Printable View
[QUOTE=Lugnutz;2580351]Were you, LusciousLips, the provider who formerly posted as Tiffanyn30? This is not a difficult question.[/QUOTE]But it sure seems like a vindictive one.
Does anyone else care about the answer? Will it matter to anyone who visits her now?
I do not post-rant or summarize often but here goes Three AMP's I two weeks One was one where I frequented and one where trust was now mutual aand progressed to being able to unhook bra play and enjoy nice he. It closed do to lack of business. Ventured to one where I was familiar in NKY and had nice hands all over me sensual rub with he. NO BREAST PLAY hands roamed ass == coochy through panties only. Third same as last-- great sensual hands all over but No Breast touching or kissing.
What is new is that all had their bra's on so tight you could not venture in casually from the bottom or top. AND at completion the latter two said tip==$40.
So it seems like new universal rules no breast, nipple touching or kissing and push for 40 its universal I said no not wioth it unless I at least get a topless massage she got huffy pouty a little bitchy etc. Just though I would share any other input from others?.
I often read some posts and see more often than not that many mongers are the providers age. I guess they are in their late 20's? So many posts are like "I'm their age had a great time, we connected so YMMV. How many of you guys did this at that age? Me? I had all the pussy I could stand for free back then. No, I'm not the best looking guy but can carry a conversation. Never even thought about this until I got a LOT older, worked a lot more hours with less chance of meeting girls and is easier to get a quick one with no drama live in issues. What do you guys think? ZT.
[QUOTE=Swami222;2583781]But it sure seems like a vindictive one.
Does anyone else care about the answer? Will it matter to anyone who visits her now?[/QUOTE]Actually, I do care to hear a direct answer.
Example: HotSquirt (who is back) was run off the biz a year ago for doing a cash-and-dash. She'll have excuses, but that what it was, a cash-and-dash. If she had come back under a different name and started providing good service, I think it is still important to know her history.
Now, with Tiffany30, I don't know why she left, and I certainly have not heard anything negative about her before. Stellar reputation as far as I know. But I would still like to know if it was her coming back. Maybe I was a customer who just didn't click with her and even though she tried, I just didn't enjoy myself. Knowing that it was her under a new moniker would save me the trouble of booking and finding out later it was the same person I had no connection with.
[QUOTE=Lugnutz;2583773]And as far as I know, guys who've seen LusciousLips lately seem to have had a good time.
It's interesting, however, that she won't answer the one simple question, which is whether she used to be Tiffanyn30. Why she won't answer this may also be interesting.
I don't spend a lot of time here anymore, because I really don't get much out of it. However, I'm pursuing this on the principle that a provider who has ever cooperated with LEO should not get business from us. One reason is that plenty of providers have been popped over time and never turned, so why support one who did?
If LL is indeed the artist formerly known as Tiffanyn30, then I did see her at one point last year. I was not one of the guys who got stung subsequently in Goshen. I did PM with a "friend" of one who did get stung, who had a lot of credible details. And unlike most rumors of provider / LEO activity, there was documentary evidence to support what he said, given the charges brought against five guys for soliciting in Goshen last August.
It would be helpful if one of the guys who got popped would provide details here. It is, after all, an anonymous forum if you use it sensibly, and there's additional safety in numbers given that there were five of you. But, I haven't seen that happen yet.
Just hypothetically, I would say just because a provider cooperated with LEO once doesn't mean she will again. I'm sure she fulfilled her end of the bargain. However, I don't think she should get our business in the future for a couple of reasons. One, if she gets popped again, the same thing is likely to happen. Two, it's the principle. However much contempt we may feel for one another (and, certainly, I feel a fair amount for many here) we are all brothers in a sense. We cum from the same wombs, so to speak. If we patronize a provider who participated in setting up other mongers, it sends a pretty bad message that this sort of behavior will be tolerated. I'm not of the school that snitches should meet with violence or other forms of illegal payback. Shunning and boycotts, however, are another story.[/QUOTE]As much as I would like to see an answer, all she has to say is no and none of us can refute it. Its probably time to let it go. New drama will pop up to keep us entertained.
[QUOTE=ZackTy;2584185]I often read some posts and see more often than not that many mongers are the providers age. I guess they are in their late 20's? So many posts are like "I'm their age had a great time, we connected so YMMV. How many of you guys did this at that age? Me? I had all the pussy I could stand for free back then. No, I'm not the best looking guy but can carry a conversation. Never even thought about this until I got a LOT older, worked a lot more hours with less chance of meeting girls and is easier to get a quick one with no drama live in issues. What do you guys think? ZT.[/QUOTE]I mongered on and off in my late 20's and early 30's. In addition to the obvious reason, I did it for pretty much the same additional reasons as I do now (the adrenaline rush, the thrill of getting away with something, variety, and so on).
Plus, I lived here back then and found that gaming Cincinnati area women in their 20's is not as easy as it sounds. By the time your typical middle class native chick around here hits her 20's, they firmly believe the world owes them a husband with a 6 figure corporate job, a 4 bedroom house, a brand new minivan, and 2 or 3 screaming brats. If you don't fit the criteria on her shopping list, you're out of luck. But my impression from a distance is it's easier to game the chicks in their 20's now. This generation of young women just seems to give it up easier, although I would sure as heck never marry one of them, as their sense of entitlement seems much worse now than it did in my younger days.
[QUOTE=Lugnutz;2583773]And as far as I know, guys who've seen LusciousLips lately seem to have had a good time.
It's interesting, however, that she won't answer the one simple question, which is whether she used to be Tiffanyn30. Why she won't answer this may also be interesting.
I don't spend a lot of time here anymore, because I really don't get much out of it. However, I'm pursuing this on the principle that a provider who has ever cooperated with LEO should not get business from us. One reason is that plenty of providers have been popped over time and never turned, so why support one who did?
If LL is indeed the artist formerly known as Tiffanyn30, then I did see her at one point last year. I was not one of the guys who got stung subsequently in Goshen. I did PM with a "friend" of one who did get stung, who had a lot of credible details. And unlike most rumors of provider / LEO activity, there was documentary evidence to support what he said, given the charges brought against five guys for soliciting in Goshen last August.
It would be helpful if one of the guys who got popped would provide details here. It is, after all, an anonymous forum if you use it sensibly, and there's additional safety in numbers given that there were five of you. But, I haven't seen that happen yet.
Just hypothetically, I would say just because a provider cooperated with LEO once doesn't mean she will again. I'm sure she fulfilled her end of the bargain. However, I don't think she should get our business in the future for a couple of reasons. One, if she gets popped again, the same thing is likely to happen. Two, it's the principle. However much contempt we may feel for one another (and, certainly, I feel a fair amount for many here) we are all brothers in a sense. We cum from the same wombs, so to speak. If we patronize a provider who participated in setting up other mongers, it sends a pretty bad message that this sort of behavior will be tolerated. I'm not of the school that snitches should meet with violence or other forms of illegal payback. Shunning and boycotts, however, are another story.[/QUOTE]If you don't care then why? I think you are going way overboard on this whole thing. We can't prove if she was or wasn't Tiffany 30, I didn't see her then and I haven't seen her as of this posting. I think you made your point just let it rest and let grown men make their decision. HL29.
Well said -it's getting worse every day. The pendulum is going to go to the extreme as it did in Japan and then we will have birth rate crisis. Doomsday scenario. LOL.
[QUOTE=UOnlyLiveOnce;2584591]I mongered on and off in my late 20's and early 30's. In addition to the obvious reason, I did it for pretty much the same additional reasons as I do now (the adrenaline rush, the thrill of getting away with something, variety, and so on).
Plus, I lived here back then and found that gaming Cincinnati area women in their 20's is not as easy as it sounds. By the time your typical middle class native chick around here hits her 20's, they firmly believe the world owes them a husband with a 6 figure corporate job, a 4 bedroom house, a brand new minivan, and 2 or 3 screaming brats. If you don't fit the criteria on her shopping list, you're out of luck. But my impression from a distance is it's easier to game the chicks in their 20's now. This generation of young women just seems to give it up easier, although I would sure as heck never marry one of them, as their sense of entitlement seems much worse now than it did in my younger days.[/QUOTE]
Same girl. Visited the trailer park last summer. She provided as advertised and had no issues with entrapment mentioned by other. Earlier ads posted by LL had a clear face pic that is not in ad now. A provider just falls from the sky and magically appears out of no where. Come on people. If she suits your needs and provides as advertised go get sum. Or don't.
[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;2584600]If you don't care then why? I think you are going way overboard on this whole thing. We can't prove if she was or wasn't Tiffany 30, I didn't see her then and I haven't seen her as of this posting. I think you made your point just let it rest and let grown men make their decision. HL29.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Lugnutz;2583771]And as far as I know, guys who've seen LusciousLips lately seem to have had a good time.
It's interesting, however, that she won't answer the one simple question, which is whether she used to be Tiffanyn30. Why she won't answer this may also be interesting.
I don't spend a lot of time here anymore, because I really don't get much out of it. However, I'm pursuing this on the principle that a provider who has ever cooperated with LEO should not get business from us. One reason is that plenty of providers have been popped over time and never turned, so why support one who did?
If LL is indeed the artist formerly known as Tiffanyn30, then I did see her at one point last year. I was not one of the guys who got stung subsequently in Goshen. I did PM with a "friend" of one who did get stung, who had a lot of credible details. And unlike most rumors of provider / LEO activity, there was documentary evidence to support what he said, given the charges brought against five guys for soliciting in Goshen last August.
It would be helpful if one of the guys who got popped would provide details here. It is, after all, an anonymous forum if you use it sensibly, and there's additional safety in numbers given that there were five of you. But, I haven't seen that happen yet.
Just hypothetically, I would say just because a provider cooperated with LEO once doesn't mean she will again. I'm sure she fulfilled her end of the bargain. However, I don't think she should get our business in the future for a couple of reasons. One, if she gets popped again, the same thing is likely to happen. Two, it's the principle. However much contempt we may feel for one another (and, certainly, I feel a fair amount for many here) we are all brothers in a sense. We cum from the same wombs, so to speak. If we patronize a provider who participated in setting up other mongers, it sends a pretty bad message that this sort of behavior will be tolerated. I'm not of the school that snitches should meet with violence or other forms of illegal payback. Shunning and boycotts, however, are another story.[/QUOTE]The best part of your post is that you don't spend much time here anymore. It would be even better if you spent NO TIME here anymore.
[QUOTE=Thorbane;2583342]Taking this to the octagon as there been provider on this board asking about Voyeurism. And all I get from my I. S. O. Is that providers 85% for the most part want full donation or double the donation because it would be myself a female friend who wants to watch. For the exception of Candice. I mostly have been going thru craigslist and the cheviot show couple. And backpage and having to weed thru that monkey farm to find what I want. I just confused that more providers do not clearly list this service? And at a price that is fair for the service render. It like in the movie fields of dreams, build it and they will come? Hope fully this will start a forum that perhaps shed some light on me on why this is happening.[/QUOTE]Little surprised on the lack of rants raves or opinions that have not been openly posted. I gotten quite a few pm Which I answered all. I was hoping to get a better understand why it not post in ads or talked about that much.
A gentleman with this part of num +1 (859) xxx-1367 contacted me today and I wouldn't see him then he used me as a reference. He doesn't sound right and nothing sounds normal about him. Please be safe ladies and make sure you do your references. If any one uses me as a reference please contact me. He starts off by saying he is a married Christian guy. Lmao.
[QUOTE=Mikeeee501;2584689]Same girl. Visited the trailer park last summer. She provided as advertised and had no issues with entrapment mentioned by other. Earlier ads posted by LL had a clear face pic that is not in ad now. A provider just falls from the sky and magically appears out of no where. Come on people. If she suits your needs and provides as advertised go get sum. Or don't.[/QUOTE]I really don't know what she did before, but I've seen her twice recently as "Luscious Lips. " She was legit for me. I had a good time and will be back.
[QUOTE=ZackTy;2584185]I often read some posts and see more often than not that many mongers are the providers age. I guess they are in their late 20's? So many posts are like "I'm their age had a great time, we connected so YMMV. How many of you guys did this at that age? Me? I had all the pussy I could stand for free back then. No, I'm not the best looking guy but can carry a conversation. Never even thought about this until I got a LOT older, worked a lot more hours with less chance of meeting girls and is easier to get a quick one with no drama live in issues. What do you guys think? ZT.[/QUOTE]I'm middle-aged. I didn't get laid much in my 20's. I think if you grew up in the 60's and 70's pussy was easy to get. When I was growing up it was harder. Most of my friends were virgins into their late teens. We had sluts. But unless you were in relationship there wasn't much action. Also depending on job you might not meet women and workplace hookups are frowned upon now and risky. I think guys could make moves back in the the day and not get swatted for sexual harrasment. I started paying for pussy when my wife passed. I wanted to also. I no longer cared about much. So fuck it. If she was around I wouldn't be here.
[QUOTE=ClassASweetie;2586273]A gentleman with this part of num +1 (859) xxx-1367 contacted me today and I wouldn't see him then he used me as a reference. He doesn't sound right and nothing sounds normal about him. Please be safe ladies and make sure you do your references. If any one uses me as a reference please contact me. He starts off by saying he is a married Christian guy. Lmao.[/QUOTE]Thank you so much!!
Always,
VR.