I moved this to the fight thread
	
	
		[QUOTE=MyyaToOliviaa;3862571]Hey its Olivia here. Just thought I would soeak my mind LOL Anywho. These sites that most people are using now are just so rinkidink. I usually come on here to see what links have been posted an use the site if I think its credible. But STG, LC, CXG are all sites NOBODY used because they took ads off BP themselves and posted them. Now all of assuded these are the ONLY working sites in US and haven't been taken down?? They arent new sites. I mean its free to post mostly or very cheap. But rhe systems are weird. I could bump myself and get a huge flush of calls, even from people who have been looking for me. But then for days of continuous posting absolutley nothing. ? Idk seems fishy to me. I just miss MIC MAD MDWT NR ECCIE AHB and TER. I just wish USA would come up with a credible postinf section. Theres no new ads on it.[/QUOTE]In some parts of the country our sister site has really taken off. We have several thousand ads a day posting on that site. What is the difference between say Orlando and Detroit? I don't know, maybe it will get used, maybe not.
Here's my question though, as an advertiser why is a lack of competition on a site where you can post a free ad a bad thing? You know we aren't scraping any other sites so whatever guys may think about ours they know that the ads there are put up by real women. If you're the only one there then anybody who looks at it is only going to see your ad. It costs you nothing to put up an ad and worst case scenario nobody answers and you're out ten minutes to make the ad. If anybody answers you're ahead.
A2.
	 
 
	
	
	
		No worries. Onward with the mission
	
	
		[QUOTE=Acoustic53;3878596]Thank you, gentlemen, for the spirited repartee! Gave me a few chuckles after a long work week.
May I address the points of contention:
1) We can debate what is an acceptable level of risk in the pursuit of "happiness" without casting aspersions on each other's ethnicity or address or education. The wilingness to accept risk and the ability to accept risk are two different things, and are influenced by age, income, personality, and experience.
Maybe you like living on the edge because you like the adrenaline rush from exposing yourself to high risk (of arrest, physical danger, etc.).
Or maybe you can accept more risk because you have sufficient financial and legal resources at your disposal to manage any problems that might arise from extracurricular activities.
Maybe you don't accept much risk because you have too much to lose. Or you have already had that unpleasant experience of losing and don't wish to repeat it. Or, perhaps you can accept more risk because you have nothing to lose.
Personally, I consider myself risk-averse, but I have certainly taken much higher risk exactly as described below, in the pursuit of "happiness" with regard to SW's. Some here call it "thinking with the little head", and I believe that is the root of the current debate. Not race, nor ethnicity, nor education.
2) While I admit to being a member of the grammar police, there is no place for that on this forum. It's a place to share information and opinions on SP's, period; we have a space where we can express ourselves free from the condemnation of the rest of the world that actively discourages men from engaging in transactional relationships, a / k / a pay for play. I don't know about the rest of you, but I have nowhere else to discuss these topics. I value the information I read here, and I surely would not wish to discourage someone else from passing on useful information just because I didn't like his style of writing.
Besides, it's worthwhile to be aware some posters dictate their posts on the fly, so these will use more vernacular.
Please keep in mind we all share the same goal in here: to get laid as often as we like and as often as we can afford it, without interference from others who don't share our mindset. There are more than enough obstacles for us to overcome out there; let's not add to them in here.[/QUOTE]Your points are well accepted acoustic.