Printable View
Just sent a message to someone new, completely innocuous I thought, until I hit send and got a warning message about language in my message being transactional etc., do I still want to send, and risk having my account suspended. I hit send since I saw nothing objectionable in it. This may be my last month at that place.
It's not new. It's not AI either. Tech like keyword and sentiment analysis has been available for decades. SA has been doing it since the 2018 SESTA / FOSTA laws were passed they just did it behind the scenes and they'd ban you after the fact. Now they've decided to implement the preemptive warning prompt. Prob not a bad idea for them from a biz perspective they no longer have the luxury of kicking paying members off the site like they used to. They want / need your $.
[QUOTE=FeldSpot;7420053]Just sent a message to someone new, completely innocuous I thought, until I hit send and got a warning message about language in my message being transactional etc., do I still want to send, and risk having my account suspended. I hit send since I saw nothing objectionable in it. This may be my last month at that place.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=FeldSpot;7420053]Just sent a message to someone new, completely innocuous I thought, until I hit send and got a warning message about language in my message being transactional etc., do I still want to send, and risk having my account suspended. I hit send since I saw nothing objectionable in it. This may be my last month at that place.[/QUOTE]What did your message specifically say?
[QUOTE=Diginonomous;7420689]What did your message specifically say?[/QUOTE]Was pretty generic movie talk, since in her profile she mentioned liking horror movies, then ended it with "Anyway, would love to talk more about what you're looking for in an arrangement if you're interested" Not sure if arrangement has become a bad word, or what, since it isn't SA anymore?
[QUOTE=FeldSpot;7420784]Was pretty generic movie talk, since in her profile she mentioned liking horror movies, then ended it with "Anyway, would love to talk more about what you're looking for in an arrangement if you're interested" Not sure if arrangement has become a bad word, or what, since it isn't SA anymore?[/QUOTE]Can confirm that I received the same warning when I asked what she was "looking for in an arrangement". Changed it to 'what's your ideal arrangement' and it went through just fine.
Hi,
Anyone seen her recently. Any feedback or info? There are old reports about her but asking if anyone have anything new.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/907588df-7e94-47b7-a7eb-f08454b12f74[/URL]
Hi gents,
Long time lurker, infrequent poster. Been on and off Seeking for a few years, now back on again hoping to get off. Here are a few updates in pursuit of that decadent goal.
BEBECITA - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f2ad4fc1-d781-4048-8a1e-de2b856f0ad1[/URL].
This conversation took place on Wednesday, in the morning. Said she was located in Rosemont and was available, as was I. She also claimed she could host. Promising bells were ringing. I asked if she wanted to text and bingo bango, she replied she was going to bed. At 10 am. Ha. No bango with this bingo. I told her to look for me another time. She must still be looking.
JENAE - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4087ebc3-c7dc-4f3d-aa47-88bcf5a37e07[/URL].
Was a very brief conversation online that went to text quickly. At least I was taking part in that text conversation. If she ever replies, I'll let you know.
AVA - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/49f8d1b6-0d9f-47f1-bf7b-9345c9e2b041[/URL].
Ava must be related to Jenae or perhaps they just share the same texting etiquette aka share a number but never text back. Maybe it's my hygiene but Wednesday is my shower day so probably not. She never replied either.
More reports as I continue getting ghosted. It is the Halloween season so maybe it's just part of the overall theme. "Here's my number but I won't text you back. Boo!
[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7425950]Hi gents,
Long time lurker, infrequent poster. Been on and off Seeking for a few years, now back on again hoping to get off. Here are a few updates in pursuit of that decadent goal.
BEBECITA - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f2ad4fc1-d781-4048-8a1e-de2b856f0ad1[/URL].
This conversation took place on Wednesday, in the morning. Said she was located in Rosemont and was available, as was I. She also claimed she could host. Promising bells were ringing. I asked if she wanted to text and bingo bango, she replied she was going to bed. At 10 am. Ha. No bango with this bingo. I told her to look for me another time. She must still be looking.
JENAE - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4087ebc3-c7dc-4f3d-aa47-88bcf5a37e07[/URL].
Was a very brief conversation online that went to text quickly. At least I was taking part in that text conversation. If she ever replies, I'll let you know.[/QUOTE]Does Jenae have a birthmark on her face? I blocked this girl and the link won't show up so I assume its the same girl. If so, she has a sister on multiple SD sites and they are both rinsers. They will ask you if you will sugar them on a platonic date to get to know you and that will be their thing until you cut it off. They have no sugar for you. Her sister's name on the site was Ashley. Not their real names, of course.
I matched with Jenae a couple months ago. We talked on the phone for about an hour; She actually seems like a sweet girl, but she was looking for a handout. I texted her about two weeks ago just to see how it was going. She said great and then proceeded to try to sell me some nudes which I declined.
[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7425950]Hi gents,
Long time lurker, infrequent poster. Been on and off Seeking for a few years, now back on again hoping to get off. Here are a few updates in pursuit of that decadent goal.
BEBECITA - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f2ad4fc1-d781-4048-8a1e-de2b856f0ad1[/URL].
This conversation took place on Wednesday, in the morning. Said she was located in Rosemont and was available, as was I. She also claimed she could host. Promising bells were ringing. I asked if she wanted to text and bingo bango, she replied she was going to bed. At 10 am. Ha. No bango with this bingo. I told her to look for me another time. She must still be looking.[/QUOTE]
Is there anyone who is reliable, willing to go downtown and in the 4-500 range or am I asking too much?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c8c1dbed-46bc-471b-8663-76ef8fdd0ba2[/URL]
Was chatting with this one, open minded. Cannot host. Asking min of 500. I passed.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87b8c5da-b241-427d-9aee-a72a8de4bbea[/URL]
Texting was going great. Then out of the blue on day of our meeting she said, I'm just not mentally ready for an arrangement again.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/eefa2663-4de3-495a-9c30-979477732c06[/URL]
Terrible communications. She will leave you on read and then respond a week or two later.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2f69f3f0-8f6d-4c45-9c5d-31972bc0c003[/URL]
This one is a pro. Multiple adds out there.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/868dfa5e-73d0-4aaf-bbec-56189c45f332[/URL]
Asking 400. Cannot host. I did not pursue.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e96c457b-6cf6-4318-9a29-db40e38ad812[/URL]
Asking 500. Got her down to 350. Cannot host, fun time, small and petite. Voice like a man. But she can suck a mean cock. Said she liked anal but wasn't game for it during our date. Open to BBFS, but I covered up.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/91082e32-613c-4994-9915-4c4f7bf34292[/URL]
Asking 700. I didn't try to negotiate at all. She said she would be open to BBFS, just no cip. I did not set anything up with her.
[QUOTE=BillyBobDilly;7426063]Does Jenae have a birthmark on her face? I blocked this girl and the link won't show up so I assume its the same girl. If so, she has a sister on multiple SD sites and they are both rinsers. They will ask you if you will sugar them on a platonic date to get to know you and that will be their thing until you cut it off. They have no sugar for you. Her sister's name on the site was Ashley. Not their real names, of course.[/QUOTE]Yes, that is a birthmark.
1. "Mandy" the good: DTF the bad wants 9 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6d10a510-d810-471c-805f-1a3211a80737[/URL].
2. "Brittany" DTF for 6 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/edd996a0-4b83-4e6c-8e7b-7612818e6747[/URL].
3. "Jazzy" DTF wants 4. Not unreasonable [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5221a8e5-2223-4936-94ce-c0d2d15e380c[/URL].
4. Another "Brittany" DTF wants 6 can't host seems like a pro. Let me know guys. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e31bc578-5a52-438c-a2ce-6d4dc65e5dbe[/URL].
5. "skinny chick" wants 6 (seems to be the union rate) DTF [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a7cd3662-dd82-4916-acbe-e493b31abe94[/URL].
6. "Alexa" DTF also has pro vibes DTF 5 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c8c67565-a5b9-49af-9423-48721312ff51[/URL].
7. "Jennifer" DTF 4 but not my type [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7907c5f1-dae6-43c5-9c3c-30450e61c35c[/URL].
8. "Heather" DTF union rate of 6 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e46755f7-1631-403c-9984-863b685ea7fa[/URL].
9. I need help or info on this woman. I am chatting her but she is slow to respond. Any input from guys that met her would help. PM is fine. I am making it a goal to see her. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9a93bd06-db5f-4a76-80be-2f18dd54b4b2[/URL].
[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7426889]Yes, that is a birthmark.[/QUOTE]Definitely avoid then. Scammers.
[QUOTE=CrewMan7;7426863][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c8c1dbed-46bc-471b-8663-76ef8fdd0ba2[/URL]
Was chatting with this one, open minded. Cannot host. Asking min of 500. I passed.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87b8c5da-b241-427d-9aee-a72a8de4bbea[/URL]
Texting was going great. Then out of the blue on day of our meeting she said, I'm just not mentally ready for an arrangement again.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/eefa2663-4de3-495a-9c30-979477732c06[/URL]
Terrible communications. She will leave you on read and then respond a week or two later.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2f69f3f0-8f6d-4c45-9c5d-31972bc0c003[/URL]
This one is a pro. Multiple adds out there.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/868dfa5e-73d0-4aaf-bbec-56189c45f332[/URL]
Asking 400. Cannot host. I did not pursue.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e96c457b-6cf6-4318-9a29-db40e38ad812[/URL]
Asking 500. Got her down to 350. Cannot host, fun time, small and petite. Voice like a man. But she can suck a mean cock. Said she liked anal but wasn't game for it during our date. Open to BBFS, but I covered up.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/91082e32-613c-4994-9915-4c4f7bf34292[/URL]
Asking 700. I didn't try to negotiate at all. She said she would be open to BBFS, just no cip. I did not set anything up with her.[/QUOTE]Funny how many of these either I blocked or blocked me. I feel like I have talked to 60% of the girls on the site that might have been my type but passed once I realized they asked for too much, were rinsers or didn't like me for some reason.
After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?
TIA.
Sam.
Hey all,
Not sure where to post this but hoping someone can help.
I recently lined up a female for a fuck buddy type situation.
She's from the suburbs and attached and only willing to meet in Chicago.
I'm married so I definitely can't host.
Where can we fuck?! Are there any cheap hotels / motels left in downtown / River North / West or South Loop where we can meet for a couple of hours or so?
I work evenings downtown so that area is preferred. And I have to get in and out, because, you know.
Any tips would be greatly appreciated!
[QUOTE=SamFlood123;7428313]After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?
TIA.
Sam.[/QUOTE]It happened last week. I too am interested in a work around or other suggestions. I hope someone has suggestions.
Thank you.
[QUOTE=SamFlood123;7428313]After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?
TIA.
Sam.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I posted about this like 2 weeks ago in here. It took a couple tries, but just keep resetting all your pictures to private and refreshing and eventually it just gave me the generic SA silhouette as my profile pic and the rest are hidden.
[QUOTE=HardChris09;7428454]Hey all,
Not sure where to post this but hoping someone can help.
I recently lined up a female for a fuck buddy type situation.
She's from the suburbs and attached and only willing to meet in Chicago.
I'm married so I definitely can't host.
Where can we fuck?! Are there any cheap hotels / motels left in downtown / River North / West or South Loop where we can meet for a couple of hours or so?
I work evenings downtown so that area is preferred. And I have to get in and out, because, you know.
Any tips would be greatly appreciated![/QUOTE]Try Dayuse app.
[QUOTE=SamFlood123;7428313]After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?
TIA.
Sam.[/QUOTE]So I've been on SA, on and off, for a couple years. Things have certainly changed a lot with their system, most recently screen names and photos. You used to be able to use made up screen names, no longer. Now they're asking for an actual name.
As for photos, you used to be able to post either a partially cropped face or even a blurred face as your primary photo. Again, no longer. Being fairly adept at Photoshop, I tried a myriad of primary photo versions. The safest, most discreet that I found Seeking would accept is this. My primary photo is me wearing sunglasses and I cropped my face super tight, basically just above the sunglasses, not showing any ears and just above the chin. With that type of cropping and the sunglasses, I feel fairly safe and discreet with my primary posting.
Trying to be discreet used to be a lot easier than this.
[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7429082]So I've been on SA, on and off, for a couple years. Things have certainly changed a lot with their system, most recently screen names and photos. You used to be able to use made up screen names, no longer. Now they're asking for an actual name.
As for photos, you used to be able to post either a partially cropped face or even a blurred face as your primary photo. Again, no longer. Being fairly adept at Photoshop, I tried a myriad of primary photo versions. The safest, most discreet that I found Seeking would accept is this. My primary photo is me wearing sunglasses and I cropped my face super tight, basically just above the sunglasses, not showing any ears and just above the chin. With that type of cropping and the sunglasses, I feel fairly safe and discreet with my primary posting..[/QUOTE]This isn't a problem for me and my situation, but just a suggestion to the group. Go to an AI image generator and upload a few pictures of yourself. Ask it to make an AI version of yourself that is close but not exact. Get a couple of pics and use those. That way you can always say its not you, its AI and if you do it close enough to your actual picture, then the women won't think you are a catfish. Just an idea in theory.
[QUOTE=BillyBobDilly;7429299]This isn't a problem for me and my situation, but just a suggestion to the group. Go to an AI image generator and upload a few pictures of yourself. Ask it to make an AI version of yourself that is close but not exact. Get a couple of pics and use those. That way you can always say its not you, its AI and if you do it close enough to your actual picture, then the women won't think you are a catfish. Just an idea in theory.[/QUOTE]That's a great idea! Thanks for the suggestion. Just another great use for AI. And once AI can suck our c*cks. Who will need Seeking anymore? (And that is coming. Pun intended.).
[QUOTE=Meddic80;7428999]Try Dayuse app.[/QUOTE]An ex sugarbaby told me about it. I can get a room at a three star place, pro-rated for 8 or 9 hours. Usually morning to late afternoon. Very convenient.
[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7429082]So I've been on SA, on and off, for a couple years. Things have certainly changed a lot with their system, most recently screen names and photos. You used to be able to use made up screen names, no longer. Now they're asking for an actual name.
As for photos, you used to be able to post either a partially cropped face or even a blurred face as your primary photo. Again, no longer. Being fairly adept at Photoshop, I tried a myriad of primary photo versions. The safest, most discreet that I found Seeking would accept is this. My primary photo is me wearing sunglasses and I cropped my face super tight, basically just above the sunglasses, not showing any ears and just above the chin. With that type of cropping and the sunglasses, I feel fairly safe and discreet with my primary posting.
Trying to be discreet used to be a lot easier than this.[/QUOTE]Would you be so kind as to send me the photo that seeking accepted so I can see what you did. Thanks.
[QUOTE=ChitownGuy321;7430126]Would you be so kind as to send me the photo that seeking accepted so I can see what you did. Thanks.[/QUOTE]There are so many "stock" photos online that I found one that fits my features generally and used that. I send a real photo if I get somewhere in conversation as well as private photos. Works well.
[QUOTE=ChitownGuy321;7430126]Would you be so kind as to send me the photo that seeking accepted so I can see what you did. Thanks.[/QUOTE]This is not my photo but it is an example of the cropping on my photo. But I do like the other guy's suggestion of using AI.
[QUOTE=WhoDat111;7427363]1. "Mandy" the good: DTF the bad wants 9 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6d10a510-d810-471c-805f-1a3211a80737[/URL].
2. "Brittany" DTF for 6 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/edd996a0-4b83-4e6c-8e7b-7612818e6747[/URL].
3. "Jazzy" DTF wants 4. Not unreasonable [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5221a8e5-2223-4936-94ce-c0d2d15e380c[/URL].
4. Another "Brittany" DTF wants 6 can't host seems like a pro. Let me know guys. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e31bc578-5a52-438c-a2ce-6d4dc65e5dbe[/URL].
5. "skinny chick" wants 6 (seems to be the union rate) DTF [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a7cd3662-dd82-4916-acbe-e493b31abe94[/URL].
6. "Alexa" DTF also has pro vibes DTF 5 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c8c67565-a5b9-49af-9423-48721312ff51[/URL].
7. "Jennifer" DTF 4 but not my type [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7907c5f1-dae6-43c5-9c3c-30450e61c35c[/URL].
8. "Heather" DTF union rate of 6 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e46755f7-1631-403c-9984-863b685ea7fa[/URL].
9. I need help or info on this woman. I am chatting her but she is slow to respond. Any input from guys that met her would help. PM is fine. I am making it a goal to see her. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9a93bd06-db5f-4a76-80be-2f18dd54b4b2[/URL].[/QUOTE]Great info. I've talked to a few dozen. Now we play the game of who will flake or are fake.
Many ok in 500 range and supposedly no rush.
I probably wouldn't do 600 unless it was an extended date.
On my trips to Chicago and other places my hit rate has been good but my repeat rate has been low.
All fuck PSE.
If anyone wants to PM me a Chicago gem. I've most likely messaged them if they e been on the site recently.
Was looking at cuddle comfort too.
Hopefully I'll have a good trip.
[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7431492]This is not my photo but it is an example of the cropping on my photo. But I do like the other guy's suggestion of using AI.[/QUOTE]Thank you for sending the pic, it is very helpful to see what you did.
I'll give it a try.
[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7431492]This is not my photo but it is an example of the cropping on my photo. But I do like the other guy's suggestion of using AI.[/QUOTE]If I knew that guy, I'd immediately be like, "I know that guy!
[QUOTE=Qlove369;6997303]She's a huge junkie. I fucked her and the next night she robbed me. She's gang unfortunately. Never seen a shadow put out light like that..[/QUOTE]You should see her now:
[URL]https://youtu.be/XQLJxwD1pQc?si=c2h3WaSQ8sm70RlU[/URL]
Very sad.