Saw April this afternoon. Great massage, great time.
Printable View
Saw April this afternoon. Great massage, great time.
I see a lot of the "higher end girls" use P411 or similar verification. But I read some news from a few years ago that the out of country was suspected of sharing member's info with authorities. Any info on this or suggestions?
[QUOTE=Stixxer;2232079]I see a lot of the "higher end girls" use P411 or similar verification. But I read some news from a few years ago that the out of country was suspected of sharing member's info with authorities. Any info on this or suggestions?[/QUOTE]Google "p411 police" and see if you're comfortable with the results.
Personally, I'm a member and have no complaints other than the price. If you use it frequently then the cost may be offset by "member discounts" that many providers offer.
Date-check is another (cheaper) option, but they keep inactive profiles around forever. OK for local legends and touring ladies, though, and you can see several SBL ladies and get your approval count on up there in a hurry.
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2232124]Google "p411 police" and see if you're comfortable with the results.
Personally, I'm a member and have no complaints other than the price. If you use it frequently then the cost may be offset by "member discounts" that many providers offer.
Date-check is another (cheaper) option, but they keep inactive profiles around forever. OK for local legends and touring ladies, though, and you can see several SBL ladies and get your approval count on up there in a hurry.
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Yeah, P411 is a little pricey, but I find it to be one of the most useful tools in my research shed. Almost all of the ladies' ads have links to reviews, and many of them list "activities they enjoy in their private lives," which serve as a clear listing of their menus. I've never had any problems or complaints with it. For me the benefits are worth the cost. I can understand if others see it differently though. Obviously LE can use any sites or resources we can use. I do take a little comfort in the fact that the P4 servers are in Canada where prostitution is legal, and where local authorities here would at least have some hoops to jump through to gain access to their database. Nothing about this hobby is totally risk free, unfortunately.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2232124]Google "p411 police" and see if you're comfortable with the results.
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Having a "little" experience with the subject matter, P411 is about the safest there is for the hobbyist. Why? Because the provider has to jump through hoops to simply set up a profile. That and the communications, if done right are non-implicating, not readily available to LE with or without a warrent. Yes, screen prints can be taken, but those have proved worthless in court as evidence.
Transversely, on the providers end it's just like any other site. References do no good if they do not check, even less if the client has turned to the darkside.
The only reason that the Google search returns anything is simply because P411 is considered one of the hardest networks for LE to gain access to. They are NOT going to waste resources putting a fake LE provider on, in the hopes of catching a hobbiest. Remember, they have to show a return on their investment. The reason BP stings are so prevalent is because they are easy (think low hanging fruit) and often produce more charges than simple prostitution.
As a side note googling P411 resulted in just as many ECCIE busts. Why? Because in this hobby, those sites are the most used AND allow Google to index the posts.
Ok, thank you all for the P411 feedback.
I've been wondering about her as well. Does she kiss well? Does she give BBBJCIM? Can you go down on her? She looks very cute!
[QUOTE=GeorgeKaplan;2231585]Anyone seen Candy / Vanessa before? Have been communicating with her, but can't get a sense of her reliability, safety, etc. , much less her service quality.
[URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/come-try-some-of-this-weet-candy-21/11087419[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TJfun;2230833]Was wondering this myself. Haven't seen her post in a long time.[/QUOTE]About a day or 2 after I asked about her, I heard from her and got to see her but been out of town since so couldn't post. She was fabulous as usual.
Like a few others on Friday, I had some extra coins and some free time on my hands. I decided to give Siara a try and found a good service for a good price.
Also, it was the same entry process as previously discussed. She had me call and she stood on the balcony as I pulled in and the went inside and left the door open for me.
[QUOTE=GeorgeKaplan;2231585]Anyone seen Candy / Vanessa before? Have been communicating with her, but can't get a sense of her reliability, safety, etc. , much less her service quality.
[URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/come-try-some-of-this-weet-candy-21/11087419[/URL][/QUOTE]Any updates here? Very cute little spinner!
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=UpForItNow;2230005]Thanks for sharing that warning. I have been hankering for a duo lately and after seeing Charlie's ad about having friends around, have tried calling her several times over the last 2 or 3 days. She never answers, and most times, the call rolls to a voice mail with a man's voice talking in a garbled tone that I can't understand. I first thought it might just be lousy sound quality on my burner phone, but had decided that it most likely indicated a pimp controlling the phone of the different ladies using the same number in their ads, but who recorded an incoherent message, maybe as a result of those recreational habits you mention. I'm not about to leave a call back request to a message like that. More than anything, it just made me uneasy and wary about whatever might be going on with her. It doesn't really sound like LE, though. Whatever, time to look elsewhere.
Oh well, these girls look like they could be fun together.[/QUOTE]I saw Charlie about 4 weeks ago off Elm Hill. She was very accomadating, very responsive, and fun to talk to. Fine body and I had no qualms about her boobs. Though I typically prefer Adrien, Charlie isa very nice alternative.
[QUOTE=OverEasy;2234806]I saw Charlie about 4 weeks ago off Elm Hill. She was very accomadating, very responsive, and fun to talk to. Fine body and I had no qualms about her boobs. Though I typically prefer Adrien, Charlie isa very nice alternative.[/QUOTE]What is wrong with her boobs?
Came across this ad and wondered if anyone has seen her? Probably legit, but she's a looker for sure.
[URL]http://nashville.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/massagefacialsbody-treatments/11419500[/URL]
[QUOTE=DogginUSA;2235192]What is wrong with her boobs?[/QUOTE]In my review, I stated that the implants just looked odd to me. Nothing wrong with them. Glad it all worked with her.
So I wanted to send a shout out to all my buddies here. Yall have been so awesome. But its time for me to dip out. I'm done posting and seeing new clients. From now on the only people I will be seeing will be regulars so if you don't see me post no worries I'm just fine. Like I said I will still be seeing regulars and I don't mind seeing gentleman from USA. Big hugs and kisses to everyone for such wonderful support! You guys are the best.