[QUOTE=Goku17;6904620]Anyone have info in LOEW?[/QUOTE]Another site had a review on her. Gave her 7/8 face / body, confirmed young w / a YMMV as the service with a score of 4 on his session.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Goku17;6904620]Anyone have info in LOEW?[/QUOTE]Another site had a review on her. Gave her 7/8 face / body, confirmed young w / a YMMV as the service with a score of 4 on his session.
I suspect so better confirm with booker. Your Sindy K review pretty much described Mollie.
[QUOTE=Goku17;6904620]Anyone have info in LOEW?[/QUOTE]
Yes, I don't remember her other names. She was also in Vegas.
[QUOTE=Therionrpg;6903830]Is she (Kiko) a rebrand? Pictures seems similar to a girl that was in LA prior.[/QUOTE]
Quick review. She may only stay for 1 more week. Fake pics except the attached one looks like her. Curvy body, nice big tits, GND Korean face with curly short black hair. Her makeup looks attractive. I thought she was quite cute and was very pleasant. It felt like winning when I saw her. Her plump pussy and thicc ass can wake up a sleeping boner. Face down and ass up made my boner rock hard more than usual. I had to stop myself several times from exploding cause it felt too good in her. Better service than typical young girls.
Contact: [URL=https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-suzy](click here)[/URL] 5'2" 32 C 110 lbs I suspect MM but couldn't be sure.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6904889]I suspect so better confirm with booker. Your Sindy K review pretty much described Mollie.[/QUOTE]Based on the Sindy K review you quoted, I don't think Loew = Sindy K (even though booker seems to be using the same photos).
Saw Loew last week and would describe her as:
F: 8.5 - very much my type, and looks youthful. I don't know how to describe her face. Almost more Japanese looking purely in terms of makeup style. Maybe more GND if not for the makeup being more sultry.
B: 8 - Youthful and natural. Probably a B cup? Great butt and slim but I wouldn't describe her as "skinny". Again, just very natural looking.
A / S: 10 - New to the business but speaks great English and communicates well. Good enough English to clearly communicate that she's intentionally pretending that you're her boyfriend to make the work feel more natural to her since she's new to it all. Loves sex, like a little choking and spanking.
Would definitely repeat, IMO she does qualify as PHYA.
Semika pics are real, some P.S. But not much. Smoking hot body and face, young, and was so ready to please. ATF material for many I would think. Maybe we had a real good connection but I think she's very service oriented too.
Face - 8-9, does have some braces on her bottom teeth would be the only knock to her. Has had some work done too so might be more points off if you don't like.
Body - 9, does have some work and scars but didn't bother me, very tight and skinny and curves in right places. Soft skin as can be.
Service - 10, could have been my lusty gf or lover. No complaints and was ready to keep going. She got into it as well.
Repeat yes. If you like her pics then I would suggest.
[QUOTE=Tobonkornot;6905419]Based on the Sindy K review you quoted, I don't think Loew = Sindy K (even though booker seems to be using the same photos).
Saw Loew last week and would describe her as:
F: 8.5 - very much my type, and looks youthful. I don't know how to describe her face. Almost more Japanese looking purely in terms of makeup style. Maybe more GND if not for the makeup being more sultry.
B: 8 - Youthful and natural. Probably a B cup? Great butt and slim but I wouldn't describe her as "skinny". Again, just very natural looking.
A / S: 10 - New to the business but speaks great English and communicates well. Good enough English to clearly communicate that she's intentionally pretending that you're her boyfriend to make the work feel more natural to her since she's new to it all. Loves sex, like a little choking and spanking.
Would definitely repeat, IMO she does qualify as PHYA.[/QUOTE]Correct, sindy k and loew are different girls. Loew cost $350, sindyk is $340.
Thank for the info. What is PHYA? Potentially?
[QUOTE=Goku17;6905958]Correct, sindy k and loew are different girls. Loew cost $350, sindyk is $340.
Thank for the info. What is PHYA? Potentially?[/QUOTE]PHYA = Pretty Hot Young Asian, so not quite to the level of HYA, at least in OP's opinion.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6904895]Quick review. She may only stay for 1 more week. Fake pics except the attached one looks like her. Curvy body, nice big tits, GND Korean face with curly short black hair. Her makeup looks attractive. I thought she was quite cute and was very pleasant. It felt like winning when I saw her. Her plump pussy and thicc ass can wake up a sleeping boner. Face down and ass up made my boner rock hard more than usual. I had to stop myself several times from exploding cause it felt too good in her. Better service than typical young girls.
Contact: [URL=https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-suzy](click here)[/URL] 5'2" 32 C 110 lbs I suspect MM but couldn't be sure.[/QUOTE]I was just about to post a lament about how pictures are not reliable anymore. If that ass in the picture were true I would have already buried my face in it. But since the pictures lie I have been waiting for a review. And once again, BA has come through.
Anyone has info on Pudding? Booker said she's young and hot, but would like to get some info on her since she has no reviews anywhere.
[QUOTE=DashingD;6905480]Semika pics are real, some P.S. But not much. Smoking hot body and face, young, and was so ready to please. ATF material for many I would think. Maybe we had a real good connection but I think she's very service oriented too.
Face - 8-9, does have some braces on her bottom teeth would be the only knock to her. Has had some work done too so might be more points off if you don't like.
Body - 9, does have some work and scars but didn't bother me, very tight and skinny and curves in right places. Soft skin as can be.
Service - 10, could have been my lusty gf or lover. No complaints and was ready to keep going. She got into it as well.
Repeat yes. If you like her pics then I would suggest.[/QUOTE]Thanks for your review- She was worth a visit. I just want to add that she is Japanese and has the whole submissive JAV girl vibe going.
[QUOTE=Madamenhu;6907205]Thanks for your review- She was worth a visit. I just want to add that she is Japanese and has the whole submissive JAV girl vibe going.[/QUOTE]What handle is she under on hx?
[QUOTE=Madamenhu;6907205]Thanks for your review- She was worth a visit. I just want to add that she is Japanese and has the whole submissive JAV girl vibe going.[/QUOTE]Hows the backside?
[QUOTE=Belly888;6907763]Hows the backside?[/QUOTE]Ass like Amy or momo or nonexistent?
[QUOTE=DashingD;6905480]Semika pics are real, some P.S. But not much. Smoking hot body and face, young, and was so ready to please. ATF material for many I would think. Maybe we had a real good connection but I think she's very service oriented too.
Face - 8-9, does have some braces on her bottom teeth would be the only knock to her. Has had some work done too so might be more points off if you don't like.
Body - 9, does have some work and scars but didn't bother me, very tight and skinny and curves in right places. Soft skin as can be.
Service - 10, could have been my lusty gf or lover. No complaints and was ready to keep going. She got into it as well.
Repeat yes. If you like her pics then I would suggest.[/QUOTE]I had the opposite experience. Respectfully its hard to believe we saw the same girl. I agree with your face and body ratings although she has no ass. I think if you are looking for a super passive GFE session with zero service queen vibes she could be your girl. Boobs are a healthy C with fresh scars underneath. The review on the other site listed DD LMAO. For me she was another jgirl strikeout. I can't do the inexperienced sessions anymore for a premium price tag just zero value. She doesn't multi task ie BJ while hand is working shaft or balls. No ass play and she will let out the typical Jgirl puppy whimper cries when you touch her nips. I'm stoked your session went well but buyers remorse for me!
[QUOTE=Randy62;6908852]I had the opposite experience. Respectfully its hard to believe we saw the same girl. I agree with your face and body ratings although she has no ass. I think if you are looking for a super passive GFE session with zero service queen vibes she could be your girl. Boobs are a healthy C with fresh scars underneath. The review on the other site listed DD LMAO. For me she was another jgirl strikeout. I can't do the inexperienced sessions anymore for a premium price tag just zero value. She doesn't multi task ie BJ while hand is working shaft or balls. No ass play and she will let out the typical Jgirl puppy whimper cries when you touch her nips. I'm stoked your session went well but buyers remorse for me![/QUOTE]I just had a good session with Semika. Real pics, super young, smooth skin, and seemed to genuinely enjoy my D.
[QUOTE=Randy62;6908852]I had the opposite experience. Respectfully its hard to believe we saw the same girl. I agree with your face and body ratings although she has no ass. I think if you are looking for a super passive GFE session with zero service queen vibes she could be your girl. Boobs are a healthy C with fresh scars underneath. The review on the other site listed DD LMAO. For me she was another jgirl strikeout. I can't do the inexperienced sessions anymore for a premium price tag just zero value. She doesn't multi task ie BJ while hand is working shaft or balls. No ass play and she will let out the typical Jgirl puppy whimper cries when you touch her nips. I'm stoked your session went well but buyers remorse for me![/QUOTE]Dang. Those pics at least accurate?
[QUOTE=Tobonkornot;6905419]Based on the Sindy K review you quoted, I don't think Loew = Sindy K (even though booker seems to be using the same photos).
Saw Loew last week and would describe her as:
F: 8.5 - very much my type, and looks youthful. I don't know how to describe her face. Almost more Japanese looking purely in terms of makeup style. Maybe more GND if not for the makeup being more sultry.
B: 8 - Youthful and natural. Probably a B cup? Great butt and slim but I wouldn't describe her as "skinny". Again, just very natural looking.
A / S: 10 - New to the business but speaks great English and communicates well. Good enough English to clearly communicate that she's intentionally pretending that you're her boyfriend to make the work feel more natural to her since she's new to it all. Loves sex, like a little choking and spanking.
Would definitely repeat, IMO she does qualify as PHYA.[/QUOTE]Just tried Loew and agree with most everything here. Her tits felt fake, but they are very well done and not too big for her frame. Her ass is all real and perfect.
She actually reminds me a lot of Haven in terms of English, service, etc, but with a better body and slightly younger.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6908902]Dang. Those pics at least accurate?[/QUOTE]Are accurate except her tits are enhanced P.S. In the photos. Not that big. She has a small heart tat on her left front shoulder.
[QUOTE=JackTms;6908958]Just tried Loew and agree with most everything here. Her tits felt fake, but they are very well done and not too big for her frame. Her ass is all real and perfect.
She actually reminds me a lot of Haven in terms of English, service, etc, but with a better body and slightly younger.[/QUOTE]Loew was excellent. She looks like the ig model lovelehee but with more angular facial features. Proportions are pretty on point tho. She's gives off a super naughty vibe but she's a bit more on the dominant side of things. She is pretty service oriented tho, so while she prefers to be dominant she will do what you ask. She prefers pounding to grinding. She's better looking than sexy Linda for reference. She's tall and has super long legs. Teeth and hair are nice. She talked a lot about the favorable exchange rate which I'm sure is why we are getting more quality girls especially from Japan.
Got to see Rabey and can confirm that she is a tiny CYA.
She wore platform high heels and still only came up to my shoulder, I am 5'11'. When she took off her heels she looks like she could hit her chin on the door knob haha.
Service was 270/ hhr with +40 for BBFS (contacted through HX).
She has a very cute and petite body. Her face is pretty and I would place her in the 27-32 age range if I had to guess. Her tits are MM but still at a small C so a modest amount of silicone. She has a great attitude and is very playful. Provides a good BBBJ and will go no hands. Speaking of hands they are tiny and made my dick look massive (its not) so that was a plus haha.
After the finish (CIP) she was even more playful, she basically used me as a jungle gym and climbed all over my body, she used her leg to massage my dick and laid on top of me in a variety of different ways. She showed me her facebook and other stuff on her phone and just all around had a welcoming and playful attitude. She did not ask me to get up for the rinse off until a couple minutes after my time had run up so not a clock watcher and will not rush you out once you pop. Maybe she wasn't being rushed at this time at least.
Amy is the reason why I don't trust half the reviewers here. There's literally no way anyone could have possibly seen Amy and thought she used to be a man - 100% some weird psy-op. Either someone had a bad experience with her or trying to prevent other people from booking her (which seems unnecessary considering all indications are even for the popular girls, their schedule is pretty free in this market. I had no trouble booking Amy in her 3rd and 4th trips down to OC, nor with Haven, Freesia, etc).
I got to go back and mark anyone that ran with this "She's a man" shit as a known bullshitter.
Pussy is immaculate, feminine voice. She's got to be Top 3 (honestly probably #1) in terms of looks / body. And she speaks great English and makes good conversation. I've seen her 3 times now and I'll probably keep looking to see her at least once per trip down to OC until I'm bored of it, which I am a little right now, but I'm sure by the time she swings by next time, I won't be able to turn down turning her out again.
[QUOTE=Limb1212;6909784]Got to see Rabey and can confirm that she is a tiny CYA.[/QUOTE]Pics accurate? or are they P.S. ?
[QUOTE=Mrmd8891;6909217]Loew was excellent. She looks like the ig model lovelehee but with more angular facial features. Proportions are pretty on point tho. She's gives off a super naughty vibe but she's a bit more on the dominant side of things. She is pretty service oriented tho, so while she prefers to be dominant she will do what you ask. She prefers pounding to grinding. She's better looking than sexy Linda for reference. She's tall and has super long legs. Teeth and hair are nice. She talked a lot about the favorable exchange rate which I'm sure is why we are getting more quality girls especially from Japan.[/QUOTE]I think she looks more like Sua from Dreamcatcher, Bini from Ohmygirl, or Kakei Jun the JAV idol.
But yeah, she's definitely top tier in looks, service and attitude.
[QUOTE=BlizaBliz;6910237]Pics accurate? or are they P.S. ?[/QUOTE]P.S. Yes. Pics are reliable. Obvious done on her face (lips and maybe nose) but pics reliable. If you're a spinner lover, you're literally wasting your time reading at this point. I feel like Ferris Beuller, in the post-credit scene where he breaks the 4th wall and tells the audience to get goin.
One of my LSC faves is coming to town. She's no Furiosa, but she'll have you feelin Anya Taylor-JOY.
This is my first review, here goes.
Was trying to book Leow but was not available for the time I wanted. * Booker recommended Yua who is new to the area. * Hesitant at first but decided to go for it.
Photo:* Real photo with slight P.S. * The photo where she is in the bathtub closely resembles how she looks like.
Face:* 7. 5, Looks young, I would guess her age between 27 to 32 years old. * Looks cute with a little makeup.
Body:* 8, Tight, flat stomach, skinny, and decent bum. * She has a nice curve even though her breast is size small, somewhere between a B and C. * Sexy body in my eyes, curvy like a coke bottle.
Service:* 8,* ok bbq, snug fit, does not allow FF which is not a big deal. * Slightly better than Amy for comparison. * Provides preview in the shower. * Enjoyed my time with Yua.
Repeat yes, she is going to be part of my rotation.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6911273]One of my LSC faves is coming to town. She's no Furiosa, but she'll have you feelin Anya Taylor-JOY.[/QUOTE]What agency is skp? Any other deets you could share?
[URL]https://www.skparadise.com[/URL]
[QUOTE=Mrmd8891;6912491]What agency is skp? Any other deets you could share?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6912578][URL]https://www.skparadise.com[/URL][/QUOTE]How does that place work? All the prices are BB specials?
[QUOTE=JayChou;6913257]How does that place work? All the prices are BB specials?[/QUOTE]Its 320 whether you want the BBFS or not. Flat rate.
[QUOTE=Randy62;6913453]Its 320 whether you want the BBFS or not. Flat rate.[/QUOTE]How accurate is this place with their photos? I'm in the middle of screening and they are only asking for screenshots of me logged in to HX and TER so far.
[QUOTE=Falcon123;6914038]How accurate is this place with their photos? I'm in the middle of screening and they are only asking for screenshots of me logged in to HX and TER so far.[/QUOTE]Are legit but with the usual photoshop. I've seen two of the girls pics are always P.S. On face and boobs.
[QUOTE=Mrmd8891;6912491]Any other deets you could share?[/QUOTE]It looks like a handful of stables will be booking her. I keep reading that Minji CG is a great value in LA. Well Sara is a steal, so they can kicks rocks. I dare someone to come up with a better 320 bb option in all of SoCal.
I'm including her original photo set from two years ago, so you fellas can compare with her current ad.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6127383]A fun little HYA just added to the Golden Triangle. Holding her tiny waist in DG reveals minimal body fat. Even though they're both toothy, I'd still rank Izzy's head game over her, but 'A' for effort. She likes watching herself get fkd hard in the mirrors. The image of her riding RCG while I'm playing with her clit and jamming three cum-coated fingers down her throat as she moans and gasps for air, will be celebrated a year from now, probably.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Randy62;6913453]Its 320 whether you want the BBFS or not. Flat rate.[/QUOTE]Flat rate aka the way the Hobby should be. I'm always making references to OG Jaime pioneering upcharges. And as much as that's true, let's not ignore the impact of entitled dudes that gave two shits about chemistry, YMMV, or time on the clock. Dudes that couldn't live with themselves, knowing other guys got more for the same price.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5845805]The line-up of dudes outside the callbox was redics. Myself included, each one of us looking shady af and seedier than the next. We legit looked like all the bad guys from Robocop.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6915222]It looks like a handful of stables will be booking her. I keep reading that Minji CG is a great value in LA. Well Sara is a steal, so they can kicks rocks. I dare someone to come up with a better 320 bb option in all of SoCal.
I'm including her original photo set from two years ago, so you fellas can compare with her current ad.[/QUOTE]Are you sure that's the same girl?
I remember those pictures. They are linked to Sally TER #380780 or people can probably search for Sally in these forums.
Here's my review of Sally that I wrote in April 2023. I wouldn't repeat since it was mostly an average session. Sara SKP looks way better than Sally IMO. I don't partake in BBFS, but do miss those non-upcharge days (for me, no upcharge for MSOG /2nd pop).
General Details.
Sally's pictures are accurate. She looks 24-34 so I would say she qualifies as HYA. Natural D cup tits with larger areolas. She slender but not super skinny nor muscular. She has the Korean girlfriend vibe moreso than a hot ABG.
The Juicy Details.
For face, she looks exactly like her pictures. Reminds me of my old Korean girlfriend at certain points. If you like what you see, then you will like it. It's a cute face. I would give her a 7.
She has natural D cups. Skin is soft. Nice body. Pictures are also accurate. I prefer fake tits and more muscles. Body would be a 7.
Service was mostly average. Great BBBJ. Very tight (which is why I would guess she's younger) with strong kegels. View in mish is good. Massage was pretty good. Full body. She speaks basically no english though. 7 seems about right considering I got 2 pops and a full body massage with time to spare which doesn't happen with other girls.
Attitude was good. I wish she was a little more into it like other girls. Other girls are super passionate. I like cock-hungry girls who girls who watch herself get pounded. She was into BBBJ though, and that cock worship was quite hot. Probably a 7.
I would recommend and I think a lot of mongers would like her since she's young, has big natural tits on a slender frame, and girlfriend material. She is basically like a younger Jane / Gem where everything is pretty solid but not my cup of tea (GFE, natural tits, good attitude, good massage). I wouldn't repeat though.
F / B / S / A = 7/7/7/7.
[QUOTE=Fuzion;6915691]Are you sure that's the same girl? I remember those pictures. They are linked to Sally TER #380780 or people can probably search for Sally in these forums.[/QUOTE]Same girl. Yes, she was Sally in LA last year. Booked through CG, M, and others I'm sure. You can't find better 320 bb.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6915222]It looks like a handful of stables will be booking her. I keep reading that Minji CG is a great value in LA. Well Sara is a steal, so they can kicks rocks. I dare someone to come up with a better 320 bb option in all of SoCal.
I'm including her original photo set from two years ago, so you fellas can compare with her current ad.[/QUOTE]If that is her photo she went by Sally with KD last year.
Lemon is back. She was with princess garden when they were called that. I remember a pretty girl and standard kgirl service. If you like her photos, I think you'll have a good time. The photos are pretty close to what she looks like in person when I last saw her. That was a while back ago so you can search the thread on her.
I haven't seen her on her return so I can't give you a recent review.
[QUOTE=Fiendinpj;6917107]Lemon is back. She was with princess garden when they were called that. I remember a pretty girl and standard kgirl service. If you like her photos, I think you'll have a good time. The photos are pretty close to what she looks like in person when I last saw her. That was a while back ago so you can search the thread on her.
I haven't seen her on her return so I can't give you a recent review.[/QUOTE]Glad to report that she still looks like her photos with an all-natural body. Nice GFE experience with lots of kissing and pretty decent skills. She definitely prefers to be led. Really nice fuckface and good audio feedback.
She's very similar to Love K in looks and attitude. If you were a fan of Love K, then you definitely would enjoy Blue / Lemon.