Printable View
[QUOTE=TooHotForYou;7407611]Anybody met Dixie? 36 white girl with tattoos and piercings. I think she's legit but something feels off when talking to her.[/QUOTE]She's been reviewed and is basically mediocre to bad. She's real, and you'll get laid, but apparently she rushes and she's closer to a cheap escort than a SB, but wants SB prices. Better fish in the sea.
[QUOTE=GoneForGood97;7408679]She's been reviewed and is basically mediocre to bad. She's real, and you'll get laid, but apparently she rushes and she's closer to a cheap escort than a SB, but wants SB prices. Better fish in the sea.[/QUOTE]I met her and she seemed fine to me. Wants more for BBFS like 400. Didn't see any problems with her but your mileage may vary. All I can say is she was one of my better lays.
Damn, so many unstable, bipolar, crazy women on the site. I've been back on the site for a couple of months and 2 out of the 4 that I met turned out to be totally deranged. Both threatened me if I didn't give them money.
This latest one was the first I ever gave an allowance to (usually I do ppm). She seemed great for two weeks and we were spending lot of time together. The sex wasn't even the most important part of it. But then she just suddenly turned on me and went postal. Totally irrational. She must have borderline personality disorder, or similar.
Well, I don't mean to come on here and whine and lament, but it was a reminder how dangerous so many women are, so I am just passing the reminder onto you guys. I really should never SMS with any of these girls and only use Signal, but I break that rule sometimes if I really want them. But it's all just Russian roulette and that doesn't take into account the other usual obvious dating risks, that I won't even go into.
But damn the pussy was really good on a couple of those dates. So I know... high risk, high potential reward. But I'm just saying be extra cautious, or at least when you feel it is warranted. And I am clearly talking to myself here, more than to the rest of you.
Wouldn't Google Voice give you sufficient protection, without the downsides of Signal? I really like it. It works on my burner, and I can access the account via browser, so I never have to have the burner inside an office / residence. It is buried in my golf bag, or elsewhere.
Agreed, likely borderline.
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7409269]Damn, so many unstable, bipolar, crazy women on the site. I've been back on the site for a couple of months and 2 out of the 4 that I met turned out to be totally deranged. Both threatened me if I didn't give them money.
This latest one was the first I ever gave an allowance to (usually I do ppm). She seemed great for two weeks and we were spending lot of time together. The sex wasn't even the most important part of it. But then she just suddenly turned on me and went postal. Totally irrational. She must have borderline personality disorder, or similar.
Well, I don't mean to come on here and whine and lament, but it was a reminder how dangerous so many women are, so I am just passing the reminder onto you guys. I really should never SMS with any of these girls and only use Signal, but I break that rule sometimes if I really want them. But it's all just Russian roulette and that doesn't take into account the other usual obvious dating risks, that I won't even go into.
But damn the pussy was really good on a couple of those dates. So I know... high risk, high potential reward. But I'm just saying be extra cautious, or at least when you feel it is warranted. And I am clearly talking to myself here, more than to the rest of you.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7409319]Wouldn't Google Voice give you sufficient protection, without the downsides of Signal? I really like it. It works on my burner, and I can access the account via browser, so I never have to have the burner inside an office / residence. It is buried in my golf bag, or elsewhere.
Agreed, likely borderline.[/QUOTE]Google voice isn't truly anonymous. Google famously will link your "device fingerprint" to any account that's been on it, and will correlate "these 2 accounts are the same person" even though you give completely fake info on one. Even worse if you're using Android. All it would take is one subpoena to Google, whether an overzealous prosecutor or a crazy SB you knocked up and walked away from tracking you down for child support, and Google will instantly provide them all your info.
If you have a true burner device that NEVER uses the same wifi as your real phone, maybe you can escape being ID'd, but you'd have to be so careful, and the risk so high I wouldn't bother. All it would take is your burner device connecting to Google's servers one time on your wifi, and they'll immediately know who you are. This is the tech they use to advertise to you, and you may notice certain ads follow you even when you're on a burner device / account.
Tl;dr don't trust anything Google for privacy / illegal activities.
[QUOTE=GoneForGood97;7409676]Google voice isn't truly anonymous. Google famously will link your "device fingerprint" to any account that's been on it, and will correlate "these 2 accounts are the same person" even though you give completely fake info on one. Even worse if you're using Android. All it would take is one subpoena to Google, whether an overzealous prosecutor or a crazy SB you knocked up and walked away from tracking you down for child support, and Google will instantly provide them all your info.
If you have a true burner device that NEVER uses the same wifi as your real phone, maybe you can escape being ID'd, but you'd have to be so careful, and the risk so high I wouldn't bother. All it would take is your burner device connecting to Google's servers one time on your wifi, and they'll immediately know who you are. This is the tech they use to advertise to you, and you may notice certain ads follow you even when you're on a burner device / account.
Tl;dr don't trust anything Google for privacy / illegal activities.[/QUOTE]Yeah, exactly, the only WiFi I ever connect my burner to is at Starbucks, to do app and software updates. Briefly. And this isn't hard to be careful at all. Just don't turn on WiFi. BTW, no one should have WiFi on on their IRL phone when they are mongering. The attempts the phone makes to connect to local WiFi signals get logged (on Google at least. So I have read on this site).
I don't think your paranoia is well placed. Yes, I am sure Google could easily figure out that my burner account is me. I have *never* seen this show up IRL, however. And my job has google as the contractor for server services, etc. No, I don't get ads from Google on my burner that have to do w / my IRL account.
[QUOTE=GoneForGood97;7409676] All it would take is one subpoena to Google, whether an overzealous prosecutor or a crazy SB you knocked up and walked away from tracking you down for child support, and Google will instantly provide them all your info.[/QUOTE]Has this ever happened, anywhere, to anyone's knowledge? I've never heard of it, and I'd wager you can't provide an example.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7409319]Wouldn't Google Voice give you sufficient protection, without the downsides of Signal? I really like it. It works on my burner, and I can access the account via browser, so I never have to have the burner inside an office / residence. It is buried in my golf bag, or elsewhere.
Agreed, likely borderline.[/QUOTE]Google voice messages are not end to end encrypted, and also Google is notoriously terrible for privacy. All those messages are easily accessible, and all vacuumed up by the gov't. And likely your cellular provider also has easy access. They aren't private or even remotely close.
"Yes, Google Voice texts are encrypted during transit between your device and Google's servers using TLS, and are also encrypted when stored (at-rest). However, these are not end-to-end encrypted messages, as a message can be unencrypted once it leaves Google's texting gateway and travels through the standard, unencrypted SMS network to the recipient. ".
So if you ever share any pics or personally identifiable conversational info via SMS, google voice, mysudo, etc, then it's out there. Also your Google Voice acct is likely easily connected with your phone, which is likely connected with you. Ok, if you bought a burner phone with cash, and stored it in a faraday bag...and never switched it on, near home, then could help, but that isn't very practical to stay in touch with others. And why do all this when Signal works just fine...and install it on a burner phone if you want, but I don't even bother with that part myself.
What are the downsides of Signal? I'm not aware of any of them, besides many dumb girls refuse to use it. But that's not a downside of the app or technology itself. You don't have to give out your # with it and you can even register it with a different # than your main cell. It is just so solid and can also enable disappearing messages after a certain period of time. (I usually set for 4 weeks with these girls).
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7409705]
I don't think your paranoia is well placed. [/QUOTE]Being smart and rational, and not taking unnecessary risks is not "paranoia."
Being lazy and careless and reckless is not a strategy I would recommend.
But it all comes down to personal decision about cost/benefit, risk/reward.
I would never say someone is "wrong" to discuss terms of an arrangement over SMS, just like I wouldn't say someone is wrong to BBFS some girl from the site. But also there is a much bigger downside (in lost pleasure) to using a condom, rather than the non existent downside of using Signal for texting. That's the part I don't get.
Well, I do lose a good number of sb prospects from insisting they communicate via Signal, so that is the real downside. However, the recent two deranged psychobitches have made me even more comfortable with my decisions here.
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7410173]Being smart and rational, and not taking unnecessary risks is not "paranoia."
Being lazy and careless and reckless is not a strategy I would recommend.
But it all comes down to personal decision about cost/benefit, risk/reward.
I would never say someone is "wrong" to discuss terms of an arrangement over SMS, just like I wouldn't say someone is wrong to BBFS some girl from the site. But also there is a much bigger downside (in lost pleasure) to using a condom, rather than the non existent downside of using Signal for texting. That's the part I don't get.
Well, I do lose a good number of sb prospects from insisting they communicate via Signal, so that is the real downside. However, the recent two deranged psychobitches have made me even more comfortable with my decisions here.[/QUOTE]Even if google knows or could figure out who I am, that does not necessarily put me at risk from what I truly fear. A SB figuring out my IRL identity and trying to parlay that into a score, or my SO figuring out what I have been up to. Those are the real risks in this game. And as I siad, the other indicators mentioned by the OP, I've never seen any of that. Even when I have potential for my sugar life crossing over to my real life, because of google being involved in my work world. Yes, I am careful. I use a VPN into the large corporate server too.
I never discuss an arrangement by text, not because of any OpSec concern, but because I think it is to my advantage to do it face to face. I also am fanatic about covered sex. I am a cautious person generally. I just don't see some of these other precautions as rational, because, as I said, I have never heard or seen of someone getting bit by not doing them.
Please relate an instance where someone was 'outed' when using Google Voice. Yes IK Google is terrible for consumers, and knowing that keeps me wary.
I used to work for google before and google voice is safe. The verification number that you use during signup can be removed and you can still use the gvoice as text only. You can repeat the process and can have multiple GVoice numbers.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7410554]Even if google knows or could figure out who I am, that does not necessarily put me at risk from what I truly fear. A SB figuring out my IRL identity and trying to parlay that into a score, or my SO figuring out what I have been up to. Those are the real risks in this game. And as I siad, the other indicators mentioned by the OP, I've never seen any of that. Even when I have potential for my sugar life crossing over to my real life, because of google being involved in my work world. Yes, I am careful. I use a VPN into the large corporate server too.
I never discuss an arrangement by text, not because of any OpSec concern, but because I think it is to my advantage to do it face to face. I also am fanatic about covered sex. I am a cautious person generally. I just don't see some of these other precautions as rational, because, as I said, I have never heard or seen of someone getting bit by not doing them.
Please relate an instance where someone was 'outed' when using Google Voice. Yes IK Google is terrible for consumers, and knowing that keeps me wary.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=AtlPrince;7410806]I used to work for google before and google voice is safe.[/QUOTE]Talking loud and saying nothing. It's "safe" in what respect(s)? What kind of attacks does it it protect you from?
Your messages via Google Voice are all vacuumed up by the NSA, and Google is certainly happy to give all your texting history to any law enforcement agency that requests it.
(And again, I never said using SMS or Google voice is crazy or "wrong". I'm not such a simpleton as to think that way. But just be aware of the actual risks and then everyone can decide for themselves).
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7410554]Even if google knows or could figure out who I am, that does not necessarily put me at risk from what I truly fear. A SB figuring out my IRL identity and trying to parlay that into a score, or my SO figuring out what I have been up to. Those are the real risks in this game. And as I siad, the other indicators mentioned by the OP, I've never seen any of that. Even when I have potential for my sugar life crossing over to my real life, because of google being involved in my work world. Yes, I am careful. I use a VPN into the large corporate server too.
I never discuss an arrangement by text, not because of any OpSec concern, but because I think it is to my advantage to do it face to face. I also am fanatic about covered sex. I am a cautious person generally. I just don't see some of these other precautions as rational, because, as I said, I have never heard or seen of someone getting bit by not doing them.
Please relate an instance where someone was 'outed' when using Google Voice. Yes IK Google is terrible for consumers, and knowing that keeps me wary.[/QUOTE]Ok, then makes sense if you are only concerned about SO figuring out what you are doing, or SB trying to blackmail or extort you. And if you aren't discussing $$$ over chats, then that lowers the risk tremendously, with no paper trail there. (As long as you don't use Venmo or Zelle for ppm...cash only, of course)
As far as an instance with someone being outed using Google Voice, I doubt that would be front page news on CNN. "Google Voice Outs Monger". But there are news stories every day about someone's texts being used against them in a criminal prosecution, or similar. That's not going to happen with Signal, especially with disappearing messages on. And again, there's no real downside to using it, at least if the girl agrees to move the conversation there.
Unless its a high profile murder case or a serious offense, Google doesn't comply with law enforcement, specially if its related to dealing with girls LOL.
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7411028]Talking loud and saying nothing. It's "safe" in what respects? What kind of attacks does it it protect you from. Your messages via Google Voice are vacuumed up by the NSA and Google is happy to give all your texting history to any law enforcement agency that requests it.
(And again, I never said using SMS or Google voice is crazy or "wrong". I'm not such a simpleton, and as to think that way. But just be aware of the actual risks and then decide for yourself).[/QUOTE]
Half of this thread gets taken up by security-related stuff like buying gift cards and fake phone numbers and what have you. Can we move that to it's own separate thread and keep this one just about the girls, please?
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7411050]As far as an instance with someone being outed using Google Voice, I doubt that would be front page news on CNN. "Google Voice Outs Monger". But there are news stories every day about someone's texts being used against them in a criminal prosecution, or similar.[/QUOTE]Not on network news, but if it happened it would certainly be discussed on *this* site and we would all know about it. And just in general, I likewise am aware of ZERO examples of someone doing sugar dating getting busted by LE for solicitation. Some might worry about it, but when it simply isn't happening in the real world, to take serious precautions against it is a form of paranoia.
[QUOTE=TheAnswer4;7411069]Half of this thread gets taken up by security-related stuff like buying gift cards and fake phone numbers and what have you. Can we move that to it's own separate thread and keep this one just about the girls, please?[/QUOTE]If you married guys want to discuss how to pay for membership, how to communicate invisibly and how to hide money. Somebody start a new thread on it. Call it "Ghost F'and Tactics for the Married Man".
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7408621]I talked to her and yes something definitely off. She says "I've never done this before", but then sounds like a hardcore escort once the conversation progresses. I think she insisted on CFS as well, but I don't remember that part for sure. Anyway just not for me and I balied pretty quickly.[/QUOTE]I've seen Dixie many times and yes, she can be a little skittish at first, but if y0u are patient, she's a lot of fun. Definitely one of the very nicest girls I've seen.
Keep in mind that even Apple, which has been relatively privacy focused company, has recently bent over for Trump administration and struck down an app that made tracking ICE personnel possible.
Do not trust any big tech company at these times. They might even release info without a court order now.
Different times, different expectations.
On the topic of this thread turning into security talks: I personally find it productive to read about experienced people's input. It takes a few scrolls to skip. I sometimes wish we had an FAQ kind of section to put common pitfalls for newcomers, though. I was once burned for giving out my actual number when I was under the influence of the little head unfortunately.
[QUOTE=Airmantroy;7411386]If you married guys want to discuss how to pay for membership, how to communicate invisibly and how to hide money. Somebody start a new thread on it. Call it "Ghost F'and Tactics for the Married Man".[/QUOTE]I'm single, and I don't care about "discretion". Not sure why you think caring about privacy, security, and avoiding criminal prosection is somehow exclusive to married men.
But sure anyone can start a new thread, and anyone can post there. Or not.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7411172]Not on network news, but if it happened it would certainly be discussed on *this* site and we would all know about it. And just in general, I likewise am aware of ZERO examples of someone doing sugar dating getting busted by LE for solicitation. Some might worry about it, but when it simply isn't happening in the real world, to take serious precautions against it is a form of paranoia.[/QUOTE]I personally don't take serious precautions against it. Instead, I take very simple common sense precautions.
And ok, we will agree to disagree if any SDs are being busted, stalked, or murdered as a result of their SMS or similar communications. You say "it isn't happening" as in 0.00, and I say it likely is. Everyone else can decide for themselves as well.
Ok continuing to stay on topic, has anyone seen Poison Ivy?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bc79da07-6794-477d-bd65-7e99c620b2b1[/URL]
I met her for lunch and she is super pretty. A very nice goodbye kiss and thought things were on track, but then she started to ghost me about a week later. Maybe I was too slow to close the deal.
She wants 600 ppm, and I've never agreed to more than 400 before, but was thinking it might be worth it on the right day. It won't be the end of the world if I end up saving that $$$$$$, but still was looking forward to doing more with her.
I also had lunch with Cheyenne, but she is very difficult to get anything going with. She says she has online SDs mailing her big stacks of cash from other states, so we may be competing with that. Or she could have made it up for all I know, but it sounded like a somewhat believable story. Seemed like a sweet girl though, but certainly dangerous. However that is true of most of them on the site, as my recent experiences have reminded me.
And I don't have her Seeking profle URL, because I blocked her, but someone was nice enough to share her escort listing with me. This is one of the mentally unstable girls I encountered recently:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/kaden[/URL]
Her Seeking pics look virtually identical. However, in person she looks AT LEAST 10 years older, and more like 15. Maybe early 40's? Well late 30's at least. with scaly, sun damaged skin.
I mean that part is perhaps forgivable, but the main point is that she just BATSHIT CRAZY and not in an endearing way, but in a "I'm going to kill myself or I'm going to get you locked up" sort of way.
I advise everyone to avoid her, but if you do ignore that advice, please share your experience here. It is guaranteed it will be a very good story, if not great, at least for the rest of us.
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7411680]Ok continuing to stay on topic, has anyone seen Poison Ivy?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/bc79da07-6794-477d-bd65-7e99c620b2b1[/URL]
I met her for lunch and she is super pretty. A very nice goodbye kiss and thought things were on track, but then she started to ghost me about a week later. Maybe I was too slow to close the deal.
She wants 600 ppm, and I've never agreed to more than 400 before, but was thinking it might be worth it on the right day. It won't be the end of the world if I end up saving that $$$$$$, but still was looking forward to doing more with her.
I also had lunch with Cheyenne, but she is very difficult to get anything going with. She says she has online SDs mailing her big stacks of cash from other states, so we may be competing with that. Or she could have made it up for all I know, but it sounded like a somewhat believable story. Seemed like a sweet girl though, but certainly dangerous. However that is true of most of them on the site, as my recent experiences have reminded me.[/QUOTE]I was talking to Cheyenne for a bit. She finally gave me her number like a month ago, but every time I hit her up, she's apparently always so busy and can't make anytime whatsoever, then apologizes and tells me she'll let me know when she's available. Weeks go by, radio silence. I hit her up one last time asking if she's free this week, received a one word reply: working. LOL. I just gave up and deleted her number. She's cute though, so I was pretty disappointed. Why did she seem dangerous?
I also talked to poison ivy for a bit. And yeah, seems like she's pretty firm on 600, would only go down to 550. She looked good, but not that good for that much.
Another month on the site and the number of attractive pot's keep drying up or straight up ignoring you. Seems like it's becoming like secret benefits on seeking.
[QUOTE=CrazyRocket;7411661]On the topic of this thread turning into security talks: I personally find it productive to read about experienced people's input. It takes a few scrolls to skip. I sometimes wish we had an FAQ kind of section to put common pitfalls for newcomers, though. I was once burned for giving out my actual number when I was under the influence of the little head unfortunately.[/QUOTE]At one stage, the Richmond VA sugar thread was the de facto national thread where people discussed it all. An archive was made there of everyone's most useful posts.
While that Richmond thread isn't what it used to be, there isn't any replacement. Anyway, the advice cataloged there is still pertinent.
[QUOTE=Georgiaguy57;7411845]I was talking to Cheyenne for a bit. She's cute though, so I was pretty disappointed. Why did she seem dangerous?.[/QUOTE]As someone pointed out a few weeks ago, she is taking some pretty hardcore medication for bipolar disorder, that is also used to treat schizophrenia. When you talk to her, she also says some irrational things. So that combination just raises the probability of her doing something crazy... perhaps accusing a guy of rape, soliciting, stalking, or who knows what?
She is pretty cute and polite in person, and I obviously took the chance here. Actions speak louder than words, but I did go into it being aware of the elevated risks.
But she rejected me, so maybe it's for the best and will keep me out of more serious trouble. Congrats to any guys who already got in and out of there successfully. I'm sure it was good.
[QUOTE=CrazyRocket;7411661]Keep in mind that even Apple, which has been relatively privacy focused company, has recently bent over for Trump administration and struck down an app that made tracking ICE personnel possible.
Do not trust any big tech company at these times. They might even release info without a court order now.
Different times, different expectations.
On the topic of this thread turning into security talks: I personally find it productive to read about experienced people's input. It takes a few scrolls to skip. I sometimes wish we had an FAQ kind of section to put common pitfalls for newcomers, though. I was once burned for giving out my actual number when I was under the influence of the little head unfortunately.[/QUOTE]Yes, that's the point about Signal. It is open source software from a non profit foundation. You don't have to trust them. The code is all public and it is reviewed and audited regularly. Not true of google, telegram, whatsapp, etc
Well if you use SMS and don't send your pics to the girls, and don't discuss ppm / allowance terms in the conversation, then it's low risk. But it's difficult to have a productive conversation, excluding those two topics, especially if you don't have your real pics in your Seeking profile.
BTW, if you click to cancel your membership before the auto renewal, it always seems to offer 20% discount, to keep it going.
You can also check your email for old offers of 25 - 30% off. and many of those links still work as well. I haven't paid full price for a subscription in over a year.
[URL]https://www.bustle.com/life/sugar-daddy-meeting-in-this-economy-sex-lives-sugar-baby-money[/URL]
[QUOTE=LGSeeking;7412989][URL]https://www.bustle.com/life/sugar-daddy-meeting-in-this-economy-sex-lives-sugar-baby-money[/URL][/QUOTE]Nice article.
Hello Gents. Been talking to few on the SA and would like to know if anyone of you had luck with them and ball park of numbers.
Maya - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c39cfd8b-e461-4308-ae51-d6611d540402[/URL].
Jen - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cb047b8b-a517-41b3-84b9-e4d19d6ffdca[/URL].
Stacy - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e8d66d3f-6df8-4309-a905-e88a9876f499[/URL] Not budging down below 1 k per meet.
Danielle - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/debc596c-3248-4497-968a-7311bae1a393[/URL] Now her ask is to meet her previous SD who offered 5 k per month.
Lizett - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c2a55388-8c2a-46a7-8749-40fc93c81261[/URL] Time waster. Not sure if she is even real.
Artemis - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d6f17872-e500-45ab-ae27-ade988b29e2c[/URL].
Alex - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/db312b43-2918-4fe2-bfac-5590b0d8033d[/URL] Awkward conversation but decent run for 500 did not pursued after a couple times.
I talked to Danielle a while ago when she "first" got on the site and she came with like 500 per week and I said nah, she is not that good looking or freaky enough for that. I reached back out like last month and she told me she had a SD so I left her alone.
I am talking to Alex now but her comms are horrible, got her down to 250 but she can't host and she won't send any more pics so I can see her body so I may pass on her. DM and lets chat about this one. Did you see her already?
[QUOTE=Turtman;7414591]Hello Gents. Been talking to few on the SA and would like to know if anyone of you had luck with them and ball park of numbers.
Maya - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c39cfd8b-e461-4308-ae51-d6611d540402[/URL].
Jen - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cb047b8b-a517-41b3-84b9-e4d19d6ffdca[/URL].
Stacy - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e8d66d3f-6df8-4309-a905-e88a9876f499[/URL] Not budging down below 1 k per meet.
Danielle - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/debc596c-3248-4497-968a-7311bae1a393[/URL] Now her ask is to meet her previous SD who offered 5 k per month.
Lizett - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c2a55388-8c2a-46a7-8749-40fc93c81261[/URL] Time waster. Not sure if she is even real.
Artemis - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d6f17872-e500-45ab-ae27-ade988b29e2c[/URL].
Alex - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/db312b43-2918-4fe2-bfac-5590b0d8033d[/URL] Awkward conversation but decent run for 500 did not pursued after a couple times.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Turtman;7414591]Hello Gents. Been talking to few on the SA and would like to know if anyone of you had luck with them and ball park of numbers.
-
Alex - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/db312b43-2918-4fe2-bfac-5590b0d8033d[/URL] Awkward conversation but decent run for 500 did not pursued after a couple times.[/QUOTE]I've seen Alex twice. Tight little body for sure. She will give BBBJ. But when she looks at you during the act, it's creepy, like she's looking through you. And good luck holding a conversation, half way through she gets distracted and changes the subject.
[QUOTE=MilfHunter818;7415498]I've seen Alex twice. Tight little body for sure. She will give BBBJ. But when she looks at you during the act, it's creepy, like she's looking through you. And good luck holding a conversation, half way through she gets distracted and changes the subject.[/QUOTE]Clear your inbox. I am chatting with her now and like you said comms are trash, got her down to 250 plus room but she won't send me any pics of her body. You said its nice, what would you rate her service? Was DFK and DATY involved or is it business as usual?
Hey gents. Chatting with Kaitlyn. I'm interested and just wondering if anyone has seen her yet. If you have and feel like sharing it would be much appreciated.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87f070dd-8f90-43b3-b5ce-f81c0d5cb623[/URL]
May the pussy be with you. SD.
So I had a text exchange with Serena:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c21c1b6e-4ca9-4288-aabb-1432a6eb0419[/URL]
Seems like a sweet, intelligent lady. Nice, conversational responses to text, but she definitely has a system all set up for herself. She's looking for short-term pay-per-meet. The further we went, the more I picked up a bit of a pro vibe.
She requires dinner or lunch with drinks for the first meet.
So, here are her expectations:
"I appreciate being spoiled with $800-1 K each meet while we are starting out, or more if you're feeling generous. ".
Good hunting,
Travelin.
[QUOTE=TravelinSD;7415821]So I had a text exchange with Serena:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c21c1b6e-4ca9-4288-aabb-1432a6eb0419[/URL]
Seems like a sweet, intelligent lady. Nice, conversational responses to text, but she definitely has a system all set up for herself. She's looking for short-term pay-per-meet. The further we went, the more I picked up a bit of a pro vibe.
She requires dinner or lunch with drinks for the first meet.
So, here are her expectations:
"I appreciate being spoiled with $800-1 K each meet while we are starting out, or more if you're feeling generous. ".
Good hunting,
Travelin.[/QUOTE]I don't remember what name she advertised under, but she looks super familiar. If I remember right she was 400 per hour on Tryst, no BBJ, which is why I never pulled the trigger. Though possible I'm mixing her up with someone else, it's been a few years. She was this hippie looking girl on Tryst.
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7412545]Yes, that's the point about Signal. It is open source software from a non profit foundation. You don't have to trust them. The code is all public and it is reviewed and audited regularly. Not true of google, telegram, whatsapp, etc
Well if you use SMS and don't send your pics to the girls, and don't discuss ppm / allowance terms in the conversation, then it's low risk. But it's difficult to have a productive conversation, excluding those two topics, especially if you don't have your real pics in your Seeking profile.[/QUOTE]I agree completely with your second paragraph, but your first paragraph requires a response.
The fact that the source code is open has nothing to do with whether it can be trusted. It is dead easy for whoever is control of infrastructure and hosting to insert their own hooks into the devops process that capture and records all traffic for future data-mining. Open-source actually makes that easier to do.
What's more, the industry is currently undergoing a major awakening, starting to realize that free software typically doesn't stay free forever. Especially services like this, which use "free" as a way to build the audience, at which time the platform then has value to be sold off (and most buyers will want all the data that has accumulated over the years, as that is more valuable than the software in most cases).
Does anyone know anything about these? I am talking to each.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/796774bf-621c-440a-96d9-ca1710a7f63f[/URL] - Brie.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e81ea0b9-4694-4825-b4cc-dc1e258fe38e[/URL] - Nadja.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c5aadbe1-13c6-4d81-949f-e561fa28dcb3[/URL] - Lexi.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/693f0263-8692-4c74-992c-22a931ede927[/URL] - erika.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1059ae8a-ede0-4be1-8394-30de832244f6[/URL] - Grace.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/da94e029-aeeb-4083-a1e4-1805158c7971[/URL] - Blythe.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d1fe47b2-2f62-44ab-9c36-cd4b83cc3395[/URL] - Moonlit33.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e829472f-8b31-457d-b0c0-4c3eb2ef863a[/URL] - Grace.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6a43dec0-0cd5-4f10-a5a6-de890bda9053[/URL] - Summer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4a0f182f-46c8-40e3-b953-d64190e3fde5[/URL] - Pixie.
If anyone has experience or warnings let me know! I can share some back if needed, as well.
[QUOTE=GoneForGood97;7416094]I don't remember what name she advertised under, but she looks super familiar. If I remember right she was 400 per hour on Tryst, no BBJ, which is why I never pulled the trigger. Though possible I'm mixing her up with someone else, it's been a few years. She was this hippie looking girl on Tryst.[/QUOTE]It may be her. She definitely gave off some hippie vibes in her initial conversational texts.