Rants and Raves

[QUOTE=AaronHamlet;5532354]You know how to read, pervert? Stick to your kiddie porn and peeping thru windows you fucking weirdo.

From the Trump hating Business Insider.

[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/2-top-fda-officials-resigned-biden-booster-plan-reports-2021-9[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ILuvEmall;5532336]Put your money where your big fat mouth is. Who's the chicken shit now?[/QUOTE]

More entertainment from the two middle school sorority queens. Keep pissing in the wind, your comments don't deserve any more insight than calling them retarded because they are shallow, stupid and detached from reality.

So those people whose Doctors prescribed Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine and not only survived Covid but the symptoms disappeared real quick are all lying? Those who have been taking preventative supplements and have not caught the China Virus are also lying? I do not always trust these so called trail studies done in labs because I think too many have an ulterior motive.

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5531680]I try to never stop a dipshit from fucking themselves up. Helps thin out the stupid herd. Like you. Please go take some Ivermectin. Make sure to load up the short bus with Nitesukr, Hamget, Comtech brown-water pants and any of the others around here. Make a clean sweep.

[B]Ivermectin - YouTube[/B]

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLtCBvKI_Mc[/URL][/QUOTE]

Merck Inc the company that manufactures Ivermectin, has explicitly stated that there is NO scientific basis that Ivermectin has a therapeutic effect against COVID-19.

[I]According to Merck, there are several ongoing clinical trials involving ivermectin as a possible treatment of Covid-19. But, at present there aren't any validated data on ivermectin's efficacy against Covid-19 in people.

Merck scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:

* No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies.

* No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease.

* A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.

[B]We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.[/B][/I]

[URL]https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/[/URL]

Oh, they're quite in phase with the reality that you're mouth is too big for your britches, and you're afraid to back it up. Just like when you got shut up in school for running that fat trap, the only difference being now you're able to take solace hiding behind the keyboard. Go ahead and pretend you're being the bigger man, we've all witnessed your repeated disgusting toilet humor here over and over again, so you're not fooling anyone. C'Mon., you're always talking down to everyone and condescending, so this should be an easy $1000 for you, right?

You're a fraud and a pedophile, and a chicken shit one at that.

[QUOTE=SgtSoros;5532409]More entertainment from the two middle school sorority queens. Keep pissing in the wind, your comments don't deserve any more insight than calling them retarded because they are shallow, stupid and detached from reality.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ILuvEmall;5532333]I think you get my point, but are just choosing to ignore it. My issue is not as much with the vaccines themselves (although admittedly, I don't feel the risk / reward is in favor for my age / health profile, and I do also question potential long-term issues which I've already pointed out), [/QUOTE]There are a lot of people with a similar mindset to you that think they're healthy enough to beat COVID-19 because of their "age / health profile" who are in their fifties, fourties, thirties, and twenties who caught COVID-19 and now either have crushing medical debt or won the herman cain award.

[URL]https://www.reddit.com/r/HermanCainAward/[/URL]

It's not a good idea to believe you're untouchable, these people did and not only were they wrong but it cost them dearly.

If anyone has taken the time to find a local Doctor they fully trust, why would you go against their recommendation because of some no face person at CDC, WHO, etc. Who says different? I choose to trust my local Doctor, even if he is retired Navy. No, I have not been prescribed any of these for the China virus but I know him, I do not know any of these others and what their true motive is.

[QUOTE=SgtSoros;5532747]Merck Inc the company that manufactures Ivermectin, has explicitly stated that there is NO scientific basis that Ivermectin has a therapeutic effect against COVID-19.

[I]According to Merck, there are several ongoing clinical trials involving ivermectin as a possible treatment of Covid-19. But, at present there aren't any validated data on ivermectin's efficacy against Covid-19 in people.

Merck scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:

* No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies.

* No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease.

* A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.

[B]We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.[/B][/I]

[URL]https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ILuvEmall;5532833]Oh, they're quite in phase with the reality that you're mouth is too big for your britches, and you're afraid to back it up. Just like when you got shut up in school for running that fat trap, the only difference being now you're able to take solace hiding behind the keyboard. Go ahead and pretend you're being the bigger man, we've all witnessed your repeated disgusting toilet humor here over and over again, so you're not fooling anyone. C'Mon., you're always talking down to everyone and condescending, so this should be an easy $1000 for you, right?

You're a fraud and a pedophile, and a chicken shit one at that.[/QUOTE]Still stuck in Middle school huh? Some of the adults here say it like is without a hint of your prepubescent gibberish BS. Based on the preponderance of your posts, there is no chance at all you could ever reach the "adult" level, it's always the same old childish, meaningless, empty rhetoric. It's ok though, as I realize this is the best you can do and like a few of the grown adults here, we are used to your infantile rants. TADA!

[QUOTE=TheRabbit;5532878]

It's not a good idea to believe you're untouchable, these people did and not only were they wrong but it cost them dearly.[/QUOTE]So did these people:

[URL]https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html[/URL]

I don't ever think I'm untouchable- didn't before Covid and don't now. It's all about risk assessment. I'll be happy to take vaccines like this one, that make sense and actually prevent transmission, once they're tested and proven as they should be:

[URL]https://www.technologynetworks.com/biopharma/news/intranasal-covid-19-vaccine-reduces-disease-severity-and-blocks-transmission-351955[/URL]

[QUOTE=ILuvEmall;5533230]So did these people:

[URL]https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html[/URL]

[/QUOTE]We talked about this VAERS data is completely unreliable and should not be taken seriously as most of those people are trolls.

[QUOTE=TheRabbit;5533308]We talked about this VAERS data is completely unreliable and should not be taken seriously as most of those people are trolls.[/QUOTE]Completely disagree, as many VAERS reports are filled out by healthcare providers. This system has been used for decades by the CDC and is the gold standard used to measure adverse events for vaccines, and now all of a sudden, because huge spikes are seen in the data caused by these Covid vaccines, they are unreliable? Again, it's ironic and hypocritical how you talk about others dismissing data points that don't agree their point of view, yet you're the very first one to do so.

To the contrary, most experts agree that VAERS system historically underreports at a rate anywhere from 1-10%. So you can take those numbers and multiply them by a factor of 10 or 100.

[QUOTE=ILuvEmall;5533485]Completely disagree, as many VAERS reports are filled out by healthcare providers. This system has been used for decades by the CDC and is [/QUOTE]No it's not, ANYONE can go that site and make a claim about having vaccine "side effects" I could go onto that site and claim that the vaccine turn me into the Hulk and it would accept it as legitimate. The CDC has stated multiple times that VAERS data is not reliable.

[QUOTE=ILuvEmall;5533485]Completely disagree, as many VAERS reports are filled out by healthcare providers. This system has been used for decades by the CDC and is...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TheRabbit;5533516]No it's not, ANYONE can go that site and make a claim about having vaccine "side effects" I could go onto that site and claim that the vaccine turn me into the Hulk and it would accept it as legitimate. The CDC has stated multiple times that VAERS data is not reliable.[/QUOTE]You need to stop talking out of your ass and making shit up. From the CDC site:

[URL]https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html[/URL]

"Under Emergency Use Authorization, FDA requires healthcare professionals to report to VAERS certain adverse events that occur after COVID-19 vaccination. ".

"Vaccine safety experts review all reports of serious adverse events submitted to VAERS. A serious adverse event after vaccination is something that causes

Permanent disability

Hospitalization or an extended hospital stay (if vaccinated while in the hospital)

Life-threatening illness

Birth defects (congenital anomalies)

Death

When VAERS staff members follow-up on a report of a serious adverse event, they ask for the patient's medical records related to the event to learn more about what happened. ".

You need to back up your ridiculous bullshit claims, instead of just making crap up. You've done that multiple times now, along with posting false stories with claims made by fraudsters with completely falsified facts. Just like the ER rooms "deluged by Ivermectin overdoses" in Oklahoma, while state officials documented only a dozen reported calls since May, most of which consisted of only mild cases of dizzines or nausea. Again, you're just fed bullshit by the media, and you lap it and repeat it as if it's fact and you're knowledgeable on the subject, when in fact you're just displaying your ignorance on the matter.

[QUOTE=ILuvEmall;5533547]You need to stop talking out of your ass and making shit up. From the CDC site:

[URL]https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html[/URL]

"Under Emergency Use Authorization, FDA requires healthcare professionals to report to VAERS certain adverse events that occur after COVID-19 vaccination. ".

"Vaccine safety experts review all reports of serious adverse events submitted to VAERS. A serious adverse event after vaccination is something that causes

Permanent disability

Hospitalization or an extended hospital stay (if vaccinated while in the hospital)

Life-threatening illness

Birth defects (congenital anomalies)

Death

When VAERS staff members follow-up on a report of a serious adverse event, they ask for the patient's medical records related to the event to learn more about what happened. ".

You need to back up your ridiculous bullshit claims, instead of just making crap up. You've done that multiple times now, along with posting false stories with claims made by fraudsters with completely falsified facts. Just like the ER rooms "deluged by Ivermectin overdoses" in Oklahoma, while state officials documented only a dozen reported calls since May, most of which consisted of only mild cases of dizzines or nausea. Again, you're just fed bullshit by the media, and you lap it and repeat it as if it's fact and you're knowledgeable on the subject, when in fact you're just displaying your ignorance on the matter.[/QUOTE]The point of VAERS is to look for patterns and provide early detection of possible adverse events that were not seen in the clinical trials. The site explicitly says that it can't verify whether these adverse events were actually caused by vaccines.

From the same CDC link.

VAERS Limitations

VAERS reports alone generally cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Some reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. VAERS reports often lack contextual information, such as total vaccinations given or information on unvaccinated groups for comparison. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they may be subject to biases. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

[QUOTE=TheRabbit;5533562]The point of VAERS is to look for patterns and provide early detection of possible adverse events that were not seen in the clinical trials. The site explicitly says that it can't verify whether these adverse events were actually caused by vaccines.

From the same CDC link.

VAERS Limitations

VAERS reports alone generally cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Some reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. VAERS reports often lack contextual information, such as total vaccinations given or information on unvaccinated groups for comparison. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they may be subject to biases. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.[/QUOTE]As I stated from the beginning, that's always been true of VAERS for every vaccine, and has been the case for decades. Nothing new under the sun, and nothing different that would make the numbers for these vaccines stick out like out a sore thumb, except for the fact that these vaccines have significantly higher reported adverse events- more in 7 months for these Covid vaccines than for all other vaccines combined in the 30 year history of VAERS. That's pretty astounding, and cannot be dismissed with your hand waving. I repeat, this is the gold standard for vaccine reporting.

New poll from the piece of shit Orangeman bad uniparty kunts at the Economist have Biden's approvals at 39%. Biden is underwater on all issues from economy, immigration, China virus response, climate change, national security, Afghanistan etc. Poll shows Kamala Harris is more unpopular than Orangeman. This is terrible for Biden / Harris but what makes it horrible is that the Economist polled 10% more democrats than republicans, a D+10 sample at Dems 38%, republicans 28% and independent 34%. On this poll equal weighted. Biden's approval is actually in the 20%'s and Orangeman is twice as popular as Kamala. Biden stole the election. He has no base therefore no floor. His ability to govern is over.

[URL]https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/hlzpfslijb/econTabReport.pdf[/URL]