Kelly and her weird photo's
One thing I have noticed about Kelly. On her Craigslist ad her photo's seem doctored. Not her body but the pink outfit. maybe it's my computer but if you look at it the outfit doesn't look like it is a natural fit. That probably sounds weird, but I would swear that she had that photo shopped on. Don't know why, and again maybe it's my computer.
detailed report...however
[QUOTE=Gatrfn]In a dream, I went to see Mary Jane (yes, she's back! ). I called her and she answered on the first ring. We went through the whole show up at the hotel (mid-scale, not "Palm-Airish) and call me for the room number bit. Long story short, went inside the room. She was very pleasantly dressed and looks exactly like the photos she posts. She has some baby fat, so she's not a twig but she isn't one to kick out of bed for eating crackers either. She took a five minute bath to "freshen" up and then we got comfortable. For $1. 5, I got a no rush, no clock watching GFE with CBJ followed by FS. She has recently had a piercing, so she is slightly tender, but I must say that she was a great experience. She was sober, polite, fresh, kind and eager to please. She may have some baby fat, but she is well worth the visit. No pimps (at least none around), smokes cigarettes but not while you are visiting. I highly recommend her. And, before anyone discounts my post because I only have one other, mind you please don't be critical. We all started posting at "1". Her ads are on CL and she is in the Ulmerton Road area for now. I highly recommend her if you don't mind a few extra pounds. She will satisfy you and not hold a stopwatch while she does it.[/QUOTE]
Which version of this Mary Jane did you see?
She has two posts on Craigslist. In one picture she doesn't show her face and has brunette hair. In the next post she is a blonde. She also states that the incall is at her place, but then states that its at a hotel. Both posts (and the only two that come up for her name on a search) with the two completely different pictures were placed yesterday, on the 20th, the exact same day you placed your post here. Sounds pretty suspicious.
Just in case (in shocking fashion) the links happen to be gone in the near future, here is the actual verbiage from the ad:
"no RIP OFFS or games or BS. Just you and me. No cash and dash (its my place) and you will leave happy. Hosting at an upscale hotel in clearwater area. NO outcalls at the moment. "
[url]http://tampa.craigslist.org/ers/581286754.html[/url]
[url]http://tampa.craigslist.org/ers/581273773.html[/url]
still thinking caution prevails
FYI....no more than 20 minutes after I posted my questions on this site, one of the links for Mary Jane was "flagged".
[QUOTE=Gatrfn] Long story short, went inside the room. She was very pleasantly dressed and looks exactly like the photos she posts. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Gatrfn]She is a 36DD, but YVVM and I can't say that the photos haven't been repaired at PhotoShop if you get the drift. [/QUOTE]
I actually don't get your drift on this one if she looks exactly like the photos she posts?
[QUOTE=SteelThunder]Which version of this Mary Jane did you see?
She has two posts on Craigslist. In one picture she has brunette hair. In the next post she is a blonde. [/QUOTE]
So, which one was she--a blonde or brunette?
[QUOTE=Gatrfn]In a dream, I went to see Mary Jane (yes, she's back! ).[/QUOTE]
Sounds like you saw her before...was it better this time now that she is back?
[QUOTE=Gatrfn]I called her and she answered on the first ring. We went through the whole show up at the hotel (mid-scale, not "Palm-Airish) [/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Gatrfn]Steelthunder, the ad I saw was written about the same way and the incall was in a higher end Clearwater hotel. [/QUOTE]
Just curious about specifically which mid-scale(?)or high-end(?) hotel she's using? This way we can take a cruise through to make sure things have a good "feel" in that area (i.e. no pimp wanna-be's hovering around and no leo)
[QUOTE=Gatrfn] As with any provider it can be hit or miss.[/QUOTE]
Actually, there are numerous providers that are not misses. I'm sure I am not the only longtime hobbyist who has several consistently reliable girls to fall back on who don't disappoint. Its the search for new excitement that leads all of us into a bad experience from time to time.
[QUOTE=Gatrfn] And, before anyone discounts my post because I only have one other, mind you please don't be critical. We all started posting at "1". I highly recommend her. She will satisfy you and not hold a stopwatch while she does it.[/QUOTE]
Everyone needs to start somewhere, very true. There are plenty of viable options out there. I for one, will not be tempted on this.
Maybe I'm missing out--or just maybe...not so much.