Sugarbabies?

[QUOTE=TroublePlay;5711108]If that site was raining reasonably priced pussy, the new rate would be a bargain. Sadly, that is not to be.

There are SB unicorns on there, but with the amount of work, the donation requests, and time it takes to mine the site, it just doesn't pay off for me. If I was retired and had no other obligations, I could meet and greet my way into some great situations, but because most babies cannot host, and being married, I cannot either, the hotel rates right now make these liaisons expensive.

I may jump on again the next time SA offers a holiday special. Until then, I am out. Going to stay with my market rate providers with less work and guaranteed results.

Speaking for myself only, of course. No judgement on others.[/QUOTE]You nailed it for me. The site's membership fee has basically been increasing by $10 per month every year. $109.99 is not all the money in the world. And (as you say) it would be a bargain if it weren't getting harder and harder to find legit, appropriate women on there.

I logged on this morning (with my unpaid account) and the first profile I came to was wanting a "virtual platonic relationship". Probably not even a real woman behind the photo.

Add to that the fact that right now, restaurants and retail store are paying signing bonuses for new employees. This decreases the number of legit college-age women likely to use the site.

And as if that weren't bad enough, we have a new COVID surge. Omicron seems to be less virulent than past strains, and I believe it will blow over; but it's yet another deterrent to young women who might have otherwise been willing to sell a bit of nookie to an older guy for a few hundred bucks.

I'm going to bide my time, and wait for omicron and the labor shortage to abate. I'm thinking things may be better in the spring.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5712305]Talking to Taylor Fox about her stint shooting porn.

She said the things you don't realize before you get there 1) that 30-45 minute video takes about 8 hours of shooting; 2) you'll be doing at least 2 or 3 guys even if the video only shows 1 guy because guys can only last so long or one's cock looks better in a specific shot angle, etc; 3) if you're not shooting and your living in the "model house" your job on the set will probably be acting as a fluffer.

Long story short, you might be making a few grand a shoot, but the total money is about the same as a good week escorting and you don't have to worry about getting busted.[/QUOTE]Nowadays it's actually pretty simple. A 40 minute video is compiled from about 30 minutes of sex. They shoot using multiple cameras and stretch out the time by repeating the same sequence from a different angle. The shoot still takes a few hours to shoot, from doing hair and makeup and setting up, to doing some Behind the Scenes footage and "pre-fuck interview, to a "post fuck report". However, the biggest change in producing porn nowadays is the distribution channels. You can literally shoot the porn in the morning, edit by the afternoon, and have customers be downloading by that evening. What used to take weeks (or months) with video and DVDs, now takes hours.

She sent me the same spam. One of the other seniors shared her PII with me. She is real and went to the FC. I think she got banned for spamming because I can no longer see her profile.

BAM.

[QUOTE=Decatur21;5712604]LOL, all I said was hello to this one and got this response:

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e72a81e3-0187-486e-a079-abcece49e7c4[/URL]

"Hey it's DreamBlondie, I would just like to more formally introduce myself. I grew up in the country with Hillbilly parents so I'm no stranger to living a rough life. I have three siblings that I absolutely love and go to for advice. I've lived a very crazy life; I grew up super poor and my parents let addiction take control of their life sadly.... ".[/QUOTE]

What does FC mean?

[QUOTE=BamBam;5713993]She sent me the same spam. One of the other seniors shared her PII with me. She is real and went to the FC. I think she got banned for spamming because I can no longer see her profile.

BAM.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JackOhLantern;5711242]She's legit. Open marriage, swinger, very open minded. I only had a couple of beers with her and can't report past that, but she seems very fun.[/QUOTE]Just wanted to give an update: Met with her tonight for a meet and greet and I must say this was one of the best encounters I've had with someone from this site by far. Very down to earth, open and honest lady. Definitely going to see her again.

FC = Fucking Chamber or you got sex with her. Check out the the de facto national sugar forum in the Richmond, VA sugar babies thread. You should also read the following starting from the last entry on up. It includes a listing of some common acronyms.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?15100-Sugarbaby-Thread-Highlights-Index-and-FAQ[/URL]

BAM.

[QUOTE=Decatur21;5714111]What does FC mean?[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1a49b425-9ee8-4c09-b6be-80a9a12fc2ab[/URL]

Feel like I've seen the pics before.

I'm always slightly skeptical when a "newbie" shows and PMs right after I view the profile, it reeks of a bot.

This time the history showed an actual profile view, anyone chat with her?

Profile says online and facetime fun. Pass. Haven't seen those pics in Cincy listings before fyi.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5716580][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1a49b425-9ee8-4c09-b6be-80a9a12fc2ab[/URL]

Feel like I've seen the pics before.

I'm always slightly skeptical when a "newbie" shows and PMs right after I view the profile, it reeks of a bot.

This time the history showed an actual profile view, anyone chat with her?[/QUOTE]

This one is asking for money via cashapp "to show you are serious. " I chatted with her previously when she accepted my offer then disappeared. I have her PII. She is seriously hot but has a BF and I think is just hoping to rinse a few people in her spare time. Any body having a better experience with her?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7f0c4cb1-eb92-42e4-b547-e61e5be32fe4[/URL]

BAM.

What's with the Diva's lately. This one is oozing with ego and attitude. Claims to be very experienced as a sugar baby and on Seeking. Wants to hang out but has to have a payment before meeting with anyone. I do not recognize her pictures but headshots only are always a bit suspicious.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b7b94b45-6a12-46a3-9f19-e11340c7bceb[/URL]

BAM.

This is an odd one. I first met her in late 2020. I had some of her PII. We did a MnG but she was not ready for the FC. She is sorta cute but not as nice in person as in her pictures. We continued to chat over time but she was never ready to do the deed. Recently, I sent her a seasonal greeting and she answered differently. She said she was ready to go and just had the platonic stuff on her profile to fend off people wanting one-time encounters. Then she tried to sell me pictures. Then she started using the royal "we" as in "we can do that but we require a deposit. " Since our last encounter she has moved from her nice suburban home to an apartment in roughly the same area. She also has a new number. It's almost like someone else (ex?) got control of her profile. Either way, when he learned I was only offering cash hand-to-hand, she went silent. Be a bit cautious with her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0db0ddb7-611f-42f8-9142-3352f7ffb044[/URL]

BAM.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0a94424e-7700-458b-a462-c5f8b2d91789[/URL]

Text on site went well then moved to snap where she was pretty inconsistent. Started talking.

About a meet and she agreed to 3 but then when I said I was coming from A neighboring states she said oh you have to host.

What the heck. So I agree and try to set up a date. Then she says I meet guys for dinner for 3 so it's 5 for more.

Gps bye bye.

[QUOTE=WanderingAbout;5716820]Profile says online and facetime fun. Pass. Haven't seen those pics in Cincy listings before fyi.[/QUOTE]That's a recent change.

Funny thing she's "Sarah" and now there's a SarahK on SB with different pics and look, coincidences like this always set of alarm bells.

The coincidence always gets me to look twice but the one on SA has glasses in every picture and shows an age of 25. The one on SB has no glasses in any of her pictures along with an age of 28 a much rounder face and different height. If they are the same chick, she has done a good and conscious job of changing her appearance. I think they are not the same.

BAM.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;5717420]That's a recent change.

Funny thing she's "Sarah" and now there's a SarahK on SB with different pics and look, coincidences like this always set of alarm bells.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BamBam;5718605]The coincidence always gets me to look twice but the one on SA has glasses in every picture and shows an age of 25. The one on SB has no glasses in any of her pictures along with an age of 28 a much rounder face and different height. If they are the same chick, she has done a good and conscious job of changing her appearance. I think they are not the same.

BAM.[/QUOTE]Either a scam or the "hot" profile as being stolen pics.

I didn't say the pics were of the same person IRL.