Printable View
Just a heads up, Ada's back at VAC. Went to see her tonight and she's as great as ever. This might be my best session yet with her, either that or she just haven't been in Vegas for so long that I forgot how good she is. I think she said she'll be here for a month or so.
BigHose1975,
But are the photos the person you get? At first the Booker told me they weren't her then he said they were.
[QUOTE=BigHose1975;7170956][URL]https://littletokyolv.com/g5/[/URL]
1. Prema, tight pussy tight body. Can take a dick. Prema is. Solid choice.
2. Mocha, is a solid choice flying under the radar.
3. Baby Betty, is a fucking hottie. IMHO she is the prettiest of the list.Petite girl very pretty, she have nice looking nipples big looking areole I can suck on those puppies all day.
4. Sera, she is legend with more than 400 reviews and she look like that 90's pornstar Kobe Thai.
5. Baby Candy, I seen her the first week when started and I saw her 3 days ago. She is been getting creampie and love every minute.
6. Sexy Tina, flying under the radar. Good choice if you want to drain your balls inside a young Asian pussy.
[/QUOTE]Can you share more about Baby Candy and Nancy? Do they look like the pictures? Spinner? Old? How was the service?
[QUOTE=JackHolly;7171622]Some mongers have a Lot of money. Kudos to those mongers, as long as they're not tipping the girls like crazy and making girls think they should charge more.[/QUOTE]But if I don't tip them more, how will I get them to cancel other monger appointments to fit me in? LOL.
I seriously already think k-girls are pretty inexpensive when you compare them to what those non-Asian hookers think their pussy is worth, and then lay around like a fucking starfish after you pony up their crazy rates.
[QUOTE=Drasil;7171916]BigHose1975,
But are the photos the person you get? At first the Booker told me they weren't her then he said they were.[/QUOTE]This question was about Nancy but for whatever reason my quote got mostly everything removed.
[QUOTE=Drasil;7171916]BigHose1975,
But are the photos the person you get? At first the Booker told me they weren't her then he said they were.[/QUOTE]Baby candy is blond now. Nancy a lot of touch up in her picture. Like all kgirls pictures there's always touch up.
This is how baby candy look like now with blond hair.
That's a shame, probably safe to miss out on Nancy then based off the other assessments.
Particularly as Betty is no where near super hot (honestly like a 6/10) and no one mentions the scarring.
I think it depends. There are some white providers that charge way more, but there are also a good number that charge the same or less. The challenge is finding the ones that charge less but also have the same level of service as K-girls do. K-girls, on average, have much better service than providers of other races (including other Asians), and that's their main advantage, in my opinion. But I've seen Chinese, Thai, and Japanese providers that charge less and offer the same or better service, but I've also seen Chinese, Thai, and Japanese providers that charge the same or more and provide far worse service, so I don't think it's fair to lump the K-girls in with other Asian providers.
But back to mongers with money, yeah, sometimes I've had last minute cancellations with girls I haven't seen before and I've always wondered if it was some regular heavy tipper that wanted to see them or something like that.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;7172181]But if I don't tip them more, how will I get them to cancel other monger appointments to fit me in? LOL.
I seriously already think k-girls are pretty inexpensive when you compare them to what those non-Asian hookers think their pussy is worth, and then lay around like a fucking starfish after you pony up their crazy rates.[/QUOTE]
Seems like most of your posts are either asking, or telling, if a girl looked like her photos or not LOL. There's no shortage of intel out there to manage reasonable expectations on looks and service.
And Betty is cute AF!! With a great little body. Even if her pics are not her. But that stuff is always subjective.
[QUOTE=Drasil;7172654]That's a shame, probably safe to miss out on Nancy then based off the other assessments.
Particularly as Betty is no where near super hot (honestly like a 6/10) and no one mentions the scarring.[/QUOTE]
My only knock as well, but she's cute and skilled. Her minimal bobbing tongue twirl BBBJ was something I hadn't experienced before. Felt fantastic!
[QUOTE=ChachoT;7169838]Only issue I have with Betty is she is not a GFE service, not much of dfk and felt always like Business like. Other wise it was my atf.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NobodyZ;7173041]Seems like most of your posts are either asking, or telling, if a girl looked like her photos or not LOL. There's no shortage of intel out there to manage reasonable expectations on looks and service.
And Betty is cute AF!! With a great little body. Even if her pics are not her. But that stuff is always subjective.[/QUOTE]LOL k. You're describing half the board buddy. Not going to go back and forth about how "useful" your posts are lmao.
There definitely is a shortage hence the point I made and that lack resulted in an experience I most likely wouldn't go back to but YMMV.
Impromptu baby Betty review to help that out:
Decently cute but looks have been overstated.
Early to mid 30's.
Breast are big and soft but there is a noticeable scarring sag and big areolas, probably a breast reduction.
Service was impersonal and closer to the vibe of a lat house, but sure YMMV and mood could be different at any given hour.
Passive and does get super creamy. If I were to give a another shot to hope for a better experience it'd be mostly swayed by that.
Anyway the real main point here was Nancy, who states it's the photos on the site. So fact checking that isn't bizarre.
Move on.
[QUOTE=Drasil;7172654]That's a shame, probably safe to miss out on Nancy then based off the other assessments.
Particularly as Betty is no where near super hot (honestly like a 6/10) and no one mentions the scarring.[/QUOTE]Totally agree with you on Betty. I thought she was average looking and body was ok. I read a lot of these reviews and most times do not match my experience. I realize I am picky, but if I am spending $400/ hour then I want good representation. Most times when I review the girls, I will at least include my approximation of height and weight. I am always looking for that little spinner. My expectation and what I read here are vastly different.
Help makes the world go around.
Does anybody know which one provides the best service in kgirl702?
Which agencies have a driver or car service available (for a fee) for those who don't have a car available?
Gents, I'm not the easiest client to please and few are up for the challenge but Sexy Tina was up for it. The pics are close enough to really be splitting hairs, in fact face is better in person, you'd be making a mistake to pass on her. Natural feeling DDs, a willingest to please and an amazing BBBJ, what else is there to say?