Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=HardHat69;6111693]So are we taking about the affidavit filed 8/24/222? I see the part about the surveillance etc on that one. That was apparently for an incident on 6/30/2022. And the arrest was 9/7/2022? Or is it an additional more recent event at the same place again?[/QUOTE]Ok I didn't finish reading that but note they only were there because of the texts between her and the agent she gave them that address otherwise they would have never been there in the first place. No agents went inside. I'm sure they drilled her to get her to roll on mm but as you can see that didn't happen.

Bs.

Pg 4 of the affidavit. Says muilpide agents coducted surveilance prior ot undercovers arrival. They did contact her via STG and she gave them the address of MM and stated that was her place of work and would meet him outside at his vehicle.

[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111655]I read nothing about surveillance? They contacted her from her stg ads![/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=JohnnyShakes;6090051]Yes, I have but wait for 2 or 3 day's.[/QUOTE]Did anything happen in the mean time? I'm still not seeing any availability.

[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111710]Pg 4 of the affidavit. Says muilpide agents coducted surveilance prior ot undercovers arrival. They did contact her via STG and she gave them the address of MM and stated that was her place of work and would meet him outside at his vehicle.

.[/QUOTE]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Not sure where they arrested her - Location of arrest says Cocoa, but the address is of the jail. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.

[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111740]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Not sure where they arrested her - Location of arrest says Cocoa, but the address is of the jail. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]The arrest was due to texts from ad on stg they got her in parking lot of mm agents never went inside.

She's the only one arrested.

[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111775]The arrest was due to texts from ad on stg they got her in parking lot of mm agents never went inside.

She's the only one arrested.[/QUOTE]Exactly, that's what I thought. The affidavit also points to her previous 2 guilty convictions so they had to make a point with her. Waited over 2 months to book her too. Court date is today. Looks like SA is the way to go for now.

I would read AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. It literaly says she was approaced and questioned in the parking lot of MM. She asked the undercover to come inside instead of conducting business in his vehicle. I am just saying from what I read, not going near that place. Her arrest also does not make sense as the case is linked all the way back to like Jun 2022. So not sure it shows up in Sep. Play safe.

[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111740]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Also, the location of arrest was in Cocoa. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111797]I would read AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. It literaly says she was approaced and questioned in the parking lot of MM. She asked the undercover to come inside instead of conducting business in his vehicle. I am just saying from what I read, not going near that place. Her arrest also does not make sense as the case is linked all the way back to like Jun 2022. So not sure it shows up in Sep. Play safe.[/QUOTE]Yup. Looks like she was the target and not MM. Read her previous affidavits too, being a habitual offender does get you more attention. You are right about playing safe, no arguments there. Will keep my distance from MM for some time.

I agree they were not there for the establishment but it like fruit of the crime so the speak. Any decent cop doing surveillance would put two and two together. Addtionally, as with most cities, if they go after MM then it will be the workers there getting hit up in a sting.

[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111784]Exactly, that's what I thought. The affidavit also points to her previous 2 guilty convictions so they had to make a point with her. Waited over 2 months to book her too. Court date is today. Looks like SA is the way to go for now.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111797]I would read AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. It literaly says she was approaced and questioned in the parking lot of MM. She asked the undercover to come inside instead of conducting business in his vehicle. I am just saying from what I read, not going near that place. Her arrest also does not make sense as the case is linked all the way back to like Jun 2022. So not sure it shows up in Sep. Play safe.[/QUOTE]Her questioning happened on 06/30 at MM. I was referring to her location of arrest which took place on 09/07.

[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111707]Ok I didn't finish reading that but note they only were there because of the texts between her and the agent she gave them that address otherwise they would have never been there in the first place. No agents went inside. I'm sure they drilled her to get her to roll on mm but as you can see that didn't happen.

Bs.[/QUOTE]She did offer to have him come in to her massage place which she said had a lockable door so the services could be performed there, which he declined. That was really dumb on her part.

[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111740]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Not sure where they arrested her - Location of arrest says Cocoa, but the address is of the jail. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]They trailed her rideshare driver after she was picked up from MM yesterday afternoon. Waited until they got to Minton to make the stop.

I same thing happened at Paradise men's club, I knew the owner of the club, if you remember how things went down. First they came in and arrested one girl, that was Sue. I think most of you remember her, cute little blonde spinner, who is now sadly deceased. But I was told by the owner that they had a talk with him and they knew what was going on and basically there was a new sheriff in town at the time and he didn't like what was going on. He was given the choice of shutting down or being taken down. That's the way I understand things went down. Maybe that will happen in this place, maybe not. Time will tell. Just my two cents.

[QUOTE=SoupBean;6112202]I same thing happened at Paradise men's club, I knew the owner of the club, if you remember how things went down. First they came in and arrested one girl, that was Sue. I think most of you remember her, cute little blonde spinner, who is now sadly deceased. But I was told by the owner that they had a talk with him and they knew what was going on and basically there was a new sheriff in town at the time and he didn't like what was going on. He was given the choice of shutting down or being taken down. That's the way I understand things went down. Maybe that will happen in this place, maybe not. Time will tell. Just my two cents.[/QUOTE]I know nothing! That said, I do find it hard to understand why LEO would go to all that trouble to nab a hooker for her 4th or 5th time. Lots of low hanging fruit around here for that. I'm guessing there is more to come out of all this.

[QUOTE=SoupBean;6112202]I same thing happened at Paradise men's club, I knew the owner of the club, if you remember how things went down. First they came in and arrested one girl, that was Sue. I think most of you remember her, cute little blonde spinner, who is now sadly deceased. But I was told by the owner that they had a talk with him and they knew what was going on and basically there was a new sheriff in town at the time and he didn't like what was going on. He was given the choice of shutting down or being taken down. That's the way I understand things went down. Maybe that will happen in this place, maybe not. Time will tell. Just my two cents.[/QUOTE]Yep, although I wasn't sure of the exact details until your report reminded me! Back in the 90's, I was a frequent flyer there and when I went to Massage Matters, it was Deja vu all over again! Of course, you could throw a rock and hit that old back building off 192 where I enjoyed myself many times over those years with many very nice women who I saw off campus as well, but their names escape me. Unfortunately, I think you're post may have hit the nail right on the head of what very well might be the consequences to come for this place! Too bad! Now, I'll just may give Mila a shot based on what I've read here or just keep seeing Liberty or Krys!