QUOTE]
You can change the number you want it forwarded to at anytime instantly. There is no way for the person you called to know you are calling from a different number NOR is there a way for the person calling you to know google is forwarding it to your number.
The only record is in your google account itself, which you can sign up for with completely bogus information.
If you are too concerned with LE tracing it back yes a hobby phone is better. But I am not concerned with that. And I do not like to carry 2 phones.
You can also use GV with a computer and VOIP.
Google funding by nsa scares me more than curious providers.
Think about it.
[QUOTE=Brahmabull]You can change the number you want it forwarded to at anytime instantly. There is no way for the person you called to know you are calling from a different number NOR is there a way for the person calling you to know google is forwarding it to your number.
The only record is in your google account itself, which you can sign up for with completely bogus information.
If you are too concerned with LE tracing it back yes a hobby phone is better. But I am not concerned with that. And I do not like to carry 2 phones.
You can also use GV with a computer and VOIP.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Redlaw]Google funding by nsa scares me more than curious providers.
Think about it.[/QUOTE]
Google also with Verizon are in collusion to control speed/content and our current gov't is just sitting back an letting it happen!
Another example of big business stepping on our necks, I thought it read "We the people" not we the corporations...
[QUOTE=Redlaw]Google funding by nsa scares me more than curious providers.
Think about it.[/QUOTE]
The article I read does not say the NSA is funding google, just helping them secure their data.
Google does not have any of my personal information, so it is what it is.
[url]http://www.pcworld.com/article/188581/the_googlensa_alliance_questions_and_answers.html[/url]
[quote]Would the government gain access to my personal information?
Thus far, most signs point to no. Sources from both The Post and The Times say Google would not share user search data or e-mail information as part of the NSA partnership.
[/quote]
Providers are not the NSA. So they won't be able to tap any resources to find out the account behind my google voice, not that there is any information to be had anyway.
Verizon controling speeds? My fios is fricking fast, I have no complaints so what ever they are controlling more power to them.
[QUOTE=Brahmabull]
Verizon controling speeds? My fios is fricking fast, I have no complaints so what ever they are controlling more power to them.[/QUOTE]
Best to read up on the topic before making such remarks, unless you don't care...which at that point it won't really matter!
[QUOTE=MoonView]Best to read up on the topic before making such remarks, unless you don't care...which at that point it won't really matter![/QUOTE]
Read up on what? Got a link? My 25/25 package is doing just fine.
I hope you didn't miss-read that like you did the NSA funding google, because I couldn't find any supporting article saying NSA was providing any money to google for anything.
As far as Verizon goes, 1000% happy with my interent and Cell service from them. If they want to do something its fine by me.
The only thing they have done in the 10+ years I have been with them that bugged me in the least was eliminating free access to binary newsgroups.
If you are talking about Google/Verizon agreement to sell tier'd levels of service to content providers, I know about this, I do not care, I doubt it will have any impact on my browsing experience.
Factually all ISPs control speeds. Thats how they can have different "packages"..
[QUOTE=Joseleche]Go to Wal-Mart, Or K-Mart and get a trac-phone. Never give any ID to anyone, there are plenty of good providers that do not reqiure it.[/QUOTE]Never give out shit. Too many good fish in the sea that don't do that. Don't hassle the one's that do require, they are just trying to be safe, but stay as anonymous as possible.
[QUOTE=Brahmabull]Read up on what? Got a link? My 25/25 package is doing just fine.
I hope you didn't miss-read that like you did the NSA funding google, because I couldn't find any supporting article saying NSA was providing any money to google for anything.
As far as Verizon goes, 1000% happy with my interent and Cell service from them. If they want to do something its fine by me.
The only thing they have done in the 10+ years I have been with them that bugged me in the least was eliminating free access to binary newsgroups.
If you are talking about Google/Verizon agreement to sell tier'd levels of service to content providers, I know about this, I do not care, I doubt it will have any impact on my browsing experience.
Factually all ISPs control speeds. Thats how they can have different "packages"..[/QUOTE]Did a search and came up with this and many others...
[url]http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40711.html[/url]
I'm not here to inform and enlighten you or to waste countless posts trying, do your own homework. If you don't care then all I can say is "ignorance is bliss"!
MnV
Once again we have found ourselves wasting time and energy arguing about something that does not belong here. This forum is about finding WOMEN and not about arguing over internet service providers!
So post something useful like exactly where I can get that BBBJCIMNQNS!
JJ
[QUOTE=Bru51]Never give out shit. Too many good fish in the sea that don't do that. Don't hassle the one's that do require, they are just trying to be safe, but stay as anonymous as possible.[/QUOTE]So, back on topic. I fully agree. However, correct me if I am wrong on the anonymity issue but somewhere in the tracfone process, you got to call them or go online with them. I don't think you can do it by using a payphone or university computer. In any event these cell phones will always give your map coordinate location.
[QUOTE=Sleazebum]Once again we have found ourselves wasting time and energy arguing about something that does not belong here. This forum is about finding WOMEN and not about arguing over internet service providers!
So post something useful like exactly where I can get that BBBJCIMNQNS!
JJ[/QUOTE]+1 to that... Net neutrality is important, but everything has it's time and place.
[QUOTE=MoonView]Did a search and came up with this and many others...
[url]http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40711.html[/url]
I'm not here to inform and enlighten you or to waste countless posts trying, do your own homework. If you don't care then all I can say is "ignorance is bliss"!
MnV[/QUOTE]Yeah as I said below, I know about that and I do not care. You can care enough for both of us.
Until something changes my browsing experience, it is just talk and back end crap that has no real world(end user) implications.
This is what big businesses do all the time. Nothing new.
[QUOTE=Sashimi]So, back on topic. I fully agree. However, correct me if I am wrong on the anonymity issue but somewhere in the tracfone process, you got to call them or go online with them. I don't think you can do it by using a payphone or university computer. In any event these cell phones will always give your map coordinate location.[/QUOTE]I don't know about tracfone, but with Net10, you can buy the phone and minutes and activate without any personal information.
They can use tower trianglulation/tracking to find the phone if it is on, but it is NOT nearly as accurate as GPS, and these pay per use phones do not usually have GPS. Tower triangulation/tracking is accurate to about 50 meters. GPS is accurate to about 3 meters.
Neither works if the phone is off. So if you are not using it, no reason for it to be on.
Gentle-mongers
With respect to all. I think the actual topic of this board is "reviews of escorts. "
Having provided this reminder, I will go back to "stealth mode" on this board.
No need to "flame me" as a non-contributing kibutzer. I post most often on the "Massage Parlor Reports" board, but thought a good natured "poke" would lighten Monday's mood
Be nice to all the ladies regardless of which board you support with postings, dreams and other monger info of interest!
PA
Stop wasting time and space with off topic chatter!
JJ
[QUOTE=Sleazebum]Once again we have found ourselves wasting time and energy arguing about something that does not belong here. This forum is about finding WOMEN and not about arguing over internet service providers!
So post something useful like exactly where I can get that BBBJCIMNQNS!
JJ[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Brahmabull]
Neither works if the phone is off. So if you are not using it, no reason for it to be on.[/QUOTE]
I usually keep my phone on so I can receive calls.
[QUOTE=Sashimi]I usually keep my phone on so I can receive calls.[/QUOTE]
We were talking about a hobby phone, not your primary cell phone.