Printable View
[QUOTE=HumblePie;4310896] "Don't you want my tens of thousands of dollars?[/QUOTE]LOL, a dude said that to Rebeccas booker that he spends thousands of $'s on kgirls. Why don't you answer my calls, don't want my $. Booker told him great go see someone else!
Dude cried on the boards like little girl cause booker basically told get the f outa here!
Just becasue you got $ don't mean shit to some of the bookers.
Selena of KTE selfie pics are real and recent. She is even more beautiful when she smiles. Spinner body with enhanced tits. English is serviceable. I had a great time and would repeat for her tight pussy. I think she is only staying until next Sunday.
[QUOTE=WilshireBoy;4303522]Had an hour with Selina. She was hot and looked exactly like her photos which is a treat. She's vietnamese and probably one of the best girls l have had from this agency.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DHorn420;4310820]Feels like not loosing out much from not being in with M, from my understanding. M has girls that offer BBFS but are always either older or or barely hit 5-6 in looks, so to me doesn't really sound all that worth it struggling to get in with that booker. I stopped trying as there are tons more bookers than just that one LOL.[/QUOTE]M's girls are more like TER 7's and 8's. Recently she had one 6, Lia, but she was one of the best fucks I've had recently! Definitely a 9 in service so well worth it! Today's lineup of Megan, Cona, Lucia, and Chanel are all 7's and 8's IMHO.
M girls may not be the best in looks but I wouldn't say 5-6 in looks. M has the best performers around IMHO. FOSTA changed things because I think non-BB guys stop coming. It's supply and demand and we get what we paid for.
I will be coming so fast when I see M has cute new young girl BB or not.
[QUOTE=JimThome;4311525]I think SESTA/FOSTA changed things. M will have some atfs occasionally but not as often or as consistently as before. But i did want to counter that M girls are always older or barely hit 5-6 looks because that part isn't true. She had at least 4 ATF worthy girls this year.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Irresponsible;4311558]Anyone have experience with girls at SAG and if the photos are reliable at all? Right now they have an Erika and want to bite the bullet but if anyone else has been with this agency let me know what you think.[/QUOTE]Liked her and would repeat but def not her in the pics.
If you like big tits, may as well try Shannon. I posted about Shannon, Taylor, Laura in LA County Asian thread. They are probably the top 3. Search for Erika here. Amber, Julie, Erika have too similar stats and I doubt are real pics. Do a reverse image search. Shannon is pics accurate. Taylor is using her real pics but you probably won't recognize her. Laura is attractive when I saw her awhile back but not her pics.
[QUOTE=Irresponsible;4311558]Anyone have experience with girls at SAG and if the photos are reliable at all? Right now they have an Erika and want to bite the bullet but if anyone else has been with this agency let me know what you think.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Irresponsible;4311558]Anyone have experience with girls at SAG and if the photos are reliable at all? Right now they have an Erika and want to bite the bullet but if anyone else has been with this agency let me know what you think.[/QUOTE]Hit or miss with SAG based on the girls I've seen in the past (none of them are available atm). Generally the pics have not been of the girls themselves but in a few cases they are fairly representative of their bodies (faces generally not as pretty).
Of the current lineup, Shannon's pics are reportedly real and I hear Taylor's pics are a good representation. Board has been pretty quiet about the rest of the girls AFAIK.
[QUOTE=HumblePie;4311699]M's girls are more like TER 7's and 8's. Recently she had one 6, Lia, but she was one of the best fucks I've had recently! Definitely a 9 in service so well worth it! Today's lineup of Megan, Cona, Lucia, and Chanel are all 7's and 8's IMHO.[/QUOTE]Couldn't have said it better especially about Lia who was one of the best fucks of my life ever and I've been around pretty long.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4311702]M girls may not be the best in looks but I wouldn't say 5-6 in looks. M has the best performers around IMHO. FOSTA changed things because I think non-BB guys stop coming. It's supply and demand and we get what we paid for.
I will be coming so fast when I see M has cute new young girl BB or not.[/QUOTE]The look thing is REALLY YMMV. I think Cona is an "8.5"; Megan is a "6", Chanel is "8" and Allie is a "8.5" and Heaven is a "8". I think Leah is definitely "5" and I am sure some guys disagree with me but as they say, different strokes for different folks. I think Leah was also a "5".
Nah man. You want 5's and 6's, you go to the Palace. That shit is one tier lower than M.
Been seeing Chanel for a few months now and I think the sessions are getting stale. I noticed a change of her behavior (maybe to due to burnout) but she seems less enthusiastic and fun as the sessions before. She gets tried more easily and seems less responsive to do something, sort of going through the motions. Is this just me or anyone esle who has seen her lately get this too? I even took a break from seeing her for two weeks and it seems more or less not as good as before. I might replace her as my ATF with Lora or someone esle.
On another note, does anyone still see Namu? I don't think she gets much business nowadays. Still on the fence, but seems like her quality went down and I make it a bad habit of texting her when I'm horny. My dick says yes, but my brain says no. I thought about just hitting her for a quick session but with the amount of driving, I might as well do a full session with a better girl. I can't seem to find a good late night quick BBFS bootie call on a weekday.
[QUOTE=Jodandayo;4310597]Check TERB for more info on Toronto. Being from there, I can tell you it's a better scene up there in general. Quality of talent is higher, quality of service is higher, rates are similar to what you'd find here, but in CAD, so that's a 30% discount when you factor in the FX rate. I'd never fly out there just for the sake of hobbying, but if you're going to be in the neighborhood anyways, why not check out the scene.[/QUOTE]I just glanced at terb right now.
I see the girls that cost $200 USD or less, but their faces are all hidden. Not even partially obscured or blurred, which makes for a huge surprise when they open the door. I bet the reason they're that cheap is because of butterface.
Look at this funny shit that charges $300 CAD. I'd rather fuck my own hand with lotion. Even Lia looked better than this. Be happy that all of M's girls at least look better than this.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4311842]Been seeing Chanel for a few months now and I think the sessions are getting stale. I noticed a change of her behavior (maybe to due to burnout) but she seems less enthusiastic and fun as the sessions before. She gets tried more easily and seems less responsive to do something, sort of going through the motions. Is this just me or anyone esle who has seen her lately get this too? I even took a break from seeing her for two weeks and it seems more or less not as good as before. I might replace her as my ATF with Lora or someone esle..[/QUOTE]Chanel must be decently attractive if you've seen her that much. Sounds like maybe she's complacent with you, having seen her so many times. She might seem fresh from a new customer's view.
I'm surprised she hasn't returned to the bay area yet.
Seems like we have positive reviews on M. I'm really into kgirls and want to know how can I contact the booker. Thanks!
[QUOTE=Irresponsible;4311558]Anyone have experience with girls at SAG and if the photos are reliable at all? Right now they have an Erika and want to bite the bullet but if anyone else has been with this agency let me know what you think.[/QUOTE]Pics are pretty accurate in my experience.