Printable View
[QUOTE=Hl123;2119051]I heard on the news the police arrested 2 girls at Red Roof Inn on Donelson pike. One was 20 and the other 16. They advertised on BP. I'm really curious who they may have been. I know for a fact that one of our favorite girls was working out of red roof yesterday and she's advertising this morning.[/QUOTE]Doing your own searching may give you more information.
[URL]http://www.wsmv.com/story/25750728/2-arrested-in-prostitution-bust-at-nashville-hotel[/URL]
[QUOTE=EricJones21;2119186]Doing your own searching may give you more information.
[URL]http://www.wsmv.com/story/25750728/2-arrested-in-prostitution-bust-at-nashville-hotel[/URL][/QUOTE]I scan those pages all the time and don't recognize her.
[QUOTE=EricJones21;2119186]Doing your own searching may give you more information.
[URL]http://www.wsmv.com/story/25750728/2-arrested-in-prostitution-bust-at-nashville-hotel[/URL][/QUOTE]There was nothing on the net about this when I posted. I posted around 9:45 and WSMV, where I saw this this morning, didn't put this up until 10:45. No need for sarcasm.
[QUOTE=Hl123;2119249]There was nothing on the net about this when I posted. I posted around 9:45 and WSMV, where I saw this this morning, didn't put this up until 10:45. No need for sarcasm.[/QUOTE]I meant that I searched the names and found some things. But I can't post them here because the rules state you can't comment on the criminal proceedings of an arrest. I know it was posted after you made the report.
They was the two girls busted brooke has been posting for a while with ashley they post in Jackson to.
[QUOTE=Spoon30;2119339]They was the two girls busted brooke has been posting for a while with ashley they post in Jackson to.[/QUOTE]I was about to post the same thing after looking up info and finding Ashley's FB page, but I didn't want to be wrong or give false info so I didn't. However, I was sure it was her and in some pics she was flashing lots of green. I had seen in other post here from yesterday (BP advertiser reviews) about avoiding Ashley, unfortunately I did not see it till too late. I actually contacted Ashley but did not make any plans. I guess if you want more info, look in 'bp advertisers reviews' section from today.
"Police allege Threet on Jan. 31 patronized a prostitute on Stainback Avenue in East Nashville after responding to an online advertisement. Threet arrived in Nashville in full uniform and was driving a state vehicle. ".
Grande cojones!
[URL]http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/crime/2014/06/14/thp-officer-prostitution-charge/10520353/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2122204]"Police allege Threet on Jan. 31 patronized a prostitute on Stainback Avenue in East Nashville after responding to an online advertisement. Threet arrived in Nashville in full uniform and was driving a state vehicle. ".
Grande cojones!
[URL]http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/crime/2014/06/14/thp-officer-prostitution-charge/10520353/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Did he show up to one of the TGTBT and that's how he got busted?
[QUOTE=Rome1188;2122287]Did he show up to one of the TGTBT and that's how he got busted?[/QUOTE]Sounds like someone flipped and gave him up, but quite dumb showing up in uniform. I wonder what providers thought about him showing up that way?
In that neck of the woods, I guess there would be some stains on his back.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2122204]"Police allege Threet on Jan. 31 patronized a prostitute on Stainback Avenue in East Nashville after responding to an online advertisement. Threet arrived in Nashville in full uniform and was driving a state vehicle. ".
Grande cojones!
[URL]http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/crime/2014/06/14/thp-officer-prostitution-charge/10520353/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sensei69;2122320]Sounds like someone flipped and gave him up, but quite dumb showing up in uniform. I wonder what providers thought about him showing up that way?[/QUOTE]This doesn't shock me. Back in the day when I patronized SWs more than a few of them told me that they did cops all the time. And since this city is overrun with police I'm sure they think they are pretty untouchable.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2122204]"Police allege Threet on Jan. 31 patronized a prostitute on Stainback Avenue in East Nashville after responding to an online advertisement. Threet arrived in Nashville in full uniform and was driving a state vehicle. ".
Grande cojones!e
[URL]http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/crime/2014/06/14/thp-officer-prostitution-charge/10520353/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]The jerk arrested yme before and lied on me.
Threet was in full uniform and driving a state-issued car when he met a male prostitute earlier this year.
I'm sorry but that's fucking hilarious.
Police will need a warrant for most cell searches:
[URL]http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/supreme-court-police-must-get-warrants-for-most-cellphone-searches/2014/06/25/e2ff1326-fc6b-11e3-8176-f2c941cf35f1_story.html[/URL]
Maybe that, combined with a passcode and a remote kill switch, could minimize at least one of the issues surrounding a brush with LEO.
-Jeepster1.
While its not used out there much, I do see reference to verifying travelers quite often. Sad to see it go, great tool for both sides of this.
[URL]http://www.kcra.com/news/sex-listings-website-myredbook-seized-by-fbi-irs/26664688[/URL]
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2133887]Police will need a warrant for most cell searches:
[URL]http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/supreme-court-police-must-get-warrants-for-most-cellphone-searches/2014/06/25/e2ff1326-fc6b-11e3-8176-f2c941cf35f1_story.html[/URL]
Maybe that, combined with a passcode and a remote kill switch, could minimize at least one of the issues surrounding a brush with LEO.
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]I saw that Supreme Court ruling and it only makes sense. Glad the justices all voted unanimously as it was obvious ruling.
[QUOTE=HossCartwright;2133965]While its not used out there much, I do see reference to verifying travelers quite often. Sad to see it go, great tool for both sides of this.
[URL]http://www.kcra.com/news/sex-listings-website-myredbook-seized-by-fbi-irs/26664688[/URL][/QUOTE]Basically there go 50-90 percent of the reliable reviews on the west coast.
Makes me wonder if the recent neutering of Naughty Reviews was related? Perhaps they got wind of trouble brewing?
I also wonder if the RB folks hadn't gotten greedy, and had paid their taxes normally, then maybe they wouldn't have set off red flags?
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2134201]Basically there go 50-90 percent of the reliable reviews on the west coast.
Makes me wonder if the recent neutering of Naughty Reviews was related? Perhaps they got wind of trouble brewing?
I also wonder if the RB folks hadn't gotten greedy, and had paid their taxes normally, then maybe they wouldn't have set off red flags?
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]No the article says child trafficking. They had children under 18 on the site. No tolerance for this. I;m glad they were shut down!
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2134201]Basically there go 50-90 percent of the reliable reviews on the west coast.
Makes me wonder if the recent neutering of Naughty Reviews was related? Perhaps they got wind of trouble brewing?
I also wonder if the RB folks hadn't gotten greedy, and had paid their taxes normally, then maybe they wouldn't have set off red flags?
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]A few years back, I was traveling to SF on a semi regular basis on business, and RB was hands down the go-to site. For a while, I would check it almost daily. It always provided reliable info, no matter if you were looking for an escort, AMP, sure-thing extras in a strip club (one of my favorite activities out there, LOL), live sex shows when those still existed, SWs (never my thing) and just about any kind of commercial sex activity imaginable. That town had it all, and pretty much still does, as best I could tell based on my last visit, though not quite as much in the open as it once was. RB never failed to give me a real good idea what to expect at the many venues of debauchery out there, how much to expect to pay, and who / what / where to stay away from. I would have missed a lot of fun without it. Very sorry to see it go.
Seeing as Google is based in SF, it would appear that they have taken the opportunity to remove most all of the references from their web page "cashe".
Hardly any reference to providers or 411 related to RB has disappeared.
To those that take the news reports as "gospel". Fox news network must be completely, fairly and accurately report EVERYTHING, huh.
New laws that went into effect July 1, 2014.
[URL]http://www.capitol.tn.gov/legislation/publications/Effective%207-1-2014.pdf[/URL]
Some notables.
Sexual Offenses. As enacted, prohibits fact that subject of an offense was a law enforcement officer or that the victim was a consenting minor as defenses for the offense of promoting prostitution. - Amends TCA Title 39, Chapter 13, Part 5 and Title 40.
Child Abuse. As enacted, adds the offense of promoting prostitution to the list of offenses constituting severe child abuse. - Amends TCA Title 36, Chapter 1, Part 1; Title 37, Chapter 1 and Title 39. Chapter 13, Part 5.
Sexual Offenses. As enacted, increases the penalty for patronizing. A prostitute under age 18 from a Class E felony to a Class A felony; increases the penalty for patronizing a prostitute with an intellectual disability from a Class E felony to a Class be felony; specifies that it is not a defense that the subject of the offense is a law enforcement officer or that the victim of the offense is a minor who consented to the offense. - Amends TCA Title 39, Chapter 13 and Title 39, Chapter 17.
Or something along those lines. 9 k is a lot of retribution. One chick certainly is BP recognizable from her mug shot, not sure about the other. More proof that the times are tough and you got to be careful.
[URL]http://www.wkrn.com/story/25960464/escorts-wanted-for-burglary-theft-after-man-refuses-to-pay-for-sex[/URL]
[QUOTE=RayRastus;2145619]Or something along those lines. 9 k is a lot of retribution. One chick certainly is BP recognizable from her mug shot, not sure about the other. More proof that the times are tough and you got to be careful.
[URL]http://www.wkrn.com/story/25960464/escorts-wanted-for-burglary-theft-after-man-refuses-to-pay-for-sex[/URL][/QUOTE]Not paying was his second mistake. The first was bringing them into his friggin' sister's house. As I have said before, no way, no how will I ever host any provider in my home (or the home of somebody I know). Too many things can go wrong on too many levels. This guy just brought new meaning to Tiitty Mc's phrase "fool service."
[QUOTE=RonSwanson;2144412]New laws that went into effect July 1, 2014.
[URL]http://www.capitol.tn.gov/legislation/publications/Effective%207-1-2014.pdf[/URL]
Some notables.
Sexual Offenses. As enacted, prohibits fact that subject of an offense was a law enforcement officer or that the victim was a consenting minor as defenses for the offense of promoting prostitution. - Amends TCA Title 39, Chapter 13, Part 5 and Title 40.
Child Abuse. As enacted, adds the offense of promoting prostitution to the list of offenses constituting severe child abuse. - Amends TCA Title 36, Chapter 1, Part 1; Title 37, Chapter 1 and Title 39. Chapter 13, Part 5.
Sexual Offenses. As enacted, increases the penalty for patronizing. A prostitute under age 18 from a Class E felony to a Class A felony; increases the penalty for patronizing a prostitute with an intellectual disability from a Class E felony to a Class be felony; specifies that it is not a defense that the subject of the offense is a law enforcement officer or that the victim of the offense is a minor who consented to the offense. - Amends TCA Title 39, Chapter 13 and Title 39, Chapter 17.[/QUOTE]The only time I've scheduled a provider claiming 18, I insisted on seeing a birth date on her driver's license to avoid trouble (ended up not having a session anyway, once I heard the limited menu).
But probably fake DL's are rampant. I would presume you're still completely up the creek if you do your due diligence but Miss 17 flashes a fake?
Also, about the definition of "a prostitute with an intellectual disability": Do we need to administer Wonderlic tests now? Moral of this story: No BJ's from Vince Young.
-Jeepster1.
[URL]http://www.xbiz.com/news/181396[/URL]
Even more concerning. There are two versions working threw both sides of the house. If passed as is, "SAVE, with its focus on web platforms like [URL]Backpage.com[/URL] that offers sexual services and personal ads, would make it a federal crime to host an advertisement that "facilitates or is designed to facilitate" sex acts with anyone under 18 years old. ".
[U]Sounds like a great idea, right?[/U][B] WRONG!!
Tell me which provider is willing to give up their personal information, Real CC info to be kept on file "somewhere" for 7+ years? Tell me which website wants to be legally on the hook?[/B].
The bill introduces extensive requirements, similar to the 18 USA see. 2257 record keeping rules for adult producers, that would broadly implicate advertising network service providers, including third-party brokers of online or wireless advertising who offer banners, sponsorship's, email, keyword searches and slotting fees.
Hosts of online adult ads would be required to review ads before publication and obtain a government-issued photo I'd from the person who created the ads and any people appearing in them.
The piece of legislation also would require a valid telephone number and credit card number from those persons and "prohibit the use of euphemisms and code words" in ads, as well as outlaw the use of prepaid debit cards or crypto-currencies in placing paid ads.
Record keeping of those individuals would need to be maintained for a minimum of seven years and operators would have to make them "available to the USA Attorney General, any designee of the Attorney General, the attorney general of a state, and any designee of the attorney general of a state for inspection at all reasonable times. ".
Failure to maintain records or making false entries would result in five-year sentences and fines starting at $250,000 per violation. Repeat offenders could get up to 15 years and $500,000 fines.
[URL]http://www.wkrn.com/story/25992106/3-arrested-in-south-nashville-sex-trafficking-prostitution-case[/URL]
"3 arrested in south Nashville sex trafficking, prostitution case".
For once, Backpage is not mentioned.
-Jeepster1.
19 year old redhead twins popped in Raleigh. Bond seems pretty steep!
[URL]http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/twin-sisters-arrested-for-prostitution-786543[/URL]
[URL]http://bossip.com/1001156/talented-twin-teen-ginger-hoes-popped-for-selling-box-on-the-net/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.
Should be posting a big investigative report about a woman who ran an escort service out of her home. It'll be on at five and six.
[QUOTE=EricJones21;2159584]Should be posting a big investigative report about a woman who ran an escort service out of her home. It'll be on at five and six.[/QUOTE][URL]http://www.jrn.com/newschannel5/news/Murfreesboro-Madam-Talks-About-What-Drove-Her-To-Do-It-268002141.html?lc=Smart[/URL]
Seems like old news. Is it sweeps week?
-Jeepster1.
Jeepster1;2159759][URL]http://www.jrn.com/newschannel5/news/Murfreesboro-Madam-Talks-About-What-Drove-Her-To-Do-It-268002141.html?lc=Smart[/URL].
Seems like old news. Is it sweeps week?
-Jeepster1.
I remember her. Freaky! Don't know why this old story keeps getting coverage. Wasnt much of a story to start with. PTSD fron the hobby? Say it aint so.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting any discussion regarding [u]racial issues[/u]. This action is in no way a reflection of the merits of the author's comments.
I am aware that the vast majority of references to racial issues are legitimate attempts to advise other fellow members about local racial issues and prejudices. However, past discussions in the Forum has repeatedly demonstrated that the subject simply cannot be discussed intelligently, in any form or for any reason, without being misinterpreted and without starting flame wars.
Please do not engage in discussions about race in the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.
[i]Thanks![/i]
The post that came after yours is why we don't allow posts like this.
A2[/blue]
[blue][Deleted by Admin]
So fucking close to the Racist-Derogatory Comments. You need to dial that shit back, not a little, but a lot.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE][blue]Deleted by Admin EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting any discussion regarding racial issues. This action is in no way a reflection of the merits of the author's comments.
(Edit)[/blue] [/QUOTE]Sorry my inelegant reference to the specter of Williamson County LEO's selective enforcement caused an issue.
The link originally referenced:
[URL]http://www.wkrn.com/story/26117498/2-calif-women-arrested-for-prostitution-at-franklin-hotel[/URL]
The $70 k bond assures that these ladies will sit in jail at taxpayer expense until August 7, damn if I can figure out why. Guess they are trying to scare other potential lovelies away by making examples of a couple of harmless out-of-towners.
Voila, Williamson County, moral menace eradicated, just in time for the election!
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2165594]Sorry my inelegant reference to the specter of Williamson County LEO's selective enforcement caused an issue.
The link originally referenced:
[URL]http://www.wkrn.com/story/26117498/2-calif-women-arrested-for-prostitution-at-franklin-hotel[/URL]
The $70 k bond assures that these ladies will sit in jail at taxpayer expense until August 7, damn if I can figure out why. Guess they are trying to scare other potential lovelies away by making examples of a couple of harmless out-of-towners.
Voila, Williamson County, moral menace eradicated, just in time for the election!
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Look back and read the story. It was not just a p charge, it was promoting. That's a little more serious charge. The franklin chief is a former metro. Couldn't go any higher.
[QUOTE=Nash1;2165705]Look back and read the story. It was not just a p charge, it was promoting. That's a little more serious charge. The franklin chief is a former metro. Couldn't go any higher.[/QUOTE]Yes they were charged with promoting, but nowhere does it say any other providers were involved, it says THEY were the providers. Maybe they were pimping others and WKRN got it wrong.
Is the promoting charge be thrown at any lady who places a BP ad for her services? If so this would seem to be a new development.
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2165843]Yes they were charged with promoting, but nowhere does it say any other providers were involved, it says THEY were the providers. Maybe they were pimping others and WKRN got it wrong.
Is the promoting charge be thrown at any lady who places a BP ad for her services? If so this would seem to be a new development.
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]I could be wrong, but if one or both advertised the other on BP they could consider that promoting.
For some recreational reading.
Http: copsrcorrupt. Underground america. Com /2014/06/ how-to-beat-backpage-prostitution. Html.
[QUOTE=RonSwanson;2167749]For some recreational reading.
Http: copsrcorrupt. Underground america. Com /2014/06/ how-to-beat-backpage-prostitution. Html.[/QUOTE]Do you have a link for computers for Dummies, I can't seem to access the link you've provided haha.
Guys be careful.
This girl and her pimp got busted from backage.
[URL]http://www.wkrn.com/story/26137056/backpage-ad-leads-to-south-nashville-prostitution-sting[/URL]
Now it doesn't look like the girl got arrested which lead me to be cautious, maybe she is working with LEO now. ?
I checked the police report on the pimp and it list the girls backpage phone number.
I did a search in google and see the ads for her which is still up. WHICH IS THIS [URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/the-best-new-thing-in-town-25/10888641[/URL].
I called the number and a girl answers. NO MASSAGE FOR ME.
BE CAREFUL!