Sugar Daddy Sites

Her profile is deleted now, but chatted with a blonde on SA who wanted 1 k for a CBJ LOL.

Will post the link if a new profile pops up, but man this isn't GPS this is more like Platinum Mouth Syndrome.

[QUOTE=HappyJob;5770274]I got the same exact message this morning from the boba drinking duo, I asked if this date was strictly platonic but they have yet to reply.[/QUOTE]The boba drinking duo! LOL, that's amazing.

Mr. Wade is getting married as he has found true love. So seeking is supposedly changing to just a regular online dating site on Valentine's Day. So no more sugar dating on the site?

[QUOTE=OcasianBoy;5775699]Mr. Wade is getting married as he has found true love. So seeking is supposedly changing to just a regular online dating site on Valentine's Day. So no more sugar dating on the site?[/QUOTE]He was married before, right? You have a link to anything that supports what you're saying? If Mr. Wade is smart, he'll stick to what made him rich.

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5775791]He was married before, right? You have a link to anything that supports what you're saying? If Mr. Wade is smart, he'll stick to what made him rich.[/QUOTE]I got the email as well. He's right. He's making it a dating site, but what that means exactly I don't know. In the least it'll be rebranded.

[QUOTE=OcasianBoy;5775699]Mr. Wade is getting married as he has found true love. So seeking is supposedly changing to just a regular online dating site on Valentine's Day. So no more sugar dating on the site?[/QUOTE]The original version allowed nudity. Or at the very least least topless. I saw some of that on very old profiles when I first started.

Then some years back, SA changed from being Seeking Arrangements to just Seeking, and took away the focus on arrangements. There was talk at the time of transitioning to being a regular dating site. This sounds like another step in that direction. Wade is probably hoping to increase his customer base with regular daters, while keeping present SDs. Not sure how that would work, but might be.

[QUOTE=JackMiles;5775948]I got the email as well. He's right. He's making it a dating site, but what that means exactly I don't know. In the least it'll be rebranded.[/QUOTE]Odd didn't receive an email. Maybe phishing?

[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5776005]The original version allowed nudity. Or at the very least least topless. I saw some of that on very old profiles when I first started.

Then some years back, SA changed from being Seeking Arrangements to just Seeking, and took away the focus on arrangements. There was talk at the time of transitioning to being a regular dating site. This sounds like another step in that direction. Wade is probably hoping to increase his customer base with regular daters, while keeping present SDs. Not sure how that would work, but might be.[/QUOTE]But who would pay that monthly fee just for "dating" opportunities? I doubt the underpinnings will change. But hey, looks like there's an opening for anyone wanting to start stealing market share.

[QUOTE=LargeEss;5776290]Odd didn't receive an email. Maybe phishing?[/QUOTE]Not at all. It's from the site and has a video of Wade talking about it.
https://youtu.be/sx3Dg_igqVg

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5776399]But who would pay that monthly fee just for "dating" opportunities? I doubt the underpinnings will change. But hey, looks like there's an opening for anyone wanting to start stealing market share.[/QUOTE]Totally agree. Regular dating sites have a premium version too, but not at the same price as SA.

Is, sadly, running a full page ad in the LA Times today, advertising his impending marriage. Actually, I think he is a f-ing idiot and I wish he wouldn't do this. Those of us in the sugar bowl who have SOs don't need anyone reminding them that we alpha males have options out there we might indulge. Keeping my SO blissfully ignorant of the possibilities is my stock in trade.

About whether people would pay for vanilla dating through seeking, they already do that for a lot of dating sites, like [URL]match.com[/URL]. There is an article in the LA Times today about expensive rich people matchmaking. It is Valentine's Day tomorrow, all this will get media attention, then blow over and go back to the old ways.

[QUOTE=OcasianBoy;5775699]Mr. Wade is getting married as he has found true love. So seeking is supposedly changing to just a regular online dating site on Valentine's Day. So no more sugar dating on the site?[/QUOTE]It sounds like he is covering himself legally. "Use seeking to find love not sex " is a good way to defend himself if the site gets in trouble.

I had a different experience with her and was quite the opposite to what you experienced. Even repeated with her a few times because she lets me deliver cream pies every time. She's either a very good actress or really likes me like she wants me to be her new bf / hubby which is a no for me. Very nice lady though based on my experience.

[QUOTE=Ajfff;5582833]Skip this gal, definitely nice and gorgeous looking like her pics, not crazy expensive, but definitely she's watched more Japanese porn than me as she's almost a limp fish. Real quick time too, all covered.

Nice looks, bad time unless you like someone with very bad English skills that wants to rush you along with very little. This despite discussing it and being firm about it before she got there.

Maybe you'd have a different result, but I'd recommend a pass unless anything changes. Not my biggest fail, but not even worth 2.

I'd put a few more of my fails / wins down, but blocked most of mine or they blocked me.[/QUOTE]

The transition to the new Seeking has happened.

Only mention of arrangements is in the potted company history, under "About Us".

Every one should go onto the web and find a nice graphic of a Valentine's Day card, and text it to a bunch of your POTs. The girls will just melt. I have revived several today.