Asian Providers

So Irene is a solid performer but in my opinion she is early 40's or late 30's, 5'6" ish and a little bigger then I would prefer (145 ish).

[QUOTE=Panther2287;6749211]I haven't seen her on her current tour but I did go to see her the past two times that she came into town. I like her look and love her big boobs! She does possess one great skill P2 P. Seems to like to satisfy you and is a fun time.

If P2 P is your thing she's your girl![/QUOTE]I definitely need to go see Kendal. I agree her P2 P is one of the best. If you connect with her it will be an amazing session.

Thanks for the honest review. Saved me a couple bucks haha.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6749281]The pics that are used for "Ellie" are the same ones used by AkD "Ginna" in the bay area around a year ago or so. Face is blurred out, but I know these pics well, LOL. She didn't have mm cs back then, but the rest sounds exactly on point.

TER I'd is 379441.

[URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20230212205710/https://www.asian-kdolls.ch/ginna[/URL]

I gave Ginna a 3/10 in looks and 6/10 in service.

"Ginna is thick to the point of being fat, got twenty pounds more than her pics, has round face looking very different from her advertised pics, and did not provide service close to what required making up for her looks.

Disappointing session in terms of how far off the pics are. ".

" Akd Ginna.

F3. 5 B3 S6 A5. 5.

Well, this was a disappointment.

First of all, the face in the pics has some of her features. But it's on a such a round base it becomes unattractive and auntie-like. At times I felt like she had some Indian features on her and thought she'd bust out some Tamil vocab. Her face looks more like a middle aged Indian woman than her face in the pics. It's weird and not attractive to me.

Tbh I had problems figuring out her age. At first I thought for sure she's older and around Essie (bgc) age. Towards the end of the session considering her skin and boobs, etc I think I'd peg her around 30. Her face makes her look older.

Now, the elephant in the room. She is thick and I would say, fat because of her height. This execerbates because she is so short. If you want a comparison, if you thought LKS Ruby / BGC Jia was baby fat, then Ginna is chubby and thick. If you thought LKS Ruby / BGC Jia was thick or chubby, Ginna is fat. Her ankles, calves, arms etc are just very thick and considering she is short at around 5 feet, it's not a great sight.

I am not a picky man at when it comes to looks, but I was disappointed walking in and seeing her. She does have natural bs that look good and meaty due to the aforementioned size. I'll give her that.

She is somewhat tight, but service was another disappointment aside from BBBJ (as I'm a service man, I'd thought maybe she can at least shine here) Constant interruption in FS and hard to get full penetration in. BBBJ was above average though and enjoyable. I think BBBJ saved the day here from being a complete disaster. It was confident, going fast around most if the shaft, had some variation and she was open to a little bit of driving. No hint of dt or sloppy toppy though. BBBJ pushed the performance grade to 6.

Attitude was very timid. No dfk and barely any lips given altogether. There was no chemistry even though I don't really try to show my disappointment with looks. There are girls who aren't lookers but they try to make it up with attitude or service. This wasn't the case here. Forgettable cg, mish and doggie, where I busted a nut. Just chilled there and left as I saw no reason to go another round. New PSE is on the table.

As is, I still had fun, but really it's hard to recommend her to anyone who's looking for service, and cannot recommend to anyone looking for, well, looks. Akd started out strong looks-wise with Jenny who is a pretty young thing, but this offering in Ginna is definitely trust being disrupted.

Maybe if you have a thick / fat fetish and enjoy all natural bs and can overlook unattractive face and focus on BBBJ. Me, there is no way I'm repeating with her. This is an Alpaca org level offering and there are way better girls out there for looks and service.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FreeWally;6747112]Not to mention the ad says doubles available. Her schedule says 'hopefully' so maybe they are trying something new.

Looking at the schedule next week lists Cherry twice, what a nice typo. Highly recommend her if you like getting sucked a long time. Unlike other girls who are just short, she is actually petite and very slender. A little sassy, reminds me of DJ Tenashar when she was younger and skinnier:

[URL]https://www.pictoa.com/albums/singaporean-dj-tenashar-leaked-nude-pics-1379429.html[/URL] (nsfw).[/QUOTE]I saw that too. I find it odd that Gianna is not open minded yet she is offering doubles with precious who is. I wonder how that would work? I would find it frustrating taking off and on a condom throughout a double session.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6749281]The pics that are used for "Ellie" are the same ones used by AkD "Ginna" in the bay area around a year ago or so. Face is blurred out, but I know these pics well, LOL. She didn't have mm cs back then, but the rest sounds exactly on point.

TER I'd is 379441.

[URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20230212205710/https://www.asian-kdolls.ch/ginna[/URL]

I gave Ginna a 3/10 in looks and 6/10 in service.

"Ginna is thick to the point of being fat, got twenty pounds more than her pics, has round face looking very different from her advertised pics, and did not provide service close to what required making up for her looks.

Disappointing session in terms of how far off the pics are. ".

" Akd Ginna.

F3. 5 B3 S6 A5. 5.

Well, this was a disappointment.

First of all, the face in the pics has some of her features. But it's on a such a round base it becomes unattractive and auntie-like. At times I felt like she had some Indian features on her and thought she'd bust out some Tamil vocab. Her face looks more like a middle aged Indian woman than her face in the pics. It's weird and not attractive to me.[/QUOTE]Thank you for this report.

My problem is. I usually find girls average when other punters find them sexy and beautiful.

I know its very subjective.

Hence I am apprehensive of very positive reviews.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6749281]The pics that are used for "Ellie" are the same ones used by AkD "Ginna" in the bay area around a year ago or so. Face is blurred out, but I know these pics well, LOL. She didn't have mm cs back then, but the rest sounds exactly on point.

TER I'd is 379441.

[URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20230212205710/https://www.asian-kdolls.ch/ginna[/URL]

I gave Ginna a 3/10 in looks and 6/10 in service.

"Ginna is thick to the point of being fat, got twenty pounds more than her pics, has round face looking very different from her advertised pics, and did not provide service close to what required making up for her looks.

Disappointing session in terms of how far off the pics are. ".

" Akd Ginna.

F3. 5 B3 S6 A5. 5.

Well, this was a disappointment.

First of all, the face in the pics has some of her features. But it's on a such a round base it becomes unattractive and auntie-like. At times I felt like she had some Indian features on her and thought she'd bust out some Tamil vocab. Her face looks more like a middle aged Indian woman than her face in the pics. It's weird and not attractive to me.

Tbh I had problems figuring out her age. At first I thought for sure she's older and around Essie (bgc) age. Towards the end of the session considering her skin and boobs, etc I think I'd peg her around 30. Her face makes her look older.

Now, the elephant in the room. She is thick and I would say, fat because of her height. This execerbates because she is so short. If you want a comparison, if you thought LKS Ruby / BGC Jia was baby fat, then Ginna is chubby and thick. If you thought LKS Ruby / BGC Jia was thick or chubby, Ginna is fat. Her ankles, calves, arms etc are just very thick and considering she is short at around 5 feet, it's not a great sight.

I am not a picky man at when it comes to looks, but I was disappointed walking in and seeing her. She does have natural bs that look good and meaty due to the aforementioned size. I'll give her that.

She is somewhat tight, but service was another disappointment aside from BBBJ (as I'm a service man, I'd thought maybe she can at least shine here) Constant interruption in FS and hard to get full penetration in. BBBJ was above average though and enjoyable. I think BBBJ saved the day here from being a complete disaster. It was confident, going fast around most if the shaft, had some variation and she was open to a little bit of driving. No hint of dt or sloppy toppy though. BBBJ pushed the performance grade to 6.

Attitude was very timid. No dfk and barely any lips given altogether. There was no chemistry even though I don't really try to show my disappointment with looks. There are girls who aren't lookers but they try to make it up with attitude or service. This wasn't the case here. Forgettable cg, mish and doggie, where I busted a nut. Just chilled there and left as I saw no reason to go another round. New PSE is on the table.

As is, I still had fun, but really it's hard to recommend her to anyone who's looking for service, and cannot recommend to anyone looking for, well, looks. Akd started out strong looks-wise with Jenny who is a pretty young thing, but this offering in Ginna is definitely trust being disrupted.

Maybe if you have a thick / fat fetish and enjoy all natural bs and can overlook unattractive face and focus on BBBJ. Me, there is no way I'm repeating with her. This is an Alpaca org level offering and there are way better girls out there for looks and service.[/QUOTE]After having a very different experience with Ellie and subsequently reading your post, I reached out to the booker and the booker says that the webpage admin made a mistake uploading the photos. He / she said that Ellie is not Ginna in the Bay Area. I actually had a very good experience with Ellie and thought it was weird to read she was fat. I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but holy shit, this girl isn't anybody's idea of fat. Ellie has her own TER I'd:390238. Booker says pics will be updated with her actual pictures. Once updated, you be the judge. Have fun!

[QUOTE=GentleSun;6750864]Booker says pics will be updated with her actual pictures. Once updated, you be the judge. Have fun![/QUOTE]I've been using FEC and SDAG for 12 years. I have never once relied on photos, because they don't help and more often than not don't match. It sets you up for disappointment. Lately, I even recognize the photos as famous Kgirls and Jgirls I know by name. Attached is Zenny, a Korean gravure model, whom I've actually seen used in an ad recently. You could blur her face out but I still instantly recognize her as Zenny. So I'm pretty sure I'm not about to show up and see her in person, and there's no way the girl is half as hot. Don't get your hopes up.

Sometimes they do PS the real girl. You can tell by tattoos or the dress. But again, it doesn't always give enough info and how would you know it's that girl not someone 30 pounds heavier but shorter. Better to not know at all and work with what you get. It depends on your reason for going. I don't mind seeing several girls to find one I like. And normally if I didn't like a girl's appearance, she still gave great service. So I have been satisfied 34 out of 35 times at K agencies. Part of it is I like Koreans anyways, so a guy who doesn't prefer Koreans is going to have a way lower satisfaction level. So going in blind doesn't bother me. But I bet if I expected the girls to look like photos every time, I'd be a lot more disappointed.

I also don't rely on TER ratings. They barely help at all, but reading certain reviews might give a clue or tip. However, I have never found TER to actually have helped me in even one of my 35 experiences. Some of it is my taste is simply different than mainstream. Some people talk up a girl I consider old and ugly, but they love how nasty it is. I'm ok with that reasoning, but I'm not looking for a MILF so it doesn't help me.

My top 3 girls of all time, not a single one is even on TER. For example Emily from SC is not on TER (pictured below 2nd), and everyone here knows how popular she is. She's super young and super hot, the only disagreement is on service level (some guys complained no CIP), where by my experience was she was amazing, one of the only 9s or 10s I'd ever give. But I bet you if she did get TER reviews, they'd be no different in rating than girls I'd give a 5 to. I've seen it happen more often than not on TER so I just don't trust it. Probably, apart from shills, it's just full of people with opposite standards than me. Which is okay but my point is it's not even helpful. I will let my TER subscription expire.

Zenny has the same waist and tits as Emily. But doesn't fuck for an hour, I bet.

I couldn't agree more with everything you said. I no longer wait for 411 on pics, service, etc. If I get burned on occasion, so be it.

Ironically, even the new pics don't look like the Ellie I met LOL.

[QUOTE=FreeWally;6751371]I've been using FEC and SDAG for 12 years. I have never once relied on photos, because they don't help and more often than not don't match. It sets you up for disappointment. Lately, I even recognize the photos as famous Kgirls and Jgirls I know by name. Attached is Zenny, a Korean gravure model, whom I've actually seen used in an ad recently. You could blur her face out but I still instantly recognize her as Zenny. So I'm pretty sure I'm not about to show up and see her in person, and there's no way the girl is half as hot. Don't get your hopes up.

Sometimes they do PS the real girl. You can tell by tattoos or the dress. But again, it doesn't always give enough info and how would you know it's that girl not someone 30 pounds heavier but shorter. Better to not know at all and work with what you get. It depends on your reason for going. I don't mind seeing several girls to find one I like. And normally if I didn't like a girl's appearance, she still gave great service. So I have been satisfied 34 out of 35 times at K agencies. Part of it is I like Koreans anyways, so a guy who doesn't prefer Koreans is going to have a way lower satisfaction level. So going in blind doesn't bother me. But I bet if I expected the girls to look like photos every time, I'd be a lot more disappointed.

I also don't rely on TER ratings. They barely help at all, but reading certain reviews might give a clue or tip. However, I have never found TER to actually have helped me in even one of my 35 experiences. Some of it is my taste is simply different than mainstream. Some people talk up a girl I consider old and ugly, but they love how nasty it is. I'm ok with that reasoning, but I'm not looking for a MILF so it doesn't help me.

My top 3 girls of all time, not a single one is even on TER. For example Emily from SC is not on TER (pictured below 2nd), and everyone here knows how popular she is. She's super young and super hot, the only disagreement is on service level (some guys complained no CIP), where by my experience was she was amazing, one of the only 9s or 10s I'd ever give. But I bet you if she did get TER reviews, they'd be no different in rating than girls I'd give a 5 to. I've seen it happen more often than not on TER so I just don't trust it. Probably, apart from shills, it's just full of people with opposite standards than me. Which is okay but my point is it's not even helpful. I will let my TER subscription expire.

Zenny has the same waist and tits as Emily. But doesn't fuck for an hour, I bet.[/QUOTE]

So after there were some reports on the current lollygirl roster, I decided to go see Irene. Since the BBFS service was free and the MSOG option was cheaper than usual (only +20), I didn't have high expectations even after the reports here. I booked an hour with her in the early afternoon and was pleasantly surprised.

Her pictures are not accurate at all, but she still looked pretty cute to me. Her stats on the website (5'5, 32 D) are accurate from what I could tell. I think her D's are manmade, but it must've not been a big change from her original size since they felt mostly natural. She is on the older side of providers but still good looking. I would place her in her late 30's or maybe early 40's. I think she's also probably half Japanese given some of the ways that she acted but I couldn't tell from her looks.

If I were to rate her overall service, I would put her somewhere around the 70th percentile of my experiences; good enough to repeat but not a must see. So I guess the surprising thing to me is that her BB rate is free. If you're someone who is into BBFS and want a budget option without having budget service, I would highly recommend visiting Irene. I asked and she leaves on the 18th of this month. If you're not looking for a cheap BB rate, I wouldn't make visiting her a priority.

During my visit, I would probably say the highlight of her service was her BBBJ. It had a lot of spit and she did a good job with some ball teasing during the sucking. She gave me a light preview of her BJ skills in the shower which was a little bit of early fun. I think she tried to do a little bit of DT but wasn't able to fit me down her throat well enough. I wouldn't call myself a magnum, but I am on the larger side.

After the BJ (which she continued with after the shower) we went into some 69 action followed by CG. Her pussy is pretty tight at the entrance, but is looser inside. I finished my first shot during CG after which we relaxed a little. She gave my legs a small massage while conversing a little. Her English is actually pretty good. Definitely rough around the edges but good enough to hold a conversation. After I got some more stamina back, she woke junior up with some more of her BJ skills and we continued in mish. My second shots usually take a bit longer to come out so we did mish for awhile then back to CG. I wasn't really interested in doing doggy since her ass is almost nonexistent (as it is for most asians). After we were both a little winded by mish / CG, she got off and just finished me with a BJ. She let me CIM without any prior mention of it. I let her know I was about to cum but she just kept sucking and took my load in her mouth.

The biggest downside from her service to me (and why she doesn't rate higher in my book) is that she doesn't as get as into the sex as I would've liked. She kinda treats the whole session as a professional serving you. Which, don't get me wrong, is still a good time but doesn't create any top tier experiences for me. As an example, her DFKs, while plentiful, didn't really feel passionate to me.

But overall, still a good experience and a really good price for BBFS service.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6749281]The pics that are used for "Ellie" are the same ones used by AkD "Ginna" in the bay area around a year ago or so. Face is blurred out, but I know these pics well, LOL. She didn't have mm cs back then, but the rest sounds exactly on point.

TER I'd is 379441.

[URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20230212205710/https://www.asian-kdolls.ch/ginna[/URL]

I gave Ginna a 3/10 in looks and 6/10 in service.

"Ginna is thick to the point of being fat, got twenty pounds more than her pics, has round face looking very different from her advertised pics, and did not provide service close to what required making up for her looks.

Disappointing session in terms of how far off the pics are. ".

" Akd Ginna.

F3. 5 B3 S6 A5. 5.

Well, this was a disappointment.

First of all, the face in the pics has some of her features. But it's on a such a round base it becomes unattractive and auntie-like. At times I felt like she had some Indian features on her and thought she'd bust out some Tamil vocab. Her face looks more like a middle aged Indian woman than her face in the pics. It's weird and not attractive to me...[/QUOTE]Is your review of Ginna or of Ellie? Have you recently seen Ellie? I am confused due to other recent postings that describe Ellie differently, essentially stating that Ellie is not Ginna. Your other reviews are more inline with my experiences.

Hey guys,

I know she's in the OC but I know some of you guys will drive up for the hotties. I also already posted the question with the OC thread.

It's difficult searching 3-letter names. If anyone has any intel on Amy I would appreciate it. I know many use fake pictures but I'm hoping hers are real. She is exactly my type and I would definitely drive up to see her. Thanks guys!

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/KCupids[/URL]

Anyone see tiffany and can give descriptions?

Got milfed x3 this week.

Hi SD folks.

I believe Ms Qni was in SD and just showed up in OC. I am surprised to see no reviews of her on the forum. The forum doesn't allow for 3 letter searches, so I searched through this thread manually but came up with nothing. Am I missing something?

[QUOTE=SomeoneOC;6753704]Hi SD folks.

I believe Ms Qni was in SD and just showed up in OC. I am surprised to see no reviews of her on the forum. The forum doesn't allow for 3 letter searches, so I searched through this thread manually but came up with nothing. Am I missing something?[/QUOTE]Go on TER.

[QUOTE=Clclcl;6753557]Anyone see tiffany and can give descriptions?

Got milfed x3 this week.[/QUOTE]Who are the milfs, or at least are any still here? I try to avoid them. It's the funny thing about reviews, some guys like nasty service and really love the milfs. I understand that, but it's just not for me.