I am looking for the big ones. . .38+ DD or more. . . . Just a hankering. Any recommendations? No FS necessary. Just a HJ and access to those boobs would be just fine.
Printable View
I am looking for the big ones. . .38+ DD or more. . . . Just a hankering. Any recommendations? No FS necessary. Just a HJ and access to those boobs would be just fine.
There are several ladies on BP that meet your criteria, check out the following.
[url]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/40-40-spec-ials-x-bbw-x-40-27/4289155http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/bbw-femme-fatale-cherri-lust-68-of-100-special-2-nights-only-27/4332053[/url]
[url]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/super-sexy-andgtandgt-super-busty-andgtandgt-super-stacked-andgtandgt-super-freaky-last-day-spec-26/4331759[/url]
I've been with MZ. Juicey she has a decent place and works hard for the money she is shorter than her pics would have you believe and she doesn't really like to be on top rather than that a decent lady, great BJ, and if all you want is boob access and a HJ then try her out.
[QUOTE=Ron1964;1105704]I am looking for the big ones. . .38+ DD or more. . . . Just a hankering. Any recommendations? No FS necessary. Just a HJ and access to those boobs would be just fine.[/QUOTE]
So as I was saying I was trying to fuck these two sugarbabies and I already told you about one. Number 2 was on deck yesterday. This lady is about 34 and works in healthcare administration or something like that. Call her Tabby. I went to her house. Now I'm not much of a pussy hound compared to some of you guys, maybe 60 or so lifetime, but before yesterday I'd only had two girls squirt. Tabby was riding me cowgirl after some wild fisting in which her whole upper canal seemed to open up like a balloon when she suddenly reached down and tugged on something (pulled her clit up maybe?) and released a geyser all over my stomach and chest. Then she apologized. I said no problem and she went back to work where she released large pools at least three more times in the next five minutes. Does this happen often to you guys? She said she comes when she squirts. I can't give you a pic of Tabby unfortunately because she's shy. However I did take some of a well known provider I squeezed in the other day. See if you can guess who she is from the uploads. There's not much excuse for attaching these pix to this post I know. Sorry. I think there may be a sugar baby number 3 coming up.
Tabby was riding me cowgirl after some wild fisting in which her whole upper canal seemed to open up like a balloon when she suddenly reached down and tugged on something (pulled her clit up maybe?) and released a geyser all over my stomach and chest. Then she apologized. I said no problem and she went back to work where she released large pools at least three more times in the next five minutes. Does this happen often to you guys?
Does not happen that often to me anyway. But of the 5 or 6 that I have had that are squirters they all have multiple orgasms and normally rub there clit to make to squirt and almost always in reverse cowgirl.
I'm also on SD. Com but haven't made the plunge yet. Out of curiousity, how much has it been costing on average for the girls? Have you done the dinner and date thing or just go straight to bed?
[QUOTE=Literal2;1108100]So as I was saying I was trying to fuck these two sugarbabies and I already told you about one. Number 2 was on deck yesterday. This lady is about 34 and works in healthcare administration or something like that. Call her Tabby. I went to her house. Now I'm not much of a pussy hound compared to some of you guys, maybe 60 or so lifetime, but before yesterday I'd only had two girls squirt. Tabby was riding me cowgirl after some wild fisting in which her whole upper canal seemed to open up like a balloon when she suddenly reached down and tugged on something (pulled her clit up maybe?) and released a geyser all over my stomach and chest. Then she apologized. I said no problem and she went back to work where she released large pools at least three more times in the next five minutes. Does this happen often to you guys? She said she comes when she squirts. I can't give you a pic of Tabby unfortunately because she's shy. However I did take some of a well known provider I squeezed in the other day. See if you can guess who she is from the uploads. There's not much excuse for attaching these pix to this post I know. Sorry. I think there may be a sugar baby number 3 coming up.[/QUOTE]
Several guys asked about contact info and compensation. I don't feel I can and I don't really want to give out contact info. The girls aren't pros and would be unhappy I think. I don't want the competition. Any girl in her right mind would spread her legs for the young guys on here before she would for me. Thank god there are some unright minds out there. If I find one that wants referrals I'll let you know. As for compensation, it's too informal to be compensation with the ones I've met. Nobody talks about it specifically. The girls don't ask for it and I don't offer it. I think the SB's idea is that she is a pampered girlfriend of a guy with resources and the SD wants to spoil her so she hopes he will give her gifts. I'm fairly generous as well as old and ugly so I usually make sure I leave her something or some amount that would be a nice Christmas present for her in the $$.5 to $$$ range. I might go higher for the right chick, or lower for a skank.
I am not trying to police the forum, but this is the "escort classified ad" forum. A place where members discuss actual escort / provider ads. An ad where you can refer someone to that has their name, contact info and even photos. The same applies for the "escort review" forum.
You, and others, claim these "Sugarbabies" are non-escorts, non-pro's, wish to be UTR, discreet, anonymous, etc etc. You can't refer any specific information about them other than a vague review or your experiences with them, so, [i]what is the purpose and point of posting a public review about them on an escort forum? [/i] If these girls are not escorts and don't want to be treated and reviewed as one, you should respect that and not post anything. Keep in mind, things around here get spread around, so one of these "Sugarbabies" may find out you're reviewing her. Other escorts read these forums and they'll be trying to snitch on a girl over jealousy. LE reads these forums and it be more reason for them to get the atty. General's involved if they see these sites are really just another escort site.
I am not trying to publicly flame you or anyone that sees these girls. I see UTR girls. It's a preference. I don't join membership sites as I have other means and resources to find these girls. MY opinion of these SD sites is they're a joke and waste of time and money. I don't post about the girls I see as they're not escorts and I don't treat them one and vice-versa.
Back to the beginning, I fail to see the point and purpose of these types of reviews when there is no actual ad and these girls supposedly are not escorts. I could maybe see it in a "general discussion" forum, but not in this one.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1108436]Several guys asked about contact info and compensation. I don't feel I can and I don't really want to give out contact info. The girls aren't pros and would be unhappy I think. I don't want the competition. Any girl in her right mind would spread her legs for the young guys on here before she would for me. Thank god there are some unright minds out there. If I find one that wants referrals I'll let you know. As for compensation, it's too informal to be compensation with the ones I've met. Nobody talks about it specifically. The girls don't ask for it and I don't offer it. I think the SB's idea is that she is a pampered girlfriend of a guy with resources and the SD wants to spoil her so she hopes he will give her gifts. I'm fairly generous as well as old and ugly so I usually make sure I leave her something or some amount that would be a nice Christmas present for her in the $$.5 to $$$ range. I might go higher for the right chick, or lower for a skank.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Richmond Fotog; 1108682]I am not trying to police the forum, but this is the "escort classified ad" forum. A place where members discuss actual escort / provider ads. An ad where you can refer someone to that has their name, contact info and even photos. The same applies for the "escort review" forum.
You, and others, claim these "Sugarbabies" are non-escorts, non-pro's, wish to be UTR, discreet, anonymous, etc etc. You can't refer any specific information.
Well Fotog I guess you're right. I haven't been careful about staying on the thread's subject in the SB posts (even though I did weave in a reference to a pro in my last in a lame attempt to stay relevant) The reason my posts got going in this sub-forum or thread is because the original sugarbabies discussion was here. My bad. Still. Its just great to have a website like USASG dedicated "for men seeking sex with women." I'll try to get more in tune with the correct classification scheme in the future.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1108748]Well Fotog I guess you're right. I haven't been careful about staying on the thread's subject in the SB posts (even though I did weave in a reference to a pro in my last in a lame attempt to stay relevant) The reason my posts got going in this sub-forum or thread is because the original sugarbabies discussion was here. My bad. Still. Its just great to have a website like USASG dedicated "for men seeking sex with women." I'll try to get more in tune with the correct classification scheme in the future.[/QUOTE]Nice to see people genuflecting Fotog, we all know he so richly deserves it *HUGE GRIN*
Happy Christmas to all (assuming this is the right forum for saying so.)
To answer the questions about who is the well known provider in my pix. Why, it's none other than Christie Lamour. I referred to her in an earlier post. She's from Colombia originally. I guess she was a porn star for several years and now is in the escort biz. All her contact info and data are on her website for you to follow up if you want to. She's several years older than she appears in her online pix, and her bolt-ons are getting a little stretchy around the edges, but she is still a very pretty woman. She keeps herself fit. As you can see she has a great ass. She's certainly not at the top of the price scale. Her fees are on her site. But she's not cheap. What you get with her is a clean, upscale hotel location and a woman who is very comfortable doing what she does. No BS. She checks you out painlessly before you see her and in my case anyway didn't ask for the fee upfront. I opted out of the bi experience with her "brother" that she advertises and he wasn't around when I saw her. Her standard answer to any requests you may have is "Of course." She heats up, her pussy gets wet and she squirms around just like a regular girl unlike some of the pros I've seen over the years. She does all the usual things you'd do with your GF, no restrictions that I encountered (well, protection of course) and she seems to really enjoy them. I don't know about greek, it's not my thing. She wears cute outfits. She gives you a kiss when you leave. She's a first class pro experience. (Not the best I've ever had though, that would be Skyler who I met in LA a few years ago, a stunning model-actress / personal fitness trainer who greeted me by unzipping my fly and putting my dick in her mouth. It just got better from there. But she was five times as expensive as Christie and I just can't afford that very often. Still not as expensive as my ex-wife.)
Generally I prefer amateurs like the sugarbabies I've talked about. With respect, I disagree with those of you who think they are really just escorts trying to fool someone. The difference for me is that, because they are amateurs, the ones I've seen are just a little shy and uncertain. I think of them as little female deer, just standing there quivering with big eyes. I like that. And Christie's not a squirter, at least for me.
[QUOTE=Biggers;1108433]I'm also on SD. Com but haven't made the plunge yet. Out of curiousity, how much has it been costing on average for the girls? Have you done the dinner and date thing or just go straight to bed?[/QUOTE]Well Fotog doesn't want us talking about sugarbabies on this thread or sub-forum or whatever you call it, so I'll try to be brief. I answered the comp / non-comp question in another post. As to the run-up with the SB's, it's different than it is with pros. In our email exchanges, one girl offered her place but said it was a mess and suggested a hotel. I went by her home and picked her up and took her to the hotel. The first thing the other one said when I spoke to her on the phone was "I'm not sure about this." I met her in a restaurant for a soda and get acquainted session for about 30 minutes and didn't say a word about sex. She emailed me later saying I was really nice. I told her,"If I see ya again I'm going to touch ya." She invited me to her place. She was the squirter. So that's the story.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1109852]To answer the questions about who is the well known provider in my pix. Why, it's none other than Christie Lamour. I referred to her in an earlier post. She's from Colombia originally. I guess she was a porn star for several years and now is in the escort biz. All her contact info and data are on her website for you to follow up if you want to. She's several years older than she appears in her online pix, and her bolt-ons are getting a little stretchy around the edges, but she is still a very pretty woman..[/QUOTE]I almost scheduled with her last time, but I've seen a few unflattering pics of her and at her price point, I want a real beauty.
[QUOTE=Rexinva;1109862]I almost scheduled with her last time, but I've seen a few unflattering pics of her and at her price point, I want a real beauty.[/QUOTE]Good standards, Rex.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1109924]Good standards, Rex.[/QUOTE]Nah, just stingy.
You were the one that said these so-called "Sugarbabies" are not escorts, but for whatever reason you want to post your daily commentary and experiences with them in a forum designated for [b]escort classified ads. [/b]
Your commentary on "Provider vs Squirter". Ditto. I got a really good laugh that you seem to be clueless about how and why a woman does that.
You post a review a review about Christie Lamour in this section. Why? By chance if someone wanted to see her they may go over to the [b]escort review forum[/b] And search for her. They won't find your review because you posted in the wrong forum.
Here's a little helpful tip for you:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?714-Richmond[/url]
You'll see there are different forums in different subjects and topics.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1109856]Well Fotog doesn't want us talking about sugarbabies on this thread or sub-forum or whatever you call it, so I'll try to be brief. [/QUOTE]
LOL Jeez.
Regardless of what name you call them or what their rank and status is, they're all courtesans of some sort. It's all a form of prostitution. Obviously, they have you fooled.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1109852]Generally I prefer amateurs like the sugarbabies I've talked about. With respect, I disagree with those of you who think they are really just escorts trying to fool someone. The difference for me is that, because they are amateurs, the ones I've seen are just a little shy and uncertain. I think of them as little female deer, just standing there quivering with big eyes. I like that. [/QUOTE]
I will agree with Richmond Fotog, they're all some sort of escorts / sex service providers. You can slap lipstick on a pig, but at the end of the day it still squeals and wallows in mud.
[QUOTE=Richmond Fotog; 1110421]LOL Jeez.
Regardless of what name you call them or what their rank and status is, they're all courtesans of some sort. It's all a form of prostitution. Obviously, they have you fooled. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Big Virginian;1110438]I will agree with Richmond Fotog, they're all some sort of escorts / sex service providers. You can slap lipstick on a pig, but at the end of the day it still squeals and wallows in mud.[/QUOTE]Hope you don't have to get intimate with any of those wallowing pigs, Big V. Sounds nasty.
[QUOTE=Richmond Fotog; 1110418]You were the one that said these so-called "Sugarbabies" are not escorts, but for whatever reason you want to post your daily commentary and experiences with them in a forum designated for [b]escort classified ads. [/b]
Your commentary on "Provider vs Squirter". Ditto. I got a really good laugh that you seem to be clueless about how and why a woman does that.
You post a review a review about Christie Lamour in this section. Why? By chance if someone wanted to see her they may go over to the [b]escort review forum[/b] And search for her. They won't find your review because you posted in the wrong forum.
Here's a little helpful tip for you:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?714-Richmond[/url]
You'll see there are different forums in different subjects and topics. [/QUOTE]So these classifications are real important, huh? Ok, whatever. Go ahead and move the Christie review anywhere you want, I don't care. But what about sugarbabies? You say they don't belong because they aren't escorts, then you say they are prostitutes. What's that all about? Tell you what. If you really do know something about how to make girls squirt, tell me! Can you make pros squirt? Damn, boy! Set up some new topic in whatever forum you want and I'll read it eagerly. 'Cause I want to know! If you have the knowledge, lets hear it. And here is my pledge: lead me with squirter info into a new forum and I will follow you there with any new sugarbaby posts of mine so you will stop getting irritated. By the way, I think I'm homing in on another one, not 100% sure, but I think so. No comp issues yet, just sexy chit chat. She says she wants to fuck. We shall see. Her pix show a sweet ass, full boobs and a perky face. She looks about 25. Next weekend or the day after I think. Don't know if she'll let me take photos. What is it Jackson always says?"With respect"? Well, in that case, Fotog, with respect I must say I think you are wrong about the SD / SB sites, at least for some of us. I've paid for one month so far, about $50, and have fucked two girls I met on the site and I know I have a good shot at fucking number 3. What is that? $16 per girl? If that's not good enough value for you, you must be up to your armpits in free pussy. In which case, good for you, but you got to understand a lot of us like to have an easy way to find amateurs.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1110554]So these classifications are real important, huh? Ok, whatever. Go ahead and move the Christie review anywhere you want, I don't care. But what about sugarbabies? You say they don't belong because they aren't escorts, then you say they are prostitutes. What's that all about? Tell you what. If you really do know something about how to make girls squirt, tell me! Can you make pros squirt? Damn, boy! Set up some new topic in whatever forum you want and I'll read it eagerly. 'Cause I want to know! If you have the knowledge, lets hear it. And here is my pledge: lead me with squirter info into a new forum and I will follow you there with any new sugarbaby posts of mine so you will stop getting irritated. By the way, I think I'm homing in on another one, not 100% sure, but I think so. No comp issues yet, just sexy chit chat. She says she wants to fuck. We shall see. Her pix show a sweet ass, full boobs and a perky face. She looks about 25. Next weekend or the day after I think. Don't know if she'll let me take photos. What is it Jackson always says?"With respect"? Well, in that case, Fotog, with respect I must say I think you are wrong about the SD / SB sites, at least for some of us. I've paid for one month so far, about $50, and have fucked two girls I met on the site and I know I have a good shot at fucking number 3. What is that? $16 per girl? If that's not good enough value for you, you must be up to your armpits in free pussy. In which case, good for you, but you got to understand a lot of us like to have an easy way to find amateurs.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Literal2;1108436]Several guys asked about contact info and compensation. I don't feel I can and I don't really want to give out contact info. The girls aren't pros and would be unhappy I think. I don't want the competition. Any girl in her right mind would spread her legs for the young guys on here before she would for me. Thank god there are some unright minds out there. If I find one that wants referrals I'll let you know. As for compensation, it's too informal to be compensation with the ones I've met. Nobody talks about it specifically. The girls don't ask for it and I don't offer it. I think the SB's idea is that she is a pampered girlfriend of a guy with resources and the SD wants to spoil her so she hopes he will give her gifts. I'm fairly generous as well as old and ugly so I usually make sure I leave her something or some amount that would be a nice Christmas present for her in the $$.5 to $$$ range. I might go higher for the right chick, or lower for a skank.[/QUOTE]I'm a little confused by a few things here. First off are you really "averaging" 16 bucks a provider because the 250-300 Christmas presents seem to say otherwise. Also, I'm wondering why your bothering to share these experiences at all on this site: over the last few years there have been some people who use the site, but this site is for sharing PERTINENT information. I mean if these are girls that can only be gotten through SD then maybe you should review them there for other people who may have the opportunity to partake. And honestly the way you describe them makes them sound like prostitutes not just the way everyone else labels them.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1110554]So these classifications are real important, huh? Ok, whatever. Go ahead and move the Christie review anywhere you want, I don't care. But what about sugarbabies? You say they don't belong because they aren't escorts, then you say they are prostitutes. What's that all about? Tell you what. If you really do know something about how to make girls squirt, tell me! Can you make pros squirt? Damn, boy! Set up some new topic in whatever forum you want and I'll read it eagerly. 'Cause I want to know! If you have the knowledge, lets hear it. And here is my pledge: lead me with squirter info into a new forum and I will follow you there with any new sugarbaby posts of mine so you will stop getting irritated. By the way, I think I'm homing in on another one, not 100% sure, but I think so. No comp issues yet, just sexy chit chat. She says she wants to fuck. We shall see. Her pix show a sweet ass, full boobs and a perky face. She looks about 25. Next weekend or the day after I think. Don't know if she'll let me take photos. What is it Jackson always says?"With respect"? Well, in that case, Fotog, with respect I must say I think you are wrong about the SD / SB sites, at least for some of us. I've paid for one month so far, about $50, and have fucked two girls I met on the site and I know I have a good shot at fucking number 3. What is that? $16 per girl? If that's not good enough value for you, you must be up to your armpits in free pussy. In which case, good for you, but you got to understand a lot of us like to have an easy way to find amateurs.[/QUOTE]I'm not sure about everyone else; but I am personally tired of all of this Sugar Baby / Daddy nonsense. The posts from Literal2 are in my opinion nothing more than advertisements for the service and as such they are against the rules against self promotion (and yes I do believe they are self promoting). They have no value to anyone except to advertise for a commercial service and as such they should not be in the member discussion section but in the advertising section. Like I said No info at all just pure advertising (The posts should be deleted. See the rules. No Self-Promotion: Please do not post any messages anywhere on this site that are primarily for the promotion or advertising of any website, forums, email address, business, multi-level marketing activity, or other entities that you have an affiliation with EXCEPT in the classified advertising section.)
If Literal2 wants to put this junk in the advertising section then so be it but get it out of all the other sections. It is not appropriate. (And before I get flamed and he says that it isn't self promotion. All I can see is that his posts are obviously ads for an expensive commercial service that has poor reviews throughout the internet.
In addition Literal2's most recent posts are pure flaming which is also banned. (No Flaming: Please do not post any messages that harrass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member.)
I would appreciate it if the moderator would review all these posts and see what he thinks. If he doesn't agree with me that these posts break the rules then so be it but I for one want real information not ads for commercial services and this last post from Literal2 is nothing more than insulting to the entire Sex Guide Community.
Thanks,
Allen
[QUOTE=Allen1965; 1110750]I'm not sure about everyone else; but I am personally tired of all of this Sugar Baby / Daddy nonsense. The posts from Literal2 are in my opinion nothing more than advertisements for the service and as such they are against the rules against self promotion (and yes I do believe they are self promoting). They have no value to anyone except to advertise for a commercial service and as such they should not be in the member discussion section but in the advertising section. Like I said No info at all just pure advertising (The posts should be deleted. See the rules. No Self-Promotion: Please do not post any messages anywhere on this site that are primarily for the promotion or advertising of any website, forums, email address, business, multi-level marketing activity, or other entities that you have an affiliation with EXCEPT in the classified advertising section.)
If Literal2 wants to put this junk in the advertising section then so be it but get it out of all the other sections. It is not appropriate. (And before I get flamed and he says that it isn't self promotion. All I can see is that his posts are obviously ads for an expensive commercial service that has poor reviews throughout the internet.
In addition Literal2's most recent posts are pure flaming which is also banned. (No Flaming: Please do not post any messages that harrass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member.)
I would appreciate it if the moderator would review all these posts and see what he thinks. If he doesn't agree with me that these posts break the rules then so be it but I for one want real information not ads for commercial services and this last post from Literal2 is nothing more than insulting to the entire Sex Guide Community.
Thanks,
Allen[/QUOTE]Please don't anyone flame this dude on my account. If this is a real issue, as opposed to forum-rage from not enough pussy, by all means, Moderator. Please review. I can live with the decision, whatever it is. FYI, I have zero interest in promoting a commercial service, zero connection with it except as a customer. How my posts can insult anyone exceeds my mental capacity, but some of you are definitely getting worked up and I'd rather get it resolved calmly. So we can get back to finding girls, which is why I'm here. Not to have pointless exchanges about classifying posts on a sex forum. Sure would like that info from Fotog on squirting, though.
I like SBs. I prefer SBs, when I can find a good one. Posting about them in this section might not be the best placement; maybe the General section, or maybe the Mod should open a new section on SBs. But let's not get too picky, because after all, ALL sexual interaction is prostitution. Only the medium of exchange changes. Free sex is invariably the most expensive kind, and the only difference between a $20 streetwalker, a $200 escort, and a SB you buy things for is desperation and conceit.
So let's not quibble over nits. OK?
[QUOTE=Cantwinlosin; 1110771]I like SBs. I prefer SBs, when I can find a good one. Posting about them in this section might not be the best placement; maybe the General section, or maybe the Mod should open a new section on SBs. But let's not get too picky, because after all, ALL sexual interaction is prostitution. Only the medium of exchange changes. Free sex is invariably the most expensive kind, and the only difference between a $20 streetwalker, a $200 escort, and a SB you buy things for is desperation and conceit.
So let's not quibble over nits. OK? [/QUOTE]Ok so I went to the site and signed up as a free user. I searched the adds and found 7 out of 10 of these girls advertise on BP Escort section, CL Casual also for $$, another site, Ave X, Best Escort Site, Local Escorts, etc etc. So for the most part they are the same girls you get anywhere else, and are only interested in Money, you give them $$, they give you what you want. Yes there is the odd single girl looking for something and not asking for anything. No offense Literal if you had luck finding them good for you. Now as I said I signed up as a free member, with that comes the constant barrage of spam, emails from supposed members asking you to upgrade so you can communicate. If they were real then I would not be complimented on my pic, I never put any up. And I personally would rather spend 50 bucks on a sure thing once than 50 a month to basically see the same girls I can find on numerous other sites for free. That is just me, an old skeptic, been there seen that a few to many times.
Moving all these posts re "those girls" is okay with me. I just don't know how to do it. Maybe I should refer to them as "so-called amateurs seeking benefits". The only reason my posts are here is because this is where I found the original discussion between obx and fotog. At the time I had just wasted a lot of time on a BP advertiser who was a phony and had spent a frustrating weekend in baltimore calling up "indies" listed on eros (thats a free classified ad site so I can name it, right?). I called six numbers, I reached the same woman each time, only one "girl" ever called me back and when she finally came by she said, after pocketing the cash, she expected to go to the movies. She may have been LE. Anyway I wanted something different and when I read obx's post I decided to try "that site." I had had a free account for a while, got all the marketing spam from them, tried a couple replies, figured out they were fake and didn't pursue it. Last month I signed up. Since then its been as I've reported. Usually the girls who are online troll with I'm's or respond to I'm's and you can quickly separate the phonies and big fat girls and gay hookers out fairly easily when you're chatting with them. I haven't spent more than a couple hours on the site altogether. I don't see the overlap with the BP girls, maybe there is some, but to give you some numbers, on another, similar website for "so-called amateurs seeking benefits" (not "that site") this morning I checked to see how many girls are listed in Florida (not Virginia). It is 10, 000 plus. So, as I said before, with respect, I think these websites are something those of us mongers who like "so-called amateurs" who haven't been ridden hard and hung up wet can use from time to time. I'm having a ball with it. I want to make them ALL squirt. So come on, Fotog, let's have the 411.
[QUOTE=Literal2;1110794]Moving all these posts re "those girls" is okay with me. I just don't know how to do it. Maybe I should refer to them as "so-called amateurs seeking benefits". The only reason my posts are here is because this is where I found the original discussion between obx and fotog. At the time I had just wasted a lot of time on a BP advertiser who was a phony and had spent a frustrating weekend in baltimore calling up "indies" listed on eros (thats a free classified ad site so I can name it, right?). I called six numbers, I reached the same woman each time, only one "girl" ever called me back and when she finally came by she said, after pocketing the cash, she expected to go to the movies. She may have been LE. Anyway I wanted something different and when I read obx's post I decided to try "that site." I had had a free account for a while, got all the marketing spam from them, tried a couple replies, figured out they were fake and didn't pursue it. Last month I signed up. Since then its been as I've reported. Usually the girls who are online troll with I'm's or respond to I'm's and you can quickly separate the phonies and big fat girls and gay hookers out fairly easily when you're chatting with them. I haven't spent more than a couple hours on the site altogether. I don't see the overlap with the BP girls, maybe there is some, but to give you some numbers, on another, similar website for "so-called amateurs seeking benefits" (not "that site") this morning I checked to see how many girls are listed in Florida (not Virginia). It is 10, 000 plus. So, as I said before, with respect, I think these websites are something those of us mongers who like "so-called amateurs" who haven't been ridden hard and hung up wet can use from time to time. I'm having a ball with it. I want to make them ALL squirt. So come on, Fotog, let's have the 411.[/QUOTE]Start a SB thread Literal then you can post all you want.
[QUOTE=Cantwinlosin; 1110771]I like SBs. I prefer SBs, when I can find a good one. Posting about them in this section might not be the best placement; maybe the General section, or maybe the Mod should open a new section on SBs. But let's not get too picky, because after all, ALL sexual interaction is prostitution. Only the medium of exchange changes. Free sex is invariably the most expensive kind, and the only difference between a $20 streetwalker, a $200 escort, and a SB you buy things for is desperation and conceit.
So let's not quibble over nits. OK? [/QUOTE]I couldn't agree with you more. Invariably you find a favorite and help her out more than you should and when it comes right down to it you always are reminded that it's all about the money. They're all working girls and we're just playing in their world.
DB
[QUOTE=Lone Wolf;1110805]Start a SB thread Literal then you can post all you want.[/QUOTE]OK. I started a new thread.
[QUOTE=Jayblack;1110741]I'm a little confused by a few things here. First off are you really "averaging" 16 bucks a provider because the 250-300 Christmas presents seem to say otherwise. Also, I'm wondering why your bothering to share these experiences at all on this site: over the last few years there have been some people who use the site, but this site is for sharing PERTINENT information. I mean if these are girls that can only be gotten through SD then maybe you should review them there for other people who may have the opportunity to partake. And honestly the way you describe them makes them sound like prostitutes not just the way everyone else labels them.[/QUOTE]I'll reply to this on the new thread.
[url]http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henrico-prostitution-sex-arrests20100820[/url].0, 6781492. Story.
The above link should provide enough info. For a recent / local doughnut eating contest?
Hey Richmond 1 suggestion. If you desire "real" women then please consider the what we face here in Richmond when.
Requesting screening. Wow!
This story about Jody is not new. It's been posted a long time ago in other forums. There has been a few more since then also reported on other forums.
This forum is for classified ads.
The correct URL:
[url]http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henrico-prostitution-sex-arrests20100820,0,6781492.story[/url]
The final chapter in the story:
[url]http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/may/04/henrico-man-sentenced-running-juvenile-prostitutio-ar-1016348/[/url]
[QUOTE=Sugarbaby; 1260643][url]http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henrico-prostitution-sex-arrests20100820[/url]
0, 6781492. Story.
The above link should provide enough info. For a recent / local doughnut eating contest?
Hey Richmond 1 suggestion. If you desire "real" women then please consider the what we face here in Richmond when.
Requesting screening. Wow![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Richmond Fotog; 1260862]This story about Jody is not new. It's been posted a long time ago in other forums. There has been a few more since then also reported on other forums.
This forum is for classified ads.
The correct URL:
[url]http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-henrico-prostitution-sex-arrests20100820,0,6781492.story[/url]
The final chapter in the story:
[url]http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/may/04/henrico-man-sentenced-running-juvenile-prostitutio-ar-1016348/[/url][/QUOTE]Ok sorry the information to the link to was dated August 20 2011 so I thought it was recent.
[QUOTE=BonnieBlaz; 1425858]Sugar baby if your a woman I would love to school you on how to not get played or low balled by the gentlemen!
I tried to be friends with a lot of clients in Virginia but I found out my mistake
If I can help another from this, because women rule the world why not women educate each other and help each other.
Now the clients I get now are 500hr men I do not low ball myself anymore trust me.[/QUOTE]You have got to be kidding me. Lmbo. I just took a few min. To look up your pictures, and we are to believe you get 500 a hr? Really, I also noted alot of your post were deleted by management. Makes you wonder.
[QUOTE=BonnieBlaz; 1425858]Sugar baby if your a woman I would love to school you on how to not get played or low balled by the gentlemen!
I tried to be friends with a lot of clients in Virginia but I found out my mistake
If I can help another from this, because women rule the world why not women educate each other and help each other.
Now the clients I get now are 500hr men I do not low ball myself anymore trust me.[/QUOTE]First off this is for MEMBER DISCUSSION not forum advertisers, she shouldn't have posted here, and you shouldn't have either. Second why are you responding to a post from six months ago? Third please? 500 hr, I rarely pay over 250hr, and see woman IMO that look much better than you. I don't want to speak for the whole area, but we really don't like your posts here in Richmond, they add nothing and waste space.
I feel sorry for anyone that or ever takes a photo of her.
$500 / hr? BS. Total BS. Keep in mind, this is the same habitual liar that claimed on this site that she's no longer a hooker and is an "adult film star." I believe the membership, and the admin, has learned this person is merely a waste of space and forum bs'er.
[QUOTE=RichmondDude;1426034]You have got to be kidding me. Lmbo. I just took a few min. To look up your pictures, and we are to believe you get 500 a hr? Really, I also noted alot of your post were deleted by management. Makes you wonder.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonnieBlaz; 1425858]Sugar baby if your a woman I would love to school you on how to not get played or low balled by the gentlemen!
I tried to be friends with a lot of clients in Virginia but I found out my mistake
If I can help another from this, because women rule the world why not women educate each other and help each other.
Now the clients I get now are 500hr men I do not low ball myself anymore trust me.[/QUOTE]Bonnie,
I know I'm somewhat new here and all, but can you please stop with your uneducated, idiotic posts? Stop trying to make yourself seem like Richmond's Next Top Model. We all know that you're not. I appreciate you attempting to contribute, but stop trying to represent yourself as The End All to everyone. $500 an hour, please. Not trying to knock your game, but I actually feel bad for your educational, literacy skills. I can only imagine how you sound face-to-face. I also saw your pics, and I damn sure find it hard to believe that anyone would pay that repeatedly. Hell, I'll give you one sucker who may be drunk, old, drunk and lonely; but more than one, repeatedly. Nah.
[QUOTE=RichmondDude;1426034]You have got to be kidding me. Lmbo. I just took a few min. To look up your pictures, and we are to believe you get 500 a hr? Really, I also noted alot of your post were deleted by management. Makes you wonder.[/QUOTE]This is why I do not see men in Richmond waste of time I am an adult entertainer, if I had pale skin you would pay me that much
I have seen women that look worst than me get paid 500 an hour do not hate if you do not have the money to afford it! Good luck
I do not go around bashing people on the internet and hide behind a computer
[QUOTE=Jayblack;1426053]First off this is for MEMBER DISCUSSION not forum advertisers, she shouldn't have posted here, and you shouldn't have either. Second why are you responding to a post from six months ago? Third please? 500 hr, I rarely pay over 250hr, and see woman IMO that look much better than you. I don't want to speak for the whole area, but we really don't like your posts here in Richmond, they add nothing and waste space.[/QUOTE]So what about my educational skills, with the social media sites and abbreviations it makes it easy to not use proper English
So you worth talk about me on here, your very lucky I do not have your information I would take legal action against you, I do have rights and morals, character I am a good person if you do not want to see that on superficial pictures and beauty go right ahead, I would love to see what you look like!
[QUOTE=Myoungvsu; 1426390]Bonnie,
I know I'm somewhat new here and all, but can you please stop with your uneducated, idiotic posts? Stop trying to make yourself seem like Richmond's Next Top Model. We all know that you're not. I appreciate you attempting to contribute, but stop trying to represent yourself as The End All to everyone. $500 an hour, please. Not trying to knock your game, but I actually feel bad for your educational, literacy skills. I can only imagine how you sound face-to-face. I also saw your pics, and I damn sure find it hard to believe that anyone would pay that repeatedly. Hell, I'll give you one sucker who may be drunk, old, drunk and lonely; but more than one, repeatedly. Nah.[/QUOTE]I just linked the convo to backpage let's see what clients think I show you better than I can tell you.
[QUOTE=Jayblack;1426053]First off this is for MEMBER DISCUSSION not forum advertisers, she shouldn't have posted here, and you shouldn't have either. Second why are you responding to a post from six months ago? Third please? 500 hr, I rarely pay over 250hr, and see woman IMO that look much better than you. I don't want to speak for the whole area, but we really don't like your posts here in Richmond, they add nothing and waste space.[/QUOTE]Your nothing but wasted space I have a voice, just like you do but I will show you better.