Printable View
It is also just how we all perceive value. If I had Bezos money I still wouldn't be spending what some of you guys spend on a provider it just would never happen. In my book no woman on the planet is worth what some of you guys say you spend. Even if I had billions I wouldn't be giving a provider like 700 dollars.
[QUOTE=SeattleMassage;5799686]It is also just how we all perceive value. If I had Bezos money I still wouldn't be spending what some of you guys spend on a provider it just would never happen. In my book no woman on the planet is worth what some of you guys say you spend. Even if I had billions I wouldn't be giving a provider like 700 dollars.[/QUOTE]I've paid hookers low, medium, and high rates. There isn't any correlation to quality. It's always a crapshoot.
[QUOTE=SeattleMassage;5799686]It is also just how we all perceive value. If I had Bezos money I still wouldn't be spending what some of you guys spend on a provider it just would never happen. In my book no woman on the planet is worth what some of you guys say you spend. Even if I had billions I wouldn't be giving a provider like 700 dollars.[/QUOTE]A lot of these girls are horrible blabbermouths. And Seattle isn't exactly a big city. I've had sessions with girls where they spoke at length at the other guys they'd seen, and it wouldn't have been hard to identify who they were.
This is one reason I almost never pick playmates on STG or TNA or any of those. I also stopped seeing one very good agency in Seattle because their girls were a little too talkative.
[QUOTE=SeattleMassage;5799686]It is also just how we all perceive value. If I had Bezos money I still wouldn't be spending what some of you guys spend on a provider it just would never happen. In my book no woman on the planet is worth what some of you guys say you spend. Even if I had billions I wouldn't be giving a provider like 700 dollars.[/QUOTE]LOL, I have a friend that is a multi millionaire and he almost ALWAYS seeks out the cheapest provider. He refuses to pay over $200. The only time I would pay way up is for a once in a life time experience. Say a BBFS with a hot fresh young porn star in a filmed session for me to go back and watch and enjoy. My top end would be say $300 for an hour, and part of that would really have to involve a connection with the girl. Some of my best sessions included non sex time in the hour just cuddling and talking.
[QUOTE=SeattleMassage;5799686]It is also just how we all perceive value. If I had Bezos money I still wouldn't be spending what some of you guys spend on a provider it just would never happen. In my book no woman on the planet is worth what some of you guys say you spend. Even if I had billions I wouldn't be giving a provider like 700 dollars.[/QUOTE]Thats how they stay RICH, by minimizing cost. Rich cheap bastards LOL.
[QUOTE=SfoDavid67;5799808]LOL, I have a friend that is a multi millionaire and he almost ALWAYS seeks out the cheapest provider. He refuses to pay over $200. [/QUOTE]"Multi-Millionaire" is table-stakes in this area. Redfin has Bellevue's median home price at $1.25 million. The average tech salary in this area gets you there in under a decade even with reasonable living expenses.
His dumpster-diving hobby sounds like a personal kink. You can't save your way to riches $500 at a time.
[QUOTE=MarkoRamius;5798990]
I agree that some cyclists can be obnoxious jerks. But there are a lot of motorists who are obnoxious jerks as well, the difference being that one group of obnoxious jerks are operating tons of metal and machinery that can easily kill people, while the other group dresses in odd clothing. And that's why I think motorists need to be held to a higher standard: simply because they can kill and injure others so easily.
[/QUOTE]When I was younger and a bike was my primary mode of transportation, I was always aware of the weight advantage motor vehicles had over me. Had I been given the opportunity of a bike lane I would be in that sucker all the time. There are a great many bi-cyclist that seem to have a holier than thou attitude towards cars (that pay for their bike lanes BTW) and feel entitled to the roads they do not contribute to.
And for the record, yes, I was hit be (more than once) by a car making a right turn and not seeing me while riding as far to the right of the road as possible.
[QUOTE=Rousse;5800140]"Multi-Millionaire" is table-stakes in this area. Redfin has Bellevue's median home price at $1.25 million. The average tech salary in this area gets you there in under a decade even with reasonable living expenses.
His dumpster-diving hobby sounds like a personal kink. You can't save your way to riches $500 at a time.[/QUOTE]He lives outside of Austin, not in Seattle. But he can afford to fly to Europe every month to fuck ****** in Germany at 50 euro a pop.
Well that just sounds like his thing. We all have our requirements that get us going, sometimes I'm not sure we even know why. There are guys who save-up for the Bunny Ranch and other legal brothels in Nevada. Not my thing, just too.... I don't know, but not really my thing. I can't put my finger on it. But some guys love it. When they think about the hobby that's the perception which pops into their heads, so that's what they go for. I think this is why a lot of guys are paying the overly made-up SoCal hookers out on Aurora. When they think of paying for a sex worker, that's the image which comes into their minds. They want the 20 minute impersonal, plastic, overly made-up circus freak show for $$$. It's how they envision it and it's what gets them off. Doesn't do it for me, but the girls are still in business, so....
Same with strip clubs. I don't get the point, but I knew a guy who absolutely loved them. He'd go every weekend and drop a [i]lot[/i] of dough on dances, then have one or two come back to his place afterward. He'd spend a couple thousand sometimes. Not my thing, but that's what he liked and it got him off. I can scream and b****h and whine like a little c***t all I want and it still won't put those girls out of business. I mean, come on here.
Guys it doesn't matter. None of this matters. None of it. There's a price-range for everyone's situation. There are a variety of experiences at every level. Some good experiences at low price points, some bad experiences at high price points but none of that matters. We all go where our comfort, perception and experience exists. That's different for me as it is for you as it is for anyone else. It's ridiculous to even debate it.
[QUOTE=SfoDavid67;5800309]he can afford to fly to Europe every month to fuck ****** in Germany at 50 euro a pop.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=StreetTroller;5800431]Well that just sounds like his thing. We all have our requirements that get us going, sometimes I'm not sure we even know why. There are guys who save-up for the Bunny Ranch and other legal brothels in Nevada. Not my thing, just too.... I don't know, but not really my thing. I can't put my finger on it. But some guys love it. When they think about the hobby that's the perception which pops into their heads, so that's what they go for. I think this is why a lot of guys are paying the overly made-up SoCal hookers out on Aurora. When they think of paying for a sex worker, that's the image which comes into their minds. They want the 20 minute impersonal, plastic, overly made-up circus freak show for $$$. It's how they envision it and it's what gets them off. Doesn't do it for me, but the girls are still in business, so....
Same with strip clubs. I don't get the point, but I knew a guy who absolutely loved them. He'd go every weekend and drop a [i]lot[/i] of dough on dances, then have one or two come back to his place afterward. He'd spend a couple thousand sometimes. Not my thing, but that's what he liked and it got him off. I can scream and b****h and whine like a little c***t all I want and it still won't put those girls out of business. I mean, come on here.
Guys it doesn't matter. None of this matters. None of it. There's a price-range for everyone's situation. There are a variety of experiences at every level. Some good experiences at low price points, some bad experiences at high price points but none of that matters. We all go where our comfort, perception and experience exists. That's different for me as it is for you as it is for anyone else. It's ridiculous to even debate it.[/QUOTE]Absolutely spot on brotha! When covid started, we all thought prices would go down. 2 yrs later, here we are smh. I get it fellas, that thing between their legs is their golden ticket and they know.
So either get your money up or fit in where you get in. Different strokes for different folks.
I spent quite a bit of time this weekend trolling for chicks online. Most of the time I never got any response, the few I did get came hours later. On Saturday evening I had a gal and we were engaged and essentially committed and then she went dark. Three hours later she said, "I'm sorry. I forgot to hit the "send" button earlier to confirm our date". Yeah, sure. She was all the way down in Tacoma so I'm glad that didn't work out. This morning I woke-up to a message from another gal I texted the day prior, "come over today and let's make each other cum". I responded, she went dark rest of day. I guess she found someone to make her "cum" before I got to her.
Tonight a long-time old regular contacted me. Haven't seen her in forevvvvvver. I don't know what kind of shape she's in these days, but I decided to try. She wants to meet me, I agree and start cleaning-up and tell her to let me know when she's at the spot. It's not too far from where I live so I just stayed-put until I heard from her. Two-and-a-half hours go by and I decided she's not coming. That's okay, I'm not out anything since I haven't left. Normally I'd just go about my night, but I decided to let her know that I was out for the night. She replied, "I was just getting ready to drive to meet you but whatever". That pissed me off. Somehow this is my fault. You should all know that she's been flaky in the past, so I sort of expected this. But, apparently it's my fault. So I said, "just getting ready now after two-and-a-half hours? You couldn't let me know? I'm no-showed so often that I just learned to move-on after a certain amount of time, you're lucky I even fucking bothered to let you know. If you're pissed-off, it's your god damn fault, not mine". I'm just not going to take that shit. Fine if she's pissed, but somehow putting this on me is BS.
I've dealt with this in the past and it's an expected part of this hobby. I just seem to be much-less willing to deal with it these last couple of years, LOL. People have always asked me why I liked the street and i've always said it's because of the immediacy of it all. I'm not waiting for potentially hours for a response, driving to somewhere and going dark. But the gals on the street haven't really been working for me, either.
[QUOTE=StreetTroller;5800431]Well that just sounds like his thing. We all have our requirements that get us going, sometimes I'm not sure we even know why. There are guys who save-up for the Bunny Ranch and other legal brothels in Nevada. Not my thing, just too.... I don't know, but not really my thing. I can't put my finger on it. But some guys love it. When they think about the hobby that's the perception which pops into their heads, so that's what they go for. I think this is why a lot of guys are paying the overly made-up SoCal hookers out on Aurora. When they think of paying for a sex worker, that's the image which comes into their minds. They want the 20 minute impersonal, plastic, overly made-up circus freak show for $$$. It's how they envision it and it's what gets them off. Doesn't do it for me, but the girls are still in business, so....
Same with strip clubs. I don't get the point, but I knew a guy who absolutely loved them. He'd go every weekend and drop a [i]lot[/i] of dough on dances, then have one or two come back to his place afterward. He'd spend a couple thousand sometimes. Not my thing, but that's what he liked and it got him off. I can scream and b****h and whine like a little c***t all I want and it still won't put those girls out of business. I mean, come on here.[/QUOTE]Most of what you state is fine. I do not go to strip clubs, so what you said about that does not apply to me. However, I still say there is nothing wrong with one making statements about rates, services, etc. , as long as one is not demeaning the op. And if one wishes to express their disagreement with such posts, fine. Just don't go "bashing" the person that made the post.
[QUOTE=StreetTroller;5800902]I spent quite a bit of time this weekend trolling for chicks online. Most of the time I never got any response, the few I did get came hours later. On Saturday evening I had a gal and we were engaged and essentially committed and then she went dark. Three hours later she said, "I'm sorry. I forgot to hit the "send" button earlier to confirm our date". Yeah, sure. She was all the way down in Tacoma so I'm glad that didn't work out. This morning I woke-up to a message from another gal I texted the day prior, "come over today and let's make each other cum". I responded, she went dark rest of day. I guess she found someone to make her "cum" before I got to her.
Tonight a long-time old regular contacted me. Haven't seen her in forevvvvvver. I don't know what kind of shape she's in these days, but I decided to try. She wants to meet me, I agree and start cleaning-up and tell her to let me know when she's at the spot. It's not too far from where I live so I just stayed-put until I heard from her. Two-and-a-half hours go by and I decided she's not coming. That's okay, I'm not out anything since I haven't left. Normally I'd just go about my night, but I decided to let her know that I was out for the night. She replied, "I was just getting ready to drive to meet you but whatever". That pissed me off. Somehow this is my fault. You should all know that she's been flaky in the past, so I sort of expected this. But, apparently it's my fault. So I said, "just getting ready now after two-and-a-half hours? You couldn't let me know? I'm no-showed so often that I just learned to move-on after a certain amount of time, you're lucky I even fucking bothered to let you know. If you're pissed-off, it's your god damn fault, not mine". I'm just not going to take that shit. Fine if she's pissed, but somehow putting this on me is BS.
I've dealt with this in the past and it's an expected part of this hobby. I just seem to be much-less willing to deal with it these last couple of years, LOL. People have always asked me why I liked the street and i've always said it's because of the immediacy of it all. I'm not waiting for potentially hours for a response, driving to somewhere and going dark. But the gals on the street haven't really been working for me, either.[/QUOTE]I've come to notice over the past year, most providers are super busy on the weekends. Also guessing they go with who has a big bank roll first. But yeah I tend to text them a day or two earlier, not the same day I have the appnt. All in all, its getting bad, they've made it all about the $. So ef services! If these chix had a regular job they would be fired. No accountability!
[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5799005]Note I said "(I think)", ie, not sure. But whether breaking the law or not, why can't common sense prevail? In that particular case, after the idiot gave me the finger, it would have been reasonably right for me to do something to him (maybe physical harm).
You would be one of the few, in a very, very minority, that would use their head and behave in a mature fashion. Most bicyclists are just jerks, and think they own the road.
And as for motorists invade bike lanes all the time, the same could be said of bicyclists who invade road lanes outside of bicycle lanes. Whether legal or not, it's still the same: if there is a bike lane, then use it![/QUOTE]In general, bicycles have the same rights to roadways and are subject to same traffic regs as cars, with obvious exceptions like freeways where non-motorized vehicles are prohibited. Bike lanes provide a separate and safer right of way that can help minimize car / cycle conflict, and I think cyclists are wise to use them but they are not legally obligated to do so.
And yes there are jerks on 2 wheels just like there are on 4 wheels. It doesn't help either group to fly the bird on the way by, nor honestly does use of the horn (which comes across as, "get the F out of my way! Other than perhaps a quick toot to let someone know you're going to pass. In my experience though, as both an automobile driver and cyclist, most people try to share the road.
I notice that Lee Groinman, Toomgis, Cameltoe, and Camhole only post, when they have something negative to say to, or about, someone else. Why do you all have to be so aggressive all the time? Why not try to be positive for a change?.
[QUOTE=EddyWhtwtr;5802018]In general, bicycles have the same rights to roadways and are subject to same traffic regs as cars, with obvious exceptions like freeways where non-motorized vehicles are prohibited. Bike lanes provide a separate and safer right of way that can help minimize car / cycle conflict, and I think cyclists are wise to use them but they are not legally obligated to do so.
And yes there are jerks on 2 wheels just like there are on 4 wheels. It doesn't help either group to fly the bird on the way by, nor honestly does use of the horn (which comes across as, "get the F out of my way! Other than perhaps a quick toot to let someone know you're going to pass. In my experience though, as both an automobile driver and cyclist, most people try to share the road.[/QUOTE]You are wrong about the use of the horn. That bicyclist I encountered a few years back was in the wrong. Not legally, but morally. Also, he certainly did not show any maturity. Plus his two buddies were in the bicycle lane. And remember, we paid for that bike lane, not the bicyclist.
As for sharing the road, where there is a dedicated bicycle lane (assuming it is not completely full, which is rare), no need for sharing. Both the motorists and the bicyclist need to exercise both common sense and maturity, plain and simple.
There is all this talk about how women have feeling and emotions, and how we need to keep that in mind. I don't disagree with that.
So, why the hell is it, that we don't seem to take into account, that males also have feelings and emotions? It's 2022. We don't live in the cave man days anymore. Yet, we still live in this macho, boot camp, drill Sargent mentality, that men and males are these bullet-proof beings, that you can do and say anything to, and they're not supposed to feel certain ways about it.
You don't have to come on this board and openly admit it. But, if you were to tell the honest truth, you would acknowledge that on this thread alone, so many men are dying on the inside, as they and other men are just beating the shit out of each other, with verbal insults.
Remember, fisticuffs is far from the only way that a male can be badly harmed and damaged.
Step back and think about all of this for a moment, rather than dismissing it.
[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5802476]You are wrong about the use of the horn. That bicyclist I encountered a few years back was in the wrong. Not legally, but morally. Also, he certainly did not show any maturity. Plus his two buddies were in the bicycle lane. And remember, we paid for that bike lane, not the bicyclist.
As for sharing the road, where there is a dedicated bicycle lane (assuming it is not completely full, which is rare), no need for sharing. Both the motorists and the bicyclist need to exercise both common sense and maturity, plain and simple.[/QUOTE]Reminds me of when I was in the right. You let people out of the elevator first! These two girls just walk in together to the elevator, giggling, smiling, totally oblivious that they should be letting me out first.
Then their asshole male friend comes in, we make eye contact, and we're glaring at each other. What he needs to realize is, just because those two girls are his friends, does not mean that they are automatically right all the time. What's going to happen if those girls do the same thing to someone else, and he's not there to protect them? What if those girls do it to some real mean bitchy woman, who will curse them out or even physically attack them? Because then, that's woman on woman, and all things are fair at that point.
I thought about this elevator incident, when you talked about the guy in the bike lane, with his two buddies. Like the elevator, the pack mentality kicks in.
[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5802476]... And remember, we paid for that bike lane, not the bicyclist.[/QUOTE]How exactly do you figure that?
Are you assuming that all bicycle owners pay no taxes? Or that all bicycle owners don't own or use a car at all?
If you are talking about gas taxes, tolls, license fees, and the like, there are hard numbers. In Washington those taxes pay for about 64% of all road costs. And Washington is on the relatively high end of those numbers nationwide.
Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure accounts for about two percent of road spending.
Sources:
[URL]https://taxfoundation.org/states-road-funding-2019/[/URL]
[URL]https://ggwash.org/view/36053/more-proof-gas-taxes-dont-pay-for-roads[/URL]
If there is some program out there that says that bicyclists don't need to pay taxes, all I can say is that I wish I knew about it sooner.
[URL]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jock_[/URL](stereotype)#text=As%20 a%20 blanket%20 term%2 C%20 jock, soccer%2 C%20 swimming%20 and%20 Ice%20 hockey.
Mean.
Aggressive.
Those are accurate, for sure.
Boys on varsity teams, usually had an arrogance and attitude problem. They thought they were all bad ass.
[QUOTE=MarkoRamius;5802908]How exactly do you figure that?
Are you assuming that all bicycle owners pay no taxes? Or that all bicycle owners don't own or use a car at all?
If you are talking about gas taxes, tolls, license fees, and the like, there are hard numbers. In Washington those taxes pay for about 64% of all road costs. And Washington is on the relatively high end of those numbers nationwide.
Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure accounts for about two percent of road spending.
Sources:
[URL]https://taxfoundation.org/states-road-funding-2019/[/URL]
[URL]https://ggwash.org/view/36053/more-proof-gas-taxes-dont-pay-for-roads[/URL]
If there is some program out there that says that bicyclists don't need to pay taxes, all I can say is that I wish I knew about it sooner.[/QUOTE]You are missing the essential point. I already stated that we needed to pay the $1450 assessment separately (as other condo / townhome / home owners needed to do). I am positive that a non-resident bicyclist did not make such a payment. So, my incident with that idiot bicyclist (giving me the finger when he was in my lane, and not in the bike lane, while his other 2 friends were) is accurate, and that he really needed to be disciplined. Remember, he was impeding my progress, not the other way around.
[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5803338]You are missing the essential point. I already stated that we needed to pay the $1450 assessment separately (as other condo / townhome / home owners needed to do). I am positive that a non-resident bicyclist did not make such a payment. So, my incident with that idiot bicyclist (giving me the finger when he was in my lane, and not in the bike lane, while his other 2 friends were) is accurate, and that he really needed to be disciplined. Remember, he was impeding my progress, not the other way around.[/QUOTE]It's not YOUR lane and there is no requirement to use a bike lane in this state. All users pay property taxes either directly or through rent and it's your motor vehicle use that is subsidized. Cars and trucks do 100% percent of the damage but only contribute an extra 2-4% in vehicle taxes for city and county roads. State gas tax allocated to cities must be used for roads.
[QUOTE=EngrJoe;5803716]It's not YOUR lane and there is no requirement to use a bike lane in this state. All users pay property taxes either directly or through rent and it's your motor vehicle use that is subsidized. Cars and trucks do 100% percent of the damage but only contribute an extra 2-4% in vehicle taxes for city and county roads. State gas tax allocated to cities must be used for roads.[/QUOTE]Yes, it is not my lane, but I PAID the $1450 over and above all the taxes, etc. For the improvement, including the bicycle lane. Hence, I am correct in expecting bicyclists to use the lane and stay out of my car lane. And that bicyclist is definitely causing issues doing that. It is only a 2 lane road, and at that part (actually along the entire road), it is illegal to cross that line and enter the other lane. But I guess that bicyclist (and obviously others) who cannot exercise maturity or common sense. Plus, I'll say it again: his 2 buddies Were in the bicycle lane.
[QUOTE=EngrJoe;5803716]It's not YOUR lane and there is no requirement to use a bike lane in this state. All users pay property taxes either directly or through rent and it's your motor vehicle use that is subsidized. Cars and trucks do 100% percent of the damage but only contribute an extra 2-4% in vehicle taxes for city and county roads. State gas tax allocated to cities must be used for roads.[/QUOTE]You do realize that you arguing with a guy that got banned from the TV Guide website for arguing in the comment section.
This is very untrue. Cars and trucks don't do 100% of the damage to roads. Weather contributes a ton to that. Look what heat waves do to cement and bridges. Fuel taxes are top 5 in the country in WA state. Bikes don't use gas so can't even fathom how you think they pay for the roads. RE taxes heavily go to Fire Departments, Police and schools. Not hard to find if you know how to google. Link to Department of Revenue Website pie chart explaining this here.
[URL]https://dor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/docs/pubs/prop_tax/homeown.pdf[/URL]
Vehicle tabs (again something a bicyclists don't pay for) fund other road projects as well as alternative forms of transportation like the light rail. Excise taxes for trucking businesses etc. pay for road projects. Shoot all the business owners pay for these taxes as well. Wonder how your bikes will get transported here without. Wait for it. Vehicles. How will your kids go to school without. Wait for it. Busses. The whole world runs on vehicles that use gas. The bicyclist is just too dense to realize that their self righteousness doesn't pay for shit. Shoot Seattle has an extra. 3% sales tax on vehicle purchases that go to the roads. Guess what, your bicyle purchase doesn't come with an extra. 3% tax when you buy it. The list goes on. Take vehicles away and all these businesses shut down. Vehicles subsidize your entire being. You ain't getting shit from Amazon online orders without the use of a vehicle. All businesses pretty much would shut down without the heavy lifting by the cars. BTW, don't argue back. I do taxes for a living. You will just look silly. If Walter pays taxes that is partially his lane. Funded by him and his hard work. By a lot of our hard work. If you have the time to ride a bike all around cause you have nothing better to do, go to the fucking forest and out of the way of hard working civilization. Don't get in our way and slow us down to your level. Most of us have shit to do. Cause we got to make enough to subsidize the weak as bike riders and our own shit we want.
[QUOTE=EngrJoe;5803716]It's not YOUR lane and there is no requirement to use a bike lane in this state. All users pay property taxes either directly or through rent and it's your motor vehicle use that is subsidized. Cars and trucks do 100% percent of the damage but only contribute an extra 2-4% in vehicle taxes for city and county roads. State gas tax allocated to cities must be used for roads.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Camhole;5804226]You do realize that you arguing with a guy that got banned from the TV Guide website for arguing in the comment section.[/QUOTE]Why do more than half of your posts seem to be about playing Whack A Mole, calling out people for making another alt? Most of your contributions should be related to the hobby, rather than criticizing other people.
[QUOTE=Gostz1953;5804273]...Bikes don't use gas so can't even fathom how you think they pay for the roads. ... If Walter pays taxes that is partially his lane. Funded by him and his hard work. By a lot of our hard work. If you have the time to ride a bike all around cause you have nothing better to do, go to the fucking forest and out of the way of hard working civilization.[/QUOTE]That is an interesting philosophy. If you take the idea "I paid taxes for it therefore it is partially mine" to its logical conclusion, doesn't that mean that we can all go down to JBLM and borrow a Stryker for a day? Or an F-15?
You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.
And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.
[URL]https://www.quora.com/Police-officers-Have-you-ever-had-to-arrest-a-person-that-you-personally-did-not-think-should-be-arrested-What-was-the-situation[/URL]
Read this.
A FEMALE police officer, 100 percent backed up the HUSBAND in court, in a domestic violence case she witnessed and had to handle and make arrests.
You see, sometimes we need to look at things as "right vs. Wrong," instead of just being PC.
For those of you who think that men are ALWAYS in the wrong, and that women are NEVER wrong, read this link.
I'm taking to you:
Toomgis.
Camhole.
Camel Toe.
Jimmysix.
Lee Groinman.
Michael1967.
Butsit.
AsaMona.
A2.
A12.
Jackson.
Before any of you get mad, look at this objectively, and think about it.
Be fair about things, for the first time in your lives.
You do notice how I say bicycles don't pay these taxes. And yes, let's take it to it's logical conclusion. All government funded projects are the peoples. We get rights to vote on what they do with that money. We might not get to trespass at JBLM, but we can vote to defund that whole place. We get to decide what happens through voting. It is ours, all of ours. We, also, get to decide we want to fund it more if the protection it provides makes us safer.
Not missing the point. But you are clearly missing the point, if they are riding their bike instead of driving that they fund less of it. Almost nothing is mutually exclusive, but bicyclists don't put as much money in but yet want more rights to the road. Only a simpleton couldn't see how that works.
[QUOTE=MarkoRamius;5804690]That is an interesting philosophy. If you take the idea "I paid taxes for it therefore it is partially mine" to its logical conclusion, doesn't that mean that we can all go down to JBLM and borrow a Stryker for a day? Or an F-15?
You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.
And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.[/QUOTE]
This is an oddball request for this place, but I am hopeful. I start my new job in SEA on 3/14. I am trying to find a room to rent within 20 minutes of the airport. If anyone has any intel please PM me.
[QUOTE=MarkoRamius;5804690]You miss the very important point that the vast majority of people who own and ride bikes also own motor vehicles and pay all of those taxes. Only in a very simplistic worldview would those two things be mutually exclusive.
And all those taxes don't completely pay for roads. The Federal Highway Trust fund has been losing money since 2008, and has been dependent on periodic donations from the general fund. Similar processes go on at the state and local level. So non gas-tax, non user-fee, and non-toll money are paying for our roads.[/QUOTE]You completely missed my point about paying the additional $1450 for that road and bike lanes, in addition to the taxes we already pay for whatever. And yet that a**hole who gave me the finger, yet riding outside the bike lane, did not pay a dime directly at that time, like we needed to.
[QUOTE=KeatsAiken;5802334]I notice that Lee Groinman, Toomgis, Cameltoe, and Camhole only post, when they have something negative to say to, or about, someone else. Why do you all have to be so aggressive all the time? Why not try to be positive for a change?.[/QUOTE]Because they either have fallen in love with a prostitute and he sob story, are prostitutes from TNA who have infiltrated this board to defend bad hooking for outrageous rates, or think that the prostitutes who read this board will see their comments and immediately decide that these cowards deserve better service or discounted rates. Seriously. Any man who advocates for WGs isn't a man. Any man who thinks WGs should be paid hundreds of dollars for covered everything isn't a man he's a cuck. Most importantly any man who would think about paying their hard earned money to have vagina sex with a fat chick is just pathetic. Fat WGs literally exist to do the most degrading things we can imagine to, that's it. If they insist that they won't do anything a man wants really what the fuck is a fat WG good for? I can personally say I've never stuck it in a fat WG's vag just their butthole and mouth.
Let me grab my POPCORN!
[QUOTE=RoflCopter22;5805512]Because they either have fallen in love with a prostitute and he sob story, are prostitutes from TNA who have infiltrated this board to defend bad hooking for outrageous rates, or think that the prostitutes who read this board will see their comments and immediately decide that these cowards deserve better service or discounted rates. Seriously. Any man who advocates for WGs isn't a man. Any man who thinks WGs should be paid hundreds of dollars for covered everything isn't a man he's a cuck. Most importantly any man who would think about paying their hard earned money to have vagina sex with a fat chick is just pathetic. Fat WGs literally exist to do the most degrading things we can imagine to, that's it. If they insist that they won't do anything a man wants really what the fuck is a fat WG good for? I can personally say I've never stuck it in a fat WG's vag just their butthole and mouth.[/QUOTE]Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.
You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.
[QUOTE=Camhole;5805988]Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.
You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.[/QUOTE]I don't disagree, that women deserve respect and equality. The problem with women nowadays is, they don't want just respect and equality: They want domination. Nowadays, on a real dating site, if a man says he wants a woman who believes in mutual respect, that is a negative for the women who see that. They want a man who will let her dominate him, and trample on him.
And, you seem to also believe, that that's the way men should be: Kowtow to women.
[QUOTE=Camhole;5805988]Or it could just be that some of us have enough power and respect in our personal and professional lives. We don't feel the need to degrade and piss on a hooker to feel better about what a pathetic, sad little loser boy that you have grown into. You don't want to pay to fuck fat bitches, then don't. I know I wouldn't but I also know that some dudes like to, to each their own.
You keep talking about what a real man does. LMAO. Like you have any idea. You think that a real man goes online and makes posts that reads somewhere between a 13 yrs old hissy fit and a low rent version of Penthouse Forums. Get off the dialup little boy, you're mom needs to make a phone call.[/QUOTE]Wow. So you've degraded yourself to calling me broke because I genuinely hate bad prostitute practices. Every prostitute I've talked about here has done what I've experienced and I'm sorry you are upset that they won't do it for you. Hey maybe one of the obese ones you pay $400 to pork with a condom on them cuddle with and bask in their company will finally give you a real hummer, but they probably sense that you're a giant mark and will defend them to your grave.
If you want to compare net worth I'm down, but it's not about that. It's about you defending bad hooking. You defending women who only care about sucking every last dollar out of every man on here which makes you look like a *****. I'm sure every guy no matter how deep down pussy whipped he is by his "ATF" prostitute agrees with me over you. What fucking hooker turned you to the dark side?
Heather Valentyne.
Had nice man mades. Was young and blonde at the time. She said she got her implants at 19. Probably had a kid at 17, then got implants. Blonde hair and big implants is one common sign of childbirth.
But, her body was flabby. Chin showed flab. The OP for her TER review put Flabby as her body type.
Tahoe Ted wouldn't let her post on TRB, because of her history as an up seller.
Memory Layne.
Feminist's vision of equality: women get the authority of men, the privileges of women, the accountability of children, and the self-awareness of a fetus.
The problem with your reply is that this isn't a dating site. I think this highlights just how confused you really are.
Are you seeing providers simply because you are unable to connect with females in any other way? That sounds like a potential problem in your part.
What's up with all of the pro-abuse incels on this forum lately? Also a lot of alts floating around here in the past several months. I'm not sure a lot of these "reports" are actually valid and real, I think about 20%, at the very least, of what we read here is absolute bullshit. Some of these posts seem to be written by guys who need to inflate their own sense of lacking masculinity. "I wanted to fuck her in the ass, she said "no" so I MADE her do it". That sounds dangerously close to rape. Who gets-off on that? Well, apparently some here do. Now, whether these reports are true or not, well....I think there's a lot of fantasy posted here to make some powerless guys here feel as if they're so-called "real" men.
[QUOTE=BrianShinamot;5806029]I don't disagree, that women deserve respect and equality. The problem with women nowadays is, they don't want just respect and equality: They want domination. Nowadays, on a real dating site, if a man says he wants a woman who believes in mutual respect, that is a negative for the women who see that. They want a man who will let her dominate him, and trample on him.[/QUOTE]
I am on EHarmony. I wrote that I believe in mutual respect. I reached out to a woman. She is 41. Here is a paraphrase of her reply to me. Keep in mind, she could have just closed me out, but she wrote this back:
How is your evening? I looked at your profile. You look like trouble. I am too old for trouble, heh.
Because we all have to pay to be on EHarmony, I do not believe that this is a scammer or troll, but I do wonder. For one, that does not sound like a 41 year old woman response. If she thinks she's too old for trouble, then why doesn't she act like it? I expect that kind of reply from a 22 hear old girl. Heh? What the hell is that from a woman over 40?
Second, there is absolutely nothing about my profile that spells trouble. If anything, my profile says boring, uninteresting, not very exciting. Nothing about me would make me stand out, to a woman who has many options.
So, here is what I conclude: Basically, because my profile doesn't say that all women are superior, women are always right, women always wear the pants in every relationship, men need to let women trample all over them, that makes me look like a trouble guy, in her mind.
If I read that a guy got that response from her, heh, I would have thought that this bio read that he likes to party, smoke weed, do drugs, and bed as many women as possible. Believe me, my profile is nothing like that.
And, there are so many simp men, who would agree with this woman, that my boring profile sounds like trouble. The same kind of simp men that are on TNA, and now on this board. This permeates the hobby world, and real life dating.
Oh, and if a 41 year old woman says she's too old for trouble, is she basically saying, that when she was younger, she outright looked for trouble guys?