Did a search, couldn't find anyone drop a review on "Chanel of SexyAngels".
So much talk about her. So tempting!
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4879393]Seems to be confusion in the Chanel's. There is Chanel of M that's is well known. Then there is Chanel of CaKdolls, with the big booty. And there is Chanel who worked for Sexy Angels. Former Chanel of SexyAngels is Kiera of Mykupcake in OC.
She disappeared mid LA covid shutdown and hadn't popped up at another org until now in OC.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TheZorak;4879101]Are those pictures of Rebecca herself?[/QUOTE]Yes, that specific booker, only Rebecca is the highest standard cgirl that stands up to kgirl service. She looks pretty, good service, boltons that have some empty sag at the bottom FYI but still totally fine in my book. Rare to have pretty cgirls that actually have service.
Oh, the pictures of the prettiest girl taking selfies is actually Rebecca.
[QUOTE=TheZorak;4879101]Are those pictures of Rebecca herself?[/QUOTE]That's her. Not too much in the foreplay department, but the main event is good. She's multi-orgasmic and likes to fuck.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4879393]Seems to be confusion in the Chanel's. There is Chanel of M that's is well known. Then there is Chanel of CaKdolls, with the big booty. And there is Chanel who worked for Sexy Angels. Former Chanel of SexyAngels is Kiera of Mykupcake in OC.
She disappeared mid LA covid shutdown and hadn't popped up at another org until now in OC.[/QUOTE]Looking at HX is probably what confused me. I follow accounts that use the Kdoll name but I think they are actually different agencies.
[QUOTE=UofiPoker;4879534]Did a search, couldn't find anyone drop a review on "Chanel of SexyAngels".
So much talk about her. So tempting![/QUOTE]Check out her reviews on TER 347471.
[QUOTE=TheZorak;4879101]Are those pictures of Rebecca herself?[/QUOTE]I believe she's retired or semi retired. At least that's what I was told.
Heard Sexy Shannon is working in NYC. Maybe she is returning soon here.
Saw her a few days ago.
OMG! That girl can DT! She can be a deep sea diving champion. She did not need to come up for air!
FYI. She has a c section scar that was discreetly covered with a fine tape. Needless to say she was tight even for my midget size chubby!
My boy and I made up so I guess this was his way of saying we ok! LOL.
[QUOTE=TheZorak;4879101]Are those pictures of Rebecca herself?[/QUOTE]Yes, those are all her.
[QUOTE=ShibaShiba;4882830]Heard Sexy Shannon is working in NYC. Maybe she is returning soon here[/QUOTE]I was just told by her booker that she is retired. Unless someone has intel to state otherwise.
BB prices are going down it seems. While I would prefer an all inclusive package at standard rate, it going in the right direction for us mongers. I hope it becomes a trend that encompass Socal as a whole.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4884712]BB prices are going down it seems. While I would prefer an all inclusive package at standard rate, it going in the right direction for us mongers. I hope it becomes a trend that encompass Socal as a whole.[/QUOTE]Website lists the standard upcharge now RIP.
Question for those who have seen Bulma, does she look close to her age listed?
I saw Tina before not long ago. Though her service was great, her age was above my liking. I don't mind if they are older, but if they look and give off a younger vibe that's fine.
[QUOTE=Dwaeji;4878487][URL]https://topbase.co/helloiamlucikim[/URL][/QUOTE]This is not the well reviewed Ivey / Ivy from LA.
[QUOTE=Fiendinpj;4885127]Question for those who have seen Bulma, does she look close to her age listed?
I saw Tina before not long ago. Though her service was great, her age was above my liking. I don't mind if they are older, but if they look and give off a younger vibe that's fine.[/QUOTE]Tina is the exception for older. Bulma looks like late 20's, not mid 30's depending on your thoughts. I'm younger asian, she's fine age wise.
[QUOTE=OldGuy65;4885307]This is not the well reviewed Ivey / Ivy from LA.[/QUOTE]This Ivy is using fake pictures.
[QUOTE=OldGuy65;4885307]This is not the well reviewed Ivey / Ivy from LA.[/QUOTE]Wish I'd read this before I visited. I can second that, she is not that Ivey. Not worth a visit. Dead fish, lackluster, and poor skills. Would not recommend.
[QUOTE=NoWthatsFun;4884164]I was just told by her booker that she is retired. Unless someone has intel to state otherwise.[/QUOTE]Bookers don't necessarily know about each girl's plans nor do they necessarily tell customers the "truth" Also, girls are notoriously fickle about their plans, and may have told the booker one thing, planned on working elsewhere, or changed their mind and only took a long "vacation". So, there is no "intel" that is reliable, especially 2nd /3rd hand on an anonymous board.
Depends on who give the intel.
I try to give intel when I think it's true, not simply because of what a booker, a girl, or another person said. I don't expect anyone to believe me though.
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;4885784]Bookers don't necessarily know about each girl's plans nor do they necessarily tell customers the "truth" Also, girls are notoriously fickle about their plans, and may have told the booker one thing, planned on working elsewhere, or changed their mind and only took a long "vacation". So, there is no "intel" that is reliable, especially 2nd /3rd hand on an anonymous board.[/QUOTE]
OK, I am going to help out because I feel like I misled you about Tina. I recommended her on here because she was good to me. What age range do you prefer?
I prefer to see young girl under thirty and I still like Bulma very much. Very nice body, great service, and her attitude cracks me up every time. Follow my post here and then SojuLover post and you get your answer: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31240-Asian-PLEASER-discussion-forum-(please-post-reviews-in-the-review-forum)&p=4718563&viewfull=1#post4718563](Click here)[/URL].
If age may be a problem, see if I call a girl young or not. Young means I think she is under 30. If I don't say it just tread carefully. I won't discuss age if I don't call them young because it will be brutal to the girls and her club. It's harder when I am in her club as well. I don't want to fudge their age like the age being advertised.
[QUOTE=Fiendinpj;4885127]Question for those who have seen Bulma, does she look close to her age listed?
I saw Tina before not long ago. Though her service was great, her age was above my liking. I don't mind if they are older, but if they look and give off a younger vibe that's fine.[/QUOTE]
I am sad for Angela. Her BB is 280. Sophia and Grace are 300. I will still decline the 7% BB tax. Be careful what you wish for though.
When guys were complaining about not enough BB options, I tried to provide a list of agencies with BB girls and even encouraged some girls to upsell to make more money. Then came an explosion of BB upsell girls. Little did I realize it came back to bit me in the ass this year when some girls not advertising BB also wanted extra for it too LOL. When BB price goes down, you will just see fewer ads with BB and it will just become YMMV or UTR like before. Then guys will again complain of lack of BB options.
The only direction I want is for more import of Asian girls, preferably young and cute.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4884712]BB prices are going down it seems. While I would prefer an all inclusive package at standard rate, it going in the right direction for us mongers. I hope it becomes a trend that encompass Socal as a whole.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4886090]OK, I am going to help out because I feel like I misled you about Tina. I recommended her on here because she was good to me. What age range do you prefer?
I prefer to see young girl under thirty and I still like Bulma very much. Very nice body, great service, and her attitude cracks me up every time. Follow my post here and then SojuLover post and you get your answer: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31240-Asian-PLEASER-discussion-forum-(please-post-reviews-in-the-review-forum)&p=4718563&viewfull=1#post4718563](Click here)[/URL].
If age may be a problem, see if I call a girl young or not. Young means I think she is under 30. If I don't say it just tread carefully. I won't discuss age if I don't call them young because it will be brutal to the girls and her club. It's harder when I am in her club as well. I don't want to fudge their age like the age being advertised.[/QUOTE]Thanks BA. You didn't mislead me about Tina, there were multiple reports that said she provided great service and was older than the pictures. I understood that and went with it. She was just a bit older than I would like. I'm in my mid 30's so if a girl looks like she's in her mid 30's or below, which most are, works for me. I'm also a health freak, so when someone is in their mid to late 30's and I see sag, it's a turn off. I've been with a few that were likely mid 30's close to 40's and still looked great because their body was tight and firm. Haha.
Appreciate your reviews BA!
Looks like Ca-dolls has added some new girls to the OC rotation. Anyone have info on Robyn, Kassie, Jude or Ivy. Looking to take one for a spin later tonight.
Curious how pricing compares from Agencies vs AMP's. Like the fact you can just stop in at an AMP. Haven't gone through the effort with HK to figure out there system to get in contact with the agencies, but not sure if it's worth the bother.
Haven't been on here in quite a while and been thinking of getting back into the game. Thank you all for the info and making it easier for returning guy like myself to navigate through here again. I was always hesitant to post my own experiences and would just lurk on these threads. Will be sure to contribute this time around. From the reviews and pics I've seen I think I have my eyes set on Grace from SAG. Tough screening for first timers?
Anyone seen her yet? I think she's a norcal girl.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/3341[/URL]
What agency do you think she was from in NorCal?
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4886845]Anyone seen her yet? I think she's a norcal girl.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/3341[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BoneRanger22;4886396]Looks like Ca-dolls has added some new girls to the OC rotation. Anyone have info on Robyn, Kassie, Jude or Ivy. Looking to take one for a spin later tonight.[/QUOTE]Jude is very cool, been around this business for a while, just average in terms of looks but great on service and great english for communication. I had a good time with her.
Ivy (or previously known as Ivey) is a ddg deadfish, if you just want something visually stunning, go check her out, if you want to be serviced, she'll do the bare minimum. I think she's also charging above standard rates for that org.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4886118]I am sad for Angela. Her BB is 280. Sophia and Grace are 300. I will still decline the 7% BB tax. Be careful what you wish for though.
When guys were complaining about not enough BB options, I tried to provide a list of agencies with BB girls and even encouraged some girls to upsell to make more money. Then came an explosion of BB upsell girls. Little did I realize it came back to bit me in the ass this year when some girls not advertising BB also wanted extra for it too LOL. When BB price goes down, you will just see fewer ads with BB and it will just become YMMV or UTR like before. Then guys will again complain of lack of BB options.
The only direction I want is for more import of Asian girls, preferably young and cute.[/QUOTE]I wholeheartedly advocate the pursuit to increase the influx of young and cute talent coming here. But then reality sinks in and you have to realize that ahjummas will inevitably be caught in the flow too.
Most here, including myself, would agree that a standard rate that encompasses a generally accepted set of services offered is ideal (remember when MSOG was a given for hour appointments regardless of which org you frequented). But for some unfathomable reason, the market dynamics of Socal and the Bay area are so divergent that it has manifested itself in a tale of two k scenes. One with virtually no upsell and upfront BB designations while the other includes fine print and asterisks showcasing a la carte style menu structure. Not to mention the wide gap in floor donation rates that are not commensurate or objectively reflected bv cost of living differences of each region. While I understand the business decision to capitalize on BB service by tacking on an additional charge, it's only effective if there's adequate demand. Seeing SAG offering lower upcharges for BB signals to me a drop in willingness to pay. It may not reach zero but one could hope. I much prefer BA's approach for obvious reasons and would love for Socal to adopt it. But my preference is worth jack shit to what bookers will do here in LA / OC.
At the end of the day, it's a business and we convey our approval or disapproval of these practices by our willingness to pay for it. And so far, IMO, to the detriment of all mongers here, it appears that the majority approves.
[QUOTE=LookslikeLE;4886491]Curious how pricing compares from Agencies vs AMP's. Like the fact you can just stop in at an AMP. Haven't gone through the effort with HK to figure out there system to get in contact with the agencies, but not sure if it's worth the bother.[/QUOTE]Full disclosure, I have never been to an AMP. Or rather, go to one for the expressed purpose of engaging in anything but a relaxing massage. But to answer your question, agencies undoubtedly will have higher pricing. On average, the going rate of an hour with an agency girl is between $240-$280. Towards your point, AMPs are generally accessible to anyone willing to put a little effort into finding where they are, using appropriate lingo and gestures to communicate your intentions, or simply "I've been here before, is X available?" to establish a nonexistent and contrived trustworthiness upon visiting a new AMP for the first time. On the other hand, agencies will require either personal info or solid references put your foot in the door.
That said, the higher pricing comes with commensurate quality of life amenities, increased safety and security barriers relative to AMPs, adherence to hygienic routines, and overall quality of service that easily trumps what AMPs have to offer. The peace of mind and caliber of talent (most of the time) agencies provides translates to considerable value in my estimation.
[QUOTE=BoneRanger22;4886396]Looks like Ca-dolls has added some new girls to the OC rotation. Anyone have info on Robyn, Kassie, Jude or Ivy. Looking to take one for a spin later tonight.[/QUOTE]Saw jude and she looks similar to the pictures. She has enhanced breasts that sag like they're natural, pale white skin, face similar to photos but in person you can tell she's had work done on her face. She told me she's 29 without me asking but she looks early 30's. Relatively slender, average asian girl body. Ample butt though.
Good enough service but nothing spectacular. She tries hard to please but I didn't find her super attractive.
Hope that helps.
Tia was at KTE recently and upcharged for BBFS. Based on pics, she was also in LA a couple years back as Jesi and toured places like NorCal.
Let us know if she does not upcharge anymore.
Her reviews: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-6503500495-338560](Here)[/URL], [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-4805681002-301923](Here)[/URL], [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-4085681002-292615](Here)[/URL], and [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-2136609915-339879](Here)[/URL].
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4886845]Anyone seen her yet? I think she's a norcal girl.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/3341[/URL][/QUOTE]
You are selling yourself short. At least one booker knows of your reviews and mine.
As vanguards of the Pussy Liberation Army, we have some influences with our honest reviews and opinions. And we need more comrades to come back.
Simply by reviewing and recommending the young cute talents then treating them well, we can influence the girls to come back and more to come here. Take Ailla as an example, she wasn't thinking of coming back at first but by the end of her tour she was thinking of coming back next year. Every journey begins with a single step.
Increasing demands for some girls while reducing demands for other girls are what we can do. I think I can also help steer guys away from ajunmas and BBFS upsells if I comment on new girls and BBFS upsell girls based on my radar. That would be the same as trying to destroy their businesses. I can sort out ajunmas and BBFS upsells by myself so I just want the businesses to thrive and bring in new girls.
Thank you for reviewing and helping other guys.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4886986]I wholeheartedly advocate the pursuit to increase the influx of young and cute talent coming here. But then reality sinks in and you have to realize that ahjummas will inevitably be caught in the flow too.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4886986]
It may not reach zero but one could hope. I much prefer BA's approach for obvious reasons and would love for Socal to adopt it. But my preference is worth jack shit to what bookers will do here in LA / OC.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4887232]You are selling yourself short. At least one booker knows of your reviews and mine.
As vanguards of the Pussy Liberation Army, we have some influences with our honest reviews and opinions. And we need more comrades to come back.
Simply by reviewing and recommending the young cute talents then treating them well, we can influence the girls to come back and more to come here. Take Ailla as an example, she wasn't thinking of coming back at first but by the end of her tour she was thinking of coming back next year. Every journey begins with a single step.
Increasing demands for some girls while reducing demands for other girls are what we can do. I think I can also help steer guys away from ajunmas and BBFS upsells if I comment on new girls and BBFS upsell girls based on my radar. That would be the same as trying to destroy their businesses. I can sort out ajunmas and BBFS upsells by myself so I just want the businesses to thrive and bring in new girls.
Thank you for reviewing and helping other guys.[/QUOTE]Everyone that honestly reviews, provide constructive feedback, pointers for newbies, and the like on this board deserves praise and thanks, including you BA. Like you said, we just need more people to contribute to help steer and influence the girls that we like to extend their stay or come back. Hopefully through a more concerted effort we can change some of the practices and policies that irks many of us here.
I'm a younger gent that similarly saw Tina recently and was a little disappointed. Service was great but her looks were not appealing to me and I had a hard time finishing.
I have also seen Bulma and can wholeheartedly recommend. She's DDG IMO. Perfect amount of curves for her tall frame. I remember watching her in RCG and thinking, WOW because her ass was incredible. It's rare for me that I walk in and think, this girl's younger (or looks younger) than I expected. That was the case with Bulma. No idea her real age but she appeared late 20's / early 30's to me.
[QUOTE=Fiendinpj;4886188]Thanks BA. You didn't mislead me about Tina, there were multiple reports that said she provided great service and was older than the pictures. I understood that and went with it. She was just a bit older than I would like. I'm in my mid 30's so if a girl looks like she's in her mid 30's or below, which most are, works for me. I'm also a health freak, so when someone is in their mid to late 30's and I see sag, it's a turn off. I've been with a few that were likely mid 30's close to 40's and still looked great because their body was tight and firm. Haha.
Appreciate your reviews BA![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4887232]As vanguards of the Pussy Liberation Army, we have some influences with our honest reviews and opinions. And we need more comrades to come back.[/QUOTE]I've always been honest in my reviews, and sometimes that means negative reviews. I've never caught any shit for it from from any AAMP. I posted lots of reviews on TER back in the day and never had any issues. Unfortunately, I would see a lot of guys posting reviews on TER were simps who would give flabby-stomach grandmas 9/10 on looks. I think in the back of their mind, they think giving exaggerated positive reviews will ingratiate them to bookers, which is nonsense. Honesty and fairness gets you respect. Simping gets you a race to the bottom. On top of that you have the selfish guys who find a "good one" and then won't review out of fear of the girl becoming popular and less available. It's not hard to see popular girls, I saw Flynn this morning, you just need to plan ahead.
If people give honest and frequent reviews, it will directly result in better quality girls available and better experiences for everyone. Guys who TOFTT and get burned will quickly put their comrades on notice and shut down most of her traffic. Girls who have bad attitudes and hate their jobs will quickly be shut down and free to seek out alternative employment. Men don't want to have experiences with women who don't want to be there. It's better for everyone if those girls find a different profession.
If people don't review, or they give inaccurate reviews, you end up with the hobby turning into Russian roulette where the pics are all fake and sometimes the girl is decent, other times you get washed up old out-of-shape retirees from the asian market who came because because "LOL Americans will stick it in anything", and / or girls who aren't GFE.
Reviewing helps the girls get more business if they're good, and helps dudes avoid the bad ones.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4887184]Tia was at KTE recently and upcharged for BBFS. Based on pics, she was also in LA a couple years back as Jesi and toured places like NorCal.
Let us know if she does not upcharge anymore.
Her reviews: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-6503500495-338560](Here)[/URL], [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-4805681002-301923](Here)[/URL], [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-4085681002-292615](Here)[/URL], and [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jesi-2136609915-339879](Here)[/URL].[/QUOTE]Sweet thanks, her reviews seem off, ranging from 5-8.
First off, thank you those who give honest reviews and those like BC and BA who have provided some invaluable information on the providers out there.
Not to beat the dead horse but I do agree with all said on reviewing HONESTLY and candidly so agencies who read the forums know what we like, what we want, and what we don't want. So they bring the right talent and say no thanks to the wrong ones.
Also, we in SoCal need to STOP paying premiums for the same things our NorCal bro's get.
I was just up in NorCal visiting and let me tell you the providers there are young and attractive and wild as fuck PSE style on the norm for much much much lower than what boring ass GFE goes for down here.
We need to stop paying the upcharges for BB because that is just straight shooting ourselves in the foot every time A desperate uninformed hobbyist pays it.
NorCal standards are PSE for $220. And let me say that it's some crazy shit and agencies list if someone is PSE or GFE so you know exactly what you’re getting. And yes, there are those who are PSE as standard service at that price without the up charge. Those who've experienced can attest.
Why you think a lot of NorCal girls come down to tour here?? Because we down here pay a lot more for less.
The only agencies that have stayed true to being more fair than most have been those like M and SA. But the others are literally ass fucking the rest of you with the up charges and you're gladly taking it and screwing it up for the rest of us.
I mean come on, Sophia at SAG was recently PSE at the normal rate. And because all those who don't know better and act like desperate teens paying the surcharge is causing places like SAG to even take a rate hike.
Enough with the surcharge people.
[QUOTE=PewpHead;4888487]I've always been honest in my reviews, and sometimes that means negative reviews. I've never caught any shit for it from from any AAMP. I posted lots of reviews on TER back in the day and never had any issues. Unfortunately, I would see a lot of guys posting reviews on TER were simps who would give flabby-stomach grandmas 9/10 on looks. I think in the back of their mind, they think giving exaggerated positive reviews will ingratiate them to bookers, which is nonsense. Honesty and fairness gets you respect. Simping gets you a race to the bottom. On top of that you have the selfish guys who find a "good one" and then won't review out of fear of the girl becoming popular and less available. It's not hard to see popular girls, I saw Flynn this morning, you just need to plan ahead.
If people give honest and frequent reviews, it will directly result in better quality girls available and better experiences for everyone. Guys who TOFTT and get burned will quickly put their comrades on notice and shut down most of her traffic. Girls who have bad attitudes and hate their jobs will quickly be shut down and free to seek out alternative employment. Men don't want to have experiences with women who don't want to be there. It's better for everyone if those girls find a different profession.
If people don't review, or they give inaccurate reviews, you end up with the hobby turning into Russian roulette where the pics are all fake and sometimes the girl is decent, other times you get washed up old out-of-shape retirees from the asian market who came because because "LOL Americans will stick it in anything", and / or girls who aren't GFE.
Reviewing helps the girls get more business if they're good, and helps dudes avoid the bad ones.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NoWthatsFun;4884164]I was just told by her booker that she is retired. Unless someone has intel to state otherwise.[/QUOTE]She was definitely still retired as of March 2020, with no intention of coming out of retirement. I saw her a few time post retirement but we stopped seeing each other once the pandemic spread.