Sugarbabies?

[QUOTE=RogerOver;5774317]Never been banned, but I'm not on the platform now. Anyone ever tried a chargeback on those fucks for banning you? I would.[/QUOTE]Before anyone going through the hassle of trying to get funds back using a chargeback, best take a look at the TOS for anything regarding about refunds or the forfeiting of membership fees. If there's nothing mentioned, then it's to your advantage since if it's not covered in the TOS, any ambiguity in a contract goes against the writer of the contract. But Seeking is a large company. I'm sure they had legal eagles write the TOS who most likely have put something in there for such an occasion. For all you know, you could already be entitled to a prorated refund; you only need to submit a request of some kind.

[QUOTE=DNut;5774057]Seeking is a private company and they can ban anyone they want; reason not required. If they feel you stepped out of line, they can ban you. If they feel that you crossed the line and whatever you said put them in legal jeopardy for not protecting the girl, they can ban you. If they don't like the user name you chose, they can ban you. They can ban you for any rason. It's a privately owned platform.[/QUOTE]If you want to avoid getting banned have a general, civil conversation with your potential sugar baby for a bit then ask if they will text with you (use Textfree) or Whatsapp or Telegram or Signal or whatever app 'to discuss things further so you dont get into trouble on here (seeking)'. If the SB doesnt then ask to do a MnG to discuss.

Do not mention ppm or money of any kind or sex acts on Seeking. If you are inclined to do so alter your text at bit by substituting words or symbols and letters for numbers and vice-a-versa so Seekings system won't automatically flag you. Example: PPM becomes each get together or h at ngout. $300 become 3OO (capital o's and no $) etc. You get the idea. This wont stop a SB from reporting you but it will dodge the SA message scan for keywords that will flag your account

And there seems to be an usual number for profiles that randomly show up as of late where their first message is 'I'm available for hookup'. Just block them and move on unless you want to roll the dice. Could be real or something you didn't want. Up to you.

These have always been my beliefs. So you are saying you should never get banned on Seeking for something you said on Whatsapp or Google Voice, right?

I would avoid the coded words on Seeking. If you were reported they could look at what you said and see it was a coded message.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5774467]If you want to avoid getting banned have a general, civil conversation with your potential sugar baby for a bit then ask if they will text with you (use Textfree) or Whatsapp or Telegram or Signal or whatever app 'to discuss things further so you dont get into trouble on here (seeking)'. If the SB doesnt then ask to do a MnG to discuss.

Do not mention ppm or money of any kind or sex acts on Seeking. If you are inclined to do so alter your text at bit by substituting words or symbols and letters for numbers and vice-a-versa so Seekings system won't automatically flag you. Example: PPM becomes each get together or h at ngout. $300 become 3OO (capital o's and no $) etc. You get the idea. This wont stop a SB from reporting you but it will dodge the SA message scan for keywords that will flag your account

And there seems to be an usual number for profiles that randomly show up as of late where their first message is 'I'm available for hookup'. Just block them and move on unless you want to roll the dice. Could be real or something you didn't want. Up to you.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5774467]If you want to avoid getting banned have a general, civil conversation with your potential sugar baby for a bit then ask if they will text with you (use Textfree) or Whatsapp or Telegram or Signal or whatever app 'to discuss things further so you dont get into trouble on here (seeking)'. If the SB doesnt then ask to do a MnG to discuss.

Do not mention ppm or money of any kind or sex acts on Seeking. If you are inclined to do so alter your text at bit by substituting words or symbols and letters for numbers and vice-a-versa so Seekings system won't automatically flag you. Example: PPM becomes each get together or h at ngout. $300 become 3OO (capital o's and no $) etc. You get the idea. This wont stop a SB from reporting you but it will dodge the SA message scan for keywords that will flag your account

And there seems to be an usual number for profiles that randomly show up as of late where their first message is 'I'm available for hookup'. Just block them and move on unless you want to roll the dice. Could be real or something you didn't want. Up to you.[/QUOTE]These are all good points, but I take it a step further: I don't discuss any details in writing at all.

I only talk turkey when I'm actually talking: preferably via videochat, or at least on the phone. Or in person, depending on the circumstances.

I flat-out tell them (in writing): No conversation on the site is completely private, and I cannot discuss details here.

My additional thoughts, Been on the sites for years, keep it simple, get them off the SA app as soon as you can! Use a phone app / burner phone, or kik or snapchat, however snap can be traced back to social media with some work, Kik can not, BUT MAKE sure you turn off location tracking in KIK! I use a paid phone app, cause I can fully message, talk, share photos, videos etc, all while keeping my real number private. So many advantages to a private number app,. I can't count the number of times a girl has reached back out after our initial negotiations failed the first time, now my $. 5 or $$ offer is good to go! Love me sum SA!

[QUOTE=Decatur21;5774506]These have always been my beliefs. So you are saying you should never get banned on Seeking for something you said on Whatsapp or Google Voice, right? I would avoid the coded words on Seeking. If you were reported they could look at what you said and see it was a coded message.[/QUOTE]Don't know if your conversations off SA site will get you banned or not. Can't imagine they would. But, never say never. Seeking is most concerned about the trouble SA users can cause SA on their site should a higher authority put SA under scrutiny.

Agreed with avoiding use of code words. In prior post mentioned, as others did too, to go off site before discussing details with SB. However, for those people inclined to stay on SA and talk details code words may reduce getting banned (may).

[QUOTE=RegulatorD;5774950]My additional thoughts, Been on the sites for years, keep it simple, get them off the SA app as soon as you can! Use a phone app / burner phone, or kik or snapchat, however snap can be traced back to social media with some work, Kik can not, BUT MAKE sure you turn off location tracking in KIK! I use a paid phone app, cause I can fully message, talk, share photos, videos etc, all while keeping my real number private. So many advantages to a private number app,. I can't count the number of times a girl has reached back out after our initial negotiations failed the first time, now my $. 5 or $$ offer is good to go! Love me sum SA![/QUOTE]I'm with you. As much money as guys pump into getting a SB / hooker and then they aren't willing to pay for a full burner app that keeps them anonymous. I never understand that thought process. I've tried a few, and personally a fan of MySudo. Not a paid endorsement. LOL. link:

[url=https://mysudo.com/]Home - MySudo[/url]

[QUOTE=DNut;5774443]Before anyone going through the hassle of trying to get funds back using a chargeback, best take a look at the TOS for anything regarding about refunds or the forfeiting of membership fees. If there's nothing mentioned, then it's to your advantage since if it's not covered in the TOS, any ambiguity in a contract goes against the writer of the contract. But Seeking is a large company. I'm sure they had legal eagles write the TOS who most likely have put something in there for such an occasion. For all you know, you could already be entitled to a prorated refund; you only need to submit a request of some kind.[/QUOTE]It's not much of a hassle. Just go online or give your card company a call to start the process. Fortunately, it forces the company to either respond or eat it. It probably wouldn't work with a vanilla card, but I've never had a credit card company not side with me. I only mention it because I just did a chargeback for a legit issue, and the company ate it plus an additional fee from the bank. If it happens to them too often, their processing fees go up.

I think Seeking relies on the fact that most people aren't going to do it. That's why they're so quick with the ban hammer.

Profiles second section is an interesting read. Tempting. Some things might be too good to be true.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f5ba8918-7133-459b-9be6-77b5d685c0ad[/URL]

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5775680]Profiles second section is an interesting read. Tempting. Some things might be too good to be true.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f5ba8918-7133-459b-9be6-77b5d685c0ad[/URL][/QUOTE]OK! So tell me you want me to come back to Cincinnati without actually saying it. LOL.

I should just fly her hot little ass to Vegas.

Kiki: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1bb80377-1566-4911-ae19-0607bd7dd035[/URL].

Spoke with her seems real and hot. But asking $700 for an physical benefits. Anybody interested I can share her number (for exchange though) I am not going to pay that much anyway.

ConfidentChick: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/35ebd3d1-7fca-443a-9e96-933c63a64f35[/URL].

Another fake says only online.

SpoiledBabe98: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5456f1bb-a054-4bf2-aef0-c86257211af7[/URL].

Met her and she is good. Willing to share her info for an exchange. She constantly changes her number though.

Aprohodite: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7e052649-d2ee-41af-ae2e-bd280e01e93c[/URL].

Some stupid must have paid for just meet and greet (not sure if she is faking it). Asking $400 for just meet and greet. Hard pass.

Daisyduke004: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ed6feec2-40dd-471b-a263-c0990204cec0[/URL].

She seems real but not good at response. Still need to get her digits.

Luvsky20: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/805f295c-6cf4-4438-88a9-9baa5e2beb4d[/URL].

Shared her snap with me but not responsive. She has been in seeking long time if anybody met her let me know. Seems high end though.

Exotiicbb: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fc243300-060d-4f1a-976e-6feca8b0e80a[/URL].

Met her not great experience though but YMMV. DM me for info.

Added some additional info.

BAM.

[QUOTE=Prat652;5776389]

SpoiledBabe98: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5456f1bb-a054-4bf2-aef0-c86257211af7[/URL].

She is also using the following profile. I am texting with her over voip. No PII; no offer yet. SexySavannah:

https://members.seeking.com/member/92cbc964-1507-4596-afbc-f54a5fc50cab

Aprohodite: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7e052649-d2ee-41af-ae2e-bd280e01e93c[/URL].

Profile gone or has me blocked.

[/QUOTE]

Evecalliope asking for $600 ppm. Settles on $500. In past was asking for $400 and doing $300. Now you know her range. Looks like pictures. Nice yet hippie type valley girl sound like in demeanor. Has a live in BF Northside area.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/58e04be3-f681-403e-96c7-23e2312f0116[/URL]

SexySavannah asking for $300 ppm. She says CFS. Lives in Florence.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/92cbc964-1507-4596-afbc-f54a5fc50cab[/URL]

Rosie out of Dayton asking $400 ppm. She has quite the sob story she sent. Lost wallet. Money. Grandmas wedding ring. Etc. Certainly not drama free.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/569e9d04-50f1-41bf-b65a-7f804445f238[/URL]

Exotiicbb below is asking for $400 ppm. Lives in Avondale. Profiles hint her figure being average is stature. She is Rubenesque.
[QUOTE=Prat652;5776389]
Exotiicbb: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fc243300-060d-4f1a-976e-6feca8b0e80a[/URL].
Met her not great experience though but YMMV. DM me for info.[/QUOTE]

We launched in 2006 at Seeking, the premier dating website for sugar babies and sugar daddies. As times have changed, so have we. We welcome anyone looking for a premium online dating experience. Our continuing mission at Seeking is to help members find relationship success by providing a platform that encourages honesty between partners. Seeking members are sophisticated individuals who wish to date attractive and successful people in a way that goes beyond typical social dating traditions and trends.

Seekings attempt to project themselves as a sophisticated dating site for the elite and encourage honesty (amongst all the scammers) is like putting paint on a pig.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5777435]We launched in 2006 at Seeking, the premier dating website for sugar babies and sugar daddies. As times have changed, so have we. We welcome anyone looking for a premium online dating experience. Our continuing mission at Seeking is to help members find relationship success by providing a platform that encourages honesty between partners. Seeking members are sophisticated individuals who wish to date attractive and successful people in a way that goes beyond typical social dating traditions and trends.

Seeking's attempt to project itself as a sophisticated dating site for the elite and encourage honesty (amongst all the scammers) is like putting paint on a pig.[/QUOTE]If you got the email, this all about Brandon Wade finding true love.

I remember back in the old days (circa 2011), it wasn't just seeking. There was also sugardaddyforme and sugardaddie-dot-com.

At the time, Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) was the best of the bunch, and became the market leader.

Things have changed. I would say that Seeking's position is "ripe for disruption" as they say. It is rapidly becoming as pretentious as Match or eHarmony, and as scam-ridden as Ashley Madison or Friendfinder.