Still on the Learning Curve!
Wolfman,
I agree!! Got a bit excessive, but still seems fun for the newbie in me! I too love the MP, and dearly miss the A, but sometimes you want to play out the fantasy! Well, now that it is out of my system, will have to see if anything developes!
Any one been to Linda's? I have not made it back since my last post!
Have a good week guys!!
TN
any info on this provider (Katelyn)
I was wondering if anyone has any comments or contact info on this woman (or if you know others similar, that would be fine too). I am in Windsor Locks, FYI.
[url]http://www.hotlocalescorts.com/Escortdetail.asp?id=753[/url]
Thanks in advance.
ISO info. on "Beth, 19yo College Girl" in Advocate
Has anyone been with this young lady? I have a call into her, and may take one for the team if she calls back.
If I hook up with her I'll post my experience. In the meantime, if you've been with her let me know what you think.
Beth - 19yo College Girl - Advocate
Hi all --
I did end up connecting with "Beth" from the Advocate yesterday. And I wish I'd seen Mack Daddy's post before scheduling the appointment.
I suppose, to be fair, I'll post the good stuff first... The young lady I met with was probably one of the most bubbly, happy, conversational and intelligent escorts I've ever had the pleasure to meet. She was chatty and extremely friendly and made me feel right at home as soon as I met her at the hotel she was staying at. She's also quite pretty, and has a kind face, beautiful eyes and a warm smile. When I arrived she let me right in and it was like we'd known each other for years right off the bat -- a very pleasant surprise. She also seems to enjoy her work, and she seems to truly enjoy people in general. All of the expected services were rendered with a smile. I wish I could have held out longer, lol.
Now for the downside... I'm having a hard time figuring out what's going on and seeing the big picture clearly. First of all, the woman I met with wasn't Beth -- not even her "stage name". She told me he name was Megan. Megan said that Beth was a friend of her's and that Beth had to leave town unexpectedly, and that she was covering for her. OK... whatever. Woulda been good to mention this on the phone.
When I called on the phone, the description I was given was: Beth, 19 year old, long straight dirty blonde hair, 5'4" 105#, B cup. I don't think Megan is 19 and she's teller than 5'4", and she's certainly not 105 (not fat, really, but chunky and not 105). So there's a little bait and switch going on there. Megan is latina, BTW -- I guess I never asked, but I had a white girl pictured in my head... I don't know too many latin girls named Beth, I guess.
Also, Megan's tits while they might be a B cup, are extremely droopy. If you have nice perky college girl tits on the brain, look elsewhere. She's also got a J-Lo booty thing going on -- so if you like that, you're in luck! My idea of perfection is something a little different.
Let's see... on the upside, Megan was completely shaven "down there", and she was quite clean and fresh, but had major 5 o'clock shadow going on (picture yourself after 2-3 days, and you get the idea). A little maintainance would be a big plus there.
Another anomoly was that she had to call another "friend" to let her know that she was finished with the room... (can you say "service"?) I asked specifically if she was an independent, and she said she was, but the whole call-in thing leads me to believe otherwise. I can deal with both (I prefer independant tho...) but you loose points big time for not being straight with me.
So all in all, my experience was fair... I don't like being mislead, even if the service is pretty good -- doesn't do much for the whole trust thing. And I chose to see "Beth" because she sounded very young and waifish (which I personally really like) but got something else. Strike two. Plus another half a strike for the prickly pootie.
I may see her again, but another half-strike, and she's out.
YMMV.
JMG
P.S. Does this sound like the same "Beth" you saw Mack Daddy?
Do you think no one is posting...
because of the changes to the website? Just curious of others opinions. I would rather see a constructive debate of the website rather then just bashing.
Then again, posting this in Hartford/Current Reports may not be useful either.