[QUOTE=Worgent6;2246697]I have to say her new thinner look is really doing it for me, and at the rates on her site I'm thinking I'm going to TOFFT on this 'new' Jacki when next down her way, unless there's any reasons you guys can give to not do so.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Worgent6;2247666]I have to agree with HH, her new look is more appealing to me, especially compared to some of her older photos that can still be found on her old site [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Cpcdman;2247691]I respectfully have to disagree with you and HH in regards to Jackie's photo's, new body. Maybe it's just my body preference in a lady, but her pics from a couple of years ago, maybe even longer ago than that, her body is very much "womanly". Her breast's are full, her ass is round, apple bottom ass, and to me she looked very, very sexy! Now, she looks like she's been through the ringer and on drugs for a long time. I don't see how she looks like she has a gymnast's body, there's no muscle tone, she just doesn't look healthy to me.
This is just my opinion, would I see her, yes, but only if it was guaranteed that she's changed her ways and is full GFE+++ and wouldn't rip me off, so that's a lot to get past!![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Werm2011;2249241]Damn. She looks like shit now. Looks 10 years older than a few years ago and beat down. Definitely not healthy looking like I remember. Pretty obvious what has happened to her. Combine that with her history of rushing you through despite repeated warnings not to do so equals no fucking way even if she gets good reviews now. I should post some nude pics I took of her from about three years ago (before the blue dress photo below) for comparison. Would look like mother vs daughter, pre abuse vs post abuse, etc. Shame.[/QUOTE]Don't waste your time or money. I've had streetwalkers give better performances. And looked better too. Her breast's were her only good asset. Just glad she supplied a party hat. After she disrobed you will notice a lot of red marks in unusual places.
