Disappointing Visit to Royal
I stoppped by yesterday to see partake in some fun, based on most reviews here. Asked for and got Gina, who was just like you guys have described, perhaps looking somewhat older, but definately a keeper.
OK, but lackluster TS with some playful activities around balls and anus. She wouldn't let me touch her at all.
Started with back massage which was good, but barely sensual. Did the flip after 20 minutes or so, and she asked what I wanted. I suggested bj and she said it would be $.2. I offered .8$ and she laughed and said no. There was no haggling, that was the end of discussion. She did a few more rubs on my legs and got off the table. I did tip her for her time and got dressed and went to Follies for some good VIP action.
Gagholes I think you should give it a try
As I posted earlier I have been to BMPs a number of times and they are hit or miss. But when they hit, man can it be worth it. It usually never includes a massage.
The thing to do, it is usually 150 for 30 and 200 for 60. Opt for 30 and try the girl out. See if she looks good and gives a good service. Also, if she speaks enough English, find out if the 200 for 60 includes a double pop cause it often doesn't and it isn't worth the extra 50 if it doesn't cause the time stays the same pretty much anyway in that case. The best looking one I dealt with did upcharge for 60 for a double and since I tip anyway it didn't really matter to me it just became her tip. She was a knockout, unfortunately she went back to Brazil even though I have seen her picture on some of the websites.
Anyway, the girls are of differing looks and quality but there are some serious gems out there just got to find them. Best thing to do is go when there are alot of girls available and ask to see them all before deciding on who. Also, have a girl in mind that you have pre-scoped by pictures which typically are fairly accurate along with all the old pictures of girls that have moved back.
Conclusion, Call the BMP and ask who is working, look on website and see if the girls that are pictured and are there are worth it. If so then go opt for 150 (some places 16) and ask to see all the girls first. Pick the one that most interest you. Generally 150 includes everything so no need to bargain or worry about that.
Please note some are better than others, look at the websites to help make a decision. Also opt for places with a number of girls to see first so you lessen the chances of being stuck with a dud.
I just tell it like it is
I never discourage anyone from posting. I just tell it like it is, no holds barred. Honesty is always best in this kind of forum. Nobody can 'prove' whether a monger's post is exaggerated or not, but I do speak with lots of experience in what I've seen over the last 30 years.
Nite
[QUOTE=Gaghoes]To classify a report as "more honest" simply because it lines up with your jaded AMP experiences still doesn't really jive - no matter how many times you've visited. It's still quite subjective. Perhaps it's your seemingly deep-seated resentment to the queens of privilege that work in these places that's more the cause of your lackluster experiences. I don't know...I'm just spit balling. Maybe they've identified you as someone that isn't really worth the trouble because that attitude shines through. Still very much up for debate, I know.
I'm thinking we could probably search the posts and find gentlemen who've visited this AMP and others just as often and would have a little less negative view. One doesn't really need to go to an AMP every other day to tell if the experience was good or not. If you've ever had sex with a woman in ANY venue, you can pretty well rate what the next hand, mouth, and pussy feels like.
All of these reports are subjective...and I would consider all of them to be equally honest unless PROVEN otherwise. I'll privately determine if I agree or not. I just don't want the next guy to feel like he has to downplay or not report his AMP experience because he's not experienced enough. I think you risk alienating some good contributions when you call certain reports "more honest" than others.[/QUOTE]